We have been submoduling Supabase for provisioning local Supabase
instances using docker-compose. Aside from the huge size of unrelated
code being pulled, there is also the risk of pulling unintentional
breaking change from the upstream to the platform.
The latest Supabase changes hide the 5432 port from the supabase-db
container and shift it to the supavisor, the instance that we are
currently not using. This causes an error in the existing setup.
## BREAKING CHANGES
This change will introduce different volume locations for the database
content, pulling this change will make the data content fresh from the
start. To keep your old data with this change, execute this command:
```
cp -r supabase/docker/volumes/db/data db/docker/volumes/db/data
```
### Changes 🏗️
The scope of this PR is snapshotting the current docker-compose code
obtained from the Supabase repository and embedding it into our
repository. This will eliminate the need for submodule / recursive
cloning and bringing the entire Supabase repository into the platform.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] Existing CI
<!-- Clearly explain the need for these changes: -->
### Changes 🏗️
Added `--progress` to the submodule update, so that cloning progress can
be tracked and does not appear to hang.
<!-- Concisely describe all of the changes made in this pull request:
-->
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] No code change, just docs.
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [x] No configuration change, just docs.
<details>
<summary> Provide feedback when cloning submodules </summary>
- now updating submodules shows the cloning repo's progress
</details>
Co-authored-by: Your Name <you@example.com>
- ci(frontend): Ensure CI fails if `yarn.lock` is inconsistent with `package.json`
- dx(frontend): Add Prettier check to `lint` script in `package.json`
- dx(frontend): Add `packageManager` to `package.json` for Corepack support
- build(frontend): Use `yarn` consistently in the Dockerfile
Restructuring the Repo to make it clear the difference between classic autogpt and the autogpt platform:
* Move the "classic" projects `autogpt`, `forge`, `frontend`, and `benchmark` into a `classic` folder
* Also rename `autogpt` to `original_autogpt` for absolute clarity
* Rename `rnd/` to `autogpt_platform/`
* `rnd/autogpt_builder` -> `autogpt_platform/frontend`
* `rnd/autogpt_server` -> `autogpt_platform/backend`
* Adjust any paths accordingly
