<!-- Clearly explain the need for these changes: -->
We keep showing local users error messages that are just not relevant
### Changes 🏗️
Swaps the error messaging logic to be dependent on the behavior of the
specific platform they are on
<!-- Concisely describe all of the changes made in this pull request:
-->
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] Test with auth container down (simulates incorrect setup) and
validate that error message is shown
- [x] Try normal path
- Follow-up to #9657
<img width="280" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2f3cd683-db63-485f-8914-5654c34f1a4c"
/>
<img width="520" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/de7e7cb9-61d4-4071-aea8-393ff5200c54"
/>
### Changes 🏗️
* Implement the input UI for Agent Input subtypes.
* Refactor node-input-component, extra out data type decision logic,
share it with runner/library input.
* Add `format` field for short-text, long-text, and mediafile type.
* Unify UI data type enum.
Out of scope:
- Styling for these inputs.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Use all the available agent input subtypes in an agent and run it
---------
Co-authored-by: Reinier van der Leer <pwuts@agpt.co>
- Resolves#8782
### Changes 🏗️
- feat(frontend/library): Use WS subscription to get real-time execution
updates
- feat(backend/ws_api): Send `GraphExecutionUpdate` on all new agent I/O
- Include agent I/O in `GraphExecutionUpdate` (by subclassing
`GraphExecution`)
- Add `IO_BLOCK_IDs` to `.blocks.io`
- feat(backend/ws_api): Add `subscribe_graph_executions` method to
WebSocket API
- feat(backend): Withhold `GraphExecution.node_executions` from requests
by non-graph-owners
- Split `GraphExecutionWithNodes` off of `GraphExecution`
- Use `GraphExecution` as much as possible, as it's a much cheaper query
than `GraphExecutionWithNodes`
- refactor(frontend): Make `GraphExecution.node_executions` optional
- fix(frontend): Parse dates in responses of `/executions` and
`/graphs/{graph_id}/executions`
- refactor(frontend/library): Move sorting logic for agent runs list
from `AgentRunsPage` to `AgentRunsSelectorList`
- refactor(backend/ws_api): Clean up message handler implementations
- refactor(backend/tests): Use `.data.execution.get_graph_execution(..)`
directly instead of `AgentServer.test_get_graph_run_results(..)`
Out-of-scope changes:
- refactor(backend): Remove unnecessary query include from
`.data.graph.get_graph_metadata(..)`
Demo:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8ea6225d-7334-49cb-a522-83f153d840da
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- Go to `/library/agents/[id]` for an agent with inputs and outputs
- Draft and run a new run
- [x] -> should appear in the list of runs at the top
- [x] -> should be selected as soon as the request finishes
- [x] -> new I/O should appear as it is generated
- [x] -> status should be updated in real-time (both in list and in
adjacent details view)
- Click "Run again"
- [x] -> should appear in the list of runs at the top
- [x] -> should be selected as soon as the request finishes
- [x] -> new I/O should appear as it is generated
- [x] -> status should be updated in real-time (both in list and in
adjacent details view)
- Click "Open in builder" under "Agent actions"; run the agent from the
builder
- [x] -> should work the same as before
- [x] -> node I/O should appear in real-time
- [x] -> node execution statuses should update in real-time
Currently, when an agent execution fails to be executed, the front-end
does not display any feedback to the user.
The scope of this change is providing that.
### Changes 🏗️
* Extracted `useToastOnFail` from `credits` page into a unified helper
method.
* Uses `useToastOnFail` on agent execution requests on library pages.
<img width="1000" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2daa0597-eb93-457d-8887-0f00c4db89ac"
/>
<img width="1000" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1a541c98-fb95-424f-8ffe-972332b3ce01"
/>
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Run agent with invalid input
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: Reinier van der Leer <pwuts@agpt.co>
- Prep work for #8782
- Prep work for #8779
### Changes 🏗️
- refactor(platform): Differentiate graph/node execution events
- fix(platform): Subscribe to execution updates by `graph_exec_id`
instead of `graph_id`+`graph_version`
- refactor(backend): Move all execution related models and functions
from `.data.graph` to `.data.execution`
- refactor(backend): Reorganize & refactor `.data.execution`
- fix(libs): Remove `load_dotenv` in `.auth.config` to fix test config
issues
- dx: Bump version of `black` in pre-commit config to v24.10.0 to match
poetry.lock
- Other minor refactoring in both frontend and backend
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- Run an agent in the builder
- [x] -> works normally, node I/O is updated in real time
- Run an agent in the library
- [x] -> works normally
---------
Co-authored-by: Zamil Majdy <zamil.majdy@agpt.co>
This is a follow up to
https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/pull/9511 fixing some
issues and updating onboarding.
### Changes 🏗️
- Update `UserOnboarding` data
- Update schema and add migration
- Change `step` in `UserOnboarding` to `completedSteps` array with
`OnboardingStep` enum
- Remove `isCompleted`: this is now inferred from `completedSteps`
values
- Don't onboard if <2 marketplace agents; that prevents self-host
onboarding
- Add endpoints:
- `is_onboarding_enabled`: to check if users should be onboarded (not if
they finished onboarding); now check if there are at least 2 marketplace
agents
- `get_store_agent`: returns `StoreAgentDetails` for given
`store_listing_version_id`
- `get_graph_meta_by_store_listing_version_id`: returns `GraphMeta`
- Add agent to Library just before running it and not when chosen and
remove code that was responsible for removing agent that wasn't run
- Move onboarding to `OnboardingProvider` (it'll be needed globally for
Phase 2)
- Multiple fixes, renames for clarity
### Checklist 📋
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Don't onboard if less than 2 marketplace agents
- [x] Avoid non-input and credentials agents
- [x] Onboarding works and can be finished
- [x] Onboarding resumes
- [x] Onboarding agent runs correctly
---------
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Tindle <nicholas.tindle@agpt.co>
<!-- Clearly explain the need for these changes: -->
We need an admin agent approval UI for handling the submissions to the
marketplace
### Changes 🏗️
- Adds routes to the admin routes list
- Fixes the db query for submitting new versions of existing agents
- Add models for responses that include version details
- add the admin pages for agent
- Adds the Admin Agent Data Table
- Add all the new endpoints to the client.ts
Models changes
- convert the Submission status to an enum
- remove is_approved from models which was left incorrectly
- Add StoreListingWithVersions
<!-- Concisely describe all of the changes made in this pull request:
-->
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] Test the admin dashboard for
- [x] Reject
- [x] Accept
- [x] Updating listing
- [x] More version submissions
---------
Co-authored-by: Zamil Majdy <zamil.majdy@agpt.co>
<!-- Clearly explain the need for these changes: -->
We need a sidebar for the admin page, might as well reuse the reusable
component to do so!
### Changes 🏗️
- Extracts the agptui sidebar to a more reusable component
- Update the usage of that sidebar in the settings page
- Use that same sidebar for the admin page
<!-- Concisely describe all of the changes made in this pull request:
-->
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] Test the old sidebar
- [x] Test the new sidebar for admin
- Resolves#9609
### Changes 🏗️
- feat(frontend/library): Add "Export agent to file" button
- fix(frontend/library): Put "Open in builder" button behind access
check
- feat(backend): Improve & move graph export stripping logic
- Add logic to strip `SecretField` values
- Move node stripping logic to `NodeModel` from `GraphModel`
- Add `NodeModel.stripped_for_export()` method
- Add `NodeModel.block` property
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- Create and configure an agent with the Publish To Medium block and a
block that uses credentials
- Go to `/library/agents/[id]` for the agent you just created
- [x] -> "Open in builder" button should show
- [x] -> "Open in builder" button should work
- [x] -> "Export agent to file" button should show
- [x] -> "Export agent to file" button should work
- [x] -> Exported file contains no credentials or secrets
- [ ] -> ~~Exported file contains no user IDs~~
- Go to `/library/agents/[id]` for an agent from the marketplace
- [x] -> "Open in builder" button should not show
- [x] -> "Export agent to file" button should not show
### Changes 🏗️
This is a follow-up of
https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/pull/9610
* Addressing the PR comments described in the mentioned PR
* Removed debug logging
* Fix image state loading logic on agent upload process
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Create an library agent and try to create a store listing.
<img width="1409" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/dc86dc97-a33f-4336-ab90-19a53c6f7e0f"
/>
### Changes 🏗️
This is to add the Otto chat bot to the frontend UI.
The changes i have made for this goes as follows:
- I have made and added a basic chat UI widget to the build page, this
will become the main UI for Otto, this will be getting updates in the
future.
- I have made an API route ``/api/otto/ask`` that will receive the
message from the frontend and pass it to the Otto API that we have setup
on GCP.
I already have plans for how we can improve the UI and make it more
modular, this way we can add more features to Otto down the line!
### Config Changes
When we merge this, we will need to add the ENV var for ``otto_api_url``
that will be the URL from GCP where the API is being hosted!
This is now ready for a review as the backend API is up and running, to
who ever does test this, if you want the API url please DM me 😄
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] Set the ENV var for ``otto_api_url`` - ask @Bentlybro for this
- [x] Set the ENV var for ``NEXT_PUBLIC_BEHAVE_AS`` to ``CLOUD``
- [x] Send otto a message from the build page frontend
- [x] Send otto a message that contains graph data to see if the sending
graph data works
- Fixes#9579
### Changes 🏗️
- Fetch & use specific graph version to render graph run I/O on
`/library/agents/[id]`
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- Run an Agent that yields an output
- [x] -> should render normally without errors
- Rename the Agent Output name
- Save the modified Agent
- Open the Agent in the Agent library and attempt to view the output
from step 1
- [x] -> should render normally without errors
---------
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Tindle <nicholas.tindle@agpt.co>
This PR adds backend to make Onboarding UI added in
https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/pull/9485 functional and
adds missing confetti screen at the end of Onboarding.
*Make sure to have at least any 2 agents in store when testing locally.*
Otherwise the onboarding will finish without showing agents.
Visit `/onboarding/reset` to reset onboarding state, otherwise it'll
always redirect to `/library` once finished.
### Changes 🏗️
- Onboarding opens automatically on sign up and login (if unfinished)
for all users
- Update db schema to add `UserOnboarding` and add migration
- Add GET and PATCH `/onboarding` endpoints and logic to retrieve and
update data Onboarding for a user
- Update `POST /library/agents` endpoint
(`addMarketplaceAgentToLibrary`), so it includes input and output nodes;
these are needed to know input schema for the Onboarding
- Use new endpoints during onboarding to fetch and update data
- Use agents from the marketplace and their input schema for the
onboarding
- Add algorithm to choose store agents based on user answers and related
endpoint `GET /onboarding/agents`
- Redirect outside onboarding if finished and resume on proper page
- Add `canvas-confetti` and `@types/canvas-confetti` frontend packages
- Add and show congrats confetti screen when user runs and agent and
before opening library
- Minor design updates and onboarding fixes
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Redirect to `/onboarding/*` on sign up and sign in (if onboarding
unfinished)
- [x] Onboarding works and can be finished
- [x] Agent runs on finish
- [x] Onboarding state is saved and logging out or refreshing page
restores correct state (user choices)
- [x] When onboarding finished, trying to go into `/onboarding`
redirects to `/library`
---------
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Tindle <nicholas.tindle@agpt.co>
Co-authored-by: Reinier van der Leer <pwuts@agpt.co>
- Resolves#9542
### Changes 🏗️
- feat(platform): Add "Delete run" button on `/library/agents/[id]` w/
confirm dialog
- Add `AgentGraphExecution.isDeleted` column for soft delete
- Add `DELETE /api/executions/{graph_exec_id}` endpoint
- feat(frontend): Add "Stop run" button on `/library/agents/[id]`
Technical improvements:
- refactor(frontend): Generalize `AgentDeleteConfirmDialog` ->
`DeleteConfirmDialog`
- refactor(frontend): Brand `GraphExecution.execution_id` and
`Schedule.id` to prevent mixing
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- Click "Delete run" under "Run actions" in the right sidebar
- [x] -> Confirmation dialog should show
- Click "Delete"
- [x] -> run should disappear from list
- [x] -> view should switch to "Draft new run" view
- [x] -> refresh page -> run should not be in list
- Click "Delete" in the menu on a run in the list
- [x] -> Confirmation dialog should show
- Click "Delete"
- [x] -> run should disappear from list
- [x] -> refresh page -> run should not be in list
---------
Co-authored-by: Krzysztof Czerwinski <34861343+kcze@users.noreply.github.com>
Reverts Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT#9570
Some of the styling changes cause issues with existing parts of the
application, and I don't know if partially reverting would cause issues
with the other refactored components/elements.
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Tindle <nicholas.tindle@agpt.co>
This PR fixes the layout of the Library page. It properly anchors the
'old experience' message to the bottom of the viewport and improves the
overall page structure using semantic HTML and Tailwind best practices.
Resolves: #9524
### Changes 🏗️
- Restructured the LibraryPage component to use proper semantic HTML
with a `<main>` element
- Added a fixed Alert component at the bottom of the viewport with 8px
margin
- Used ShadcN Alert component for the 'old experience' message for UI
consistency
- Implemented responsive behavior to hide the alert on mobile screens
- Optimized Tailwind classes by using the `container` utility and
removing redundant styles
- Improved accessibility and UX by using appropriate semantic elements
### Screenshot
<img width="926" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e393007c-639e-4383-922c-41fa67133da8"
/>
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<details>
<summary>Alert Message at Bottom of Library Page</summary>
- [ ] Visit the Library page and verify the alert appears fixed at the
bottom with 8px margin
- [ ] Resize browser window to various desktop sizes and confirm alert
remains centered
- [ ] Scroll through Library page content and verify the alert stays
fixed at the bottom
- [ ] Open developer tools and toggle to mobile view (width < 640px) to
confirm alert is hidden
- [ ] Test in both light and dark mode to ensure alert styling is
consistent with theme
- [ ] Click the "here" link in the alert and verify it navigates to the
monitoring page
- [ ] Verify that QuestionMarkCircled icon in the alert is properly
styled and visible
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: Bentlybro <tomnoon9@gmail.com>
Our application currently uses multiple inconsistent button
implementations across the codebase.
This PR standardizes buttons to use our base Button component that
leverages ShadcN, improving UI consistency, maintainability, and
accessibility.
Resolves: #9567
### Changes 🏗️
- Replaced custom button implementations in various components with our
base Button component and greatly reduced redundant overlapping styles.
- Paired with our designer to streamline our `globals.css` to match the
desired approach.
- Added button variant documentation in Storybook
- Deprecated the obsolete 'primary' class and marked it.
### Screenshots 📷
#### Variants
<img width="466" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9e4f6360-57ec-4f28-b702-e57252d67def"
/>
<img width="418" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a9af17dc-e8bc-429d-a9ac-8380e34b9089"
/>
<img width="129" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2df5d184-bb49-4640-bfb4-879360ca35e6"
/>
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<details>
<summary>Button Consolidation Test Plan</summary>
Visual Verification
- [ ] Verify all button variants (default, destructive, outline,
secondary, ghost, link) render correctly
- [ ] Confirm button styling is consistent across all themes (light,
dark, etc.)
- [ ] Validate that the rounded-full style is applied to appropriate
variants
Functional Testing
- [ ] Test click handlers continue to work on all migrated buttons
- [ ] Verify hover, focus, and active states display correctly on all
buttons
- [ ] Confirm disabled states are working properly
- [ ] Test loading state animations and behavior
Responsive Testing
- [ ] Verify button layouts on mobile devices (< 640px)
- [ ] Confirm button layouts on tablet devices (640px - 1024px)
- [ ] Test button layouts on desktop screens (> 1024px)
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Tindle <nicholas.tindle@agpt.co>
- Resolves#9545
### Changes 🏗️
- fix(platform): Make "Delete" button on `/monitoring` soft-delete the
`LibraryAgent` instead of hard-deleting the corresponding `AgentGraph`
- feat(frontend): Add "Delete agent" button on `/library/agents/[id]`
Technical:
- fix(backend): Accept partial input on `update_library_agent` endpoint
- feat(backend): Add `GET /api/library/agents/{library_agent_id}`
endpoint
- refactor(frontend): Replace use of `GraphMeta` by `LibraryAgent` where
possible on `/library/agents/[id]`
Also, out of scope but important:
- fix(frontend): Hide buttons that require direct graph access depending
on `agent.can_access_graph`
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- Go to the Library and select an agent
- [x] -> `/library/agents/[id]` should load normally
- Save this URL for later (especially the ID)!
- Click "Delete agent" on `/library/agents/[id]`
- [x] -> should show a confirmation dialog
- Click "Delete" to confirm
- [x] -> should redirect back to `/library`
- [x] -> deleted agent should no longer be listed in the Library
- Click "Delete agent" on `/monitoring`
- [x] -> should show a confirmation dialog
- Click "Delete" to confirm
- [x] -> agent should disappear from agent list
- [x] -> views should reset / deselect the deleted agent where
applicable
### Changes 🏗️
Remove Stripe on frontend.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
- Resolves#8774
- Resolves#8775
- Includes back-end work for #9168
- Partially implements #8776
- Partially implements #8777
### Changes 🏗️
- Add `/library` page
- Change target of "Library" navigation link from `/monitoring` to
`/library`
- Move `/agents/[id]` page to `/library/agents/[id]`
- Set application background color to `bg-neutral-50`
- Redirect to new library agent's "runs" page (`/library/agents/[id]`)
after adding from marketplace
Further (technical) frontend changes:
- Add types and client methods for all library API endpoints
- Added `primary` variant to `agptui/Button` component
Backend changes:
- Add functionality to library backend
- Aggregate agent status
- Image generation for use in library view
- Add `LibraryAgent.imageUrl` column to DB schema
- Sorting & pagination
- Explicit relation between library agents and their graph's creator
- Refactor & update API endpoints for DX
- Other minor refactoring
- Add missing but required `MEDIA_GCS_BUCKET_NAME` to `.env.example`
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- `/library`
- [x] Create agent from scratch -> should show up on `/library`
- [x] Add agent to library from marketplace -> should show up on
`/library`
- [x] Click on agent in `/library` -> should go to
`/library/agents/[id]`
- [x] Test sorting & pagination functionality
- `/library/agents/[id]`
- [x] Fill out inputs and click "Run" -> should run like normally
- [x] Select completed agent run -> should show all inputs & outputs
- [x] Click "run again" on a completed agent run -> should run
successfully with same input
- [x] `/monitoring` should still work the same as before
---------
Co-authored-by: abhi1992002 <abhimanyu1992002@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Reinier van der Leer <pwuts@agpt.co>
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Tindle <nicholas.tindle@agpt.co>
### Changes 🏗️
Fix these buttons:
<img width="337" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/702bf3e1-7168-4372-8dcf-71abdea0bc19"
/>
<img width="337" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/362a5e44-3bd4-4849-ba92-8b21cfcfe767"
/>
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: Abhimanyu Yadav <122007096+Abhi1992002@users.noreply.github.com>
### Changes 🏗️
This PR adds interactive UI for the onboarding flow, without any
connection to the backend.
Visit `/onboarding` to see it!
- Add Onboarding pages to `app/onboarding/`
- Add Onboarding components to `components/onboarding`
Note:
- Backend isn't connected, so the agents won't run and state isn't
preserved
- Onboarding state is lost on refresh
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
There are many occurrences in the UI code that we are defining the font
through class but it refers to the invalid font-family names. This
causes the component to end up rendering the text using Times New Roman.
### Changes 🏗️
Remove manual font definition through string font-family name.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
- Resolves#8780
- Part of #8774
### Changes 🏗️
- Add new UI components
- Add `/agents/[id]` page, with sub-components:
- `AgentRunsSelectorList`
- `AgentRunSummaryCard`
- `AgentRunStatusChip`
- `AgentRunDetailsView`
- `AgentRunDraftView`
- `AgentScheduleDetailsView`
Backend improvements:
- Improve output of execution-related API endpoints: return
`GraphExecution` instead of `NodeExecutionResult[]`
- Reduce log spam from Prisma in tests
General frontend improvements:
- Hide nav link names on smaller screens to prevent navbar overflow
- Clean up styling and fix sizing of `agptui/Button`
Technical frontend improvements:
- Fix tailwind config size increments
- Rename `font-poppin` -> `font-poppins`
- Clean up component implementations and usages
- Yeet all occurrences of `variant="default"`
- Remove `default` button variant as duplicate of `outline`; make
`outline` the default
- Fix minor typing issues
DX:
- Add front end type-check step to `pre-commit` config
- Fix logging setup in conftest.py
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- `/agents/[id]` (new)
- Go to page -> list of runs loads
- Create new run -> runs; all I/O is visible
- Click "Run again" -> runs again with same input
- `/monitoring` (existing)
- Go to page -> everything loads
- Selecting agents and agent runs works
---------
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Tindle <nicktindle@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Tindle <nicholas.tindle@agpt.co>
Co-authored-by: Swifty <craigswift13@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Zamil Majdy <zamil.majdy@agpt.co>
<!-- Clearly explain the need for these changes: -->
We want to support some more advanced search specific actions. These are
the base API layers and sample blocks for some of the services we need.
### Changes 🏗️
<!-- Concisely describe all of the changes made in this pull request:
-->
- support pydantic models as an output format
- add apollo
- add smartlead
- add zerobounce
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] Built agents to test
---------
Co-authored-by: Krzysztof Czerwinski <34861343+kcze@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bently <tomnoon9@gmail.com>
Implemented a fully functional user settings page allowing changes to
account details and notification preferences. This change uses a server
first approach and adds much needed form validation to this page.
This PR has added loading skeletons for better UX during data fetching.
Refactored related components to support these changes and finally
implemented server actions to streamline data ingestion.
## Note to developers:
At the moment the notification switches set back to default upon save.
We will want to pass in this information after the api is implemented.
## Changes 🏗️
Rebuilt / Refactored `SettingsFormInput` to `SettingsForm`:
- Implemented Form Validation
- Implemented a form schema with Zod to validate user input
- Added toast messaging to properly inform the user if the form has been
successfully completed or if there is an error in thrown from the server
action.
Added `loading.tsx`
- Using `Skeletons` we can deliver a better loading UI for our users
causing less screen shifting.
Added `actions.ts`
- Added a server action for the settings page. This server action will
handle the updating of user's settings for this page. It handles the
interaction between the application and supabase. After this server
action is ran we revalidate the path for our settings page ensuring
proper data passed to our components.
There is an additional TODO for @ntindle for the api endpoint getting
created. This endpoint will cover the newly added notification switches
and it's toggles.
## Screenshots 📷
### Before Changes:
<img width="1083" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f5283fd5-705b-47cf-a7fa-4ca4d7f03444"
/>
### After Changes:
<img width="762" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/20f96f01-b138-4eb7-8867-ce62a2d603d4"
/>
<img width="1083" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0ae363f5-068f-48e5-8b0f-c079a08f9242"
/>
<img width="1083" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8cb045ef-f322-4992-881e-fb92281c55cb"
/>
#### Form Validation
<img width="1083" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b78cfef6-94da-49f1-9c93-56cdb9ea4c96"
/>
<img width="1083" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ade5dce9-8c4b-40eb-aa0f-ff6d31bc3c3c"
/>
<img width="245" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/88866bbf-4e33-43d9-b04a-b53ac848852d"
/>
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<details>
<summary>Test Plan</summary>
- [ ] Goto the route of `profile/settings`
- [ ] Add an invalid email and notice the new validation messaging
- [ ] Add invalid passwords that do not match and or is under 8
characters notice the new validation messaging
- [ ] Select the cancel button and notice that the form has been set
back to the default values
- [ ] With the form untouched notice the `Save changes` button is
disabled. Toggle a switch and notice the `Save changes` button is now
enabled.
- [ ] Enter in a valid pair of new passwords in the `New Password` and
`Confirm New Password` input fields and select `Save changes`
- [ ] Enter in the same passwords again and notice that we will now be
shown an Error. This error is bubbling up from supabase in our backend
and is stating `New password should be different from the old password`
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Tindle <nicholas.tindle@agpt.co>
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Tindle <nicktindle@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Reinier van der Leer <pwuts@agpt.co>
- Follow-up to #9258
The front end is fetching `/library/agents` -> `LibraryAgent[]` but
using the result as `GraphMeta[]`. This breaks a bunch of things.
### Changes 🏗️
Frontend:
- Add `LibraryAgent` type for `api.listLibraryAgents()`
- Amend all broken usages of `LibraryAgent` objects
- Introduce branded typing for `LibraryAgent.id` and `GraphMeta.id` to
disallow mixing them. This prevents incorrect use in the future, and
reduces the chance of this frontend issue accumulating interest on
existing open PRs.
Backend:
- Add a migration to create `LibraryAgent` objects for all existing
`AgentGraphs`
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] Check that all existing agents are listed in the agents list on
`/monitoring` (check against DB or `GET /api/graphs`)
- [x] Check that all views of `/monitoring` work
- [x] Try to run an agent and check its status
### Changes 🏗️
Added the dispute & refund handling on the system.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2d9c7b48-2ee1-401d-be65-5e9787c8130e
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
### Background
Resolves: #9313
The application is incorrectly nesting the user's profile settings
within the route of `/marketplace` instead of the appropriate route of
`/profile`
This pr will modify the existing code to handle the relocation of the
(user) directory from the /marketplace to /profile.
### Changes 🏗️
1. Refactored directory of `(user)`:
- Moved the directory of (user) from `/marketplace/(user)` to
`profile/(user)`
2. Update Sidebar and Navbar components:
- Updating the existing code from the routing of market to profile by
modifying the existing routes.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<details>
<summary>Test Plan</summary>
- [ ] Navigate to the route of `profile/` and observe the moved page.
- [ ] Navigate to the route of `profile/integrations` and observe the
moved page.
- [ ] Navigate to the route of `profile/api_keys` and observe the moved
page.
- [ ] Navigate to the route of `profile/profile` and observe the moved
page.
- [ ] Navigate to the route of `profile/settings` and observe the moved
page.
- [ ] Navigate to the route of `profile/credits` and observe the moved
page.
</details>
### Background
Resolves: #9313
The marketplace featured agent's section has a bug where if you hover
over a featured agent's card we are getting an incorrect background
color applied to the description.
### Changes 🏗️
1. Refactored `FeaturedStoreCard` to `FeaturedAgentCard`:
- Condensed props and leverage StoreAgent type from api
- Removed onClick handler from props as this is not json serializable
and is not inline with NextJS best practices
- Used built in Card Components from ShadCN to minimize custom styling.
- Optimize images with implementation of the Image component from NextJS
2. Enhanced `FeaturedCardSection` components:
- Removing extensive prop passing and leverage the agent itself with the
StoreAgent type.
- Implemented Link from NextJS to better handler routing and remove the
`useRouter` implementation
- Removed unnecessary handleCardClick method.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
Test Plan
<details>
<summary></summary>
- [ ] Goto the landing page of the application or /marketplace
- [ ] Scroll to the featured agents section
- [ ] Move mouse over each of the cards and observe the image
disappearing and text being shown
- [ ] Observe the background color of the text that replaced the image
matches that of the card
</details>
Scheduling always takes the newest version of an agent.
### Changes 🏗️
This PR allows to schedule any graph version by adding number input to
schedule popup. Number is automatically set to the newest version when
agent is chosen.
<img width="533" alt="Screenshot 2025-02-07 at 5 05 56 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/357b8810-6f02-4066-b7a3-824d9bfd62af"
/>
- Update API, so it accepts graph version
- Update schedule pop up, so it lets user input version number
- Open and schedule correct agent
- Add `Version` column to the schedules table
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Can schedule version between 1 and max version
- [x] Reject incorrect version
- [x] Table shows proper version
- [x] Removing schedule works
Currently it's only possible to open latest graph from monitor and see
the node execution results only when manually running. This PR adds
ability to open running and finished graphs in builder.
### Changes 🏗️
Builder now handles graph version and execution ID in addition to graph
ID when opening a graph. When an execution ID is provided, node
execution results are fetched and subscribed to in real time. This makes
it possible to open a graph that is already executing and see both
existing node execution data and real-time updates (if it's still
running).
- Use graph version and execution id on the builder page and in
`useAgentGraph`
- Use graph version on the `execute_graph` endpoint
- Use graph version on the websockets to distinguish between versions
- Move `formatEdgeID` to utils; it's used in `useAgentGraph.ts` and in
`Flow.tsx`
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Opening finished execution restores node results
- [x] Opening running execution restores results and continues to run
properly
- [x] Results are separate for each graph across multiple tabs
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: Zamil Majdy <zamil.majdy@agpt.co>
<!-- Clearly explain the need for these changes: -->
### Changes 🏗️
- If a node fails to execute and error contains `Insufficient balance`
show toast with link to Billing page
- Rename `Credits` page to `Billing`
<img width="398" alt="Screenshot 2025-02-05 at 2 27 36 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6a5b4db0-a579-4607-a6bd-d5cf9229092f"
/>
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: Aarushi <50577581+aarushik93@users.noreply.github.com>
### What's This PR About?
This PR makes a few simple improvements to how user profiles are handled
in the app:
- **Always Have a Profile:**
If a user doesn't already have a profile, the system now automatically
creates one with some default info (including a fun, randomly generated
username). This way, you never end up with a missing profile.
- **Better Profile Updates:**
Removes the creation of profiles on failed get requests
The use of credit points (equivalent to cents) can cause confussion, the
scope of this PR is removing the use of it in the UI and using USD value
instead.
### Changes 🏗️
Show US values on:
* credit page
* block cost
* balance button in the navbar
<img width="1440" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2b6a18b0-f89d-48bf-84bd-0ea6aa9182f7"
/>
<img width="1440" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7545b496-0e7c-49ea-afc1-a3d1fd3289fb"
/>
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
### Changes
Make the auto top-up wordings clearer:
<img width="547" alt="Screenshot 2025-02-05 at 1 38 16 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9a902442-1815-4a38-af39-d7d4b0e120f0"
/>
<img width="555" alt="Screenshot 2025-02-05 at 1 40 29 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4c9c9cdc-2d73-45f2-8a8d-f7ae7f97541b"
/>
es 🏗️
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
### Changes 🏗️
* Set the minimum auto top-up amount to 500.
* Add description on minimum and dollar value in the input box.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
### Changes 🏗️
Fix return URL post-top-up, when FRONT_END_BASE_URL is used.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
Currently if user tries to sign in with an email that is already
associated with a user they are redirected to login without any
feedback.
### Changes 🏗️
- Show feedback: "User with this email already exists" on signup when
user already registered
- Beta user waitlist message is shown otherwise as previously
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
<img width="1129" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/94aab319-7755-413b-91e1-4ad1ba383b83"
/>
### Changes 🏗️
Add a transaction history table on the user credits page.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: Krzysztof Czerwinski <kpczerwinski@gmail.com>
### Changes 🏗️
- Add `div` to recenter page elements
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
<!-- Clearly explain the need for these changes: -->
We want to be able to use typechecking and see errors before they occur.
This is a PR to help enable us to do so by fixing the existing errors
and hopefully not causing new ones.
### Changes 🏗️
- adds check to ci
- disables some code points
- fixes lots of type errors
- fixes a bunch of the stories
<!-- Concisely describe all of the changes made in this pull request:
-->
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] added types
- [x] Ran some of the stories
- [x] Asked all the relevant parties for manual checks
---------
Co-authored-by: SwiftyOS <craigswift13@gmail.com>
We want to have some more intelligent and less user managed memory
methods, so we add mem0
### Changes 🏗️
- Adds user_id to kwargs for blocks
- Add mem0 blocks
<!-- Concisely describe all of the changes made in this pull request:
-->
### Checklist 📋
- [x] document adding user_id to kwargs for blocks
- [x] Add run and agent Id as optional checkboxes that will be passed
down to mem0
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] Build and submit an agent to @Torantulino and the marketplace for
a personal AI tutor based on recommendations from the mem0 team
---------
Co-authored-by: Aarushi <50577581+aarushik93@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Zamil Majdy <zamil.majdy@agpt.co>
<img width="1157" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5b70aa1e-876f-4163-b69e-c22bd21ea8d3"
/>
### Changes 🏗️
Added auto-top-up credits capability:
* Added autoTopUpConfig column on user
* Added autoTopUp form UI
* Added payment charge logic for top_up_credits
* Added auto-top-up logic on spend_credits
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: Krzysztof Czerwinski <kpczerwinski@gmail.com>
<!-- Clearly explain the need for these changes: -->
Update and adds a basic credential field for use in integrations like
reddit
### Changes 🏗️
<!-- Concisely describe all of the changes made in this pull request:
-->
- Reddit
- Drops the Username and Password for reddit from the .env
- Updates Reddit block with modern provider and credential system
- moves clientid and secret to reading from `Settings().secrets` rather
than input on the block
- moves user agent to `Settings().config`
- SMTP
- update the block to support user password and modern credentials
- Add `UserPasswordCredentials`
- Default API key expiry to None explicitly to help type cohesion
- add `UserPasswordCredentials` with a weird form of `bearer` which we
ideally remove because `basic` is a more appropriate name. This is
dependent on `Webhook _base` allowing a subset of `Credentials`
- Update `Credentials` and `CredentialsType`
- Fix various `OAuth2Credentials | APIKeyCredentials` -> `Credentials`
mismatches between base and derived classes
- Replace `router/@post(create_api_key_credentials)` with
`create_credentials` which now takes a credential and is discriminated
by `type` provided by the credential
- UI/Frontend
- Updated various pages to have saved credential types, icons, and text
for User Pass Credentials
- Update credential input to have an input/modals/selects for user/pass
combos
- Update the types to support having user/pass credentials too (we
should make this more centralized)
- Update Credential Providres to support user_password
- Update `client.ts` to support the new streamlined credential creation
method and endpoint
- DX
- Sort the provider names **again**
TODO:
- [x] Reactivate Conditionally Disabling Reddit
~~- [ ] Look into moving Webhooks base to allow subset of `Credentials`
rather than requiring all webhooks to support the input of all valid
`Credentials` types~~ Out of scope
- [x] Figure out the `singleCredential` calculator in
`credentials-input.tsx` so that it also respects User Pass credentials
and isn't a logic mess
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] Test with agents
---------
Co-authored-by: Zamil Majdy <zamil.majdy@agpt.co>
