From ca216dfd7f91ef1e79c3129879b31a8a1d2b79a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Otto Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2026 16:46:23 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] ci(docs-claude-review): Update comments instead of creating new ones (#12106) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ## Changes 🏗️ This PR updates the Claude Block Docs Review CI workflow to update existing comments instead of creating new ones on each push. ### What's Changed: 1. **Concurrency group** - Prevents race conditions if the workflow runs twice simultaneously 2. **Comment cleanup step** - Deletes any previous Claude review comment before posting a new one 3. **Marker instruction** - Instructs Claude to include a `` marker in its comment for identification ### Why: Previously, every PR push would create a new review comment, cluttering the PR with multiple comments. Now only the most recent review is shown. ### Testing: 1. Create a PR that triggers this workflow (modify a file in `docs/integrations/` or `autogpt_platform/backend/backend/blocks/`) 2. Verify first run creates comment with marker 3. Push another commit 4. Verify old comment is deleted and new comment is created (not accumulated) Requested by @Bentlybro --- ## Checklist 📋 #### For code changes: - [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description - [ ] I have made a test plan - [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan (will be tested on merge) #### For configuration changes: - [x] `.env.default` is updated or already compatible with my changes - [x] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my changes - [x] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR description (under **Changes**)

Greptile Overview

Greptile Summary

Added concurrency control and comment deduplication to prevent multiple Claude review comments from accumulating on PRs. The workflow now deletes previous review comments (identified by `` marker) before posting new ones, and uses concurrency groups to prevent race conditions.

Confidence Score: 5/5

- This PR is safe to merge with minimal risk - The changes are well-contained, follow GitHub Actions best practices, and use built-in GitHub APIs safely. The concurrency control prevents race conditions, and the comment cleanup logic uses proper filtering with `head -1` to handle edge cases. The HTML comment marker approach is standard and reliable. - No files require special attention

Sequence Diagram

```mermaid sequenceDiagram participant GH as GitHub PR Event participant WF as Workflow participant API as GitHub API participant Claude as Claude Action GH->>WF: PR opened/synchronized WF->>WF: Check concurrency group Note over WF: Cancel any in-progress runs
for same PR number WF->>API: Query PR comments API-->>WF: Return all comments WF->>WF: Filter for CLAUDE_DOCS_REVIEW marker alt Previous comment exists WF->>API: DELETE comment by ID API-->>WF: Comment deleted else No previous comment WF->>WF: Skip deletion end WF->>Claude: Run code review Claude->>API: POST new comment with marker API-->>Claude: Comment created ```
Last reviewed commit: fb1b436 --- .github/workflows/docs-claude-review.yml | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+) diff --git a/.github/workflows/docs-claude-review.yml b/.github/workflows/docs-claude-review.yml index ca2788b387..19d5dd667b 100644 --- a/.github/workflows/docs-claude-review.yml +++ b/.github/workflows/docs-claude-review.yml @@ -7,6 +7,10 @@ on: - "docs/integrations/**" - "autogpt_platform/backend/backend/blocks/**" +concurrency: + group: claude-docs-review-${{ github.event.pull_request.number }} + cancel-in-progress: true + jobs: claude-review: # Only run for PRs from members/collaborators @@ -91,5 +95,35 @@ jobs: 3. Read corresponding documentation files to verify accuracy 4. Provide your feedback as a PR comment + ## IMPORTANT: Comment Marker + Start your PR comment with exactly this HTML comment marker on its own line: + + + This marker is used to identify and replace your comment on subsequent runs. + Be constructive and specific. If everything looks good, say so! If there are issues, explain what's wrong and suggest how to fix it. + + - name: Delete old Claude review comments + env: + GH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} + run: | + # Get all comment IDs with our marker, sorted by creation date (oldest first) + COMMENT_IDS=$(gh api \ + repos/${{ github.repository }}/issues/${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}/comments \ + --jq '[.[] | select(.body | contains(""))] | sort_by(.created_at) | .[].id') + + # Count comments + COMMENT_COUNT=$(echo "$COMMENT_IDS" | grep -c . || true) + + if [ "$COMMENT_COUNT" -gt 1 ]; then + # Delete all but the last (newest) comment + echo "$COMMENT_IDS" | head -n -1 | while read -r COMMENT_ID; do + if [ -n "$COMMENT_ID" ]; then + echo "Deleting old review comment: $COMMENT_ID" + gh api -X DELETE repos/${{ github.repository }}/issues/comments/$COMMENT_ID + fi + done + else + echo "No old review comments to clean up" + fi