**What type of PR is this?**
Other
**What does this PR do? Why is it needed?**
Calls to `Stater.StateBySlot` and `Stater.State` should be followed by
`shared.WriteStateFetchError` to provide the most robust error handling.
**Acknowledgements**
- [x] I have read
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/prysmaticlabs/prysm/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md).
- [x] I have included a uniquely named [changelog fragment
file](https://github.com/prysmaticlabs/prysm/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md#maintaining-changelogmd).
- [x] I have added a description with sufficient context for reviewers
to understand this PR.
- [x] I have tested that my changes work as expected and I added a
testing plan to the PR description (if applicable).
<!-- Thanks for sending a PR! Before submitting:
1. If this is your first PR, check out our contribution guide here
https://docs.prylabs.network/docs/contribute/contribution-guidelines
You will then need to sign our Contributor License Agreement (CLA),
which will show up as a comment from a bot in this pull request after
you open it. We cannot review code without a signed CLA.
2. Please file an associated tracking issue if this pull request is
non-trivial and requires context for our team to understand. All
features and most bug fixes should have
an associated issue with a design discussed and decided upon. Small bug
fixes and documentation improvements don't need issues.
3. New features and bug fixes must have tests. Documentation may need to
be updated. If you're unsure what to update, send the PR, and we'll
discuss
in review.
4. Note that PRs updating dependencies and new Go versions are not
accepted.
Please file an issue instead.
5. A changelog entry is required for user facing issues.
-->
**What type of PR is this?**
Design Doc
**What does this PR do? Why is it needed?**
This PR adds a design doc for adding graffiti. The idea is to have it
populated judiciously so that we can get proper information about the
EL, CL and their corresponding version info. At the same time being
flexible enough with the user input.
**Which issues(s) does this PR fix?**
Fixes #
**Other notes for review**
**Acknowledgements**
- [x] I have read
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/prysmaticlabs/prysm/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md).
- [x] I have included a uniquely named [changelog fragment
file](https://github.com/prysmaticlabs/prysm/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md#maintaining-changelogmd).
- [x] I have added a description to this PR with sufficient context for
reviewers to understand this PR.
A TOCTOU issue was reported by EF security in which two attestations
being validated at the same time may result in both of them being
forwarded. The spec says that we need to forward only the first one.
<!-- Thanks for sending a PR! Before submitting:
1. If this is your first PR, check out our contribution guide here
https://docs.prylabs.network/docs/contribute/contribution-guidelines
You will then need to sign our Contributor License Agreement (CLA),
which will show up as a comment from a bot in this pull request after
you open it. We cannot review code without a signed CLA.
2. Please file an associated tracking issue if this pull request is
non-trivial and requires context for our team to understand. All
features and most bug fixes should have
an associated issue with a design discussed and decided upon. Small bug
fixes and documentation improvements don't need issues.
3. New features and bug fixes must have tests. Documentation may need to
be updated. If you're unsure what to update, send the PR, and we'll
discuss
in review.
4. Note that PRs updating dependencies and new Go versions are not
accepted.
Please file an issue instead.
5. A changelog entry is required for user facing issues.
-->
**What type of PR is this?**
Other
**What does this PR do? Why is it needed?**
- Remove unnecessary `Copy()` call in `Eth1DataHasEnoughSupport`
- `data.Copy()` was called on every iteration of the vote counting loop,
even though `AreEth1DataEqual` only reads the data and never mutates it.
- Additionally, `Eth1DataVotes()` already returns copies of all votes,
so state is protected regardless.
**Which issues(s) does this PR fix?**
Fixes #
**Other notes for review**
**Acknowledgements**
- [x] I have read
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/prysmaticlabs/prysm/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md).
- [x] I have included a uniquely named [changelog fragment
file](https://github.com/prysmaticlabs/prysm/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md#maintaining-changelogmd).
- [x] I have added a description to this PR with sufficient context for
reviewers to understand this PR.
<!-- Thanks for sending a PR! Before submitting:
1. If this is your first PR, check out our contribution guide here
https://docs.prylabs.network/docs/contribute/contribution-guidelines
You will then need to sign our Contributor License Agreement (CLA),
which will show up as a comment from a bot in this pull request after
you open it. We cannot review code without a signed CLA.
2. Please file an associated tracking issue if this pull request is
non-trivial and requires context for our team to understand. All
features and most bug fixes should have
an associated issue with a design discussed and decided upon. Small bug
fixes and documentation improvements don't need issues.
3. New features and bug fixes must have tests. Documentation may need to
be updated. If you're unsure what to update, send the PR, and we'll
discuss
in review.
4. Note that PRs updating dependencies and new Go versions are not
accepted.
Please file an issue instead.
5. A changelog entry is required for user facing issues.
-->
**What type of PR is this?**
Other
**What does this PR do? Why is it needed?**
The for loop in MigrateToCold function was brute force in nature. It
could be improved by just directly jumping by `slotsPerArchivedPoint`
rather than going over every single slot.
```
for slot := oldFSlot; slot < fSlot; slot++ {
...
if slot%s.slotsPerArchivedPoint == 0 && slot != 0 {
```
No need to do the modulo for every single slot.
We could just find the correct starting point and jump by
slotsPerArchivedPoint at a time.
**Which issues(s) does this PR fix?**
Fixes #
**Other notes for review**
**Acknowledgements**
- [x] I have read
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/prysmaticlabs/prysm/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md).
- [x] I have included a uniquely named [changelog fragment
file](https://github.com/prysmaticlabs/prysm/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md#maintaining-changelogmd).
- [x] I have added a description to this PR with sufficient context for
reviewers to understand this PR.
---------
Co-authored-by: Potuz <potuz@prysmaticlabs.com>
The constructor `NewStateRootNotFoundError` incorrectly returned
`StateNotFoundError`. This prevented handlers that rely on
errors.As(err, *lookup.StateRootNotFoundError) from matching and mapping
the error to HTTP 404. The function now returns
StateRootNotFoundError and constructs that type, restoring the intended
behavior for “state root not found” cases.
---------
Co-authored-by: Radosław Kapka <rkapka@wp.pl>
This PR introduces flag `--ignore-unviable-attestations` (replaces and
deprecates `--disable-last-epoch-targets`) to drop attestations whose
target state is not viable; default remains to process them unless
explicitly enabled.
The head state is guaranteed to have the same shuffling and active
indices if the previous dependent root coincides with the target
checkpoint's in some cases.
**What type of PR is this?**
Other
**What does this PR do? Why is it needed?**
Move the "Not enough connected peers" (for a given subnet) from WARN to
DEBUG
**Rationale:**
The
<img width="1839" height="31" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/44dbdc8d-3e37-42ee-967b-75a7a1fbcafb"
/>
log is (potentially) printed every 5 minutes.
Every 5 minutes, the BN checks if, for a given subnet, the actual count
of peers is at least equal to a minimum one.
If not, this kind of log is printed.
When validators are connected and selected to be an aggregator in the
next epoch, the BN needs to subscribe and find new peers in the
corresponding attestation subnet.
If, right after the beacon is subscribed (but before it had time to find
peers), the "5 min ticker" ticks, then this warning log is displayed,
even if the slot for which the validator is selected as an aggregator is
still minutes away.
For this reason, this log is moved from WARN to DEBUG
**Acknowledgements**
- [x] I have read
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/prysmaticlabs/prysm/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md).
- [x] I have included a uniquely named [changelog fragment
file](https://github.com/prysmaticlabs/prysm/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md#maintaining-changelogmd).
- [x] I have added a description to this PR with sufficient context for
reviewers to understand this PR.
**What type of PR is this?**
Other
**What does this PR do? Why is it needed?**
This pull request removes `NUMBER_OF_COLUMNS` and
`MAX_CELLS_IN_EXTENDED_MATRIX` configuration.
**Other notes for review**
Please read commit by commit, with commit messages.
**Acknowledgements**
- [x] I have read
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/prysmaticlabs/prysm/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md).
- [x] I have included a uniquely named [changelog fragment
file](https://github.com/prysmaticlabs/prysm/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md#maintaining-changelogmd).
- [x] I have added a description to this PR with sufficient context for
reviewers to understand this PR.
**What type of PR is this?**
Other
**What does this PR do? Why is it needed?**
- Added log prefix to the `genesis` package.
- Added log prefix to the `params` package.
- `WithGenesisValidatorsRoot`: Use camelCase for log field param.
- Move `Origin checkpoint found in db` log from WARN to INFO, since it
is the expected behaviour.
**Other notes for review**
Please read commit by commit
**Acknowledgements**
- [x] I have read
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/prysmaticlabs/prysm/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md).
- [x] I have included a uniquely named [changelog fragment
file](https://github.com/prysmaticlabs/prysm/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md#maintaining-changelogmd).
- [x] I have added a description to this PR with sufficient context for
reviewers to understand this PR.
The slot parameter in blobCacheEntry.filter was unused and redundant.
All slot/epoch-sensitive checks happen before filter
(commitmentsToCheck), and disk availability is handled via
BlobStorageSummary (epoch-aware).
Changes:
- Drop slot from blobCacheEntry.filter signature.
- Update call sites in availability_blobs.go and blob_cache_test.go.
Mirrors the data_column_cache.filter API (which does not take slot),
reduces API noise, and removes dead code without changing behavior.
<!-- Thanks for sending a PR! Before submitting:
1. If this is your first PR, check out our contribution guide here
https://docs.prylabs.network/docs/contribute/contribution-guidelines
You will then need to sign our Contributor License Agreement (CLA),
which will show up as a comment from a bot in this pull request after
you open it. We cannot review code without a signed CLA.
2. Please file an associated tracking issue if this pull request is
non-trivial and requires context for our team to understand. All
features and most bug fixes should have
an associated issue with a design discussed and decided upon. Small bug
fixes and documentation improvements don't need issues.
3. New features and bug fixes must have tests. Documentation may need to
be updated. If you're unsure what to update, send the PR, and we'll
discuss
in review.
4. Note that PRs updating dependencies and new Go versions are not
accepted.
Please file an issue instead.
5. A changelog entry is required for user facing issues.
-->
**What type of PR is this?**
Feature
**What does this PR do? Why is it needed?**
| Feature | Semi-Supernode | Supernode |
| ----------------------- | ------------------------- |
------------------------ |
| **Custody Groups** | 64 | 128 |
| **Data Columns** | 64 | 128 |
| **Storage** | ~50% | ~100% |
| **Blob Reconstruction** | Yes (via Reed-Solomon) | No reconstruction
needed |
| **Flag** | `--semi-supernode` | `--supernode` |
| **Can serve all blobs** | Yes (with reconstruction) | Yes (directly) |
**note** if your validator total effective balance results in more
custody than the semi-supernode it will override those those
requirements.
cgc=64 from @nalepae
Pro:
- We are useful to the network
- Less disconnection likelihood
- Straight forward to implement
Con:
- We cannot revert to a full node
- We have to serve incoming RPC requests corresponding to 64 columns
Tested the following using this kurtosis setup
```
participants:
# Super-nodes
- el_type: geth
el_image: ethpandaops/geth:master
cl_type: prysm
vc_image: gcr.io/offchainlabs/prysm/validator:latest
cl_image: gcr.io/offchainlabs/prysm/beacon-chain:latest
count: 2
cl_extra_params:
- --supernode
vc_extra_params:
- --verbosity=debug
# Full-nodes
- el_type: geth
el_image: ethpandaops/geth:master
cl_type: prysm
vc_image: gcr.io/offchainlabs/prysm/validator:latest
cl_image: gcr.io/offchainlabs/prysm/beacon-chain:latest
count: 2
validator_count: 1
cl_extra_params:
- --semi-supernode
vc_extra_params:
- --verbosity=debug
additional_services:
- dora
- spamoor
spamoor_params:
image: ethpandaops/spamoor:master
max_mem: 4000
spammers:
- scenario: eoatx
config:
throughput: 200
- scenario: blobs
config:
throughput: 20
network_params:
fulu_fork_epoch: 0
withdrawal_type: "0x02"
preset: mainnet
global_log_level: debug
```
```
curl -H "Accept: application/json" http://127.0.0.1:32961/eth/v1/node/identity
{"data":{"peer_id":"16Uiu2HAm7xzhnGwea8gkcxRSC6fzUkvryP6d9HdWNkoeTkj6RSqw","enr":"enr:-Ni4QIH5u2NQz17_pTe9DcCfUyG8TidDJJjIeBpJRRm4ACQzGBpCJdyUP9eGZzwwZ2HS1TnB9ACxFMQ5LP5njnMDLm-GAZqZEXjih2F0dG5ldHOIAAAAAAAwAACDY2djQIRldGgykLZy_whwAAA4__________-CaWSCdjSCaXCErBAAE4NuZmSEAAAAAIRxdWljgjLIiXNlY3AyNTZrMaECulJrXpSOBmCsQWcGYzQsst7r3-Owlc9iZbEcJTDkB6qIc3luY25ldHMFg3RjcIIyyIN1ZHCCLuA","p2p_addresses":["/ip4/172.16.0.19/tcp/13000/p2p/16Uiu2HAm7xzhnGwea8gkcxRSC6fzUkvryP6d9HdWNkoeTkj6RSqw","/ip4/172.16.0.19/udp/13000/quic-v1/p2p/16Uiu2HAm7xzhnGwea8gkcxRSC6fzUkvryP6d9HdWNkoeTkj6RSqw"],"discovery_addresses":["/ip4/172.16.0.19/udp/12000/p2p/16Uiu2HAm7xzhnGwea8gkcxRSC6fzUkvryP6d9HdWNkoeTkj6RSqw"],"metadata":{"seq_number":"3","attnets":"0x0000000000300000","syncnets":"0x05","custody_group_count":"64"}}}
```
```
curl -s http://127.0.0.1:32961/eth/v1/debug/beacon/data_column_sidecars/head | jq '.data | length'
64
```
```
curl -X 'GET' \
'http://127.0.0.1:32961/eth/v1/beacon/blobs/head' \
-H 'accept: application/json'
```
**Which issues(s) does this PR fix?**
Fixes #
**Other notes for review**
**Acknowledgements**
- [x] I have read [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/prysmaticlabs/prysm/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md).
- [x] I have included a uniquely named [changelog fragment file](https://github.com/prysmaticlabs/prysm/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md#maintaining-changelogmd).
- [x] I have added a description to this PR with sufficient context for reviewers to understand this PR.
---------
Co-authored-by: Preston Van Loon <pvanloon@offchainlabs.com>
Co-authored-by: james-prysm <jhe@offchainlabs.com>
Co-authored-by: Manu NALEPA <enalepa@offchainlabs.com>
**What type of PR is this?**
Bug fix
**What does this PR do? Why is it needed?**
I am seeing massive metrics cardinality on error cases.
Example:
```
http_error_count{code="Not Found",endpoint="/eth/v1/beacon/blob_sidecars/1682952",method="GET"} 2
http_error_count{code="Not Found",endpoint="/eth/v1/beacon/blob_sidecars/1682953",method="GET"} 2
http_error_count{code="Not Found",endpoint="/eth/v1/beacon/blob_sidecars/1682954",method="GET"} 2
http_error_count{code="Not Found",endpoint="/eth/v1/beacon/blob_sidecars/1682955",method="GET"} 2
http_error_count{code="Not Found",endpoint="/eth/v1/beacon/blob_sidecars/1682956",method="GET"} 2
http_error_count{code="Not Found",endpoint="/eth/v1/beacon/blob_sidecars/1682957",method="GET"} 2
http_error_count{code="Not Found",endpoint="/eth/v1/beacon/blob_sidecars/1682958",method="GET"} 2
http_error_count{code="Not Found",endpoint="/eth/v1/beacon/blob_sidecars/1682959",method="GET"} 2
http_error_count{code="Not Found",endpoint="/eth/v1/beacon/blob_sidecars/1682960",method="GET"} 2
http_error_count{code="Not Found",endpoint="/eth/v1/beacon/blob_sidecars/1682961",method="GET"} 2
http_error_count{code="Not Found",endpoint="/eth/v1/beacon/blob_sidecars/1682962",method="GET"} 2
http_error_count{code="Not Found",endpoint="/eth/v1/beacon/blob_sidecars/1682966",method="GET"} 2
http_error_count{code="Not Found",endpoint="/eth/v1/beacon/blob_sidecars/1682967",method="GET"} 2
http_error_count{code="Not Found",endpoint="/eth/v1/beacon/blob_sidecars/1682968",method="GET"} 2
http_error_count{code="Not Found",endpoint="/eth/v1/beacon/blob_sidecars/1682969",method="GET"} 2
http_error_count{code="Not Found",endpoint="/eth/v1/beacon/blob_sidecars/1682970",method="GET"} 2
http_error_count{code="Not Found",endpoint="/eth/v1/beacon/blob_sidecars/1682971",method="GET"} 2
http_error_count{code="Not Found",endpoint="/eth/v1/beacon/blob_sidecars/1682972",method="GET"} 2
http_error_count{code="Not Found",endpoint="/eth/v1/beacon/blob_sidecars/1682973",method="GET"} 2
http_error_count{code="Not Found",endpoint="/eth/v1/beacon/blob_sidecars/1682974",method="GET"} 2
http_error_count{code="Not Found",endpoint="/eth/v1/beacon/blob_sidecars/1682975",method="GET"} 2
http_error_count{code="Not Found",endpoint="/eth/v1/beacon/blob_sidecars/1682976",method="GET"} 2
http_error_count{code="Not Found",endpoint="/eth/v1/beacon/blob_sidecars/1682977",method="GET"} 2
http_error_count{code="Not Found",endpoint="/eth/v1/beacon/blob_sidecars/1682978",method="GET"} 2
http_error_count{code="Not Found",endpoint="/eth/v1/beacon/blob_sidecars/1682980",method="GET"} 2
http_error_count{code="Not Found",endpoint="/eth/v1/beacon/blob_sidecars/1682983",method="GET"} 2
```
Now it looks like this:
```
# TYPE http_error_count counter
http_error_count{code="Not Found",endpoint="beacon.GetBlockV2",method="GET"} 606
http_error_count{code="Not Found",endpoint="blob.Blobs",method="GET"} 4304
```
**Which issues(s) does this PR fix?**
**Other notes for review**
Other uses of http metrics use the endpoint name rather than the request
URL.
**Acknowledgements**
- [x] I have read
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/prysmaticlabs/prysm/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md).
- [x] I have included a uniquely named [changelog fragment
file](https://github.com/prysmaticlabs/prysm/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md#maintaining-changelogmd).
- [x] I have added a description to this PR with sufficient context for
reviewers to understand this PR.
**What type of PR is this?**
Other
**What does this PR do? Why is it needed?**
When unmarshaling a block with fastssz, if the target block's
`ExecutionRequests` field is nil, it will not get populated
```
if b.ExecutionRequests == nil {
b.ExecutionRequests = new(v1.ExecutionRequests)
}
if err = b.ExecutionRequests.UnmarshalSSZ(buf); err != nil {
return err
}
```
This is true for other fields and that's why we initialize them in our
gossip data maps. There is no bug at the moment because even if
execution requests are nil, we initialize them in
`consensus-types/blocks/proto.go`
```
er := pb.ExecutionRequests
if er == nil {
er = &enginev1.ExecutionRequests{}
}
```
However, since we initialize other fields in the data map, it's safer to
do it for execution requests too, to avoid a bug in case the code in
`consensus-types/blocks/proto.go` changes in the future.
**Acknowledgements**
- [x] I have read
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/prysmaticlabs/prysm/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md).
- [x] I have included a uniquely named [changelog fragment
file](https://github.com/prysmaticlabs/prysm/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md#maintaining-changelogmd).
- [x] I have added a description to this PR with sufficient context for
reviewers to understand this PR.
**What type of PR is this?**
Feature
**What does this PR do? Why is it needed?**
This PR adds integrates state-diff into `HasState()`.
One thing to note: we are assuming that, for a given block root, that
has either a state summary or a block in db, and also falls in the state
diff tree, then there must exist a state. This function could return
true, even when there is no actual state saved due to any error.
But this is fine, because we have that assumption throughout the whole
state diff feature.
**Review after #16033 is merged**
**What type of PR is this?**
Other
**What does this PR do? Why is it needed?**
This PR refactors the code to find the corresponding slot of a given
block root using state summary or the block itself, into its own
function `SlotByBlockRoot(ctx, blockroot)`.
Note that there exists a function `slotByBlockRoot(ctx context.Context,
tx *bolt.Tx, blockRoot []byte)` immediately below the new function. Also
note that this function has two drawbacks, which led to creation of the
new function:
- the old function requires a boltdb tx, which is not necessarily
available to the caller.
- the old function does NOT make use of the state summary cache.
edit:
- the old function also uses the state bucket to retrieve the state and
it's slot. this is not something we want in the state diff feature,
since there is no state bucket.
**What type of PR is this?**
Feature
**What does this PR do? Why is it needed?**
This PR integrates the state diff path into the `State()` function from
`db/kv`, which allows reading of states using the state diff db, when
the `EnableStateDiff` flag is enabled.
**Notes for reviewers:**
Files `kv/state_diff_test.go` and `config/features/config.go` only
contain renamings:
- `kv/state_diff_test.go`: rename `setDefaultExponents()` to
`setDefaultStateDiffExponents()` to be less vague.
- `config/features/config.go`: rename `enableStateDiff` to
`EnableStateDiff` to make it public.
This PR removes the last production usage for: `LastArchivedRoot` by
- extend the P2P config to accept a `StateGen` dependency and wire it up
from the beacon node
- update gossip scoring to read the active validator count via stategen
using last finalized block root
note: i think the correct implementation should process last finalizes
state to current slot, but that's a bigger change i dont want to make in
this PR, i just want to remove usages for `LastArchivedRoot`
**What type of PR is this?**
Bug fix
**What does this PR do? Why is it needed?**
This PR fixes a bug in the state diff `getBaseAndDiffChain()` method. In
the process of finding the diff chain indices, there could be a scenario
where multiple levels return the same diff slot number not equal to the
base (full snapshot) slot number.
This resulted in multiple diff items being added to the diff chain for
the same slot, but on different levels, which resulted in errors reading
the diff.
Fix: we keep a `lastSeenAnchorSlot` equal to the `BaseAnchorSlot` and
update it every time we see a new anchor slot. We ignore if the current
found anchor slot is equal to the `lastSeenAnchorSlot`.
Scenario example:
exponents: [20, 14, 10, 7, 5]
offset: 0
slots saved: slot 2^11, and slot (2^11 + 2^5)
slot to read: slot (2^11 + 2^5)
resulting list of anchor slots (diff chain indices): [0, 0, 2^11, 2^11,
2^11 + 2^5]
* stop emitting payload attribute events during late block handling when we are not proposing the next slot
* Change the behavior to not even enter FCU if we are not proposing next slot
* init
* reverting some functions
* rolling back a change and fixing linting
* wip
* wip
* fixing test
* breaking up proofs and cells for cleaner code
* fixing test and type
* fixing safe conversion
* fixing test
* fixing more tests
* fixing even more tests
* fix the 0 indices option
* adding a test for coverage
* small test update
* changelog
* radek's suggestions
* Update beacon-chain/core/peerdas/validator.go
Co-authored-by: Manu NALEPA <enalepa@offchainlabs.com>
* addressing comments on kzg package
* addressing suggestions for reconstruction
* more manu feedback items
* removing unneeded files
* removing unneeded setter
---------
Co-authored-by: james-prysm <jhe@offchainlabs.com>
Co-authored-by: Manu NALEPA <enalepa@offchainlabs.com>
* Reverted all config.FuluForkEpoch = config.FarFutureEpoch from 8b6f187b15
* Fix tests by referencing electra epoch / slot values in requests and test setup
* Changelog fragment
* wip
* fixing tests
* adding script to update workspace for eth clients
* updating test sepc to 1.6.0 and fixing broadcaster test
* fix specrefs
* more ethspecify fixes
* still trying to fix ethspecify
* fixing attestation tests
* fixing sha for consensus specs
* removing script for now until i have something more standard
* fixing more p2p tests
* fixing discovery tests
* attempting to fix discovery test flakeyness
* attempting to fix port binding issue
* more attempts to fix flakey tests
* Revert "more attempts to fix flakey tests"
This reverts commit 25e8183703.
* Revert "attempting to fix port binding issue"
This reverts commit 583df8000d.
* Revert "attempting to fix discovery test flakeyness"
This reverts commit 3c76525870.
* Revert "fixing discovery tests"
This reverts commit 8c701bf3b9.
* Revert "fixing more p2p tests"
This reverts commit 140d5db203.
* Revert "fixing attestation tests"
This reverts commit 26ded244cb.
* fixing attestation tests
* fixing more p2p tests
* fixing discovery tests
* attempting to fix discovery test flakeyness
* attempting to fix port binding issue
* more attempts to fix flakey tests
* changelog
* fixing import
* adding some missing dependencies, but TestService_BroadcastAttestationWithDiscoveryAttempts is still failing
* attempting to fix test
* reverting test as it migrated to other pr
* reverting test
* fixing test from merge
* Fix `TestService_BroadcastAttestationWithDiscoveryAttempts`.
* Fix again `TestService_Start_OnlyStartsOnce`.
* fixing TestListenForNewNodes
* removing manual set of fulu epoch
* missed a few
* fixing subnet test
* Update beacon-chain/rpc/eth/config/handlers_test.go
Co-authored-by: Preston Van Loon <pvanloon@offchainlabs.com>
* removing a few more missed spots of reverting fulu epoch setting
* updating test name based on feedback
* fixing rest apis, they actually need the setting of the epoch due to the guard
---------
Co-authored-by: Manu NALEPA <enalepa@offchainlabs.com>
Co-authored-by: Preston Van Loon <pvanloon@offchainlabs.com>
* Remove Beacon API endpoints that were deprecated in Electra
* changelog <3
* build fix
* remove more stuff
* fix post-submit e2e and remove structs
* list endpoints in the changelog
---------
Co-authored-by: james-prysm <90280386+james-prysm@users.noreply.github.com>
* Use head for block validation when possible
When validating blocks for pubsub, we always copy a state and advance
when we simply need to get a read only beacon state without a copy in
most cases since the head state normally works.
* fix test
* fix tests
* fix more tests
* fix more tests
* Add nil check to be safe
* fix more tests
* add test case
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
