## Changes 🏗️
Make sure `NEXT_PUBLIC_PW_TEST` is set only when running Playwright.
This forces the app to use "mock" feature flags, so the tests run stable
and predictable despite changes on LaunchDarkly.
## Checklist 📋
### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] should not have `PW_TEST=true` ...
### For configuration changes:
None
Our current auth setup (`autogpt_libs.auth` + its usage) is quite
inconsistent and doesn't do all of its jobs properly. The 401 responses
you get when unauthenticated are not included in the OpenAPI spec,
causing these to be unaccounted for in the generated frontend API
client. Usage of the FastAPI dependencies supplied by
`autogpt_libs.auth.depends` aren't consistently used the same way,
making maintenance on these hard to oversee. API tests use many
different ways to get around the auth requirement, making this also hard
to maintain and oversee.
This pull request aims to fix all of this and give us a consistent,
clean, and self-documenting API auth implementation.
- Resolves#10715
### Changes 🏗️
- Homogenize use of `autogpt_libs.auth` security dependencies throughout
the backend
- Fix OpenAPI schema generation for 401 responses
- Handle possible 401 responses in frontend
- Tighten validation and add warnings for weak settings in
`autogpt_libs.auth.config`
- Increase test coverage for `autogpt_libs.auth` to 100%
- Standardize auth setup for API tests
- Rename `APIKeyValidator` to `APIKeyAuthenticator` and move to its own
module in `backend.server`
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] All tests for `autogpt_libs.auth` pass
- [x] All tests for `backend.server` pass
- [x] @ntindle does a security audit for these changes
- [x] OpenAPI spec for authenticated routes is generated with the
appropriate `401` response
---------
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Tindle <nicholas.tindle@agpt.co>
This PR transforms GitHub Copilot from a general coding assistant into a
platform-specific expert by providing comprehensive onboarding and a
fully configured development environment that mirrors the AutoGPT
platform's CI/CD pipeline.
## Key Features
### CI-Aligned Development Environment
- **Production-Grade Setup**: The `copilot-setup-steps.yml` workflow now
mirrors the platform's CI workflows, providing Copilot with the same
environment used for testing and deployment
- **Essential Services**: Automatically starts Docker services
(PostgreSQL, Redis, RabbitMQ, ClamAV) required for platform development
- **Database Readiness**: Includes Prisma migrations and client
generation to ensure the database is immediately usable
- **Environment Configuration**: Copies default environment files and
validates service health, eliminating manual setup steps
### Comprehensive Platform Knowledge
- **Unified Documentation**: The `copilot-instructions.md` file
integrates knowledge from multiple sources (installer.md,
advanced_setup.md, CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md) into a single comprehensive
guide
- **Development Patterns**: Includes advanced patterns for block
development, API creation, frontend work, and security implementation
- **Architecture Insights**: Provides deep understanding of the agent
block system, database schema, middleware, and CI/CD workflows
- **Troubleshooting Guide**: Comprehensive error handling and validation
steps based on production experience
### Enhanced Development Workflow
```bash
# Before: Trial-and-error dependency installation
# After: Fully configured environment ready immediately
# Copilot now understands:
poetry run serve # Backend server (port 8000)
pnpm dev # Frontend server (port 3000)
docker compose up -d # Essential services
poetry run pytest backend/blocks/test/test_block.py -xvs # Block validation
```
## Benefits
This configuration provides Copilot with:
- **Immediate Productivity**: No time wasted on environment setup or
dependency discovery
- **Platform Expertise**: Deep understanding of AutoGPT's architecture,
security patterns, and development workflows
- **CI Consistency**: Local development environment matches production
testing environment
- **Comprehensive Context**: Access to all platform documentation and
development patterns in a single source
The setup eliminates the slow trial-and-error process typical of
LLM-based development tools and ensures Copilot works efficiently from
the first interaction.
## References
- [GitHub Copilot Agent Environment
Setup](https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/how-tos/use-copilot-agents/coding-agent/customize-the-agent-environment#preinstalling-tools-or-dependencies-in-copilots-environment)
- [AutoGPT Platform CI Workflows](.github/workflows/)
- [Platform Development Guide](autogpt_platform/CLAUDE.md)
<!-- START COPILOT CODING AGENT TIPS -->
---
💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions,
customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context
Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more [Copilot coding agent
tips](https://gh.io/copilot-coding-agent-tips) in the docs.
---------
Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: ntindle <8845353+ntindle@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Tindle <nicholas.tindle@agpt.co>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Tindle <nicktindle@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Reinier van der Leer <pwuts@agpt.co>
- Resolves#10653
The objective is to move to a base image with fewer active
vulnerabilities. Hence the choice for `debian:13-slim` (0 high, 1
medium, 21 low severity), a huge improvement compared to our current
base image `python:3.11.10-slim-bookworm` (4 high, 11 medium, 15 low
severity).
### Changes 🏗️
- Change backend base image to `debian:13-slim`
- Use Python 3.13
- Fix now-deprecated use of class property in `AppProcess` and
`BaseAppService`
- Expand backend CI matrix to run with Python 3.11 through 3.13
- Update Python version constraint in `pyproject.toml` to include Python
3.13
Also, unrelated:
- Update `autogpt-platform-backend` package version to `v0.6.22`, the
latest release
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] CI passes
- [x] No new errors in deployment logs
- [x] Everything seems to work normally in deployment
## Changes 🏗️
- Run the API query generation as part of the `dev` command
- update the `README` to reflect so
- Add CI job to generate queries and type-check to make sure we are not
out of sync
- the job is run both in Front-end and Back-end changes
- Generate the files via script to load the BE URL dynamically from the
env
- Remove generated files from Git
- rename the `type-check` command to `types`
## Checklist 📋
### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] CI passes
- [x] `README` updates make sense
#### For configuration changes:
None
---------
Co-authored-by: Zamil Majdy <zamil.majdy@agpt.co>
## Summary
This PR adds the frontend service to the Docker Compose configuration,
enabling `docker compose up` to run the complete stack, including the
frontend. It also implements comprehensive environment variable
improvements, unified .env file support, and fixes Docker networking
issues.
## Key Changes
### 🐳 Docker Compose Improvements
- **Added frontend service** to `docker-compose.yml` and
`docker-compose.platform.yml`
- **Production build**: Uses `pnpm build + serve` instead of dev server
for better stability and lower memory usage
- **Service dependencies**: Frontend now waits for backend services
(`rest_server`, `websocket_server`) to be ready
- **YAML anchors**: Implemented DRY configuration to avoid duplicating
environment values
### 📁 Unified .env File Support
- **Frontend .env loading**: Automatically loads `.env` file during
Docker build and runtime
- **Backend .env loading**: Optional `.env` file support with fallback
to sensible defaults in `settings.py`
- **Single source of truth**: All `NEXT_PUBLIC_*` and API keys can be
defined in respective `.env` files
- **Docker integration**: Updated `.dockerignore` to include `.env`
files in build context
- **Git tracking**: Frontend and backend `.env` files are now trackable
(removed from gitignore)
### 🔧 Environment Variable Architecture
- **Dual environment strategy**:
- Server-side code uses Docker service names
(`http://rest_server:8006/api`)
- Client-side code uses localhost URLs (`http://localhost:8006/api`)
- **Comprehensive config**: Added build args and runtime environment
variables
- **Network compatibility**: Fixes connection issues between frontend
and backend containers
- **Shared backend variables**: Common environment variables (service
hosts, auth settings) centralized using YAML anchors
### 🛠️ Code Improvements
- **Centralized env-config helper** (`/frontend/src/lib/env-config.ts`)
with server-side priority
- **Updated all frontend code** to use shared environment helpers
instead of direct `process.env` access
- **Consistent API**: All environment variable access now goes through
helper functions
- **Settings.py improvements**: Better defaults for CORS origins and
optional .env file loading
### 🔗 Files Changed
- `docker-compose.yml` & `docker-compose.platform.yml` - Added frontend
service and shared backend env vars
- `frontend/Dockerfile` - Simplified build process to use .env files
directly
- `backend/settings.py` - Optional .env loading and better defaults
- `frontend/src/lib/env-config.ts` - New centralized environment
configuration
- `.dockerignore` - Allow .env files in build context
- `.gitignore` - Updated to allow frontend/backend .env files
- Multiple frontend files - Updated to use env helpers
- Updates to both auto installer scripts to work with the latest setup!
## Benefits
- ✅ **Single command deployment**: `docker compose up` now runs
everything
- ✅ **Better reliability**: Production build reduces memory usage and
crashes
- ✅ **Network compatibility**: Proper container-to-container
communication
- ✅ **Maintainable config**: Centralized environment variable management
with .env files
- ✅ **Development friendly**: Works in both Docker and local development
- ✅ **API key management**: Easy configuration through .env files for
all services
- ✅ **No more manual env vars**: Frontend and backend automatically load
their respective .env files
## Testing
- ✅ Verified Docker service communication works correctly
- ✅ Frontend responds and serves content properly
- ✅ Environment variables are correctly resolved in both server and
client contexts
- ✅ No connection errors after implementing service dependencies
- ✅ .env file loading works correctly in both build and runtime phases
- ✅ Backend services work with and without .env files present
### Checklist 📋
#### For configuration changes:
- [x] `.env.default` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [x] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [x] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
---------
Co-authored-by: Lluis Agusti <hi@llu.lu>
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Tindle <nicholas.tindle@agpt.co>
Co-authored-by: Claude <claude@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bentlybro <Github@bentlybro.com>
Reverts Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT#10536 to bring platform back up due
to this error:
```
│ Error creating Supabase client Error: @supabase/ssr: Your project's URL and API key are required to create a Supabase client! │
│ │
│ Check your Supabase project's API settings to find these values │
│ │
│ https://supabase.com/dashboard/project/_/settings/api │
│ at <unknown> (https://supabase.com/dashboard/project/_/settings/api) │
│ at bX (.next/server/chunks/3873.js:6:90688) │
│ at <unknown> (.next/server/chunks/150.js:6:13460) │
│ at n (.next/server/chunks/150.js:6:13419) │
│ at o (.next/server/chunks/150.js:6:14187) │
│ ⨯ Error: Your project's URL and Key are required to create a Supabase client! │
│ │
│ Check your Supabase project's API settings to find these values │
│ │
│ https://supabase.com/dashboard/project/_/settings/api │
│ at <unknown> (https://supabase.com/dashboard/project/_/settings/api) │
│ at bY (.next/server/chunks/3006.js:10:486) │
│ at g (.next/server/app/(platform)/auth/callback/route.js:1:5890) │
│ at async e (.next/server/chunks/9836.js:1:101814) │
│ at async k (.next/server/chunks/9836.js:1:15611) │
│ at async l (.next/server/chunks/9836.js:1:15817) { │
│ digest: '424987633' │
│ } │
│ Error creating Supabase client Error: @supabase/ssr: Your project's URL and API key are required to create a Supabase client! │
│ │
│ Check your Supabase project's API settings to find these values │
│ │
│ https://supabase.com/dashboard/project/_/settings/api │
│ at <unknown> (https://supabase.com/dashboard/project/_/settings/api) │
│ at bX (.next/server/chunks/3873.js:6:90688) │
│ at <unknown> (.next/server/chunks/150.js:6:13460) │
│ at n (.next/server/chunks/150.js:6:13419) │
│ at j (.next/server/chunks/150.js:6:7482) │
│ Error creating Supabase client Error: @supabase/ssr: Your project's URL and API key are required to create a Supabase client! │
│ │
│ Check your Supabase project's API settings to find these values │
│ │
│ https://supabase.com/dashboard/project/_/settings/api │
│ at <unknown> (https://supabase.com/dashboard/project/_/settings/api) │
│ at bX (.next/server/chunks/3873.js:6:90688) │
│ at <unknown> (.next/server/chunks/150.js:6:13460) │
│ at n (.next/server/chunks/150.js:6:13419) │
│ at h (.next/server/chunks/150.js:6:10561) │
│ Error creating Supabase client Error: @supabase/ssr: Your project's URL and API key are required to create a Supabase client! │
│ │
│ Check your Supabase project's API settings to find these values │
│ │
│ https://supabase.com/dashboard/project/_/settings/api │
│ at <unknown> (https://supabase.com/dashboard/project/_/settings/api) │
│ at bX (.next/server/chunks/3873.js:6:90688) │
│ at <unknown> (.next/server/chunks/150.js:6:13460) │
│ at n (.next/server/chunks/150.js:6:13419)
```
## Summary
This PR adds the frontend service to the Docker Compose configuration,
enabling `docker compose up` to run the complete stack including the
frontend. It also implements comprehensive environment variable
improvements and fixes Docker networking issues.
## Key Changes
### 🐳 Docker Compose Improvements
- **Added frontend service** to `docker-compose.yml` and
`docker-compose.platform.yml`
- **Production build**: Uses `pnpm build + serve` instead of dev server
for better stability and lower memory usage
- **Service dependencies**: Frontend now waits for backend services
(`rest_server`, `websocket_server`) to be ready
- **YAML anchors**: Implemented DRY configuration to avoid duplicating
environment values
### 🔧 Environment Variable Architecture
- **Dual environment strategy**:
- Server-side code uses Docker service names
(`http://rest_server:8006/api`)
- Client-side code uses localhost URLs (`http://localhost:8006/api`)
- **Comprehensive config**: Added build args and runtime environment
variables
- **Network compatibility**: Fixes connection issues between frontend
and backend containers
### 🛠️ Code Improvements
- **Centralized env-config helper** (`/frontend/src/lib/env-config.ts`)
with server-side priority
- **Updated all frontend code** to use shared environment helpers
instead of direct `process.env` access
- **Consistent API**: All environment variable access now goes through
helper functions
### 🔗 Files Changed
- `docker-compose.yml` & `docker-compose.platform.yml` - Added frontend
service
- `frontend/Dockerfile` - Added build args for environment variables
- `frontend/src/lib/env-config.ts` - New centralized environment
configuration
- Multiple frontend files - Updated to use env helpers
## Benefits
- ✅ **Single command deployment**: `docker compose up` now runs
everything
- ✅ **Better reliability**: Production build reduces memory usage and
crashes
- ✅ **Network compatibility**: Proper container-to-container
communication
- ✅ **Maintainable config**: Centralized environment variable management
- ✅ **Development friendly**: Works in both Docker and local development
## Testing
- ✅ Verified Docker service communication works correctly
- ✅ Frontend responds and serves content properly
- ✅ Environment variables are correctly resolved in both server and
client contexts
- ✅ No connection errors after implementing service dependencies
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
## Changes 🏗️
- Make docker + deps cache actually work on the FE CI
- Run the E2E test data script before Playwright
## Checklist 📋
### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] CI is faster in repeated runs ( _uses cache_ )
- [x] Test data script runs successfully
### For configuration changes:
None
## Changes 🏗️https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/42e1c896-5f3b-447c-aee9-4f5963c217d9
There is now a 🔔 icon on the Navigation bar that shows previous agent
runs and displays real-time agent running status.
If you run an agent, the bell will show on a badge how many agents are
running. If you hover over it, a hint appears. If you click on it, it
opens a dropdown and displays the executions with their status ( _which
should match what we have in library functionality, not design-wise_ ).
I leveraged the existing APIs for this purpose. Most of the run logic is
[encapsulated on this
hook](https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/compare/dev...feat/agent-notifications?expand=1#diff-a9e7f2904d6283b094aca19b64c7168e8c66be1d5e0bb454be8978cb98526617)
and is also an independent `<AgentActivityDropdown />` component.
Clicking on an agent run opens that run in the library page.
This new functionality is covered by E2E tests 💆🏽✔️
## Checklist 📋
### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] The navigation bar layout looks good when logged out
- [x] The navigation bar layout looks good when logged in
- [x] Open an agent in the library and click `Run`
- [x] See the real-time activity of the agent running on the navigation
bar bell icon
### For configuration changes:
_No configuration changes needed._
## Changes 🏗️
### User creation tests
Now, all tests use the users created via the platform signup in
`global-setup.ts`. Their login details are on a `.auth/user-pool.json`
file. I have the delete the logic that created tests users via Supabase
directly.
### Build tests speed
I have refactored the builder tests, so that, instead of adding 100s of
blocks under a given test user session, a new test user logins and adds
block for each letter:
```
Test user 1
- logins and adds blocks starting with "a"
Test user 2
- logins and adds blocks starting with "b"
```
Given that we know the builder becomes slow once we have 30 or more
blocks, in this way a test user never adds more than 10 blocks on a
given test ( _without losing coverage_ ), so we don't need time-outs or
artificially waiting due to the UI being slow.
### Readability test changes
Refactor existing tests, using short-hand utilities, to be:
- easier to write
- clearer to read
- easier to debug
```ts
// Selectors
getId("id") // --> page.getByTestId("id")
getText("foo") // --> page.getByText("id")
getButton("Run") // --> page.getByRole("button", {name: "Run"}
...
// Assetions
const btn = getButton("Save")
isVisible(btn) // --> expect(btn).toBeVisible()
```
These utilities live under `selectors.ts` and `assertions.ts`. Their
usage is optional but encouraged.
## Checklist 📋
### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Refactored tests code looks good
- [x] E2E tests are 🟢 on the CI
### For configuration changes:
No config changes
## Block Development SDK - Simplifying Block Creation
### Problem
Currently, creating a new block requires manual updates to **5+ files**
scattered across the codebase:
- `backend/data/block_cost_config.py` - Manually add block costs
- `backend/integrations/credentials_store.py` - Add default credentials
- `backend/integrations/providers.py` - Register new providers
- `backend/integrations/oauth/__init__.py` - Register OAuth handlers
- `backend/integrations/webhooks/__init__.py` - Register webhook
managers
This creates significant friction for developers, increases the chance
of configuration errors, and makes the platform difficult to scale.
### Solution
This PR introduces a **Block Development SDK** that provides:
- Single import for all block development needs: `from backend.sdk
import *`
- Automatic registration of all block configurations
- Zero external file modifications required
- Provider-based configuration with inheritance
### Changes 🏗️
#### 1. **New SDK Module** (`backend/sdk/`)
- **`__init__.py`**: Unified exports of 68+ block development components
- **`registry.py`**: Central auto-registration system for all block
configurations
- **`builder.py`**: `ProviderBuilder` class for fluent provider
configuration
- **`provider.py`**: Provider configuration management
- **`cost_integration.py`**: Automatic cost application system
#### 2. **Provider Builder Pattern**
```python
# Configure once, use everywhere
my_provider = (
ProviderBuilder("my-service")
.with_api_key("MY_SERVICE_API_KEY", "My Service API Key")
.with_base_cost(5, BlockCostType.RUN)
.build()
)
```
#### 3. **Automatic Cost System**
- Provider base costs automatically applied to all blocks using that
provider
- Override with `@cost` decorator for block-specific pricing
- Tiered pricing support with cost filters
#### 4. **Dynamic Provider Support**
- Modified `ProviderName` enum to accept any string via `_missing_`
method
- No more manual enum updates for new providers
#### 5. **Application Integration**
- Added `sync_all_provider_costs()` to `initialize_blocks()` for
automatic cost registration
- Maintains full backward compatibility with existing blocks
#### 6. **Comprehensive Examples** (`backend/blocks/examples/`)
- `simple_example_block.py` - Basic block structure
- `example_sdk_block.py` - Provider with credentials
- `cost_example_block.py` - Various cost patterns
- `advanced_provider_example.py` - Custom API clients
- `example_webhook_sdk_block.py` - Webhook configuration
#### 7. **Extensive Testing**
- 6 new test modules with 30+ test cases
- Integration tests for all SDK features
- Cost calculation verification
- Provider registration tests
### Before vs After
**Before SDK:**
```python
# 1. Multiple complex imports
from backend.data.block import Block, BlockCategory, BlockOutput
from backend.data.model import SchemaField, CredentialsField
# ... many more imports
# 2. Update block_cost_config.py
BLOCK_COSTS[MyBlock] = [BlockCost(...)]
# 3. Update credentials_store.py
DEFAULT_CREDENTIALS.append(...)
# 4. Update providers.py enum
# 5. Update oauth/__init__.py
# 6. Update webhooks/__init__.py
```
**After SDK:**
```python
from backend.sdk import *
# Everything configured in one place
my_provider = (
ProviderBuilder("my-service")
.with_api_key("MY_API_KEY", "My API Key")
.with_base_cost(10, BlockCostType.RUN)
.build()
)
class MyBlock(Block):
class Input(BlockSchema):
credentials: CredentialsMetaInput = my_provider.credentials_field()
data: String = SchemaField(description="Input data")
class Output(BlockSchema):
result: String = SchemaField(description="Result")
# That's it\! No external files to modify
```
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Created new blocks using SDK pattern with provider configuration
- [x] Verified automatic cost registration for provider-based blocks
- [x] Tested cost override with @cost decorator
- [x] Confirmed custom providers work without enum modifications
- [x] Verified all example blocks execute correctly
- [x] Tested backward compatibility with existing blocks
- [x] Ran all SDK tests (30+ tests, all passing)
- [x] Created blocks with credentials and verified authentication
- [x] Tested webhook block configuration
- [x] Verified application startup with auto-registration
#### For configuration changes:
- [x] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
(no changes needed)
- [x] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes (no changes needed)
- [x] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
### Impact
- **Developer Experience**: Block creation time reduced from hours to
minutes
- **Maintainability**: All block configuration in one place
- **Scalability**: Support hundreds of blocks without enum updates
- **Type Safety**: Full IDE support with proper type hints
- **Testing**: Easier to test blocks in isolation
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Abhimanyu Yadav <122007096+Abhi1992002@users.noreply.github.com>
This pull request introduces extensive updates to the frontend testing
infrastructure, focusing on Playwright-based testing for user
authentication flows. Key changes include the addition of a global setup
for creating test users, new utilities for managing test user pools, and
expanded test coverage for signup and authentication scenarios.
### Testing Infrastructure Enhancements:
* **Global Setup for Tests**:
- Added `globalSetup` in `playwright.config.ts` to create test users
before all tests run. This ensures consistent test data across test
suites. (`autogpt_platform/frontend/playwright.config.ts`,
[autogpt_platform/frontend/playwright.config.tsR16-R17](diffhunk://#diff-27484f7f20f2eb1aeb289730a440f3a126fa825a7b3fae1f9ed19e217c4f2e40R16-R17))
- Implemented `global-setup.ts` to handle test user creation and save
user pools to the file system. Includes fallback for reusing existing
user pools if available.
(`autogpt_platform/frontend/src/tests/global-setup.ts`,
[autogpt_platform/frontend/src/tests/global-setup.tsR1-R43](diffhunk://#diff-3a8141beba2a6117e0eb721c35b39acc168a8f913ee625ce056c6fab5ac3b192R1-R43))
* **Test User Management Utilities**:
- Added functions in `auth.ts` to create, save, load, and clean up test
users. Supports batch creation and file-based persistence for user
pools. (`autogpt_platform/frontend/src/tests/utils/auth.ts`,
[autogpt_platform/frontend/src/tests/utils/auth.tsR1-R190](diffhunk://#diff-198b5d07aa72d50c153a70ecdfdc4bacc408c2d638c90d858f40d0183549973bR1-R190))
- Enhanced `user-generator.ts` to generate individual or multiple test
users with customizable options.
(`autogpt_platform/frontend/src/tests/utils/user-generator.ts`,
[autogpt_platform/frontend/src/tests/utils/user-generator.tsR2-R41](diffhunk://#diff-a7cb4f403a4cf3605ed1046b0263412205e56e51b16052a9da1e8db9bf34b940R2-R41))
### Expanded Test Coverage:
* **Signup Flow Tests**:
- Added comprehensive tests for signup functionality, including
successful signup, form validation, custom credentials, and duplicate
email handling. (`autogpt_platform/frontend/src/tests/signup.spec.ts`,
[autogpt_platform/frontend/src/tests/signup.spec.tsR1-R113](diffhunk://#diff-d1baa54deff7f3b1eedefd6cec5619ae8edd872d361ef57b6c32998ed22d6661R1-R113))
- Developed `signup.ts` utility functions to automate signup processes
and validate form behavior.
(`autogpt_platform/frontend/src/tests/utils/signup.ts`,
[autogpt_platform/frontend/src/tests/utils/signup.tsR1-R184](diffhunk://#diff-cb05d73a6bd7a129759b0b3382825e90cde561a42fc85b6a25777f6bd2f84511R1-R184))
* **Authentication Utilities**:
- Introduced `SigninUtils` in `signin.ts` for login, logout, and
authentication cycle testing. Provides reusable methods for verifying
user states. (`autogpt_platform/frontend/src/tests/utils/signin.ts`,
[autogpt_platform/frontend/src/tests/utils/signin.tsR1-R94](diffhunk://#diff-7cfec955c159d69f51ba9fcca7d979be090acd6fe246b125551d60192d697d98R1-R94))
### Minor Updates:
* Added environment variable `BROWSER_TYPE` to CI workflow for
browser-specific Playwright tests.
(`.github/workflows/platform-frontend-ci.yml`,
[.github/workflows/platform-frontend-ci.ymlR215-R216](diffhunk://#diff-29396f5dccefac146b71bed295fdbb790b17fda6a5ce2e9f4f8abe80eb14a527R215-R216))
These changes collectively improve the robustness and maintainability of
the frontend testing framework, enabling more reliable and scalable
testing of user authentication features.
### Checklist 📋
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Validated all authentication tests, and they are working
# Change details
- **Before**: Each job separately installs dependencies (~4 redundant
installations)
### Massive Redundancy in Setup Steps
Each job repeats these SAME 4 steps:
- Checkout repository
- Set up Node.js (version 21)
- Enable corepack
- Install dependencies (pnpm install --frozen-lockfile)
This happens 4+ times across different jobs:
- lint job
- type-check job
- chromatic job
- test job (runs 2x due to matrix strategy)
### No Dependency Caching
No caching strategy - downloads packages fresh every time
- Every workflow run downloads all packages from scratch
- No benefit from previous runs, even with identical pnpm-lock.yaml
- **After**: Dependencies installed once in setup job, cached and reused
This optimization maintains all existing CI functionality while
significantly improving pipeline efficiency.
A workflow run example is dispatched:
https://github.com/souhailaS/AutoGPT/actions/workflows/platform-frontend-ci.yml
## Additional Context
We are a team of researchers from University of Zurich
(https://www.ifi.uzh.ch/en/zest.html) currently **working on automating
energy optimizations in GitHub Actions workflows**. This optimization
maintains full functionality while significantly reducing computational
overhead and energy consumption.
souhaila.serbout@uzh.ch
## Changes 🏗️
We want to make running the AutoGPT Front-end as easy as possible. For
that, you should be able to run it with the least amount of commands.
We recently added generated queries and types on the Front-end from the
Back-end OpenAPI schema, to make development easier and catch bugs
earlier. However, with the current setup, developers are forced to run
`pnpm generate:api-all` with the Back-end running, which is annoying.
After this PR, the Front-end can be rerun with just `pnpm i & pnpm dev`.
## Checklist 📋
### For code changes
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Run the Front-end with just `pnpm dev` and it works
---------
Co-authored-by: Abhimanyu Yadav <122007096+Abhi1992002@users.noreply.github.com>
Currently, we don't have a secure way to pass Authorization headers when
calling the `SendWebRequestBlock`.
This hinders the integration of third-party applications that do not yet
have native block support.
### Changes 🏗️
Add Host-scoped credentials support for the newly introduced
SendAuthenticatedWebRequestBlock.
<img width="1000" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0d3d577a-2b9b-4f0f-9377-0e00a069ba37"
/>
<img width="1000" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a59b9f16-c89c-453d-a628-1df0dfd60fb5"
/>
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] Uses `https://api.openai.com/v1/images/edits` through
SendWebRequestBlock by passing the api-key through host-scoped
credentials.
An anti-virus file scan step is added to each file upload step on the
platform before the file is sent to cloud storage or local machine
storage.
### Changes 🏗️
* Added ClamAV service
* Added AV file scan on each upload step
* Added tests & documentation
* Make the step mandatory even on local development
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] Tried using FileUploadBlock & AgentFileInputBlock
## Changes 🏗️
<img width="800" alt="Screenshot 2025-06-25 at 13 43 06"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/13ffd32e-ffa1-482e-91a6-8363ad6b67df"
/>
<br /><br />
- Setup Chromatic ( install + `package.json` command )
- Make it run on the CI
- Remove a lot of old component in Storybook which were broken or need
deign review
- for now we only keep on Storybook what has been ✅ by design
- Remove `test-storybook:ci` commands
- I plan to run tests via Chromatic, but I want to look at that setup on
a separate PR and in a clean state
## 📋 Checklist
### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] The `chromatic` job succeeds on the CI and the changes appear on
Chromatic's dashboard
This pull request sets up and configures Orval for API client
generation. It automates the process of creating TypeScript clients from
the backend's OpenAPI specification, improving development efficiency
and reducing manual code maintenance.
### Changes 🏗️
- Configures Orval with a new configuration file (`orval.config.ts`).
- Adds scripts to `package.json` for fetching the OpenAPI spec and
generating the API client.
- Implements a custom mutator for handling authentication.
- Adds API client generation as a step in the CI workflow.
- Adds `.gitignore` entry for generated API client files.
- Adds a security middleware to prevent caching of sensitive data.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Verified that the API client is generated correctly.
- [x] Confirmed that the custom mutator is functioning as expected for
authentication.
- [x] Ensured that the new CI workflow step for API client generation is
successful.
- [x] Tested generated API calls
#### For configuration changes:
- [x] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [x] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<!-- Clearly explain the need for these changes: -->
<!-- Concisely describe all of the changes made in this pull request:
-->
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
## 🤖 Installing Claude Code GitHub App
This PR adds a GitHub Actions workflow that enables Claude Code
integration in our repository.
### What is Claude Code?
[Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) is an AI coding agent that can
help with:
- Bug fixes and improvements
- Documentation updates
- Implementing new features
- Code reviews and suggestions
- Writing tests
- And more!
### How it works
Once this PR is merged, we'll be able to interact with Claude by
mentioning @claude in a pull request or issue comment.
Once the workflow is triggered, Claude will analyze the comment and
surrounding context, and execute on the request in a GitHub action.
### Important Notes
- **This workflow won't take effect until this PR is merged**
- **@claude mentions won't work until after the merge is complete**
- The workflow runs automatically whenever Claude is mentioned in PR or
issue comments
- Claude gets access to the entire PR or issue context including files,
diffs, and previous comments
### Security
- Our Anthropic API key is securely stored as a GitHub Actions secret
- Only users with write access to the repository can trigger the
workflow
- All Claude runs are stored in the GitHub Actions run history
- Claude's default tools are limited to reading/writing files and
interacting with our repo by creating comments, branches, and commits.
- We can add more allowed tools by adding them to the workflow file
like:
```
allowed_tools: Bash(npm install),Bash(npm run build),Bash(npm run lint),Bash(npm run test)
```
There's more information in the [Claude Code
documentation](http://docs.anthropic.com/s/claude-code-github-actions).
After merging this PR, let's try mentioning @claude in a comment on any
PR to get started!
<!-- Clearly explain the need for these changes: -->
fixed#10098
### Changes 🏗️
tells dependabot to ignore poetry
<!-- Concisely describe all of the changes made in this pull request:
-->
### Checklist 📋
N/A
- Resolves#10041
Upgrading to Next v15 isn't trivial, but still a good idea if not simply
necessary.
### Changes 🏗️
- Upgrade Next.js from `v14.2.26` to `v15.3.2`
- Fix usage of now-async APIs `params`, `searchParams`, `headers`
([docs](https://nextjs.org/docs/app/guides/upgrading/version-15#async-request-apis-breaking-change))
- Update Next+TypeScript configs
- Set build target to ES2022 for better performance
- Unignore TypeScript build errors
- Set `hideSourceMaps: false` because OSS FTW :)
- Remove obsolete `webpack.config.js`
- Fix existing warnings/errors
- Fix Sentry missing navigation hook warning
- Fix `DYNAMIC_SERVER_USAGE` build error on `/profile` and
`/marketplace`
- Moved `getStoreData` to a proper server action `getMarketplaceData`
- Fix breaking CSS syntax error in `customnode.css`
- Use Turbopack for faster dev+test build times
- Add separate build step to frontend CI workflow: this also fixes the
test timing out if the build takes too long
Other technical improvements:
- Wrap `handleSortChange` in `MarketplaceSearchPage` in `useCallback`
- Fix typing in `ProfileInfoForm`
- Improve output of frontend tests
> [!NOTE]
> Next prints this error (in dev mode):
> ```
> Error: Route "/marketplace" used `cookies().getAll()`. `cookies()`
should be awaited before using its value. Learn more:
https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/sync-dynamic-apis
> at Object.getAll (src/lib/supabase/getServerSupabase.ts:16:31)
> at getAll (../../src/cookies.ts:115:41)
> ...
> ```
> As far as I can see, this isn't breaking, and will become a warning in
prod. See also [the Next docs about this
issue](https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/sync-dynamic-apis)
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Follow the full release QA test script
#### For configuration changes:
- [x] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
---------
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
## 🧢 Overview
This PR migrates the AutoGPT Platform frontend from [yarn
1](https://classic.yarnpkg.com/lang/en/) to [pnpm](https://pnpm.io/)
using **corepack** for automatic package manager management.
**yarn1** is not longer maintained and a bit old, moving to **pnpm** we
get:
- ⚡ Significantly faster install times,
- 💾 Better disk space efficiency,
- 🛠️ Better community support and maintenance,
- 💆🏽♂️ Config swap very easy
## 🏗️ Changes
### Package Management Migration
- updated [corepack](https://github.com/nodejs/corepack) to use
[pnpm](https://pnpm.io/)
- Deleted `yarn.lock` and generated new `pnpm-lock.yaml`
- Updated `.gitignore`
### Documentation Updates
- `frontend/README.md`:
- added comprehensive tech stack overview with links
- updated all commands to use pnpm
- added corepack setup instructions
- and included migration disclaimer for yarn users
- `backend/README.md`:
- Updated installation instructions to use pnpm with corepack
- `AGENTS.md`:
- Updated testing commands from yarn to pnpm
### CI/CD & Infrastructure
- **GitHub Workflows** :
- updated all jobs to use pnpm with corepack enable
- cleaned FE Playwright test workflow to avoid Sentry noise
- **Dockerfile**:
- updated to use pnpm with corepack, changed lock file reference, and
updated cache mount path
### 📋 Checklist
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
**Test Plan:**
> assuming you are on the `frontend` folder
- [x] Clean installation works: `rm -rf node_modules && corepack enable
&& pnpm install`
- [x] Development server starts correctly: `pnpm dev`
- [x] Build process works: `pnpm build`
- [x] Linting and formatting work: `pnpm lint` and `pnpm format`
- [x] Type checking works: `pnpm type-check`
- [x] Tests run successfully: `pnpm test`
- [x] Storybook starts correctly: `pnpm storybook`
- [x] Docker build succeeds with new pnpm configuration
- [x] GitHub Actions workflow passes with pnpm commands
#### For configuration changes:
- [x] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [x] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [x] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
### Description 📝
This PR introduces a GitHub Actions workflow that enables
cross-repository event dispatching for development environment
deployments. The workflow listens for specific PR events and dispatches
corresponding deployment/undeployment actions to our cloud
infrastructure repository.
**How it works:**
- The workflow triggers on PR events (opened, synchronized, closed) and
PR target events (labeled, unlabeled)
- When a PR comment containing `!deploy` is detected from authorized
users (PR author, repo owners, members, or collaborators), it dispatches
a deployment event
- When a PR with existing deployments is closed, it automatically
dispatches an undeployment event to clean up resources
**Interaction with target repository:**
The workflow dispatches events to
`Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT_cloud_infrastructure` with a payload
containing:
- `action`: Either "deploy" or "undeploy"
- `pr_number`: The PR number for tracking
- `pr_title`: Human-readable identifier
- `pr_state`: Current PR state
- `repo`: Source repository name
This enables the infrastructure repository to spin up isolated
development environments for each PR on demand.
### Changes 🏗️
- Added `.github/workflows/dev-deploy-pr-dispatcher.yml` workflow file
- Implements secure cross-repository communication using repository
dispatch events
- Includes authorization checks to ensure only authorized users can
trigger deployments
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] No code changes - this is a workflow addition only
#### For configuration changes:
- [x] New workflow file added that requires testing
- [x] Requires `DISPATCH_TOKEN` secret to be configured with appropriate
permissions for cross-repository dispatch
- [x] No environment variable changes needed
- [ ] Workflow will be tested after initial merge to verify proper event
dispatching
<!-- Clearly explain the need for these changes: -->
Swap to pooling supabase connections rather than depending on x number
of max open connections
### Changes 🏗️
Adds direct connect URL to be used throughout the system
<!-- Concisely describe all of the changes made in this pull request:
-->
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] Test thoroughly all of the endpoints in the dev env with switched
infra matching pr
- [x] Follow the new release plan tests
- [x] Follow the old release plan tests
#### For configuration changes:
- [x] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [x] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [x] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>configuration changes</summary>
- Change how we connect to the database to use direct when configured
and database URL when not
- update prisma for this
- have default matching database and default
</details>
Currently, our CI always uses the latest version of Poetry. This causes
issues with the lockfile check whenever a new Poetry version is
released, especially if that new version has different lockfile
generation behavior.
This new mechanism determines the Poetry version to use as follows:
- Get Poetry version from backend/poetry.lock in the current branch
- Get Poetry version from backend/poetry.lock on the base branch
- Use the newest version out of the two found versions
This way, we don't automatically update to new Poetry versions, but it
is still possible to update to newer versions through pull requests.
We have been submoduling Supabase for provisioning local Supabase
instances using docker-compose. Aside from the huge size of unrelated
code being pulled, there is also the risk of pulling unintentional
breaking change from the upstream to the platform.
The latest Supabase changes hide the 5432 port from the supabase-db
container and shift it to the supavisor, the instance that we are
currently not using. This causes an error in the existing setup.
## BREAKING CHANGES
This change will introduce different volume locations for the database
content, pulling this change will make the data content fresh from the
start. To keep your old data with this change, execute this command:
```
cp -r supabase/docker/volumes/db/data db/docker/volumes/db/data
```
### Changes 🏗️
The scope of this PR is snapshotting the current docker-compose code
obtained from the Supabase repository and embedding it into our
repository. This will eliminate the need for submodule / recursive
cloning and bringing the entire Supabase repository into the platform.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] Existing CI
<!-- Clearly explain the need for these changes: -->
### Changes 🏗️
<!-- Concisely describe all of the changes made in this pull request:
-->
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
We want to send emails on a schedule, in response to events, and be
expandable without being overbearing on the amount of effort to
implement. We also want this to use rabbitmq and be easy for other
services to send messages into.
This PR adds the first use of the service to simply show a log message
### Changes 🏗️
<!-- Concisely describe all of the changes made in this pull request:
-->
- Adds a new backend service for notifications
- Adds first notification into the service -> Agent Execution
- Adds spawning the notification service
Also
- Adds RabbitMQ to CI so we can test stuff
- Adds a minor fix for one of the migrations that I thought was causing
failures, but isn't but the change is still useful
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] Built and ran an agent and ensured the following log line appeared
which shows the event would have sent an email
```
2025-02-10 15:52:02,232 INFO Processing notification:
user_id='96b8d2f5-a036-437f-bd8e-ba8856028553'
type=<NotificationType.AGENT_RUN: 'AGENT_RUN'>
data=AgentRunData(agent_name='CalculatorBlock', credits_used=0.0,
execution_time=0.0, graph_id='30e5f332-a092-4795-892a-b063a8c7bdd9',
node_count=1) created_at=datetime.datetime(2025, 2, 10, 15, 52, 2,
162865)
```
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
None of the other ports are configurable via .env.example listing so
left as is
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: Reinier van der Leer <pwuts@agpt.co>
<!-- Clearly explain the need for these changes: -->
We want to be able to use typechecking and see errors before they occur.
This is a PR to help enable us to do so by fixing the existing errors
and hopefully not causing new ones.
### Changes 🏗️
- adds check to ci
- disables some code points
- fixes lots of type errors
- fixes a bunch of the stories
<!-- Concisely describe all of the changes made in this pull request:
-->
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] added types
- [x] Ran some of the stories
- [x] Asked all the relevant parties for manual checks
---------
Co-authored-by: SwiftyOS <craigswift13@gmail.com>
<!-- Clearly explain the need for these changes: -->
We are making issues stale that aren’t. With the additions of more
careful project management this has become a hindrance rather than help.
### Changes 🏗️
<!-- Concisely describe all of the changes made in this pull request:
-->
- increases days until stale from 50 to 100
Make all changes necessary to make everything work with Poetry v2.0.0.
- Resolves#9196
## Changes
- Removed `--no-update` flag from `poetry lock` command in codebase
- Removed extra path arguments from `poetry -C [path] run [command]`
occurrences
- Regenerated all lock files in hierarchical order
- Added workaround for Poetry bug where `packages.[i].format` is now
suddenly required
Additionally:
- Fixed up .dockerignore
- Fixes .venv being erroneously copied over from local
- Fixes build context bloat (300MB -> 2.5MB)
- Fixed warnings about entrypoint script not being installed in docker
builds
### Relevant (breaking) changes in v2.0.0
- `--no-update` flag no longer exists for `poetry lock` as it has become
default behavior
- The `-C` option now actually changes the directory, so any path
arguments in `poetry run` commands can/must be removed
- Poetry v2.0.0 uses the new v2.1 lock file spec, so all lock files have
to be regenerated to avoid false-positive lock file updates and checks
on future PRs
- **BUG:** when specifying `poetry.tool.packages`, `format` is required
now
- python-poetry/poetry#9961
Full Poetry v2.0.0 release notes and change log:
https://python-poetry.org/blog/announcing-poetry-2.0.0
# 🌎 Overview
AutoGPT Store Version 2 expands on the Pre-Store by enhancing agent
discovery, providing richer content presentation, and introducing new
user engagement features. The focus is on creating a visually appealing
and interactive marketplace that allows users to explore and evaluate
agents through images, videos, and detailed descriptions.
### Vision
To create a visually compelling and interactive open-source marketplace
for autonomous AI agents, where users can easily discover, evaluate, and
interact with agents through media-rich listings, ratings, and version
history.
### Objectives
📊 Incorporate visuals (icons, images, videos) into agent listings.
⭐ Introduce a rating system and agent run count.
🔄 Provide version history and update logs from creators.
🔍 Improve user experience with advanced search and filtering features.
### Changes 🏗️
<!-- Concisely describe all of the changes made in this pull request:
-->
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: Bently <tomnoon9@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Aarushi <aarushik93@gmail.com>
- Resolves#8948
### Changes 🏗️
- Parallelize frontend test job into a per-browser matrix
- Speed up "Free Disk Space" step by disabling removal of large system
packages
- Resolves#8884
We need to prevent breaking updates to dependency version requirements
of `autogpt_libs`.
`autogpt_libs/pytroject.toml` and `backend/poetry.lock` are loosely
coupled, and to ensure they stay in sync we need an extra check.
For now I'm also reverting the breaking update of #8787, otherwise this
added CI check will immediately fail.
### Changes
- ci(backend): Add `poetry.lock` check
- Revert "build(deps): bump pydantic from 2.9.2 to 2.10.2 in
/autogpt_platform/autogpt_libs in the production-dependencies group
across 1 directory (#8787)"
- Resolves#8859
- Follow-up to #8751
### Changes
- Add `autogpt_libs` to the backend CI path filter
- Add `ruff format` step for `autogpt_libs` to `linter.py` and
`pre-commit` config
- Run `poetry run format` with the new setup
Dependabot's commit messages are bulky and don't use our commit message
scopes. Although not fully customizable, this partially fixes it.
### Changes 🏗️
- Fix dependabot commit message scopes
Co-authored-by: Zamil Majdy <zamil.majdy@agpt.co>
