This simply removes the schedule "every minute" option from the schedule
tasks UI, Its still possible to set a every minute schedule via the
custom option
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] Check the Schedule Tasks UI to see there is no more "Every Minute"
option
- [x] Check you can still set a schedule a agent to run every minute
using the custom option
<!-- Clearly explain the need for these changes: -->
We need the ability to reject or remove already approved agents from the
marketplace via the Admin Dashboard. Previously, once an agent was
approved, there was no easy way to remove it from the marketplace
without direct database intervention.
This addresses several use cases:
- Removing agents that require credentials (short-term solution
discussed with Reinier)
- Handling broken agents mistakenly approved
- Managing outdated or problematic agents
- Quick response to issues without engineering support
### Changes 🏗️
<!-- Concisely describe all of the changes made in this pull request:
-->
- **Backend**: Modified `review_store_submission` function in
`/backend/server/v2/store/db.py` to handle rejecting already approved
agents
- Added logic to detect when rejecting an approved agent
- Updates StoreListing to remove agent from marketplace when rejected
- Handles multiple approved versions correctly
- **Frontend**: Updated admin marketplace UI components
- `expandable-row.tsx`: Show action buttons for both PENDING and
APPROVED agents
- `approve-reject-buttons.tsx`:
- Show only "Revoke" button for approved agents (hide Approve button)
- Update button text from "Reject" to "Revoke" for approved agents
- Update dialog titles and descriptions appropriately
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] Navigate to Admin Dashboard > Marketplace Management
- [x] Find a PENDING agent and verify both Approve and Reject buttons
appear
- [x] Find an APPROVED agent and verify only "Revoke" button appears
- [x] Click Revoke on an approved agent and verify dialog shows "Revoke
Approved Agent" title
- [x] Submit revocation with comments and verify agent status changes to
REJECTED
- [x] Verify the agent is removed from the public marketplace
- [x] Test with an agent that has multiple approved versions - verify it
switches to another approved version
- [x] Test with an agent that has only one approved version - verify
hasApprovedVersion is set to false
#### For configuration changes:
- [x] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [x] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [x] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
No configuration changes required - this uses existing admin
authentication and database schema.
Fixes SECRT-1218
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Abhimanyu Yadav <122007096+Abhi1992002@users.noreply.github.com>
- Resolves#10645
### Changes 🏗️
- Implement infinite scroll in the Agent Runs list (on
`/library/agents/[id]`)
- Add horizontal scroll support to `ScrollArea` and `InfiniteScroll`
components
- Fix `InfiniteScroll` triggering twice
- Fix date handling by React Queries
- Add response mutator to parse dates coming out of API
- Make legacy `GraphExecutionMeta` compatible with generated type
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- Open `/library/agents/[id]`
- [x] Agent runs list loads
- Scroll agent runs list to the end
- [x] More runs are loaded and appear in the list
- resolves -
https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/issues/10511
In this PR, I’ve added backend endpoints and a frontend UI for edit
functionality on the Agent Dashboard. Now, users can update their store
submission, if status is `PENDING` or `APPROVED`, but not for `REJECTED`
and `DRAFT`. When users make changes to a pending status submission, the
changes are made to the same version. However, when users make changes
to an approved status submission, a new store listing version is
created.
Backend works something like this:
<img width="866" height="832" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-15 at 9 39 02 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/209c60ac-8350-43c1-ba4c-7378d95ecba7"
/>
### Changes
- I’ve updated the `StoreSubmission` view to include `video_url` and
`categories`.
- I’ve added a new frontend UI for editing submissions.
- I’ve created an endpoint for editing submissions.
- I’ve added more end-to-end tests to ensure the edit submission
functionality works as expected.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] I have checked manually, everything is working perfectly.
- [x] All e2e tests are also passing.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zamil Majdy <zamil.majdy@agpt.co>
Co-authored-by: neo <neo.dowithless@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Reinier van der Leer <pwuts@agpt.co>
Co-authored-by: Swifty <craigswift13@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ubbe <hi@ubbe.dev>
Co-authored-by: Lluis Agusti <hi@llu.lu>
## Changes 🏗️
Setup for the new Agent Runs page:
<img width="900" height="521" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-15 at 14 36 34"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/460d6611-4b15-4878-92d3-b477dc4453a9"
/>
It is behind a feature flag in Launch Darkly, `new-agent-runs`, so we
can progressively enable in staging and later on production.
### Other improvements
<img width="350" height="291" alt="Screenshot_2025-08-15_at_14 28 08"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/972d2a1a-a4cd-4e92-b6d7-2dcf7f57c2db"
/>
- Added a new `<ErrorCard />` component to paint gracefully API errors
when fetching data
- Moved some sub-components of the old library page to a nested
`/components` folder 📁
Behind a feature flag
## Checklist 📋
### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Tested with the feature flag ON and OFF
### For configuration changes:
None
---------
Co-authored-by: Abhimanyu Yadav <122007096+Abhi1992002@users.noreply.github.com>
In this project, I’ve added all the reusable, non-reactive components
that will be used in the new block menu. I’ve also included a new
library called `react-timeago` that helps us find related times.
### Checklist 📋
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Everything works perfectly locally
## Changes 🏗️
- Run the API query generation as part of the `dev` command
- update the `README` to reflect so
- Add CI job to generate queries and type-check to make sure we are not
out of sync
- the job is run both in Front-end and Back-end changes
- Generate the files via script to load the BE URL dynamically from the
env
- Remove generated files from Git
- rename the `type-check` command to `types`
## Checklist 📋
### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] CI passes
- [x] `README` updates make sense
#### For configuration changes:
None
---------
Co-authored-by: Zamil Majdy <zamil.majdy@agpt.co>
## Changes 🏗️
Add the following caps to the **Agent Activity Dropdown**:
- display activity only from the last 72h
- display up to 1000 items
## Checklist 📋
### For code changes
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Open the agent activity with a big amount of times locally
- [x] It displays up to a 1000 and with 72h cap
### For configuration changes
None
Co-authored-by: Abhimanyu Yadav <122007096+Abhi1992002@users.noreply.github.com>
- Resolves#10444
Sometimes, the order of nodes and/or links isn't consistent between
frontend and backend, which currently can result in unnecessary
re-saving of the graph when the user tries to run it.
Also, `sub_graphs` was not included in the frontend `Graph` type, which
can cause unchecked code issues when the object is propragated using
spread operators.
### Changes 🏗️
- fix(frontend/builder): Make `graphsEquivalent` insensitive to link and
node order
- dx(frontend): Fix typing of `Graph.sub_graphs` (and its variants)
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- Import an agent and open it in the builder
- Run it without making any changes to the graph itself
- [x] -> graph shouldn't re-save
I’ve added a new launch darkly flag to toggle between the new and old
block menu in the builder.
### Changes 🏗️
- A new flag name `NEW_BLOCK_MENU` has been added.
- A new block menu block has been created, which is a normal component.
It will be expanded with more components in the future. Currently, it’s
just a one-line component.
- A new control panel has been created, which improves state
localisation and has a new design according to the design files.
<img width="1512" height="981" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-18 at 2 49 54 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3deeefe3-9e42-4178-9cf9-77773ed7e172"
/>
### Checklist 📋
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Everything works perfectly on local.
### Changes 🏗️
- Generate API client for orval v7.11.2
- Fix type error in `useAgentSelectStep.ts`
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Platform works
- [x] Updated codepath in `useAgentSelectStep.ts` works
## Summary
Fixes three critical issues in the admin dashboard spending page
(SECRT-1438):
- Fixed user search not working (P1) - query parameters weren't being
passed to backend
- Fixed broken pagination (P1) - server-side GET requests missing query
parameters
- Added visual feedback for credit updates (P3) - toast notifications,
loading states, auto-dismiss modal
## Root Cause
Server-side API requests weren't appending query parameters for
GET/DELETE requests in the `makeAuthenticatedRequest` function in
`helpers.ts`.
## Changes
- Added missing `transaction_filter` parameter to API client's
`getUsersHistory` method
- Fixed server-side GET request query parameter handling by updating
`makeAuthenticatedRequest` to use `buildUrlWithQuery`
- Added Suspense key to force re-render on URL parameter changes
- Added toast notifications for success/error states when adding credits
- Modal now closes automatically after successful submission
- Added loading state with disabled buttons during credit submission
- Page refreshes automatically to show updated balances
- Added debug logging to help diagnose parameter passing issues
## Test Plan
- [x] Search for users by email in admin spending dashboard
- [x] Navigate through pagination (Next/Previous buttons)
- [x] Filter by transaction type (Grant, Usage, etc.)
- [x] Add credits to a user account
- [x] Verify toast notification appears
- [x] Verify modal closes after successful submission
- [x] Verify balance updates without manual refresh
## Linear Issue
Closes [SECRT-1438](https://linear.app/autogpt/issue/SECRT-1438)
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
<!-- Clearly explain the need for these changes: -->
We want to support ~~proxy curl~~ enrichlayer as an integration, and
this is a baseline way to get there
### Changes 🏗️
- Adds some subset of proxycurl blocks based on the API docs:
~~https://nubela.co/proxycurl/docs#people-api-person-profile-endpoint~~https://enrichlayer.com/docs/pc/#people-api
<!-- Concisely describe all of the changes made in this pull request:
-->
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] manually test the blocks with an API key
- [x] make sure the automated tests pass
---------
Co-authored-by: SwiftyOS <craigswift13@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude <claude@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: majdyz <zamil@agpt.co>
This PR has added end-to-end tests for the profile form page. These
tests include:
- Redirects to the login page when the user is not authenticated.
- Can save profile changes successfully.
- Can cancel profile changes (skipped because we need to fix the form
for this test).
### Changes 🏗️
- Added test-id's inside the ProfileInfoForm.
- Created a page object for the profile form page.
- Added a test for this page in `profile-form.spec.ts`.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] All test are working perfectly locally
I have added e2e tests for agent dashboard page
It includes, tests like
- dashboard page loads successfully
- submit agent button works correctly
- agent table displays data correctly
- agent table actions work correctly
I’ve also updated the e2e test script to include some static agent
submissions, so I can test if it loads on the frontend.
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] All tests are working perfectly locally
<img width="469" height="177" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-08 at 12 13 42 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5e37afc3-c151-476a-84de-0a06f44a0722"
/>
This PR helps us bypass the proxy server in server-side requests,
allowing us to directly send requests to the backend and reduce latency.
### Changes 🏗️
- Introduced server-side detection to dynamically set the base URL for
API requests.
- Added error handling for server-side requests to log failures and
throw errors appropriately.
- Updated header management to include authentication tokens when
applicable.
### Checklist 📋
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] All E2E tests are working.
- [x] I have manually checked the server-side and client-side
components, and both are working perfectly.
- Resolves -
https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/issues/10433
- Depends on -
https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/pull/10427
- Need to review this pr, once this issue is fixed -
https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/issues/10404
I’ve created additional tests for the agents marketplace page
Tests that I have added
- Add to library button works and agent appears in library.
- Download button functionality works.
- Agent page details are visible.
- User can access agent page when logged in.
- User can access agent page when logged out
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] I have done all the tests and they are working perfectly
---------
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Tindle <nicholas.tindle@agpt.co>
Co-authored-by: Lluis Agusti <hi@llu.lu>
Co-authored-by: Zamil Majdy <zamil.majdy@agpt.co>
Co-authored-by: Ubbe <hi@ubbe.dev>
We currently use infinite scroll pagination in multiple places, but our
strategies vary across these locations. This repetitive code writing is
not ideal, and our current methods are also complex. We’re not utilising
React Query’s useInfiniteQuery hooks effectively.
To address these issues, we’re introducing a new component called
`InfiniteScroll` that handles pagination independently.
### How to use it?
- Use React Query’s `useInfiniteHook` to return multiple data points.
For pagination, we only need `fetchNextPage`, `hasNextPage`, and
`isFetchingNextPage`.
```ts
const {
data: agents,
fetchNextPage,
hasNextPage,
isFetchingNextPage,
isLoading: agentLoading,
} = useGetV2ListLibraryAgentsInfinite(
{
page: 1,
page_size: 8,
search_term: searchTerm || undefined,
sort_by: librarySort,
},
);
```
- Simply pass these three data points and the current data length to the
`InfiniteScroll` component. That's it
```tsx
<InfiniteScroll
dataLength={agents.length}
isFetchingNextPage={isFetchingNextPage}
fetchNextPage={fetchNextPage}
hasNextPage={hasNextPage}
loader={<LoadingSpinner />}
>
...
```
### Changes
- Add the `InfiniteScroll.tsx` component for consistency and simplicity
in pagination across the frontend.
- Update the current library page to use the `InfiniteScroll` component.
### Checklist 📋
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] I’ve tested everything locally, and it’s working perfectly fine.
- Resolves -
https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/issues/10428
- Depends on -
https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/pull/10427
- Need to review this pr, once this issue is fixed -
https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/issues/10404
I’ve created additional tests for the creators marketplace page
Tests that I have added
- User can access creator's page when logged out.
- User can access creator's page when logged in.
- Creator page details are visible.
- Agents in agent by sections navigation works.
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] I have done all the tests and they are working perfectly
Make agent graph execution durable by making it retriable. When it fails
to retry, we should make the error visible to the UI.
<img width="900" height="495" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/70e3e117-31e7-4704-8bdf-1802c6afc70b"
/>
<img width="900" height="407" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/78ca6c28-6cc2-4aff-bfa9-9f94b7f89f77"
/>
### Changes 🏗️
* Make _on_graph_execution retriable
* Increase retry count for failing db-manager RPC
* Add test coverage for RPC failure retry
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] Allow graph execution retry
## Summary
- Adds AI-generated activity status summaries for agent execution
results
- Provides users with conversational, non-technical summaries of what
their agents accomplished
- Includes comprehensive execution data analysis with honest failure
reporting
## Changes Made
- **Backend**: Added `ActivityStatusGenerator` module with async LLM
integration
- **Database**: Extended `GraphExecutionStats` and `Stats` models with
`activity_status` field
- **Frontend**: Added "Smart Agent Execution Summary" display with
disclaimer tooltip
- **Settings**: Added `execution_enable_ai_activity_status` toggle
(disabled by default)
- **Testing**: Comprehensive test suite with 12 test cases covering all
scenarios
## Key Features
- Collects execution data including graph structure, node relations,
errors, and I/O samples
- Generates user-friendly summaries from first-person perspective
- Honest reporting of failures and invalid inputs (no sugar-coating)
- Payload optimization for LLM context limits
- Full async implementation with proper error handling
## Test Plan
- [x] All existing tests pass
- [x] New comprehensive test suite covers success/failure scenarios
- [x] Feature toggle testing (enabled/disabled states)
- [x] Frontend integration displays correctly
- [x] Error handling and edge cases covered
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
## Changes 🏗️
- Moved API call from `usePublishAgentModal` to `useAgentInfoStep` for
better encapsulation
- overall cleaner state management + [state
colocation](https://kentcdodds.com/blog/state-colocation-will-make-your-react-app-faster)
- Added loading states with a spinner to the submit button during API
call
- Removed redundant validation: now relies entirely on zod schema
validation
- All thumbnails now use 16:9 (`aspect-video`) aspect ratio for
consistency
- Highlight selected thumbnails with blue border
- Table alignment fixes
- Rename `Edit` action to `View` to better reflect the content of the
modal that appears when clicked...
## Checklist 📋
### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] API calls work with loading states in Agent Info Step
- [x] Image aspect ratios are consistent across all components
- [x] Form validation works through zod schema only
### For configuration changes:
None
## Changes 🏗️
### Why these changes
We have a high-priority bug where the publish agent modal wouldn't open
when clicking `Edit` on the Dashboard Creator page table. The create
form was also buggy.
When looking into the code, I noticed it was pretty messy. I went ahead
and refactored it:
- [x] separation of concerns ( _split render / hook logic_ )
- [x] split into sub-components ( `PublishAgentModal/components` )
- [x] colocated state ( moved state to the modal steps rather than
having everything top-level )
- [x] used the new Design System components
Overall, we end up with a cleaner and stable experience ✨
### E2E tests
I also added E2E tests 🤖 to make sure we catch regressions in the future
in this modal. For now, it tests the first 2 steps. It does not do image
upload and publish as that wasn't working locally ( _might iterate on
that later_ )
### Step 1 – Select Agent
<img width="1161" height="859" alt="Screenshot 2025-07-29 at 16 12 46"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a4949fb0-1a44-4926-a374-51eefadef063"
/>
### Step 2 – Agent Info Form
<img width="1061" height="804" alt="Screenshot 2025-07-29 at 16 03 11"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b9a45bda-18ea-4844-b52c-db499f45193e"
/>
### Step 3 – Agent Review
<img width="1480" height="867" alt="Screenshot 2025-07-29 at 16 11 07"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/248bdf58-886d-43f3-a37a-35fd1a83e566"
/>
## Checklist 📋
### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] open the modal through the Account menu → ( `Publish Agent` )
- [x] complete the form and check validation errors
- [x] add images and generate image
- [x] publish the agent
- [x] the agent shows up on the table
- [x] Open an agent under review in the table ( _click `Edit` on the
actions_ )
- [x] it opens the modal on the 3rd step ( _review step_ )
### For configuration changes:
None
---------
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Abhimanyu Yadav <122007096+Abhi1992002@users.noreply.github.com>
## Changes 🏗️
My previous PR,
https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/pull/10480, didn't fully
resolve the issue of broken links sometimes appearing for some runs in
the Agent Activity dropdown.
- Fixed the logic ( verified with a deployment in dev... )
- Simplified logic, making less API calls
- If we have an execution without a clear agent ID, we display it but
don't link to it
- Re-generated API types ( _had to update call in dashboard agents
because of it_ )
## Checklist 📋
### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Run agents
- [x] Runs appear correctly in the activity dropdown without broken
links
### For configuration changes:
None
## Changes 🏗️
Fix the issue where sometimes the agent activity would show a link to
agent runs that are not available in the library. So only show runs that
can be verified in the library. Improve the display of the agent name as
well 🤔
## Checklist 📋
### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Run agents
- [x] There are no empty links on the activity dropdown
- [x] Agent names look good 💅🏽
### For configuration changes:
None
## Changes 🏗️
There is a bug where the agent activity dropdown bubble only shows up to
`6` even if there are `50 running agents`. We only display the last 6
runs in the dropdown, but the bubble badge count should show the correct
all running agents.
On top of that we added the option to search runs by agent name when you
have more than 6 recent runs:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/931e3db7-5715-48d1-b4df-22490fae9de0
- Also make the dropdown items a link ( `a` ) so that you can command
click them to open runs in new tabs.
- Keep up to `400` executions on the state ( worse case load test )
- Each execution object is relatively small (ID, status, timestamps,
agent info)
- 400 objects × ~`1KB` each = negligible memory footprint `400kb`
- Always display running agents at the top
- Only display runs from the last week on the dropdown
- the agent library page contains the historical runs, this is just to
show the recent ones
### Code changes
- **Added count tracking**
- the `NotificationState` interface now includes separate count fields
(`activeCount`, `recentCompletionsCount`, `recentFailuresCount`) to
track the actual numbers independent of display limits.
- **Dual array system:**
- the `categorizeExecutions` function now creates:
- unlimited arrays for counting all executions
- limited arrays (sliced to 6 items) for dropdown display
- Updated all helper functions to properly maintain both the display
arrays and the count fields.
- Component uses actual counts
- `<AgentActivityDropdown />` component now uses `activeCount` for the
badge and hover hint instead of `activeExecutions.length`
## Checklist 📋
### For code changes
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Login and navigate to library or build
- [x] Start running agents like there is no tomorrow
- [x] The badge shows the correct agent execution count ( .i.e 10 )
- [x] The dropdown only displays the 6 most recent
- [x] You can command click on the runs and they open in new tabs
### For configuration changes
None
We want scrolling for agent dialog list
- Based on #9833
### Changes 🏗️
- adds backend support for paginating this content
- adds frontend support for scrolling pagination
<!-- Concisely describe all of the changes made in this pull request:
-->
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] test UI for this
---------
Co-authored-by: Venkat Sai Kedari Nath Gandham <154089422+Kedarinath1502@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude <claude@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
## Changes 🏗️
- Close websocket connections gracefully during logout ( _whether from
another tab or not_ )
- Also fixed an error on `HeroSection` that shows when the onboarding is
disabled locally ( `null` )
- Uncomment legit tests about connecting/saving agents
- Centralise local storage usage through a single service with typed
keys
## Checklist 📋
### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Login in 3 tabs ( 1 builder, 1 marketplace, 1 agent run view )
- [x] Logout from the marketplace tab
- [x] The other tabs show logout state gracefully without toasts or
errors
- [x] Websocket connections are closed ( _devtools console shows that_ )
### For configuration changes:
None
This PR implements a comprehensive Ayrshare social media integration for
AutoGPT Platform, enabling users to post content across multiple social
media platforms through a unified interface. Ayrshare provides a single
API to manage posts across Facebook, Twitter/X, LinkedIn, Instagram,
YouTube, TikTok, Pinterest, Reddit, Telegram, Google My Business,
Bluesky, Snapchat, and Threads.
The integration addresses the need for social media automation and
content distribution workflows within AutoGPT agents, allowing users to:
- Connect their social media accounts via SSO
- Post content with platform-specific options and constraints
- Schedule posts across multiple platforms simultaneously
- Handle platform-specific media requirements and validation
⚠️ To simplify the review process all except the twitter post block has
been commented out, future pr's will uncomment other platfroms so we can
test them in isolation.
### Changes 🏗️
#### Backend Integration (`backend/integrations/ayrshare.py`)
- **AyrshareClient**: Complete API client implementation with post
creation, profile management, and JWT generation
- **SocialPlatform enum**: Comprehensive platform definitions for all
supported social networks
- **Response models**: PostResponse, ProfileResponse, JWTResponse for
type-safe API interactions
- **Error handling**: Custom AyrshareAPIException with proper HTTP
status code handling
#### Social Media Posting Blocks (`backend/blocks/ayrshare/post.py`)
- **BaseAyrshareInput**: Shared input schema with common fields (post
text, media URLs, scheduling, etc.)
- **Platform-specific blocks**: 13 dedicated posting blocks, each with
platform-specific validation and options:
- PostToFacebookBlock: Carousel, Reels, Stories, targeting, alt text
- PostToXBlock: Threads, polls, long posts, premium features, subtitles
- PostToLinkedInBlock: Document support, visibility controls, audience
targeting
- PostToInstagramBlock: Stories, Reels, user tags, collaborators
- PostToYouTubeBlock: Video uploads, playlists, visibility, country
targeting
- PostToPinterestBlock: Pins, carousels, board management
- PostToTikTokBlock: Video/image posts, AI labeling, brand content
- PostToRedditBlock: Basic posting functionality
- PostToTelegramBlock: GIF handling, mentions
- PostToGMBBlock: Event/offer posts, call-to-action buttons
- PostToBlueskyBlock: Character limit validation, alt text
- PostToSnapchatBlock: Story types, video thumbnails
- PostToThreadsBlock: Hashtag restrictions, carousel support
#### Helper Models
- **CarouselItem**: Facebook carousel configuration
- **CallToAction, EventDetails, OfferDetails**: Google My Business post
types
- **InstagramUserTag**: Instagram user tagging with coordinates
- **LinkedInTargeting**: LinkedIn audience targeting options
- **PinterestCarouselOption**: Pinterest carousel image options
- **YouTubeTargeting**: YouTube country blocking/allowing
#### Authentication & SSO (`backend/server/integrations/router.py`)
- **SSO endpoint**: `/integrations/ayrshare/sso_url` for account linking
- **Profile management**: Automatic profile creation and key management
- **JWT generation**: Secure token generation for social media account
linking
- **Platform allowlist**: Configured access to all supported social
platforms
#### Frontend Integration (`frontend/src/components/CustomNode.tsx`)
- **AYRSHARE block type**: New BlockUIType.AYRSHARE for
Ayrshare-specific nodes
- **SSO button**: "Connect Social Media Accounts" with loading states
- **Handle generation**: Special handling for Ayrshare blocks with SSO
integration
#### Configuration
- **Environment variables**: Added AYRSHARE_API_KEY and AYRSHARE_JWT_KEY
to .env.example
- **Block registration**: All Ayrshare blocks registered in
AYRSHARE_NODE_IDS array
#### Type Safety & Error Handling
- **Modern typing**: Updated to use `list`, `dict`, `Any` instead of
legacy typing
- **Comprehensive validation**: Platform-specific constraints (character
limits, media counts, file types)
- **User-friendly errors**: Clear error messages for validation failures
and API errors
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
**Test Plan:**
**Backend API Testing:**
- [x] Verify AyrshareClient initializes correctly with API key
- [x] Test JWT generation for SSO authentication
- [x] Test profile creation and management
- [x] Verify all 13 posting blocks are properly registered
- [x] Test platform-specific validation rules for each block
- [x] Verify error handling for missing credentials and API failures
**Frontend Integration Testing:**
- [x] Verify AYRSHARE block type renders correctly in flow editor
- [x] Test SSO button functionality and popup window behavior
- [x] Confirm loading states work properly during authentication
- [x] Verify input handles generate correctly for Ayrshare blocks
- [x] Test platform-specific input fields and validation
**End-to-End Workflow Testing:**
- [x] Create agent with Ayrshare posting blocks
- [x] Test SSO flow: click "Connect Social Media Accounts" button
- [x] Verify popup opens with Ayrshare authentication page
- [x] Test social media account linking process
- [x] Create posts with various platform-specific options:
- [ X ] X (Twitter) - tested basic posting with image
- [] Test scheduling functionality across platforms
- [x] Verify media upload constraints and validation
- [] Test error handling for invalid inputs and failed posts
**Error Case Testing:**
- [] Test behavior with missing AYRSHARE_API_KEY configuration
- [] Test invalid social media credentials handling
- [] Test network failure scenarios
- [] Verify platform-specific validation error messages
- [] Test character limit enforcement per platform
- [] Test media file type and size restrictions
**Security Testing:**
- [ x ] Verify JWT tokens are properly generated and validated
- [x] Test profile key isolation between users
- [x] Confirm sensitive credentials are not logged
- [x] Verify SSO popup prevents XSS attacks
#### For configuration changes:
- [x] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [x] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [x] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
**Configuration Changes:**
- Added `AYRSHARE_API_KEY` environment variable for Ayrshare API
authentication
- Added `AYRSHARE_JWT_KEY` environment variable for SSO token generation
- No docker-compose.yml changes required (uses existing backend
services)
---------
Co-authored-by: Reinier van der Leer <pwuts@agpt.co>
## Overview
This PR adds comprehensive Airtable integration to the AutoGPT platform,
enabling users to seamlessly connect their Airtable bases with AutoGPT
workflows for powerful no-code automation capabilities.
## Why Airtable Integration?
Airtable is one of the most popular no-code databases used by teams for
project management, CRMs, inventory tracking, and countless other use
cases. This integration brings significant value:
- **Data Automation**: Automate data entry, updates, and synchronization
between Airtable and other services
- **Workflow Triggers**: React to changes in Airtable bases with
webhook-based triggers
- **Schema Management**: Programmatically create and manage Airtable
table structures
- **Bulk Operations**: Efficiently process large amounts of data with
batch create/update/delete operations
## Key Features
### 🔌 Webhook Trigger
- **AirtableWebhookTriggerBlock**: Listens for changes in Airtable bases
and triggers workflows
- Supports filtering by table, view, and specific fields
- Includes webhook signature validation for security
### 📊 Record Operations
- **AirtableCreateRecordsBlock**: Create single or multiple records (up
to 10 at once)
- **AirtableUpdateRecordsBlock**: Update existing records with upsert
support
- **AirtableDeleteRecordsBlock**: Delete single or multiple records
- **AirtableGetRecordBlock**: Retrieve specific record details
- **AirtableListRecordsBlock**: Query records with filtering, sorting,
and pagination
### 🏗️ Schema Management
- **AirtableCreateTableBlock**: Create new tables with custom field
definitions
- **AirtableUpdateTableBlock**: Modify table properties
- **AirtableAddFieldBlock**: Add new fields to existing tables
- **AirtableUpdateFieldBlock**: Update field properties
## Technical Implementation Details
### Authentication
- Supports both API Key and OAuth authentication methods
- OAuth implementation includes proper token refresh handling
- Credentials are securely managed through the platform's credential
system
### Webhook Security
- Added `credentials` parameter to WebhooksManager interface for proper
signature validation
- HMAC-SHA256 signature verification ensures webhook authenticity
- Webhook cursor tracking prevents duplicate event processing
### API Integration
- Comprehensive API client (`_api.py`) with full type safety
- Proper error handling and response validation
- Support for all Airtable field types and operations
## Changes 🏗️
### Added Blocks:
- AirtableWebhookTriggerBlock
- AirtableCreateRecordsBlock
- AirtableDeleteRecordsBlock
- AirtableGetRecordBlock
- AirtableListRecordsBlock
- AirtableUpdateRecordsBlock
- AirtableAddFieldBlock
- AirtableCreateTableBlock
- AirtableUpdateFieldBlock
- AirtableUpdateTableBlock
### Modified Files:
- Updated WebhooksManager interface to support credential-based
validation
- Modified all webhook handlers to support the new interface
## Test Plan 📋
### Manual Testing Performed:
1. **Authentication Testing**
- ✅ Verified API key authentication works correctly
- ✅ Tested OAuth flow including token refresh
- ✅ Confirmed credentials are properly encrypted and stored
2. **Webhook Testing**
- ✅ Created webhook subscriptions for different table events
- ✅ Verified signature validation prevents unauthorized requests
- ✅ Tested cursor tracking to ensure no duplicate events
- ✅ Confirmed webhook cleanup on block deletion
3. **Record Operations Testing**
- ✅ Created single and batch records with various field types
- ✅ Updated records with and without upsert functionality
- ✅ Listed records with filtering, sorting, and pagination
- ✅ Deleted single and multiple records
- ✅ Retrieved individual record details
4. **Schema Management Testing**
- ✅ Created tables with multiple field types
- ✅ Added fields to existing tables
- ✅ Updated table and field properties
- ✅ Verified proper error handling for invalid field types
5. **Error Handling Testing**
- ✅ Tested with invalid credentials
- ✅ Verified proper error messages for API limits
- ✅ Confirmed graceful handling of network errors
### Security Considerations 🔒
1. **API Key Management**
- API keys are stored encrypted in the credential system
- Keys are never logged or exposed in error messages
- Credentials are passed securely through the execution context
2. **Webhook Security**
- HMAC-SHA256 signature validation on all incoming webhooks
- Webhook URLs use secure ingress endpoints
- Proper cleanup of webhooks when blocks are deleted
3. **OAuth Security**
- OAuth tokens are securely stored and refreshed
- Scopes are limited to necessary permissions
- Token refresh happens automatically before expiration
## Configuration Requirements
No additional environment variables or configuration changes are
required. The integration uses the existing credential management
system.
## Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have read the [contributing
instructions](https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/blob/master/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md)
- [x] Confirmed that `make lint` passes
- [x] Confirmed that `make test` passes
- [x] Updated documentation where needed
- [x] Added/updated tests for new functionality
- [x] Manually tested all blocks with real Airtable bases
- [x] Verified backwards compatibility of webhook interface changes
#### Security:
- [x] No hard-coded secrets or sensitive information
- [x] Proper input validation on all user inputs
- [x] Secure credential handling throughout
<!-- Clearly explain the need for these changes: -->
### Changes 🏗️
<!-- Concisely describe all of the changes made in this pull request:
-->
This PR contains code changes that will resolve the cursor jump issue in
the **Note** block #9252 . The changes in code affects the
NodeTextBoxInput component to transfer the state into local state and
not mutate the `value` prop directly.
Also includes change to use store admin which is from rebase issue but
approved by maintainer @ntindle
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Tested the note block allows to edit text normally
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f2800bf1-9867-4627-ac9d-44718627b263
---------
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Tindle <nicholas.tindle@agpt.co>
Co-authored-by: Abhimanyu Yadav <122007096+Abhi1992002@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Zamil Majdy <zamil.majdy@agpt.co>
Co-authored-by: Ubbe <hi@ubbe.dev>
## Changes 🏗️https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/42e1c896-5f3b-447c-aee9-4f5963c217d9
There is now a 🔔 icon on the Navigation bar that shows previous agent
runs and displays real-time agent running status.
If you run an agent, the bell will show on a badge how many agents are
running. If you hover over it, a hint appears. If you click on it, it
opens a dropdown and displays the executions with their status ( _which
should match what we have in library functionality, not design-wise_ ).
I leveraged the existing APIs for this purpose. Most of the run logic is
[encapsulated on this
hook](https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/compare/dev...feat/agent-notifications?expand=1#diff-a9e7f2904d6283b094aca19b64c7168e8c66be1d5e0bb454be8978cb98526617)
and is also an independent `<AgentActivityDropdown />` component.
Clicking on an agent run opens that run in the library page.
This new functionality is covered by E2E tests 💆🏽✔️
## Checklist 📋
### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] The navigation bar layout looks good when logged out
- [x] The navigation bar layout looks good when logged in
- [x] Open an agent in the library and click `Run`
- [x] See the real-time activity of the agent running on the navigation
bar bell icon
### For configuration changes:
_No configuration changes needed._
## Changes 🏗️
Launch Darkly is not being initialised in production, despite on paper
all env variables being well set 🧐
I tried doing production builds locally, and I noticed this provider
needs to be initialised on the client because Launch Darkly flags are
designed to work on the client side, where they can access user context
and browser environment.
## Checklist 📋
### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Did production build locally and run it
- [x] See LD initialised on the console after the `use client` directive
was added
### For configuration changes:
None
## Changes 🏗️https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/dd635fa1-d8ea-4e5b-b719-2c7df8e57832
Using [LaunchDarkly](https://launchdarkly.com/), introduce the concept
of "beta" blocks, which are blocks that will be disabled in production
unless enabled via a feature flag. This allows us to safely hide and
test certain blocks in production safely.
## Checklist 📋
### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Checkout and run FE locally
- [x] With the `beta-blocks` flag `disabled` in LD
- [x] Go to the builder and see **you can't** add the blocks specified
on the flag
- [x] With the `beta-blocks` flag `enabled` in LD
- [x] Go to the builder and see **you can** add the blocks specified on
the flag
### For configuration changes:
- [x] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
🚧 We need to add the `NEXT_PUBLIC_LAUNCHDARKLY_CLIENT_ID` to the dev and
prod environments.
## Summary
This PR introduces a complete cloud storage infrastructure and file
upload system that agents can use instead of passing base64 data
directly in inputs, while maintaining backward compatibility for the
builder's node inputs.
### Problem Statement
Currently, when agents need to process files, they pass base64-encoded
data directly in the input, which has several limitations:
1. **Size limitations**: Base64 encoding increases file size by ~33%,
making large files impractical
2. **Memory usage**: Large base64 strings consume significant memory
during processing
3. **Network overhead**: Base64 data is sent repeatedly in API requests
4. **Performance impact**: Encoding/decoding base64 adds processing
overhead
### Solution
This PR introduces a complete cloud storage infrastructure and new file
upload workflow:
1. **New cloud storage system**: Complete `CloudStorageHandler` with
async GCS operations
2. **New upload endpoint**: Agents upload files via `/files/upload` and
receive a `file_uri`
3. **GCS storage**: Files are stored in Google Cloud Storage with
user-scoped paths
4. **URI references**: Agents pass the `file_uri` instead of base64 data
5. **Block processing**: File blocks can retrieve actual file content
using the URI
### Changes Made
#### New Files Introduced:
- **`backend/util/cloud_storage.py`** - Complete cloud storage
infrastructure (545 lines)
- **`backend/util/cloud_storage_test.py`** - Comprehensive test suite
(471 lines)
#### Backend Changes:
- **New cloud storage infrastructure** in
`backend/util/cloud_storage.py`:
- Complete `CloudStorageHandler` class with async GCS operations
- Support for multiple cloud providers (GCS implemented, S3/Azure
prepared)
- User-scoped and execution-scoped file storage with proper
authorization
- Automatic file expiration with metadata-based cleanup
- Path traversal protection and comprehensive security validation
- Async file operations with proper error handling and logging
- **New `UploadFileResponse` model** in `backend/server/model.py`:
- Returns `file_uri` (GCS path like
`gcs://bucket/users/{user_id}/file.txt`)
- Includes `file_name`, `size`, `content_type`, `expires_in_hours`
- Proper Pydantic schema instead of dictionary response
- **New `upload_file` endpoint** in `backend/server/routers/v1.py`:
- Complete new endpoint for file upload with cloud storage integration
- Returns GCS path URI directly as `file_uri`
- Supports user-scoped file storage for proper isolation
- Maintains fallback to base64 data URI when GCS not configured
- File size validation, virus scanning, and comprehensive error handling
#### Frontend Changes:
- **Updated API client** in
`frontend/src/lib/autogpt-server-api/client.ts`:
- Modified return type to expect `file_uri` instead of `signed_url`
- Supports the new upload workflow
- **Enhanced file input component** in
`frontend/src/components/type-based-input.tsx`:
- **Builder nodes**: Still use base64 for immediate data retention
without expiration
- **Agent inputs**: Use the new upload endpoint and pass `file_uri`
references
- Maintains backward compatibility for existing workflows
#### Test Updates:
- **New comprehensive test suite** in
`backend/util/cloud_storage_test.py`:
- 27 test cases covering all cloud storage functionality
- Tests for file storage, retrieval, authorization, and cleanup
- Tests for path validation, security, and error handling
- Coverage for user-scoped, execution-scoped, and system storage
- **New upload endpoint tests** in `backend/server/routers/v1_test.py`:
- Tests for GCS path URI format (`gcs://bucket/path`)
- Tests for base64 fallback when GCS not configured
- Validates file upload, virus scanning, and size limits
- Tests user-scoped file storage and access control
### Benefits
1. **New Infrastructure**: Complete cloud storage system with
enterprise-grade features
2. **Scalability**: Supports larger files without base64 size penalties
3. **Performance**: Reduces memory usage and network overhead with async
operations
4. **Security**: User-scoped file storage with comprehensive access
control and path validation
5. **Flexibility**: Maintains base64 support for builder nodes while
providing URI-based approach for agents
6. **Extensibility**: Designed for multiple cloud providers (GCS, S3,
Azure)
7. **Reliability**: Automatic file expiration, cleanup, and robust error
handling
8. **Backward compatibility**: Existing builder workflows continue to
work unchanged
### Usage
**For Agent Inputs:**
```typescript
// 1. Upload file
const response = await api.uploadFile(file);
// 2. Pass file_uri to agent
const agentInput = { file_input: response.file_uri };
```
**For Builder Nodes (unchanged):**
```typescript
// Still uses base64 for immediate data retention
const nodeInput = { file_input: "data:image/jpeg;base64,..." };
```
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] All new cloud storage tests pass (27/27)
- [x] All upload file tests pass (7/7)
- [x] Full v1 router test suite passes (21/21)
- [x] All server tests pass (126/126)
- [x] Backend formatting and linting pass
- [x] Frontend TypeScript compilation succeeds
- [x] Verified GCS path URI format (`gcs://bucket/path`)
- [x] Tested fallback to base64 data URI when GCS not configured
- [x] Confirmed file upload functionality works in UI
- [x] Validated response schema matches Pydantic model
- [x] Tested agent workflow with file_uri references
- [x] Verified builder nodes still work with base64 data
- [x] Tested user-scoped file access control
- [x] Verified file expiration and cleanup functionality
- [x] Tested security validation and path traversal protection
#### For configuration changes:
- [x] No new configuration changes required
- [x] `.env.example` remains compatible
- [x] `docker-compose.yml` remains compatible
- [x] Uses existing GCS configuration from media storage
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude AI <claude@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Tindle <nicholas.tindle@agpt.co>
## Changes 🏗️
<img width="1843" height="321" alt="Screenshot 2025-07-17 at 15 48 01"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/63f528f7-1dc3-4587-a5af-d02b2c858191"
/>
In this recent PR
https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/pull/10394/ the
navigation bar disappeared when logged out. A change was introduced
where the navigation bar does not show up if we don't have profile data
( _which we won't have when logged out_ ). This solves it + adds tests
covering the navigation bar in the logged out state.
## Checklist 📋
### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Run this locally
- [x] See the navbar appearing
- [x] E2E tests pass on the CI
### For configuration changes:
None
## Changes 🏗️
### User creation tests
Now, all tests use the users created via the platform signup in
`global-setup.ts`. Their login details are on a `.auth/user-pool.json`
file. I have the delete the logic that created tests users via Supabase
directly.
### Build tests speed
I have refactored the builder tests, so that, instead of adding 100s of
blocks under a given test user session, a new test user logins and adds
block for each letter:
```
Test user 1
- logins and adds blocks starting with "a"
Test user 2
- logins and adds blocks starting with "b"
```
Given that we know the builder becomes slow once we have 30 or more
blocks, in this way a test user never adds more than 10 blocks on a
given test ( _without losing coverage_ ), so we don't need time-outs or
artificially waiting due to the UI being slow.
### Readability test changes
Refactor existing tests, using short-hand utilities, to be:
- easier to write
- clearer to read
- easier to debug
```ts
// Selectors
getId("id") // --> page.getByTestId("id")
getText("foo") // --> page.getByText("id")
getButton("Run") // --> page.getByRole("button", {name: "Run"}
...
// Assetions
const btn = getButton("Save")
isVisible(btn) // --> expect(btn).toBeVisible()
```
These utilities live under `selectors.ts` and `assertions.ts`. Their
usage is optional but encouraged.
## Checklist 📋
### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Refactored tests code looks good
- [x] E2E tests are 🟢 on the CI
### For configuration changes:
No config changes
This update enhances the performance and user experience by allowing
data to be prefetched, reducing loading times on the frontend.
### Changes
- Introduced `usePrefetch` in Orval configuration to support
prefetching.
- Added prefetch queries for user profiles, admin listings history,
notification preferences, and execution schedules.
- Updated OpenAPI specifications to include descriptions for provider
names and adjusted required fields in request models.
- Enhanced the Navbar component to utilize the new prefetch
functionality for user profile data.
- Improved type definitions for various models to ensure better
integration with the API.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] I’ve checked everything manually, and everything is working fine.
## Changes 🏗️
<img width="800" height="265" alt="Screenshot 2025-07-16 at 13 10 57"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/01164bde-0523-4284-bf74-d1a735b77d5c"
/>
When redoing the navigation bar, I moved the profile query to be
executed on the server using the new
[react-query](https://tanstack.com/query/latest) generated hooks.
The README [states the new hooks can be called on the
server](https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/blob/master/autogpt_platform/frontend/README.md#server-side-prefetching),
but when looking deeply into the implementation of
[`custom-mutator.ts`](https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/blob/master/autogpt_platform/frontend/src/app/api/mutators/custom-mutator.ts),
it turns out they can not ( yet ) as `custom-mutator` calls the proxy
API ( _which can't be called from a RSC_ 😅 ).
### Solution
For now, I changed the call to be made through the old `BackendAPI`,
which can be called client and server side ✅ ( _I did that as part of
the server 🍪 migration_ ) and added an E2E test to catch this ever
disappears again.
Next, I will open a separate PR refactoring `custom-mutator` so that it
can be called on the server.
## Checklist 📋
### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Run the app
- [x] Login
- [x] You see your account name and email when opening the account menu
## Changes 🏗️
- Put `Continue with Google` button below the other button on the forms
( _to confirm with design_ )
- Ensure some vertical spacing so the forms don't end touching the
header on small screens
- Apply style adjustments asked by design on navbar links
## Checklist 📋
### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Check the above
### For configuration changes:
None
- Resolves#10313
- Resolves#10333
Before:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a105b2b0-a90b-4bc6-89da-bef3f5a5fa1f
- No credentials input
- Stuttery experience when panning or zooming the viewport
After:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f58d7864-055f-4e1c-a221-57154467c3aa
- Pretty much the same UX as in the Library, with fully-fledged
credentials input support
- Much smoother when moving around the canvas
### Changes 🏗️
Frontend:
- Add credentials input support to Run UX in Builder
- Pass run inputs instead of storing them on the input nodes
- Re-implement `RunnerInputUI` using `AgentRunDetailsView`; rename to
`RunnerInputDialog`
- Make `AgentRunDraftView` more flexible
- Remove `RunnerInputList`, `RunnerInputBlock`
- Make moving around in the Builder *smooooth* by reducing unnecessary
re-renders
- Clean up and partially re-write bead management logic
- Replace `request*` fire-and-forget methods in `useAgentGraph` with
direct action async callbacks
- Clean up run input UI components
- Simplify `RunnerUIWrapper`
- Add `isEmpty` utility function in `@/lib/utils` (expanding on
`_.isEmpty`)
- Fix default value handling in `TypeBasedInput` (**Note:** after all
the changes I've made I'm not sure this is still necessary)
- Improve & clean up Builder test implementations
Backend + API:
- Fix front-end `Node`, `GraphMeta`, and `Block` types
- Small refactor of `Graph` to match naming of some `LibraryAgent`
attributes
- Fix typing of `list_graphs`,
`get_graph_meta_by_store_listing_version_id` endpoints
- Add `GraphMeta` model and `GraphModel.meta()` shortcut
- Move `POST /library/agents/{library_agent_id}/setup-trigger` to `POST
/library/presets/setup-trigger`
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- Test the new functionality in the Builder:
- [x] Running an agent with (credentials) inputs from the builder
- [x] Beads behave correctly
- [x] Running an agent without any inputs from the builder
- [x] Scheduling an agent from the builder
- [x] Adding and searching blocks in the block menu
- [x] Test that all existing `AgentRunDraftView` functionality in the
Library still works the same
- [x] Run an agent
- [x] Schedule an agent
- [x] View past runs
- [x] Run an agent with inputs, then edit the agent's inputs and view
the agent in the Library (should be fine)
## Changes 🏗️
<img width="800" alt="Screenshot 2025-07-07 at 13 16 44"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0d404958-d4c9-454d-b71a-9dd677fe0fdc"
/>
<img width="800" alt="Screenshot 2025-07-07 at 13 17 08"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1142f6d5-a6af-485d-b42e-98afd26de3ed"
/>
Update the UI of the logged-out pages ( _login, signup,
reset-password..._ ) using the new Design System components, so the app
starts to look a bit more cohesive 💆🏽
Some notes:
- I refactored the `<AuthCard />` components a bit to be easier to use
- I split the render from hook login on login/signup
- I added a couple of modals to improve the UX when logging in with
Google or using non-whitelisted emails
- _see below my comments for more context_
- When there are API errors, they are shown in a toast to prevent the
layout of the form from jumping
- When using the components in the UI, an issue with border-radius, see
comments for an explanation
## Checklist 📋
### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Logout on the platform
- [x] Check the updated Login/Signup/Reset password pages
- [x] The UI looks good and is consistent
- [x] The forms work as expected
## Changes 🏗️
<img width="900" height="327" alt="Screenshot 2025-07-10 at 20 12 38"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/044f00ed-7e05-46b7-a821-ce1cb0ee9298"
/>
<br /><br />
Navbar updated to look pretty from the new designs:
- the logo is now centred instead of on the left
- menu items have been updated to a smaller font-size and less radius
- icons have been updated
I also generated the API files ( _sorry for the noise_ ). I had to do
some border-radius and button updates on the atoms/tokens for it to look
good.
## Checklist 📋
## For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Login/logout
- [x] The new navbar looks good across screens
## For configuration changes
No config changes
## Changes 🏗️
Style refinements on Toasts.
## Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Check Storybook toast stories
- [x] They match Figma
#### For configuration changes:
None
## Block Development SDK - Simplifying Block Creation
### Problem
Currently, creating a new block requires manual updates to **5+ files**
scattered across the codebase:
- `backend/data/block_cost_config.py` - Manually add block costs
- `backend/integrations/credentials_store.py` - Add default credentials
- `backend/integrations/providers.py` - Register new providers
- `backend/integrations/oauth/__init__.py` - Register OAuth handlers
- `backend/integrations/webhooks/__init__.py` - Register webhook
managers
This creates significant friction for developers, increases the chance
of configuration errors, and makes the platform difficult to scale.
### Solution
This PR introduces a **Block Development SDK** that provides:
- Single import for all block development needs: `from backend.sdk
import *`
- Automatic registration of all block configurations
- Zero external file modifications required
- Provider-based configuration with inheritance
### Changes 🏗️
#### 1. **New SDK Module** (`backend/sdk/`)
- **`__init__.py`**: Unified exports of 68+ block development components
- **`registry.py`**: Central auto-registration system for all block
configurations
- **`builder.py`**: `ProviderBuilder` class for fluent provider
configuration
- **`provider.py`**: Provider configuration management
- **`cost_integration.py`**: Automatic cost application system
#### 2. **Provider Builder Pattern**
```python
# Configure once, use everywhere
my_provider = (
ProviderBuilder("my-service")
.with_api_key("MY_SERVICE_API_KEY", "My Service API Key")
.with_base_cost(5, BlockCostType.RUN)
.build()
)
```
#### 3. **Automatic Cost System**
- Provider base costs automatically applied to all blocks using that
provider
- Override with `@cost` decorator for block-specific pricing
- Tiered pricing support with cost filters
#### 4. **Dynamic Provider Support**
- Modified `ProviderName` enum to accept any string via `_missing_`
method
- No more manual enum updates for new providers
#### 5. **Application Integration**
- Added `sync_all_provider_costs()` to `initialize_blocks()` for
automatic cost registration
- Maintains full backward compatibility with existing blocks
#### 6. **Comprehensive Examples** (`backend/blocks/examples/`)
- `simple_example_block.py` - Basic block structure
- `example_sdk_block.py` - Provider with credentials
- `cost_example_block.py` - Various cost patterns
- `advanced_provider_example.py` - Custom API clients
- `example_webhook_sdk_block.py` - Webhook configuration
#### 7. **Extensive Testing**
- 6 new test modules with 30+ test cases
- Integration tests for all SDK features
- Cost calculation verification
- Provider registration tests
### Before vs After
**Before SDK:**
```python
# 1. Multiple complex imports
from backend.data.block import Block, BlockCategory, BlockOutput
from backend.data.model import SchemaField, CredentialsField
# ... many more imports
# 2. Update block_cost_config.py
BLOCK_COSTS[MyBlock] = [BlockCost(...)]
# 3. Update credentials_store.py
DEFAULT_CREDENTIALS.append(...)
# 4. Update providers.py enum
# 5. Update oauth/__init__.py
# 6. Update webhooks/__init__.py
```
**After SDK:**
```python
from backend.sdk import *
# Everything configured in one place
my_provider = (
ProviderBuilder("my-service")
.with_api_key("MY_API_KEY", "My API Key")
.with_base_cost(10, BlockCostType.RUN)
.build()
)
class MyBlock(Block):
class Input(BlockSchema):
credentials: CredentialsMetaInput = my_provider.credentials_field()
data: String = SchemaField(description="Input data")
class Output(BlockSchema):
result: String = SchemaField(description="Result")
# That's it\! No external files to modify
```
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Created new blocks using SDK pattern with provider configuration
- [x] Verified automatic cost registration for provider-based blocks
- [x] Tested cost override with @cost decorator
- [x] Confirmed custom providers work without enum modifications
- [x] Verified all example blocks execute correctly
- [x] Tested backward compatibility with existing blocks
- [x] Ran all SDK tests (30+ tests, all passing)
- [x] Created blocks with credentials and verified authentication
- [x] Tested webhook block configuration
- [x] Verified application startup with auto-registration
#### For configuration changes:
- [x] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
(no changes needed)
- [x] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes (no changes needed)
- [x] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
### Impact
- **Developer Experience**: Block creation time reduced from hours to
minutes
- **Maintainability**: All block configuration in one place
- **Scalability**: Support hundreds of blocks without enum updates
- **Type Safety**: Full IDE support with proper type hints
- **Testing**: Easier to test blocks in isolation
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Abhimanyu Yadav <122007096+Abhi1992002@users.noreply.github.com>
This plugin helps users organise library pages and use React Query for
data fetching on these pages.
### Changes
- Restructure the component position.
- Divide the component into two parts: one for rendering and the other
for hooks.
- Change data fetching from the normal fetch to an autogenerated React
query.
- Everything is shifted to the client side.
### Important Notes
- I haven’t changed any UI in this. I’ve divided it into sub-parts
because my main focus is on data fetching.
- Edit is not working, so I need to fix it in the follow-up PR. I
haven’t broken it; it broke already.
- I need to fix prop drilling in further PRs.
- I need to fix loading states.
> I haven’t changed the credit page or integration because I’m getting
errors while setting up Stripe for testing. My card is constantly
declined, and the integration page is attached to the builder page. I’ll
add changes to it when I’m working with the builder.
### Checklist 📋
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Tested manually and everything is working perfectly
- [x] Verified agent listing loads correctly
- [x] Confirmed delete functionality works
Auto type conversion doesn't work on optional type.
To reproduce:
<img width="981" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/92198d32-bce9-44fd-a9b0-b7b431aec3ba"
/>
Use the AgentNumberInput block and try to pass a string value to the
sub-agent that uses it.
### Changes 🏗️
Added optional type auto conversation support.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] Try to convert string to optional[int]
