## 🧢 Overview
This PR migrates the AutoGPT Platform frontend from [yarn
1](https://classic.yarnpkg.com/lang/en/) to [pnpm](https://pnpm.io/)
using **corepack** for automatic package manager management.
**yarn1** is not longer maintained and a bit old, moving to **pnpm** we
get:
- ⚡ Significantly faster install times,
- 💾 Better disk space efficiency,
- 🛠️ Better community support and maintenance,
- 💆🏽♂️ Config swap very easy
## 🏗️ Changes
### Package Management Migration
- updated [corepack](https://github.com/nodejs/corepack) to use
[pnpm](https://pnpm.io/)
- Deleted `yarn.lock` and generated new `pnpm-lock.yaml`
- Updated `.gitignore`
### Documentation Updates
- `frontend/README.md`:
- added comprehensive tech stack overview with links
- updated all commands to use pnpm
- added corepack setup instructions
- and included migration disclaimer for yarn users
- `backend/README.md`:
- Updated installation instructions to use pnpm with corepack
- `AGENTS.md`:
- Updated testing commands from yarn to pnpm
### CI/CD & Infrastructure
- **GitHub Workflows** :
- updated all jobs to use pnpm with corepack enable
- cleaned FE Playwright test workflow to avoid Sentry noise
- **Dockerfile**:
- updated to use pnpm with corepack, changed lock file reference, and
updated cache mount path
### 📋 Checklist
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
**Test Plan:**
> assuming you are on the `frontend` folder
- [x] Clean installation works: `rm -rf node_modules && corepack enable
&& pnpm install`
- [x] Development server starts correctly: `pnpm dev`
- [x] Build process works: `pnpm build`
- [x] Linting and formatting work: `pnpm lint` and `pnpm format`
- [x] Type checking works: `pnpm type-check`
- [x] Tests run successfully: `pnpm test`
- [x] Storybook starts correctly: `pnpm storybook`
- [x] Docker build succeeds with new pnpm configuration
- [x] GitHub Actions workflow passes with pnpm commands
#### For configuration changes:
- [x] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [x] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [x] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
We have been submoduling Supabase for provisioning local Supabase
instances using docker-compose. Aside from the huge size of unrelated
code being pulled, there is also the risk of pulling unintentional
breaking change from the upstream to the platform.
The latest Supabase changes hide the 5432 port from the supabase-db
container and shift it to the supavisor, the instance that we are
currently not using. This causes an error in the existing setup.
## BREAKING CHANGES
This change will introduce different volume locations for the database
content, pulling this change will make the data content fresh from the
start. To keep your old data with this change, execute this command:
```
cp -r supabase/docker/volumes/db/data db/docker/volumes/db/data
```
### Changes 🏗️
The scope of this PR is snapshotting the current docker-compose code
obtained from the Supabase repository and embedding it into our
repository. This will eliminate the need for submodule / recursive
cloning and bringing the entire Supabase repository into the platform.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] Existing CI
Dependabot's commit messages are bulky and don't use our commit message
scopes. Although not fully customizable, this partially fixes it.
### Changes 🏗️
- Fix dependabot commit message scopes
Co-authored-by: Zamil Majdy <zamil.majdy@agpt.co>
* ci: create dependabot
* ci: target the dev branch for dependabot
* ci: group prs
* ci: group updates
---------
Co-authored-by: Aarushi <50577581+aarushik93@users.noreply.github.com>
