- Resolves [OPEN-2549: Make "Run again" work with credentials in
`AgentRunDetailsView`](https://linear.app/autogpt/issue/OPEN-2549/make-run-again-work-with-credentials-in-agentrundetailsview)
- Resolves#10237
### Changes 🏗️
- feat(frontend/library): Make "Run Again" button work for runs with
credentials
- feat(backend/executor): Store passed-in credentials on
`GraphExecution`
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- Go to `/library/agents/[id]` for an agent with credentials inputs
- Run the agent manually
- [x] -> runs successfully
- [x] -> "Run again" shows among the action buttons on the newly created
run
- Click "Run again"
- [x] -> runs successfully
### Changes 🏗️
This PR implements email notifications for agent creators when their
agent submissions are approved or rejected by an admin in the
marketplace.
Specifically, the changes include:
- Added `AGENT_APPROVED` and `AGENT_REJECTED` notification types to
`schema.prisma`.
- Created `AgentApprovalData` and `AgentRejectionData` Pydantic models
for notification data.
- Configured the notification system to use immediate queues and new
Jinja2 templates for these types.
- Designed two new email templates: `agent_approved.html.jinja2` and
`agent_rejected.html.jinja2`, with dynamic content for agent details,
reviewer feedback, and relevant action links.
- Modified the `review_store_submission` function to:
- Include `User` and `Reviewer` data in the database query.
- Construct and queue the appropriate email notification based on the
approval/rejection status.
- Ensure email sending failures do not block the agent review process.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Approve an agent via the admin dashboard.
- [x] Verify the agent creator receives an "Agent Approved" email with
correct details and a link to the store.
- [x] Reject an agent via the admin dashboard (providing a reason).
- [x] Verify the agent creator receives an "Agent Rejected" email with
correct details, the rejection reason, and a link to resubmit.
- [x] Verify that if email sending fails (e.g., misconfigured SMTP), the
agent approval/rejection process still completes successfully without
error.
<img width="664" height="975" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d397f2dc-56eb-45ab-877e-b17f1fc234d1"
/>
<img width="664" height="975" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/25597752-f68c-46fe-8888-6c32f5dada01"
/>
---
Linear Issue: [SECRT-1168](https://linear.app/autogpt/issue/SECRT-1168)
<a
href="https://cursor.com/background-agent?bcId=bc-7394906c-0341-4bd0-8842-6d9d6f83c56c">
<picture>
<source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://cursor.com/open-in-cursor-dark.svg">
<source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://cursor.com/open-in-cursor-light.svg">
<img alt="Open in Cursor" src="https://cursor.com/open-in-cursor.svg">
</picture>
</a>
<a
href="https://cursor.com/agents?id=bc-7394906c-0341-4bd0-8842-6d9d6f83c56c">
<picture>
<source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://cursor.com/open-in-web-dark.svg">
<source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://cursor.com/open-in-web-light.svg">
<img alt="Open in Web" src="https://cursor.com/open-in-web.svg">
</picture>
</a>
---------
Co-authored-by: Cursor Agent <cursoragent@cursor.com>
- resolves -
https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/issues/10511
In this PR, I’ve added backend endpoints and a frontend UI for edit
functionality on the Agent Dashboard. Now, users can update their store
submission, if status is `PENDING` or `APPROVED`, but not for `REJECTED`
and `DRAFT`. When users make changes to a pending status submission, the
changes are made to the same version. However, when users make changes
to an approved status submission, a new store listing version is
created.
Backend works something like this:
<img width="866" height="832" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-15 at 9 39 02 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/209c60ac-8350-43c1-ba4c-7378d95ecba7"
/>
### Changes
- I’ve updated the `StoreSubmission` view to include `video_url` and
`categories`.
- I’ve added a new frontend UI for editing submissions.
- I’ve created an endpoint for editing submissions.
- I’ve added more end-to-end tests to ensure the edit submission
functionality works as expected.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] I have checked manually, everything is working perfectly.
- [x] All e2e tests are also passing.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zamil Majdy <zamil.majdy@agpt.co>
Co-authored-by: neo <neo.dowithless@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Reinier van der Leer <pwuts@agpt.co>
Co-authored-by: Swifty <craigswift13@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ubbe <hi@ubbe.dev>
Co-authored-by: Lluis Agusti <hi@llu.lu>
### Changes 🏗️
This PR optimizes database performance by adding missing foreign key
indexes, removing unused/redundant indexes, cleaning up all legacy
untracked indexes, and adding performance indexes for materialized views
to achieve 100% optimized database indexing.
**Foreign Key Indexes Added:**
- `AgentGraph`: `[forkedFromId, forkedFromVersion]` - For fork
relationship queries
- `AgentGraphExecution`: `[agentPresetId]` - For preset-based execution
filtering
- `AgentNodeExecution`: `[agentNodeId]` - For node execution lookups
- `AgentNodeExecutionInputOutput`: `[agentPresetId]` - For preset
input/output queries
- `AgentPreset`: `[agentGraphId, agentGraphVersion]` & `[webhookId]` -
For graph and webhook lookups
- `LibraryAgent`: `[agentGraphId, agentGraphVersion]` & `[creatorId]` -
For agent and creator queries
- `StoreListing`: `[agentGraphId, agentGraphVersion]` - For marketplace
agent lookups
- `StoreListingReview`: `[reviewByUserId]` - For user review queries
**Unused/Redundant Indexes Removed:**
- `User.email` - Unused index identified by linter
- `AnalyticsMetrics.userId` - Unused index causing write overhead
- `AnalyticsDetails.type` - Redundant (covered by composite `[userId,
type]`)
- `APIKey.key`, `APIKey.status` - Unused indexes
- Named index `"analyticsDetails"` - Converted to standard composite
index
**All Legacy Untracked Indexes Removed:**
- `idx_store_listing_version_status` - Redundant with Prisma composite
index
- `idx_slv_agent` - Redundant with Prisma-managed `[agentGraphId,
agentGraphVersion]`
- `idx_store_listing_version_approved_listing` - Redundant with unique
constraint
- `StoreListing_agentId_owningUserId_idx` - Legacy index superseded by
current strategy
- `StoreListing_isDeleted_isApproved_idx` - Replaced by optimized
composite index
- `StoreListing_isDeleted_idx` - Redundant with composite index
- `StoreListingVersion_agentId_agentVersion_isDeleted_idx` - Legacy
index replaced
- `idx_store_listing_approved` - Redundant with existing `[owningUserId,
slug]` unique constraint and `[isDeleted, hasApprovedVersion]` index
- `idx_slv_categories_gin` - Specialized array search index removed (can
be re-added if category filtering is implemented)
- `idx_profile_user` - Duplicate of Prisma-managed `Profile_userId_idx`
**Materialized View Performance Indexes Added:**
- `idx_mv_review_stats_rating` on `mv_review_stats(avg_rating DESC)` -
Optimizes sorting agents by rating
- `idx_mv_review_stats_count` on `mv_review_stats(review_count DESC)` -
Optimizes sorting agents by review count
**Result: 100% Optimized Database Indexing**
- All database indexes are now defined and managed through Prisma schema
- No more untracked indexes requiring manual SQL maintenance
- Added performance indexes for materialized views used by marketplace
views
- Improved query performance for agent sorting and filtering
- Enhanced maintainability and consistency across environments
**Schema Comments Updated:**
- Removed all references to dropped untracked indexes
- Simplified documentation to reflect Prisma-only approach for regular
tables
- Added comprehensive documentation for materialized view indexes and
their purposes
- Maintained documentation for materialized view refresh strategy
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Schema changes compile successfully with Prisma
- [x] Migration adds required FK indexes and materialized view
performance indexes
- [x] Migration drops all legacy indexes and redundant untracked indexes
- [x] All pre-commit hooks pass (linting, formatting, type checking)
- [x] No breaking changes to existing foreign key relationships
- [x] Verified existing Prisma indexes cover all query patterns
- [x] Schema comments comprehensively document all indexing strategy
- [x] Materialized view performance indexes optimize marketplace sorting
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
---------
Co-authored-by: Swifty <craigswift13@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This PR adds a database index to improve query performance based on
Supabase query performance insights and index recommendations. These
indexes target frequently queried columns and relationships to reduce
query execution time.
### Changes 🏗️
- Added index on `AgentNodeExecutionInputOutput.agentPresetId`
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Verified schema changes are valid Prisma syntax
- [x] Confirmed indexes target frequently queried columns based on
Supabase recommendations
- [x] Ensured no duplicate indexes are created
#### For configuration changes:
- [x] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [x] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [x] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
### Summary
Performance optimization for the platform's store and creator
functionality by adding targeted database indexes and implementing
materialized views to reduce query execution time.
### Changes 🏗️
**Database Performance Optimizations:**
- Added strategic database indexes for `StoreListing`,
`StoreListingVersion`, `StoreListingReview`, `AgentGraphExecution`, and
`Profile` tables
- Implemented materialized views (`mv_agent_run_counts`,
`mv_review_stats`) to cache expensive aggregation queries
- Optimized `StoreAgent` and `Creator` views to use materialized views
and improved query patterns
- Added automated refresh function with 15-minute scheduling for
materialized views (when pg_cron extension is available)
**Key Performance Improvements:**
- Filtered indexes on approved store listings to speed up marketplace
queries
- GIN index on categories for faster category-based searches
- Composite indexes for common query patterns (e.g., listing + version
lookups)
- Pre-computed agent run counts and review statistics to eliminate
expensive aggregations
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Verified migration runs successfully without errors
- [x] Confirmed materialized views are created and populated correctly
- [x] Tested StoreAgent and Creator view queries return expected results
- [x] Validated automatic refresh function works properly
- [x] Confirmed rollback migration successfully removes all changes
#### For configuration changes:
- [x] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [x] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [x] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
**Note:** No configuration changes were required as this is purely a
database schema optimization.
This PR introduces key-value storage blocks.
### Changes 🏗️
- **Database Schema**: Add AgentNodeExecutionKeyValueData table with
composite primary key (userId, key)
- **Persistence Blocks**: Create PersistInformationBlock and
RetrieveInformationBlock in persistence.py
- **Scope-based Storage**: Support for within_agent (per agent) vs
across_agents (global user) persistence
- **Key Structure**: Use formal # delimiter for storage keys:
`agent#{graph_id}#{key}` and `global#{key}`
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Run all 244 block tests - all passing ✅
- [x] Test PersistInformationBlock with mock data storage
- [x] Test RetrieveInformationBlock with mock data retrieval
- [x] Verify scope-based key generation (within_agent vs across_agents)
- [x] Verify database function integration through all manager classes
- [x] Run lint and type checking - all passing ✅
- [x] Verify database migration is included and valid
#### For configuration changes:
- [x] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [x] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [x] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
Note: This change adds database schema and new blocks but doesn't
require environment or docker-compose changes as it uses existing
database infrastructure.
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This pull request adds support for setting up (webhook-)triggered agents
in the Library. It contains changes throughout the entire stack to make
everything work in the various phases of a triggered agent's lifecycle:
setup, execution, updates, deletion.
Setting up agents with webhook triggers was previously only possible in
the Builder, limiting their use to the agent's creator only. To make it
work in the Library, this change uses the previously introduced
`AgentPreset` to store information on, instead of on the graph's nodes
to which only a graph's creator has access.
- Initial ticket: #10111
- Builds on #9786
### Changes 🏗️
Frontend:
- Amend the Library's `AgentRunDraftView` to handle creating and editing
Presets
- Add `hideIfSingleCredentialAvailable` parameter to `CredentialsInput`
- Add multi-select support to `TypeBasedInput`
- Add Presets section to `AgentRunsSelectorList`
- Amend `AgentRunSummaryCard` for use for Presets
- Add `AgentStatusChip` to display general agent status (for now: Active
/ Inactive / Error)
- Add Preset loading logic and create/update/delete handlers logic to
`AgentRunsPage`
- Rename `IconClose` to `IconCross`
API:
- Add `LibraryAgent` properties `has_external_trigger`,
`trigger_setup_info`, `credentials_input_schema`
- Add `POST /library/agents/{library_agent_id}/setup_trigger` endpoint
- Remove redundant parameters from `POST
/library/presets/{preset_id}/execute` endpoint
Backend:
- Add `POST /library/agents/{library_agent_id}/setup_trigger` endpoint
- Extract non-node-related logic from `on_node_activate` into
`setup_webhook_for_block`
- Add webhook-related logic to `update_preset` and `delete_preset`
endpoints
- Amend webhook infrastructure to work with AgentPresets
- Add preset trigger support to webhook ingress endpoint
- Amend executor stack to work with passed-in node input
(`nodes_input_masks`, generalized from `node_credentials_input_map`)
- Amend graph validation to work with passed-in node input
- Add `AgentPreset`->`IntegrationWebhook` relation
- Add `WebhookWithRelations` model
- Change behavior of `BaseWebhooksManager.get_manual_webhook(..)` to
avoid unnecessary changes of the webhook URL: ignore `events` to find
matching webhook, and update `events` if necessary.
- Fix & improve `AgentPreset` API, models, and DB logic
- Add `isDeleted` filter to get/list queries
- Add `user_id` attribute to `LibraryAgentPreset` model
- Add separate `credentials` property to `LibraryAgentPreset` model
- Fix `library_db.update_preset(..)` replacement of existing
`InputPresets`
- Make `library_db.update_preset(..)` more usage-friendly with separate
parameters for updateable properties
- Add `user_id` checks to various DB functions
- Fix error handling in various endpoints
- Fix cache race condition on `load_webhook_managers()`
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- Test existing functionality
- [x] Auto-setup and -teardown of webhooks on save in the builder still
works
- [x] Running an agent normally from the Library still works
- Test new functionality
- [x] Setting up a trigger in the Library
- [x] Updating a trigger in the Library
- [x] Disabling and re-enabling a trigger in the Library
- [x] Deleting a trigger in the Library
- [x] Triggers set up in the Library result in a new run when the
webhook receives a payload
Main issues:
* `AIStructuredResponseGeneratorBlock` is not able to produce a list of
objects.
* `SmartDecisionBlock` is not able to call tools with some optional
inputs.
### Changes 🏗️
* Allow persisting `null` / `None` value as execution output.
* Provide `multiple_tool_calls` option for `SmartDecisionBlock`.
* Provide `list_result` option for `AIStructuredResponseGeneratorBlock`
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] Run `SmartDecisionBlock` & `AIStructuredResponseGeneratorBlock`
### Changes 🏗️
This PR adds `Run 10 agents` step to wallet tasks that can be done by
running any agents 10 times either from Library or Builder (onboarding
agent run also counts).
- Merge `Finish onboarding` and `See results` steps into one in the
wallet
- User is redirected directly to onboarding agent runs in Library after
congrats screen
- Add `RUN_AGENTS` step and `agentRuns` integer to schema and related
migration
- Running agent from Library and Builder increments `agentRuns`
- Open NPS survey popup when 10 agents are run
- Fix resuming onboarding on login when unfinished
- Remove no longer needed `get-results.mp4` tutorial video
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Onboarding can be completed and proper reward is awarded
- [x] `Run 10 agents` can be completed and reward is awarded
- [x] When unning different agents and the same agent
- [x] Running from library and builder counts
- [x] Onboarding is resumed to last finished step on login
# Query Optimization for AgentNodeExecution Tables
## Overview
This PR describes the database index optimizations applied to improve
the performance of slow queries in the AutoGPT platform backend.
## Problem Analysis
The following queries were identified as consuming significant database
resources:
### 1. Complex Filtering Query (19.3% of total time)
```sql
SELECT ... FROM "AgentNodeExecution"
WHERE "agentNodeId" = $1
AND "agentGraphExecutionId" = $2
AND "executionStatus" = $3
AND "id" NOT IN (
SELECT "referencedByInputExecId"
FROM "AgentNodeExecutionInputOutput"
WHERE "name" = $4 AND "referencedByInputExecId" IS NOT NULL
)
ORDER BY "addedTime" ASC
```
### 2. Multi-table JOIN Query (8.9% of total time)
```sql
SELECT ... FROM "AgentNodeExecution"
LEFT JOIN "AgentNode" ON ...
LEFT JOIN "AgentBlock" ON ...
WHERE "AgentBlock"."id" IN (...)
AND "executionStatus" != $11
AND "agentGraphExecutionId" IN (...)
ORDER BY "queuedTime" DESC, "addedTime" DESC
```
### 3. Bulk Graph Execution Queries (multiple variations, ~10% combined)
Multiple queries filtering by `agentGraphExecutionId` with various
ordering requirements.
## Optimization Strategy
### 1. Composite Indexes for AgentNodeExecution
Set the following composite indexes to the `AgentNodeExecution` model:
```prisma
@@index([agentGraphExecutionId, agentNodeId, executionStatus])
@@index([addedTime, queuedTime])
```
#### Benefits:
- **Index 1**: Covers the exact WHERE clause of the complex filtering
query, allowing index-only scans
- **Index 2**: Optimizes queries filtering by graph execution and status
- **Index 3**: Supports efficient sorting when filtering by graph
execution
- **Index 4**: Optimizes ORDER BY operations on time fields
### 2. Composite Index for AgentNodeExecutionInputOutput
Added the following composite index:
```prisma
// Input and Output pin names are unique for each AgentNodeExecution.
@@unique([referencedByInputExecId, referencedByOutputExecId, name])
@@index([referencedByOutputExecId])
// Composite index for `upsert_execution_input`.
@@index([name, time])
```
#### Benefits:
- Dramatically improves the NOT IN subquery performance in Query 1
- Allows the database to use an index scan instead of a full table scan
- Reduces the subquery execution time from O(n) to O(log n)
## Expected Performance Improvements
1. **Query 1 (19.3% of total time)**:
- Expected improvement: 80-90% reduction in execution time
- The composite index on `[agentNodeId, agentGraphExecutionId,
executionStatus]` will allow index-only scans
- The subquery will benefit from the new index on
`AgentNodeExecutionInputOutput`
2. **Query 2 (8.9% of total time)**:
- Expected improvement: 50-70% reduction in execution time
- The `[agentGraphExecutionId, executionStatus]` index will reduce the
initial filtering cost
3. **Bulk Queries (10% combined)**:
- Expected improvement: 60-80% reduction in execution time
- Composite indexes including time fields will optimize sorting
operations
## Migration Considerations
1. **Index Creation Time**: Creating these indexes on existing large
tables may take time
2. **Storage Impact**: Each index requires additional storage space
3. **Write Performance**: Slight decrease in INSERT/UPDATE performance
due to index maintenance
## Additional Optimizations
### NotificationEvent Table Index
Added index for notification batch queries:
```prisma
@@index([userNotificationBatchId])
```
This optimizes the query:
```sql
SELECT ... FROM "NotificationEvent"
WHERE "userNotificationBatchId" IN (...)
```
#### Benefits:
- Eliminates full table scans when filtering by batch ID
- Improves query performance from O(n) to O(log n)
- Particularly beneficial for users with many notification events
## Future Optimizations
Consider these additional optimizations if needed:
1. Partitioning `AgentNodeExecution` table by `createdAt` or
`agentGraphExecutionId`
2. Implementing materialized views for frequently accessed aggregate
data
3. Adding covering indexes for specific query patterns
4. Implementing query result caching at the application level
---------
Co-authored-by: Zamil Majdy <zamil.majdy@agpt.co>
- Follow-up fix for #9862
### Changes 🏗️
- Rename the stored `data` input field to `inputs` on all Agent Executor
nodes in the DB
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Dry-run the query in Supabase to verify that the data operation
works
- [x] CI
Introduce a late execution check scheduled job. The late threshold
duration is configurable.
This initial version only reports the error to Sentry.
### Changes 🏗️
* Added late execution check scheduled job
* Move the registration weekly notification processing job out of API
call and calling it directly from the scheduler service.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] Manual firing of scheduled job through an exposed API
This PR introduces copying agents feature in the Library. Users can copy
and download their library agents but they can edit only the ones they
own (included copied ones).
### Changes 🏗️
- DB migration: add relation in `AgentGraph`: `forked_from_id` and
`forked_from_version`
- Add `fork_graph` function that makes a hardcopy of agent graph and its
nodes (all with new ids)
- Add `fork_library_agent` that copies library agent and its graph for a
user
- Add endpoint `/library/agents/{libraryAgentId}/fork`
- Add UI to `library/agents/[id]/page.tsx`: `Edit a copy` button with
dialog confirmation
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Agent can be copied, edited and runs
Array fields in `schema.prisma` are non-nullable, but generated
migrations don’t add `NOT NULL` constraints. This causes existing rows
to get `NULL` values when new array columns are added, breaking schema
expectations and leading to bugs.
### Changes 🏗️
- Backfill all `NULL` rows on non-nullable array columns to empty arrays
- Set `NOT NULL` constraint on all array columns
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Existing `NULL` rows are properly backfilled
- [x] Existing arrays are not set to default empty arrays
- [x] Affected columns became non-nullable in the db
### Changes 🏗️
- Update onboarding to give user rewards for completing steps
- Remove `canvas-confetti` lib and add `party-js` instead; the former
didn't allow to play confetti from a component
- Add onboarding videos in `frontend/public/onboarding/`
- Remove Balance (`CreditsCard.tsx`) and add openable `Wallet.tsx` (and
accompanying `WalletTaskGroup.tsx`) instead that displays grouped
onboarding tasks with descriptions and short instructional videos
- Further relevant updates to `useOnboarding`, `types.ts`
- Implement onboarding rewards
- Add `onboarding_reward` function in `credit.py` that is used to reward
user for finished onboarding tasks safely - transaction key is
deterministic, so the same user won't be rewarded twice for the same
step.
- Add `reward_user` in `onboarding.py`
- Update `UserOnboarding` model and add a migration
<img width="464" alt="Screenshot 2025-04-05 at 6 06 29 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fca8d09e-0139-466b-b679-d24117ad01f0"
/>
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Onboarding works
- [x] Tasks can be completed
- [x] Rewards are added correctly for all completed tasks
Distilled from #9541 to reduce the scope of that PR.
- Part of #9307
- ❗ Blocks #9786
- ❗ Blocks #9541
### Changes 🏗️
- Fix `LibraryAgent` schema (for #9786)
- Fix relationships between `LibraryAgent`, `AgentGraph`, and
`AgentPreset`
- Impose uniqueness constraint on `LibraryAgent`
- Rename things that are called `agent` that actually refer to a
`graph`/`agentGraph`
- Fix singular/plural forms in DB schema
- Simplify reference names of closely related objects (e.g.
`AgentGraph.AgentGraphExecutions` -> `AgentGraph.Executions`)
- Eliminate use of `# type: ignore` in DB statements
- Add `typed` and `typed_cast` utilities to `backend.util.type`
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] CI static type checking (with all risky `# type: ignore` removed)
- [x] Check that column references in views are updated
This is a follow up to
https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/pull/9511 fixing some
issues and updating onboarding.
### Changes 🏗️
- Update `UserOnboarding` data
- Update schema and add migration
- Change `step` in `UserOnboarding` to `completedSteps` array with
`OnboardingStep` enum
- Remove `isCompleted`: this is now inferred from `completedSteps`
values
- Don't onboard if <2 marketplace agents; that prevents self-host
onboarding
- Add endpoints:
- `is_onboarding_enabled`: to check if users should be onboarded (not if
they finished onboarding); now check if there are at least 2 marketplace
agents
- `get_store_agent`: returns `StoreAgentDetails` for given
`store_listing_version_id`
- `get_graph_meta_by_store_listing_version_id`: returns `GraphMeta`
- Add agent to Library just before running it and not when chosen and
remove code that was responsible for removing agent that wasn't run
- Move onboarding to `OnboardingProvider` (it'll be needed globally for
Phase 2)
- Multiple fixes, renames for clarity
### Checklist 📋
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Don't onboard if less than 2 marketplace agents
- [x] Avoid non-input and credentials agents
- [x] Onboarding works and can be finished
- [x] Onboarding resumes
- [x] Onboarding agent runs correctly
---------
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Tindle <nicholas.tindle@agpt.co>
<!-- Clearly explain the need for these changes: -->
The store listing and submissions were previously just a best guess
without much implementation. This updates the database models and
queries and such to be based on discussion around what the process
should look like. It also adds and update the relevant routers for this
change
### Changes 🏗️
Store Listing
- change isApproved to hasApprovedVersion
- Move slug into store listing
- mark an active version in store listing
Store Version
- Move submissions into version
- make name optional
- have state transition timestamps for submitted and approved/rejected
- added a changes field
- added internal comments and clarified review comments field
SubmissionStatus
- Fixed DAFT to DRAFT
StoreListingSubmission
- Dropped table
Graph
- Used more modern format for the params for prisma -- no other changes
Added migrations for all the model movements
<!-- Concisely describe all of the changes made in this pull request:
-->
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] Use the store codepaths from the release testplan doc as the test
plan (claude I can't publish the testplan but I am a maintainer lol,
trust me here my guy, you're supposed to be lenient)
- [x] Check the db is used as appropriate following the rules
---------
Co-authored-by: Zamil Majdy <zamil.majdy@agpt.co>
Agents using Agent blocks should be seamlessly downloaded from the
marketplace to a file and imported from a file.
Requirements:
* A recursive export process that exports all the required agents to a
single file, no matter how many layers deep (taking care of potential
loops).
* An import process that expects and extracts several agents from a
single file into your library at once.
Considerations:
We need to ensure the reference IDs in the Agent Blocks match/are
updated to match the imported sub-agent ids to prevent broken
references.
### Changes 🏗️
* Add sub_graphs field on Graph model
* Improve graph creation query to support inserting graph + subgraphs in
batch
* Deprecate graph template & remove its column
* Update on marketplace download agent (unified the used method, with
more secure cleanup & proper ownership check).
* Fix failing test cases
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] Export graph with sub agents.
- [x] Import the exported graph with sub agents.
### Changes 🏗️
Removed some indices in the marketplace table that were useless.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
This PR adds backend to make Onboarding UI added in
https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/pull/9485 functional and
adds missing confetti screen at the end of Onboarding.
*Make sure to have at least any 2 agents in store when testing locally.*
Otherwise the onboarding will finish without showing agents.
Visit `/onboarding/reset` to reset onboarding state, otherwise it'll
always redirect to `/library` once finished.
### Changes 🏗️
- Onboarding opens automatically on sign up and login (if unfinished)
for all users
- Update db schema to add `UserOnboarding` and add migration
- Add GET and PATCH `/onboarding` endpoints and logic to retrieve and
update data Onboarding for a user
- Update `POST /library/agents` endpoint
(`addMarketplaceAgentToLibrary`), so it includes input and output nodes;
these are needed to know input schema for the Onboarding
- Use new endpoints during onboarding to fetch and update data
- Use agents from the marketplace and their input schema for the
onboarding
- Add algorithm to choose store agents based on user answers and related
endpoint `GET /onboarding/agents`
- Redirect outside onboarding if finished and resume on proper page
- Add `canvas-confetti` and `@types/canvas-confetti` frontend packages
- Add and show congrats confetti screen when user runs and agent and
before opening library
- Minor design updates and onboarding fixes
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Redirect to `/onboarding/*` on sign up and sign in (if onboarding
unfinished)
- [x] Onboarding works and can be finished
- [x] Agent runs on finish
- [x] Onboarding state is saved and logging out or refreshing page
restores correct state (user choices)
- [x] When onboarding finished, trying to go into `/onboarding`
redirects to `/library`
---------
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Tindle <nicholas.tindle@agpt.co>
Co-authored-by: Reinier van der Leer <pwuts@agpt.co>
- Resolves#9542
### Changes 🏗️
- feat(platform): Add "Delete run" button on `/library/agents/[id]` w/
confirm dialog
- Add `AgentGraphExecution.isDeleted` column for soft delete
- Add `DELETE /api/executions/{graph_exec_id}` endpoint
- feat(frontend): Add "Stop run" button on `/library/agents/[id]`
Technical improvements:
- refactor(frontend): Generalize `AgentDeleteConfirmDialog` ->
`DeleteConfirmDialog`
- refactor(frontend): Brand `GraphExecution.execution_id` and
`Schedule.id` to prevent mixing
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- Click "Delete run" under "Run actions" in the right sidebar
- [x] -> Confirmation dialog should show
- Click "Delete"
- [x] -> run should disappear from list
- [x] -> view should switch to "Draft new run" view
- [x] -> refresh page -> run should not be in list
- Click "Delete" in the menu on a run in the list
- [x] -> Confirmation dialog should show
- Click "Delete"
- [x] -> run should disappear from list
- [x] -> refresh page -> run should not be in list
---------
Co-authored-by: Krzysztof Czerwinski <34861343+kcze@users.noreply.github.com>
<!-- Clearly explain the need for these changes: -->
If we bounce too many emails from Postmark, they will be really upset
with us, which is not so good. We need a way to react when we bounce
emails, so we set it up so they notify us via webhooks.
We also need to build authentication into those webhooks to prevent
random people from sending us fake webhooks.
All this together means we need a new route for the inbound webhook.
To do this, we need a way to track if the email address is valid. So,
after chatting with @itsababseh, we are adding a validated email field
that defaults to `True` because all the users are already validated in
prod. In dev, we may suffer.
### Changes 🏗️
<!-- Concisely describe all of the changes made in this pull request:
-->
- Adds special API Key auth handler to the libs so that we can easily
test stuff on the /docs endpoint and re-use it if needed
- Adds New Secret for this API key from postmark
- Adds a validatedEmail boolean to the`User` table
- Adds a postmark endpoint to the routers list for handling the inbound
webhook from Postmark
- "Handle" all the various things this endpoint could send us (most of
them we do nothing about)
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] Sign up with john@example.com email (the one postmark uses in
webhooks)
- [x] Set email validation to true
- [x] Send the bounce webhook notice
- [x] Check it gets set to false
#### For configuration changes:
- [x] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [x] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [x] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
- Resolves#8774
- Resolves#8775
- Includes back-end work for #9168
- Partially implements #8776
- Partially implements #8777
### Changes 🏗️
- Add `/library` page
- Change target of "Library" navigation link from `/monitoring` to
`/library`
- Move `/agents/[id]` page to `/library/agents/[id]`
- Set application background color to `bg-neutral-50`
- Redirect to new library agent's "runs" page (`/library/agents/[id]`)
after adding from marketplace
Further (technical) frontend changes:
- Add types and client methods for all library API endpoints
- Added `primary` variant to `agptui/Button` component
Backend changes:
- Add functionality to library backend
- Aggregate agent status
- Image generation for use in library view
- Add `LibraryAgent.imageUrl` column to DB schema
- Sorting & pagination
- Explicit relation between library agents and their graph's creator
- Refactor & update API endpoints for DX
- Other minor refactoring
- Add missing but required `MEDIA_GCS_BUCKET_NAME` to `.env.example`
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- `/library`
- [x] Create agent from scratch -> should show up on `/library`
- [x] Add agent to library from marketplace -> should show up on
`/library`
- [x] Click on agent in `/library` -> should go to
`/library/agents/[id]`
- [x] Test sorting & pagination functionality
- `/library/agents/[id]`
- [x] Fill out inputs and click "Run" -> should run like normally
- [x] Select completed agent run -> should show all inputs & outputs
- [x] Click "run again" on a completed agent run -> should run
successfully with same input
- [x] `/monitoring` should still work the same as before
---------
Co-authored-by: abhi1992002 <abhimanyu1992002@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Reinier van der Leer <pwuts@agpt.co>
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Tindle <nicholas.tindle@agpt.co>
<!-- Clearly explain the need for these changes: -->
### Changes 🏗️
Add email notifications on refund events.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
- Follow-up to #9258
The front end is fetching `/library/agents` -> `LibraryAgent[]` but
using the result as `GraphMeta[]`. This breaks a bunch of things.
### Changes 🏗️
Frontend:
- Add `LibraryAgent` type for `api.listLibraryAgents()`
- Amend all broken usages of `LibraryAgent` objects
- Introduce branded typing for `LibraryAgent.id` and `GraphMeta.id` to
disallow mixing them. This prevents incorrect use in the future, and
reduces the chance of this frontend issue accumulating interest on
existing open PRs.
Backend:
- Add a migration to create `LibraryAgent` objects for all existing
`AgentGraphs`
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] Check that all existing agents are listed in the agents list on
`/monitoring` (check against DB or `GET /api/graphs`)
- [x] Check that all views of `/monitoring` work
- [x] Try to run an agent and check its status
### Changes 🏗️
Added the dispute & refund handling on the system.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2d9c7b48-2ee1-401d-be65-5e9787c8130e
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
- Blocked by #9267
This re-introduces changes from the following PRs with fixes:
- #9218
- #9211
### Changes 🏗️
- See #9218
- See #9211
Fixes:
- Fix Prisma query statements in `v2.library.db`
- Fix creation of (library) agents
- Fix test cleanup of (library) agents
- Fix handling and passing of `node_input` parameters
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Create & run a new agent
- [x] Update & run an existing agent
### Changes 🏗️
Due to the legacy of SQLite usage, some of the JSON columns are actually
a string column string a stringified JSON column.
The scope of this PR is migrating those columns into an actual JSON
column.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
<!-- Clearly explain the need for these changes: -->
The email service has requirements to
- Email users when some activity has happened on their account on some
scheduled basis -> We need a way to get active users and the executions
that happened while they were active
- Allow users to configure what emails they get -> Need a user
preference
- Get User email by Id so that we can email them -> Pretty
self-explanatory
We need to add a few new backend queries + db models for the
notification to start handling these details. This is the first set of
those changes based on experience building the app service
### Changes 🏗️
<!-- Concisely describe all of the changes made in this pull request:
-->
- Adds a new DB Model, `UserNotificationPreferences,` with related
migration
- Adds a new DB Model `NotificationEvent` with related migration to
track what notifications we've sent and how many and such (how much we
add here is open to change depending on what limits on data we want)
- Adds a new DB Model `UserNotificationBatch` with related migration to
handle batching of like models
- Adds queries to get users and executions by `datetime` ranges as `ISO`
strings
- Adds new queries to the `DatabaseManager` and exposes them to the
other `AppService`s
- Exposes all new queries plus an existing one `get_user_by_id`
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] I extracted these changes from a working implementation of the
service, and tested they don't bring down the service by being uncalled
by running the standard agent tests we do on release
---------
Co-authored-by: Reinier van der Leer <pwuts@agpt.co>
### What's This PR About?
This PR makes a few simple improvements to how user profiles are handled
in the app:
- **Always Have a Profile:**
If a user doesn't already have a profile, the system now automatically
creates one with some default info (including a fun, randomly generated
username). This way, you never end up with a missing profile.
- **Better Profile Updates:**
Removes the creation of profiles on failed get requests
This re-introduces PR #9179 with some fixes.
This PR enables the execution of store agents even if they are not owned
by the user. Key changes include handling store-listed agents in the
`get_graph` logic, improving execution flow, and ensuring
version-specific handling. These updates support more flexible agent
execution.
### Changes 🏗️
(copied from #9179)
- **Graph Retrieval:** Updated `get_graph` to check store listings for
agents not owned by the user.
- **Version Handling:** Added `graph_version` to execution methods for
consistent version-specific execution.
- **Execution Flow:** Refactored `scheduler.py`, `rest_api.py`, and
other modules for clearer logic and better maintainability.
- **Testing:** Updated `test_manager.py` and other test cases to
validate execution of store-listed agents added test for accessing graph
Out-of-scope changes:
- Add logic to pretty-print Pydantic validation error responses to
backend API client in frontend
---------
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Tindle <nicktindle@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Tindle <nicholas.tindle@agpt.co>
Co-authored-by: Swifty <craigswift13@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Zamil Majdy <zamil.majdy@agpt.co>
<img width="1157" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5b70aa1e-876f-4163-b69e-c22bd21ea8d3"
/>
### Changes 🏗️
Added auto-top-up credits capability:
* Added autoTopUpConfig column on user
* Added autoTopUp form UI
* Added payment charge logic for top_up_credits
* Added auto-top-up logic on spend_credits
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: Krzysztof Czerwinski <kpczerwinski@gmail.com>
We need to be able to determine the cost of graph/node execution.
### Changes 🏗️
* Add these columns into CreditTransaction `metadata` column:
- graph_id
- node_id
- graph_exec_id
- node_exec_id
- block_id
* Drop the `blockId` column and backfill the dropped value into
metadata->>block_id.
* Frequent queries on these values will require an index created on
demand through a migration, depending on the use case.
---------
Co-authored-by: Krzysztof Czerwinski <kpczerwinski@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Reinier van der Leer <pwuts@agpt.co>
This PR adds Stripe integration and payment processing for topping-up
user accounts with credits.
### Changes 🏗️
Includes:
- https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/pull/9176
#### Top-up flow
1. To top-up a user visits their settings and clicks `Credits` button
(it's unavailable if `NEXT_PUBLIC_STRIPE_PUBLISHABLE_KEY` isn't present)
2. User inputs top-up amount (min 5$ in 1$ increments) and click the
button to confirm.
3. Backend receives top-up request, creates database entry and requests
stripe to provide url for this specific checkout.
4. User gets redirected to externally hosted Stripe checkout page, after
payment (or cancelling) they get redirected back to Credits page.
5. In the meantime Stripe processes payment and sends webhook
confirmation to the backend, backend updates database to activate bought
credits.
6. Credits page shows success (or failure) information (by using url
param `topup=success|cancel`). Credit counter won't update without
refreshing the page unless payment was confirmed before user was back on
Credits page which is the case when testing checkout locally.
<img width="804" alt="Screenshot 2025-01-01 at 2 55 35 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/22fb518d-b30b-4154-bb4b-edea1d57b6c2"
/>
#### Backend
- Add `stripe` package
- Add environment variables:
- `STRIPE_API_KEY`
- `STRIPE_WEBHOOK_SECRET`
- Add routes:
- `POST /credits`: top-up request, returns Stripe checkout url.
- `POST /credits/stripe_webhook`: Stripe webhook endpoint to notify of
successful payment.
- `PATCH /credits`: prompts beckend to check payment status. It's an
additional failsafe in case webhook fails.
- Update `credit.py` and related files to handle top-up request and
payment confirmation
#### Frontend
- Add `stripe-js` package
- Add `NEXT_PUBLIC_STRIPE_PUBLISHABLE_KEY` environment variable
- Modify user settings sidebar to show `Credits` if
`NEXT_PUBLIC_STRIPE_PUBLISHABLE_KEY` is available
- Add `store/credits` page where user can top-up their account, it shows
confirmation (or failure) after completing checkout.
- Add `useCredits` hook that returns user credits and allows to request
top-up.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [x] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: Zamil Majdy <zamil.majdy@agpt.co>
- **Revert "feature(platform): Implement library add, update, remove,
archive functionality (#9218)"**
- **Revert "feat(backend): Add Support for Managing Agent Presets with
Pagination and Soft Delete (#9211)"**
These PRs contain untested changes to DB functions and cause issues in
production.
### Description
This PR enables the execution of store agents even if they are not owned
by the user. Key changes include handling store-listed agents in the
`get_graph` logic, improving execution flow, and ensuring
version-specific handling. These updates support more flexible agent
execution.
### Changes 🏗️
- **Graph Retrieval:** Updated `get_graph` to check store listings for
agents not owned by the user.
- **Version Handling:** Added `graph_version` to execution methods for
consistent version-specific execution.
- **Execution Flow:** Refactored `scheduler.py`, `rest_api.py`, and
other modules for clearer logic and better maintainability.
- **Testing:** Updated `test_manager.py` and other test cases to
validate execution of store-listed agents added test for accessing graph
---------
Co-authored-by: Reinier van der Leer <pwuts@agpt.co>
Co-authored-by: Zamil Majdy <zamil.majdy@agpt.co>
### Changes 🏗️https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/actions/runs/12696734339/job/35391431786
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
### Changes 🏗️https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/actions/runs/12696734339/job/35391431786
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
Python format uses `{Variable}` as the variable placeholder, while Jinja
uses `{{Variable}}` as its default.
Jinja is used as the main templating engine on the system, but the
Python format version is still maintained for backward compatibility.
However, the backward compatibility support can cause a side effect
while passing JSON string value into the block that uses it:
https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/issues/9194
### Changes 🏗️
* Use `{{Variable}}` place holder format and removed `{Variable}`
support in these blocks:
- '363ae599-353e-4804-937e-b2ee3cef3da4', -- AgentOutputBlock
- 'db7d8f02-2f44-4c55-ab7a-eae0941f0c30', -- FillTextTemplateBlock
- '1f292d4a-41a4-4977-9684-7c8d560b9f91', -- AITextGeneratorBlock
- 'ed55ac19-356e-4243-a6cb-bc599e9b716f' --
AIStructuredResponseGeneratorBlock
* Add Jinja templating support on `AITextGeneratorBlock` &
`AIStructuredResponseGeneratorBlock`
* Migrated the existing database content to prevent breaking changes.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
- Resolves#9182
Formerly known as `FAILED` with error message `TERMINATED`.
### Changes 🏗️
- Add `TERMINATED` to `AgentExecutionStatus` enum in DB schema (and its
mirror in the front end)
- Update executor to give terminated node and graph executions status
`TERMINATED` instead of `FAILED`/`COMPLETED`
- Add `TERMINATED` case to status checks referencing
`AgentExecutionStatus`
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- Start and forcefully stop a graph execution
---------
Co-authored-by: Zamil Majdy <zamil.majdy@agpt.co>
### Changes 🏗️
- Redirect to the marketplace.
- Ensure that the store agent uses agent graph data instead of store
listing data.
- Don’t export agent input values.
- URL sanitization: We can’t open an agent if it has a colon in its
name.
- Show all top agents.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
# 🌎 Overview
AutoGPT Store Version 2 expands on the Pre-Store by enhancing agent
discovery, providing richer content presentation, and introducing new
user engagement features. The focus is on creating a visually appealing
and interactive marketplace that allows users to explore and evaluate
agents through images, videos, and detailed descriptions.
### Vision
To create a visually compelling and interactive open-source marketplace
for autonomous AI agents, where users can easily discover, evaluate, and
interact with agents through media-rich listings, ratings, and version
history.
### Objectives
📊 Incorporate visuals (icons, images, videos) into agent listings.
⭐ Introduce a rating system and agent run count.
🔄 Provide version history and update logs from creators.
🔍 Improve user experience with advanced search and filtering features.
### Changes 🏗️
<!-- Concisely describe all of the changes made in this pull request:
-->
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: Bently <tomnoon9@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Aarushi <aarushik93@gmail.com>
First step for the PAYG System.
### Changes 🏗️
- Add `stripeCustomerId` to `User` model
- Rename model `UserBlockCredit` to `CreditTransaction`
- Rename model `UserBlockCreditType` to `CreditTransactionType`
- Update related code
- Add a migration
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
Some table foreign key sources are not properly indexed, causing the
potential full table scan on the code queries.
### Changes 🏗️
Added DB indexes on several tables.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
