From 65a90d077f8e64c77f8d686bb992c0ede30fcb39 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Cofson Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2025 10:58:11 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Remove MUST keywords from descriptive Payload statements As discussed in PR #216, RFC 2119 keywords should be reserved for actual normative requirements, not descriptive statements. --- nomos/raw/nomos-message-formatting.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/nomos/raw/nomos-message-formatting.md b/nomos/raw/nomos-message-formatting.md index 7cb38e0..d2866b6 100644 --- a/nomos/raw/nomos-message-formatting.md +++ b/nomos/raw/nomos-message-formatting.md @@ -148,9 +148,9 @@ class BlendingHeader: #### Payload -The payload MUST be formatted according to the +The Payload is formatted according to the [Payload Formatting Specification][payload-formatting]. -The formatted payload MUST be generated as the outcome of +The formatted Payload is generated as the outcome of the [Message Encapsulation Mechanism][message-encapsulation]. #### Maximum Payload Length