This pull request adds support for setting up (webhook-)triggered agents
in the Library. It contains changes throughout the entire stack to make
everything work in the various phases of a triggered agent's lifecycle:
setup, execution, updates, deletion.
Setting up agents with webhook triggers was previously only possible in
the Builder, limiting their use to the agent's creator only. To make it
work in the Library, this change uses the previously introduced
`AgentPreset` to store information on, instead of on the graph's nodes
to which only a graph's creator has access.
- Initial ticket: #10111
- Builds on #9786
### Changes 🏗️
Frontend:
- Amend the Library's `AgentRunDraftView` to handle creating and editing
Presets
- Add `hideIfSingleCredentialAvailable` parameter to `CredentialsInput`
- Add multi-select support to `TypeBasedInput`
- Add Presets section to `AgentRunsSelectorList`
- Amend `AgentRunSummaryCard` for use for Presets
- Add `AgentStatusChip` to display general agent status (for now: Active
/ Inactive / Error)
- Add Preset loading logic and create/update/delete handlers logic to
`AgentRunsPage`
- Rename `IconClose` to `IconCross`
API:
- Add `LibraryAgent` properties `has_external_trigger`,
`trigger_setup_info`, `credentials_input_schema`
- Add `POST /library/agents/{library_agent_id}/setup_trigger` endpoint
- Remove redundant parameters from `POST
/library/presets/{preset_id}/execute` endpoint
Backend:
- Add `POST /library/agents/{library_agent_id}/setup_trigger` endpoint
- Extract non-node-related logic from `on_node_activate` into
`setup_webhook_for_block`
- Add webhook-related logic to `update_preset` and `delete_preset`
endpoints
- Amend webhook infrastructure to work with AgentPresets
- Add preset trigger support to webhook ingress endpoint
- Amend executor stack to work with passed-in node input
(`nodes_input_masks`, generalized from `node_credentials_input_map`)
- Amend graph validation to work with passed-in node input
- Add `AgentPreset`->`IntegrationWebhook` relation
- Add `WebhookWithRelations` model
- Change behavior of `BaseWebhooksManager.get_manual_webhook(..)` to
avoid unnecessary changes of the webhook URL: ignore `events` to find
matching webhook, and update `events` if necessary.
- Fix & improve `AgentPreset` API, models, and DB logic
- Add `isDeleted` filter to get/list queries
- Add `user_id` attribute to `LibraryAgentPreset` model
- Add separate `credentials` property to `LibraryAgentPreset` model
- Fix `library_db.update_preset(..)` replacement of existing
`InputPresets`
- Make `library_db.update_preset(..)` more usage-friendly with separate
parameters for updateable properties
- Add `user_id` checks to various DB functions
- Fix error handling in various endpoints
- Fix cache race condition on `load_webhook_managers()`
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- Test existing functionality
- [x] Auto-setup and -teardown of webhooks on save in the builder still
works
- [x] Running an agent normally from the Library still works
- Test new functionality
- [x] Setting up a trigger in the Library
- [x] Updating a trigger in the Library
- [x] Disabling and re-enabling a trigger in the Library
- [x] Deleting a trigger in the Library
- [x] Triggers set up in the Library result in a new run when the
webhook receives a payload
This change introduced async execution for blocks and the execution
engine. Paralellism will be achieved through a single process
asynchronous execution instead of process concurrency.
### Changes 🏗️
* Support async execution for the graph executor
* Removed process creation for node execution
* Update all blocks to support async executions
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] Manual graph executions, tested many of the impacted blocks.
This pull request introduces a comprehensive backend testing guide and
adds new tests for analytics logging and various API endpoints, focusing
on snapshot testing. It also includes corresponding snapshot files for
these tests. Below are the most significant changes:
### Documentation Updates:
* Added a detailed `TESTING.md` file to the backend, providing a guide
for running tests, snapshot testing, writing API route tests, and best
practices. It includes examples for mocking, fixtures, and CI/CD
integration.
### Analytics Logging Tests:
* Implemented tests for logging raw metrics and analytics in
`analytics_test.py`, covering success scenarios, various input values,
invalid requests, and complex nested data. These tests utilize snapshot
testing for response validation.
* Added snapshot files for analytics logging tests, including responses
for success cases, various metric values, and complex analytics data.
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-654bc5aa1951008ec5c110a702279ef58709ee455ba049b9fa825fa60f7e3869R1-R3)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-e0a434b107abc71aeffb7d7989dbfd8f466b5e53f8dea25a87937ec1b885b122R1-R3)
[[3]](diffhunk://#diff-dd0bc0b72264de1a0c0d3bd0c54ad656061317f425e4de461018ca51a19171a0R1-R3)
[[4]](diffhunk://#diff-63af007073db553d04988544af46930458a768544cabd08412265e0818320d11R1-R30)
### Snapshot Files for API Endpoints:
* Added snapshot files for various API endpoint tests, such as:
- Graph-related operations (`graphs_get_single_response`,
`graphs_get_all_response`, `blocks_get_all_response`).
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-b25dba271606530cfa428c00073d7e016184a7bb22166148ab1726b3e113dda8R1-R29)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-1054e58ec3094715660f55bfba1676d65b6833a81a91a08e90ad57922444d056R1-R31)
[[3]](diffhunk://#diff-cfd403ab6f3efc89188acaf993d85e6f792108d1740c7e7149eb05efb73d918dR1-R14)
- User-related operations (`auth_get_or_create_user_response`,
`auth_update_email_response`).
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-49e65ab1eb6af4d0163a6c54ed10be621ce7336b2ab5d47d47679bfaefdb7059R1-R5)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-ac1216f96878bd4356454c317473654d5d5c7c180125663b80b0b45aa5ab52cbR1-R3)
- Credit-related operations (`credits_get_balance_response`,
`credits_get_auto_top_up_response`, `credits_top_up_request_response`).
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-189488f8da5be74d80ac3fb7f84f1039a408573184293e9ba2e321d535c57cddR1-R3)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-ba3c4a6853793cbed24030cdccedf966d71913451ef8eb4b2c4f426ef18ed87aR1-R4)
[[3]](diffhunk://#diff-43d7daa0c82070a9b6aee88a774add8e87533e630bbccbac5a838b7a7ae56a75R1-R3)
- Graph execution and deletion (`blocks_execute_response`,
`graphs_delete_response`).
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-a2ade7d646ad85a2801e7ff39799a925a612548a1cdd0ed99b44dd870d1465b5R1-R12)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-c0d1cd0a8499ee175ce3007c3a87ba5f3235ce02d38ce837560b36a44fdc4a22R1-R3)##
Summary
- add pytest-snapshot to backend dev requirements
- snapshot server route response JSONs
- mention how to update stored snapshots
## Testing
- `poetry run format`
- `poetry run test`
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] run poetry run test
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Tindle <nicholas.tindle@agpt.co>
- Part of #9307
- ❗ Blocks #9541
### Changes 🏗️
Backend:
- Fix+improve `GET /library/presets` (`list_presets`) endpoint
- Fix pagination
- Add `graph_id` filter parameter
- Allow partial preset updates: `PUT /presets/{preset_id}` -> `PATCH
/presets/{preset_id}`
- Allow creating preset from graph execution through `POST /presets`
- Clean up models & DB functions
- Split `upsert_preset` into `create_preset` + `update_preset`
- Add `LibraryAgentPresetUpdatable`
- Replace `CreateLibraryAgentPresetRequest` with
`LibraryAgentPresetCreatable`
- Use `LibraryAgentPresetCreatable` as base class for
`LibraryAgentPreset`
- Remove redundant `set_is_deleted_for_library_agent(..)`
- Improve log statements
- Improve DB statements (e.g. by using unique keys where possible)
Frontend:
- Add timestamp parsing logic to library agent preset endpoints
- Brand `LibraryAgentPreset.id` + references
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] CI green
- Since these changes don't affect existing front-end functionality, no
additional testing is needed.
Suppose we have pint with list[list[int]] type, and we want directly
insert the a new value inside the first index of the first list e.g:
list[0][0] = X through a dynamic pin, this will be translated into
list_$_0_$_0, and the system does not currently support this.
### Changes 🏗️
Add support for nested dynamic pins for list, object, and dict.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] lots of unit tests
- [x] Tried inserting the value directly on the `value` nested field on
Google Sheets Write block.
<img width="371" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0a5e7213-b0e0-4fce-9e89-b39f7a583582"
/>
- Resolves#9987
### Changes 🏗️
- Split `pin_url(..)` out of `validate_url(..)` and call
`extra_url_validator` in between
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] GitHub Read Pull Request Block works with "Include PR Changes"
enabled
The Library Agent credentials UX (#9789) currently doesn't work for
sub-graphs.
### Changes 🏗️
- Include sub-graphs in generating `Graph.credentials_input_schema`
- Propagate `node_credentials_input_map` into `AgentExecutionBlock`
executions
- Fix: also apply `node_credentials_input_map` in `_enqueue_next_nodes`
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- Import a graph with sub-graphs that need credentials
- Run this agent from the Library
- [x] -> Should work
Using sync code in the async route often introduces a blocking
event-loop code that impacts stability.
The current RPC system only provides a synchronous client to call the
service endpoints.
The scope of this PR is to provide an entirely decoupled signature
between client and server, allowing the client can mix & match async &
sync options on the client code while not changing the async/sync nature
of the server.
### Changes 🏗️
* Add support for flexible async/sync RPC client.
* Migrate scheduler client to all-async client.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Scheduler route test.
- [x] Modified service_test.py
- [x] Run normal agent executions
<!-- Clearly explain the need for these changes: -->
We need a way to refund people who spend money on agents wihout making
manual db actions
### Changes 🏗️
- Adds a bunch for refunding users
- Adds reasons and admin id for actions
- Add admin to db manager
- Add UI for this for the admin panel
- Clean up pagination controls
<!-- Concisely describe all of the changes made in this pull request:
-->
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] Test by importing dev db as baseline
- [x] Add transactions on top for "refund", and make sure all existing
transactions work
---------
Co-authored-by: Zamil Majdy <zamil.majdy@agpt.co>
Currently the execution task is not properly distributed between
executors because we need to send the execution request to the execution
server.
The execution manager now accepts the execution request from the message
queue. Thus, we can remove the synchronous RPC system from this service,
let the system focus on executing the agent, and not spare any process
for the HTTP API interface.
This will also reduce the risk of the execution service being too busy
and not able to accept any add execution requests.
### Changes 🏗️
* Remove the RPC system in Agent Executor
* Allow the cancellation of the execution that is still waiting in the
queue (by avoiding it from being executed).
* Make a unified helper for adding an execution request to the system
and move other execution-related helper functions into
`executor/utils.py`.
* Remove non-db connections (redis / rabbitmq) in Database Manager and
let the client manage this by themselves.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Existing CI, some agent runs
Distilled from #9541 to reduce the scope of that PR.
- Part of #9307
- ❗ Blocks #9786
- ❗ Blocks #9541
### Changes 🏗️
- Fix `LibraryAgent` schema (for #9786)
- Fix relationships between `LibraryAgent`, `AgentGraph`, and
`AgentPreset`
- Impose uniqueness constraint on `LibraryAgent`
- Rename things that are called `agent` that actually refer to a
`graph`/`agentGraph`
- Fix singular/plural forms in DB schema
- Simplify reference names of closely related objects (e.g.
`AgentGraph.AgentGraphExecutions` -> `AgentGraph.Executions`)
- Eliminate use of `# type: ignore` in DB statements
- Add `typed` and `typed_cast` utilities to `backend.util.type`
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] CI static type checking (with all risky `# type: ignore` removed)
- [x] Check that column references in views are updated
This is a prerequisite infra change for
https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/issues/9714.
We will need a service where we can maintain our own client (db, redis,
rabbitmq, be it async/sync) and configure our own cadence of
initialization and cleanup.
While refactoring the service.py, an option to use Pyro as an RPC
protocol is also removed.
### Changes 🏗️
* Decouple resource initialization and cleanup from the parent
AppService logic.
* Removed Pyro.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] CI
- Resolves#9731
### Changes 🏗️
- feat: Add "Steps" showing `node_execution_count` to agent run view
- Add `GraphExecutionMeta.stats.node_exec_count` attribute
- feat(backend/executor): Send graph execution update after *every* node
execution (instead of only I/O node executions)
- Update graph execution stats after every node execution
- refactor: Move `GraphExecutionMeta` stats into sub-object
(`cost`, `duration`, `total_run_time` -> `stats.cost`, `stats.duration`,
`stats.node_exec_time`)
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- View an agent run with 1+ steps on `/library/agents/[id]`
- [x] "Info" section layout doesn't break
- [x] Number of steps is shown
- Initiate a new agent run
- [x] "Steps" increments in real time during execution
- Resolves#8782
### Changes 🏗️
- feat(frontend/library): Use WS subscription to get real-time execution
updates
- feat(backend/ws_api): Send `GraphExecutionUpdate` on all new agent I/O
- Include agent I/O in `GraphExecutionUpdate` (by subclassing
`GraphExecution`)
- Add `IO_BLOCK_IDs` to `.blocks.io`
- feat(backend/ws_api): Add `subscribe_graph_executions` method to
WebSocket API
- feat(backend): Withhold `GraphExecution.node_executions` from requests
by non-graph-owners
- Split `GraphExecutionWithNodes` off of `GraphExecution`
- Use `GraphExecution` as much as possible, as it's a much cheaper query
than `GraphExecutionWithNodes`
- refactor(frontend): Make `GraphExecution.node_executions` optional
- fix(frontend): Parse dates in responses of `/executions` and
`/graphs/{graph_id}/executions`
- refactor(frontend/library): Move sorting logic for agent runs list
from `AgentRunsPage` to `AgentRunsSelectorList`
- refactor(backend/ws_api): Clean up message handler implementations
- refactor(backend/tests): Use `.data.execution.get_graph_execution(..)`
directly instead of `AgentServer.test_get_graph_run_results(..)`
Out-of-scope changes:
- refactor(backend): Remove unnecessary query include from
`.data.graph.get_graph_metadata(..)`
Demo:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8ea6225d-7334-49cb-a522-83f153d840da
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- Go to `/library/agents/[id]` for an agent with inputs and outputs
- Draft and run a new run
- [x] -> should appear in the list of runs at the top
- [x] -> should be selected as soon as the request finishes
- [x] -> new I/O should appear as it is generated
- [x] -> status should be updated in real-time (both in list and in
adjacent details view)
- Click "Run again"
- [x] -> should appear in the list of runs at the top
- [x] -> should be selected as soon as the request finishes
- [x] -> new I/O should appear as it is generated
- [x] -> status should be updated in real-time (both in list and in
adjacent details view)
- Click "Open in builder" under "Agent actions"; run the agent from the
builder
- [x] -> should work the same as before
- [x] -> node I/O should appear in real-time
- [x] -> node execution statuses should update in real-time
- Prep work for #8782
- Prep work for #8779
### Changes 🏗️
- refactor(platform): Differentiate graph/node execution events
- fix(platform): Subscribe to execution updates by `graph_exec_id`
instead of `graph_id`+`graph_version`
- refactor(backend): Move all execution related models and functions
from `.data.graph` to `.data.execution`
- refactor(backend): Reorganize & refactor `.data.execution`
- fix(libs): Remove `load_dotenv` in `.auth.config` to fix test config
issues
- dx: Bump version of `black` in pre-commit config to v24.10.0 to match
poetry.lock
- Other minor refactoring in both frontend and backend
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- Run an agent in the builder
- [x] -> works normally, node I/O is updated in real time
- Run an agent in the library
- [x] -> works normally
---------
Co-authored-by: Zamil Majdy <zamil.majdy@agpt.co>
The current block web requests utility has a logic to avoid the system
firing into blocklisted IPs.
However, the current logic is still prone to a few security issues:
* DNS rebinding attack: due to the lack of guarantee on the used IP not
being changed during the IP checking and firing step.
* Open redirect: due to the request sensitive request headers are still
being propagated throughout the web redirect.
### Changes 🏗️
* Uses IP pinning to request the web.
* Strip `Authorization`, `Proxy-Authorization`, `Cookie` upon web
redirects.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Test the web request block, add more tests with different
validation scenarios.
Blocks that are not defined in the block cost are pretty much free. The
lack of cost control makes it hard to control its quota. The scope of
this change is providing a way to charge any executions based on the
number of block being executed in real-time.
### Changes 🏗️
* Add execution charge logic based on the number of blocks executed,
controlled by these two configurations:
* `execution_cost_count_threshold`: We will charge the execution based
on the multiple of this number.
* `execution_cost_per_threshold`: The amount we are charging on its
threshold multiple.
* Make charging logic on the graph execution logic (as opposed to node
level) so it's being done serially and insufficient fund error is
guaranteed to stop the graph execution.
* Moved cost calculation logic into backend/executor/util.py
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Execute graph with configured threshold & cost and test the
balance being deducted on that.
- [x] Existing cost calculation is still being done without any issue.
- [x] Low balance stop the whole graph execution.
### Changes 🏗️
Added these types of input blocks:
* TextShort
* TextLong
* Number
* Date
* Time
* FileUpload
* Dropdown
* Toggle
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Test in respective block codes.
<!-- Clearly explain the need for these changes: -->
The store listing and submissions were previously just a best guess
without much implementation. This updates the database models and
queries and such to be based on discussion around what the process
should look like. It also adds and update the relevant routers for this
change
### Changes 🏗️
Store Listing
- change isApproved to hasApprovedVersion
- Move slug into store listing
- mark an active version in store listing
Store Version
- Move submissions into version
- make name optional
- have state transition timestamps for submitted and approved/rejected
- added a changes field
- added internal comments and clarified review comments field
SubmissionStatus
- Fixed DAFT to DRAFT
StoreListingSubmission
- Dropped table
Graph
- Used more modern format for the params for prisma -- no other changes
Added migrations for all the model movements
<!-- Concisely describe all of the changes made in this pull request:
-->
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] Use the store codepaths from the release testplan doc as the test
plan (claude I can't publish the testplan but I am a maintainer lol,
trust me here my guy, you're supposed to be lenient)
- [x] Check the db is used as appropriate following the rules
---------
Co-authored-by: Zamil Majdy <zamil.majdy@agpt.co>
Agents using Agent blocks should be seamlessly downloaded from the
marketplace to a file and imported from a file.
Requirements:
* A recursive export process that exports all the required agents to a
single file, no matter how many layers deep (taking care of potential
loops).
* An import process that expects and extracts several agents from a
single file into your library at once.
Considerations:
We need to ensure the reference IDs in the Agent Blocks match/are
updated to match the imported sub-agent ids to prevent broken
references.
### Changes 🏗️
* Add sub_graphs field on Graph model
* Improve graph creation query to support inserting graph + subgraphs in
batch
* Deprecate graph template & remove its column
* Update on marketplace download agent (unified the used method, with
more secure cleanup & proper ownership check).
* Fix failing test cases
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] Export graph with sub agents.
- [x] Import the exported graph with sub agents.
<!-- Clearly explain the need for these changes: -->
We don't want to spam the user with similar notification types so we
want to group them up over a timespan and handle that as a group of
notifications.
### Changes 🏗️
- Adds a batch queue
- Moves the ExecutionScheduleur to a generic Scheduler
- Makes the Agent run a batch operation
- Fixes various bugs in how we originally made the batch db models and
queries
<!-- Concisely describe all of the changes made in this pull request:
-->
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] Run 10 agents back to back
- [x] Notice how many emails you get
- [x] Wait a bit and you should after an hour (change the cron rule to
speed up testing this) you'll get an email and see all the batches in
your db are empty
---------
Co-authored-by: Zamil Majdy <zamil.majdy@agpt.co>
Now that the MVP for Smar Decision Block is available, we need to add
this info in the block output:
Messages (list) - The messages list sent to the LLM plus its generated
response as the latest assistant entry. This is a single list of
dictionaries in standard LLM API format).
### Changes 🏗️
* Add `conversations` output pin that populates the update
`conversation_history` input pin with the assistant response.
* Refactored `Smart Decision Block` to avoid downloading the whole graph
on each execution, remove code duplication, declutter data fetching.
* Minor UI issue on the smart decision block entry in the search bar.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
Co-authored-by: Swifty <craigswift13@gmail.com>
Originally we did not allow Blocks to be used as tools due to the
limitations of communicating the correct tool function signatures.
It has however, been decided to allow them to be used knowing that there
are limitations with them.
### Changes 🏗️
- Added ability to execute blocks as tools
### Checklist 📋
<img width="613" alt="Screenshot 2025-02-25 at 12 49 26"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e614f56d-2bdc-46c9-8c2c-e56f80343bde"
/>
- create an agent with an SDM block and a block as a tool
- run agent and make sure the block can be called as a tool
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
---------
Co-authored-by: Zamil Majdy <zamil.majdy@agpt.co>
- Resolves#8774
- Resolves#8775
- Includes back-end work for #9168
- Partially implements #8776
- Partially implements #8777
### Changes 🏗️
- Add `/library` page
- Change target of "Library" navigation link from `/monitoring` to
`/library`
- Move `/agents/[id]` page to `/library/agents/[id]`
- Set application background color to `bg-neutral-50`
- Redirect to new library agent's "runs" page (`/library/agents/[id]`)
after adding from marketplace
Further (technical) frontend changes:
- Add types and client methods for all library API endpoints
- Added `primary` variant to `agptui/Button` component
Backend changes:
- Add functionality to library backend
- Aggregate agent status
- Image generation for use in library view
- Add `LibraryAgent.imageUrl` column to DB schema
- Sorting & pagination
- Explicit relation between library agents and their graph's creator
- Refactor & update API endpoints for DX
- Other minor refactoring
- Add missing but required `MEDIA_GCS_BUCKET_NAME` to `.env.example`
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- `/library`
- [x] Create agent from scratch -> should show up on `/library`
- [x] Add agent to library from marketplace -> should show up on
`/library`
- [x] Click on agent in `/library` -> should go to
`/library/agents/[id]`
- [x] Test sorting & pagination functionality
- `/library/agents/[id]`
- [x] Fill out inputs and click "Run" -> should run like normally
- [x] Select completed agent run -> should show all inputs & outputs
- [x] Click "run again" on a completed agent run -> should run
successfully with same input
- [x] `/monitoring` should still work the same as before
---------
Co-authored-by: abhi1992002 <abhimanyu1992002@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Reinier van der Leer <pwuts@agpt.co>
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Tindle <nicholas.tindle@agpt.co>
## Task
The SmartDecisionMakerBlock is a specialized block in a graph-based
system that leverages a language model (LLM) to make intelligent
decisions about which tools or functions to invoke based on a
user-provided prompt. It is designed to process input data, interact
with a language model, and dynamically determine the appropriate tools
to call from a set of available options, making it a powerful component
for AI-driven workflows.
## How It Works in Practice
- **Scenario:** Imagine a workflow where a user inputs, "Send an email
to John about the meeting." The SmartDecisionMakerBlock is connected to
tools like send_email, schedule_meeting, and search_contacts.
- **Execution:**
1. The block receives the prompt and system instructions (e.g., "Choose
a function to call").
2.It identifies the available tools from the graph and constructs their
signatures (e.g., send_email(recipient, subject, body)).
3. The LLM analyzes the prompt and decides to call send_email with
arguments like recipient: "John", subject: "Meeting", body: "Let’s
discuss...".
4. The block yields these tool-specific outputs, which can be picked up
by downstream nodes to execute the email-sending action.
## Changes 🏗️
- Add the Smart Decision Maker (SDM) block.
- Break circular imports in integration code.
## Work in Progress
⚠️ **Important note this is a temporary UX for the system - UX will be
addressed in a future PR** ⚠️
### Current Status
I’m currently focused on the smart decision logic. The main additions in
the ongoing PR include:
- Defining function signatures for OpenAI function-calling schemas based
on node links and the linked blocks.
- Adding tests for function signature generation.
- Force all tool calls to be made via an agent. (Need to uncomment)
- Restrict each tool call entry to a single node.
- simplify the output emission process, to emit each parameter one at a
time.
- Change test to use agents and hardcode output how I think it should
work to test it does actually work
- Hook up openai, in a simplified way, to test the function calling
(mock for testing)
- Once all the above is working, use credentials system and build of
llm.py
### What’s Next
- Review Process
### Reviewers Phase 1
This PR is now ready for review, during the first phase of reviews I'm
looking for comments on approach and logic.
Out of scope: code style and organization at this stage
### Reviewers Phase 2
Once we are all happy with the approach and logic. We can open the
review process to general code quality and nits, to be considered.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zamil Majdy <zamil.majdy@agpt.co>
- Resolves#8780
- Part of #8774
### Changes 🏗️
- Add new UI components
- Add `/agents/[id]` page, with sub-components:
- `AgentRunsSelectorList`
- `AgentRunSummaryCard`
- `AgentRunStatusChip`
- `AgentRunDetailsView`
- `AgentRunDraftView`
- `AgentScheduleDetailsView`
Backend improvements:
- Improve output of execution-related API endpoints: return
`GraphExecution` instead of `NodeExecutionResult[]`
- Reduce log spam from Prisma in tests
General frontend improvements:
- Hide nav link names on smaller screens to prevent navbar overflow
- Clean up styling and fix sizing of `agptui/Button`
Technical frontend improvements:
- Fix tailwind config size increments
- Rename `font-poppin` -> `font-poppins`
- Clean up component implementations and usages
- Yeet all occurrences of `variant="default"`
- Remove `default` button variant as duplicate of `outline`; make
`outline` the default
- Fix minor typing issues
DX:
- Add front end type-check step to `pre-commit` config
- Fix logging setup in conftest.py
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- `/agents/[id]` (new)
- Go to page -> list of runs loads
- Create new run -> runs; all I/O is visible
- Click "Run again" -> runs again with same input
- `/monitoring` (existing)
- Go to page -> everything loads
- Selecting agents and agent runs works
---------
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Tindle <nicktindle@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Tindle <nicholas.tindle@agpt.co>
Co-authored-by: Swifty <craigswift13@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Zamil Majdy <zamil.majdy@agpt.co>
- Blocked by #9267
This re-introduces changes from the following PRs with fixes:
- #9218
- #9211
### Changes 🏗️
- See #9218
- See #9211
Fixes:
- Fix Prisma query statements in `v2.library.db`
- Fix creation of (library) agents
- Fix test cleanup of (library) agents
- Fix handling and passing of `node_input` parameters
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Create & run a new agent
- [x] Update & run an existing agent
### Changes 🏗️
Due to the legacy of SQLite usage, some of the JSON columns are actually
a string column string a stringified JSON column.
The scope of this PR is migrating those columns into an actual JSON
column.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
Currently it's only possible to open latest graph from monitor and see
the node execution results only when manually running. This PR adds
ability to open running and finished graphs in builder.
### Changes 🏗️
Builder now handles graph version and execution ID in addition to graph
ID when opening a graph. When an execution ID is provided, node
execution results are fetched and subscribed to in real time. This makes
it possible to open a graph that is already executing and see both
existing node execution data and real-time updates (if it's still
running).
- Use graph version and execution id on the builder page and in
`useAgentGraph`
- Use graph version on the `execute_graph` endpoint
- Use graph version on the websockets to distinguish between versions
- Move `formatEdgeID` to utils; it's used in `useAgentGraph.ts` and in
`Flow.tsx`
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Opening finished execution restores node results
- [x] Opening running execution restores results and continues to run
properly
- [x] Results are separate for each graph across multiple tabs
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: Zamil Majdy <zamil.majdy@agpt.co>
Currently, the test is failing on Jan 29 because 29th Feb does not
exist.
### Changes 🏗️
Force use the first day of the month for getting the current time.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Tindle <nicholas.tindle@agpt.co>
We want to have some more intelligent and less user managed memory
methods, so we add mem0
### Changes 🏗️
- Adds user_id to kwargs for blocks
- Add mem0 blocks
<!-- Concisely describe all of the changes made in this pull request:
-->
### Checklist 📋
- [x] document adding user_id to kwargs for blocks
- [x] Add run and agent Id as optional checkboxes that will be passed
down to mem0
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] Build and submit an agent to @Torantulino and the marketplace for
a personal AI tutor based on recommendations from the mem0 team
---------
Co-authored-by: Aarushi <50577581+aarushik93@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Zamil Majdy <zamil.majdy@agpt.co>
This re-introduces PR #9179 with some fixes.
This PR enables the execution of store agents even if they are not owned
by the user. Key changes include handling store-listed agents in the
`get_graph` logic, improving execution flow, and ensuring
version-specific handling. These updates support more flexible agent
execution.
### Changes 🏗️
(copied from #9179)
- **Graph Retrieval:** Updated `get_graph` to check store listings for
agents not owned by the user.
- **Version Handling:** Added `graph_version` to execution methods for
consistent version-specific execution.
- **Execution Flow:** Refactored `scheduler.py`, `rest_api.py`, and
other modules for clearer logic and better maintainability.
- **Testing:** Updated `test_manager.py` and other test cases to
validate execution of store-listed agents added test for accessing graph
Out-of-scope changes:
- Add logic to pretty-print Pydantic validation error responses to
backend API client in frontend
---------
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Tindle <nicktindle@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Tindle <nicholas.tindle@agpt.co>
Co-authored-by: Swifty <craigswift13@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Zamil Majdy <zamil.majdy@agpt.co>
<img width="1157" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5b70aa1e-876f-4163-b69e-c22bd21ea8d3"
/>
### Changes 🏗️
Added auto-top-up credits capability:
* Added autoTopUpConfig column on user
* Added autoTopUp form UI
* Added payment charge logic for top_up_credits
* Added auto-top-up logic on spend_credits
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: Krzysztof Czerwinski <kpczerwinski@gmail.com>
To maintain the transaction running-balance integrity, the monthly
top-up balance has to adjust the top-up amount to maintain the balance
of the user to be at least X amount, instead of top-up the user balance
with a fixed X amount.
### Changes 🏗️
* Add an additional query to sum the remaining un-snapshotted balance
(if any).
* Monthly top-up transaction set the amount target_amount -
current_balance instead of fixed target_amount.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
We want to allow external api calls against our platform
We also want to keep it sep from internal platform calls for dev ex,
security and scale seperation of concerns
### Changes 🏗️
This PR adds the required external routes
It mounts the new routes on the same app
Infra PR will seprate routing and domains
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
We need to be able to determine the cost of graph/node execution.
### Changes 🏗️
* Add these columns into CreditTransaction `metadata` column:
- graph_id
- node_id
- graph_exec_id
- node_exec_id
- block_id
* Drop the `blockId` column and backfill the dropped value into
metadata->>block_id.
* Frequent queries on these values will require an index created on
demand through a migration, depending on the use case.
---------
Co-authored-by: Krzysztof Czerwinski <kpczerwinski@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Reinier van der Leer <pwuts@agpt.co>
This PR adds Stripe integration and payment processing for topping-up
user accounts with credits.
### Changes 🏗️
Includes:
- https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/pull/9176
#### Top-up flow
1. To top-up a user visits their settings and clicks `Credits` button
(it's unavailable if `NEXT_PUBLIC_STRIPE_PUBLISHABLE_KEY` isn't present)
2. User inputs top-up amount (min 5$ in 1$ increments) and click the
button to confirm.
3. Backend receives top-up request, creates database entry and requests
stripe to provide url for this specific checkout.
4. User gets redirected to externally hosted Stripe checkout page, after
payment (or cancelling) they get redirected back to Credits page.
5. In the meantime Stripe processes payment and sends webhook
confirmation to the backend, backend updates database to activate bought
credits.
6. Credits page shows success (or failure) information (by using url
param `topup=success|cancel`). Credit counter won't update without
refreshing the page unless payment was confirmed before user was back on
Credits page which is the case when testing checkout locally.
<img width="804" alt="Screenshot 2025-01-01 at 2 55 35 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/22fb518d-b30b-4154-bb4b-edea1d57b6c2"
/>
#### Backend
- Add `stripe` package
- Add environment variables:
- `STRIPE_API_KEY`
- `STRIPE_WEBHOOK_SECRET`
- Add routes:
- `POST /credits`: top-up request, returns Stripe checkout url.
- `POST /credits/stripe_webhook`: Stripe webhook endpoint to notify of
successful payment.
- `PATCH /credits`: prompts beckend to check payment status. It's an
additional failsafe in case webhook fails.
- Update `credit.py` and related files to handle top-up request and
payment confirmation
#### Frontend
- Add `stripe-js` package
- Add `NEXT_PUBLIC_STRIPE_PUBLISHABLE_KEY` environment variable
- Modify user settings sidebar to show `Credits` if
`NEXT_PUBLIC_STRIPE_PUBLISHABLE_KEY` is available
- Add `store/credits` page where user can top-up their account, it shows
confirmation (or failure) after completing checkout.
- Add `useCredits` hook that returns user credits and allows to request
top-up.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [x] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: Zamil Majdy <zamil.majdy@agpt.co>
- **Revert "feature(platform): Implement library add, update, remove,
archive functionality (#9218)"**
- **Revert "feat(backend): Add Support for Managing Agent Presets with
Pagination and Soft Delete (#9211)"**
These PRs contain untested changes to DB functions and cause issues in
production.
### Description
This PR enables the execution of store agents even if they are not owned
by the user. Key changes include handling store-listed agents in the
`get_graph` logic, improving execution flow, and ensuring
version-specific handling. These updates support more flexible agent
execution.
### Changes 🏗️
- **Graph Retrieval:** Updated `get_graph` to check store listings for
agents not owned by the user.
- **Version Handling:** Added `graph_version` to execution methods for
consistent version-specific execution.
- **Execution Flow:** Refactored `scheduler.py`, `rest_api.py`, and
other modules for clearer logic and better maintainability.
- **Testing:** Updated `test_manager.py` and other test cases to
validate execution of store-listed agents added test for accessing graph
---------
Co-authored-by: Reinier van der Leer <pwuts@agpt.co>
Co-authored-by: Zamil Majdy <zamil.majdy@agpt.co>
Python format uses `{Variable}` as the variable placeholder, while Jinja
uses `{{Variable}}` as its default.
Jinja is used as the main templating engine on the system, but the
Python format version is still maintained for backward compatibility.
However, the backward compatibility support can cause a side effect
while passing JSON string value into the block that uses it:
https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/issues/9194
### Changes 🏗️
* Use `{{Variable}}` place holder format and removed `{Variable}`
support in these blocks:
- '363ae599-353e-4804-937e-b2ee3cef3da4', -- AgentOutputBlock
- 'db7d8f02-2f44-4c55-ab7a-eae0941f0c30', -- FillTextTemplateBlock
- '1f292d4a-41a4-4977-9684-7c8d560b9f91', -- AITextGeneratorBlock
- 'ed55ac19-356e-4243-a6cb-bc599e9b716f' --
AIStructuredResponseGeneratorBlock
* Add Jinja templating support on `AITextGeneratorBlock` &
`AIStructuredResponseGeneratorBlock`
* Migrated the existing database content to prevent breaking changes.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
- resolves - #9120
### Changes
- Added a new endpoint to download agent files as JSON, allowing users
to retrieve agent data by store listing version ID and version number.
- Introduced a new `get_agent` function in the database module to fetch
agent details and prepare the graph data for download.
- Enhanced the frontend `AgentInfo` component to include a download
button, which triggers the download of the agent file.
- Integrated loading state and user feedback via toast notifications
during the download process.
- Updated the API client to support the new download functionality.
### Demo video
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6744a753-297f-4ccc-abde-f56ca24ed2d5
### Example Json
```json
{
"id": "14378095-4cc5-41ea-975e-bd0bce010bea",
"version": 1,
"is_active": true,
"is_template": false,
"name": "something",
"description": "1",
"nodes": [
{
"id": "6914efa0-e4fa-4ce8-802c-d5577cf061b6",
"block_id": "aeb08fc1-2fc1-4141-bc8e-f758f183a822",
"input_default": {},
"metadata": {
"position": {
"x": 756,
"y": 452.5
}
},
"input_links": [],
"output_links": [],
"webhook_id": null,
"graph_id": "14378095-4cc5-41ea-975e-bd0bce010bea",
"graph_version": 1,
"webhook": null
}
],
"links": [],
"input_schema": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {},
"required": []
},
"output_schema": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {},
"required": []
}
}
```
---------
Co-authored-by: SwiftyOS <craigswift13@gmail.com>
https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/issues/8739 causes input
fields that are supposed to be an advanced field end up being a
mandatory field:
*See the retry count field here.
### Changes 🏗️
Set the `advanced` field on each input field, and set the default value
using this logic:
* If it has a default value, set it to True.
* otherwise, False.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: Swifty <craigswift13@gmail.com>
# 🌎 Overview
AutoGPT Store Version 2 expands on the Pre-Store by enhancing agent
discovery, providing richer content presentation, and introducing new
user engagement features. The focus is on creating a visually appealing
and interactive marketplace that allows users to explore and evaluate
agents through images, videos, and detailed descriptions.
### Vision
To create a visually compelling and interactive open-source marketplace
for autonomous AI agents, where users can easily discover, evaluate, and
interact with agents through media-rich listings, ratings, and version
history.
### Objectives
📊 Incorporate visuals (icons, images, videos) into agent listings.
⭐ Introduce a rating system and agent run count.
🔄 Provide version history and update logs from creators.
🔍 Improve user experience with advanced search and filtering features.
### Changes 🏗️
<!-- Concisely describe all of the changes made in this pull request:
-->
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: Bently <tomnoon9@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Aarushi <aarushik93@gmail.com>
First step for the PAYG System.
### Changes 🏗️
- Add `stripeCustomerId` to `User` model
- Rename model `UserBlockCredit` to `CreditTransaction`
- Rename model `UserBlockCreditType` to `CreditTransactionType`
- Update related code
- Add a migration
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
This is a follow-up of
https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/pull/8752
There are several APIs and functions related to graph execution that are
unused now.
There is also confusion about the name of `GraphExecution` that exists
in graph.py & execution.py.
### Changes 🏗️
* Renamed `GraphExecution` in `execution.py` to `GraphExecutionEntry`,
this is only used as a queue entry for execution.
* Removed unused `get_graph_execution` & `list_executions` in
`execution.py`.
* Removed `with_run` option on `get_graph` function in `graph.py`.
* Removed `GraphMetaWithRuns`
* Removed exposed functions only for testing.
* Removed `executions` fields in Graph model.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [ ] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [ ] I have made a test plan
- [ ] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [ ] ...
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
- [ ] Create from scratch and execute an agent with at least 3 blocks
- [ ] Import an agent from file upload, and confirm it executes
correctly
- [ ] Upload agent to marketplace
- [ ] Import an agent from marketplace and confirm it executes correctly
- [ ] Edit an agent from monitor, and confirm it executes correctly
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [ ] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
- Changing ports
- Adding new services that need to communicate with each other
- Secrets or environment variable changes
- New or infrastructure changes such as databases
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: Krzysztof Czerwinski <34861343+kcze@users.noreply.github.com>
