Update PR template

This commit is contained in:
Reinier van der Leer
2023-09-06 15:35:53 +02:00
parent d3fe982e27
commit ea37eb95f9

View File

@@ -1,49 +1,30 @@
<!-- ⚠️ At the moment any non-essential commands are not being merged.
If you want to add non-essential commands to Auto-GPT, please create a plugin instead.
We are expecting to ship plugin support within the week (PR #757).
Resources:
* https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/Auto-GPT-Plugin-Template
<!--
## Contribution guide
Before submitting a PR, please check out our contribution guide:
https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/Nexus/wiki/Contributing
1. Avoid duplicate work, issues, PRs etc.
2. Also consider contributing something other than code; see the [contribution guide]
for options.
3. Clearly explain your changes.
4. Avoid making unnecessary changes, especially if they're purely based on personal
preferences. Doing so is the maintainers' job. ;-)
5. Link the GitHub issues that are resolved by this PR.
-->
<!-- 📢 Announcement
We've recently noticed an increase in pull requests focusing on combining multiple changes. While the intentions behind these PRs are appreciated, it's essential to maintain a clean and manageable git history. To ensure the quality of our repository, we kindly ask you to adhere to the following guidelines when submitting PRs:
Focus on a single, specific change.
Do not include any unrelated or "extra" modifications.
Provide clear documentation and explanations of the changes made.
Ensure diffs are limited to the intended lines — no applying preferred formatting styles or line endings (unless that's what the PR is about).
For guidance on committing only the specific lines you have changed, refer to this helpful video: https://youtu.be/8-hSNHHbiZg
Check out our [wiki page on Contributing](https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/Nexus/wiki/Contributing)
By following these guidelines, your PRs are more likely to be merged quickly after testing, as long as they align with the project's overall direction. -->
### Background
<!-- Provide a concise overview of the rationale behind this change. Include relevant context, prior discussions, or links to related issues. Ensure that the change aligns with the project's overall direction. -->
<!-- Clearly explain the need for these changes: -->
### Changes
<!-- Describe the specific, focused change made in this pull request. Detail the modifications clearly and avoid any unrelated or "extra" changes. -->
### Documentation
<!-- Explain how your changes are documented, such as in-code comments or external documentation. Ensure that the documentation is clear, concise, and easy to understand. -->
### Changes 🏗️
<!-- Concisely describe all of the changes made in this pull request: -->
### Test Plan
<!-- Describe how you tested this functionality. Include steps to reproduce, relevant test cases, and any other pertinent information. -->
### PR Quality Checklist
- [ ] My pull request is atomic and focuses on a single change.
- [ ] I have thoroughly tested my changes with multiple different prompts.
- [ ] I have considered potential risks and mitigations for my changes.
- [ ] I have documented my changes clearly and comprehensively.
- [ ] I have not snuck in any "extra" small tweaks changes. <!-- Submit these as separate Pull Requests, they are the easiest to merge! -->
- [ ] I have run the following commands against my code to ensure it passes our linters:
```shell
black .
isort .
mypy
autoflake --remove-all-unused-imports --recursive --ignore-init-module-imports --ignore-pass-after-docstring autogpt tests --in-place
```
<!-- If you haven't added tests, please explain why. If you have, check the appropriate box. If you've ensured your PR is atomic and well-documented, check the corresponding boxes. -->
<!-- By submitting this, I agree that my pull request should be closed if I do not fill this out or follow the guidelines. -->
### PR Quality Score card ✨
- [ ] Is your pull request atomic, focusing on a single change? &ensp; `+5 pts`
- [ ] Have you documented your changes clearly and comprehensively? &ensp; `+5 pts`
- [ ] Have you changed or added a feature? &ensp; `-4 pts`
- [ ] Have you updated the documentation accordingly? &ensp; `+4 pts`
- [ ] Have you added/updated corresponding integration tests? &ensp; `+5 pts`
- [ ] Have you changed the behavior of one of the agents in the repo? &ensp; `-5 pts`
- [ ] Have you also run `agbenchmark` to verify that these changes do not regress performance? &ensp; `+10 pts`