mirror of
https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT.git
synced 2026-04-08 03:00:28 -04:00
e596ea87cbae55eedba3bc58f144702e9e310504
21 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
8fddc9d71f |
fix(backend): Reduce GET /api/graphs expense + latency (#11986)
[SECRT-1896: Fix crazy `GET /api/graphs` latency (P95 = 107s)](https://linear.app/autogpt/issue/SECRT-1896) These changes should decrease latency of this endpoint by ~~60-65%~~ a lot. ### Changes 🏗️ - Make `Graph.credentials_input_schema` cheaper by avoiding constructing a new `BlockSchema` subclass - Strip down `GraphMeta` - drop all computed fields - Replace with either `GraphModel` or `GraphModelWithoutNodes` wherever those computed fields are used - Simplify usage in `list_graphs_paginated` and `fetch_graph_from_store_slug` - Refactor and clarify relationships between the different graph models - Split `BaseGraph` into `GraphBaseMeta` + `BaseGraph` - Strip down `Graph` - move `credentials_input_schema` and `aggregate_credentials_inputs` to `GraphModel` - Refactor to eliminate double `aggregate_credentials_inputs()` call in `credentials_input_schema` call tree - Add `GraphModelWithoutNodes` (similar to current `GraphMeta`) ### Checklist 📋 #### For code changes: - [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description - [x] I have made a test plan - [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan: - [x] `GET /api/graphs` works as it should - [x] Running a graph succeeds - [x] Adding a sub-agent in the Builder works as it should |
||
|
|
7e37de8e30 |
fix: Include graph schemas for marketplace agents in Agent Generator (#11920)
## Problem When marketplace agents are included in the `library_agents` payload sent to the Agent Generator service, they were missing required fields (`graph_id`, `graph_version`, `input_schema`, `output_schema`). This caused Pydantic validation to fail with HTTP 422 Unprocessable Entity. **Root cause:** The `MarketplaceAgentSummary` TypedDict had a different shape than `LibraryAgentInfo` expected by the Agent Generator: - Agent Generator expects: `graph_id`, `graph_version`, `name`, `description`, `input_schema`, `output_schema` - MarketplaceAgentSummary had: `name`, `description`, `sub_heading`, `creator`, `is_marketplace_agent` ## Solution 1. **Add `agent_graph_id` to `StoreAgent` model** - The field was already in the database view but not exposed 2. **Include `agentGraphId` in hybrid search SQL query** - Carry the field through the search CTEs 3. **Update `search_marketplace_agents_for_generation()`** - Now fetches full graph schemas using `get_graph()` and returns `LibraryAgentSummary` (same type as library agents) 4. **Update deduplication logic** - Use `graph_id` instead of name for more accurate deduplication ## Changes - `backend/api/features/store/model.py`: Add optional `agent_graph_id` field to `StoreAgent` - `backend/api/features/store/hybrid_search.py`: Include `agentGraphId` in SQL query columns - `backend/api/features/store/db.py`: Map `agentGraphId` when creating `StoreAgent` objects - `backend/api/features/chat/tools/agent_generator/core.py`: Update `search_marketplace_agents_for_generation()` to fetch and include full graph schemas ## Testing - [ ] Agent creation on dev with marketplace agents in context - [ ] Verify no 422 errors from Agent Generator - [ ] Verify marketplace agents can be used as sub-agents Fixes: SECRT-1817 --------- Co-authored-by: majdyz <majdyz@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Zamil Majdy <zamil.majdy@agpt.co> |
||
|
|
18a1661fa3 |
feat: add library agent fetching with two-phase search for sub-agent support (#11889)
## Context
When users ask the chat to create agents, they may want to compose
workflows that reuse their existing agents as sub-agents. For this to
work, the Agent Generator service needs to know what agents the user has
available.
**Challenge:** Users can have large libraries with many agents. Fetching
all of them would be slow and provide too much context to the LLM.
## Solution
This PR implements **search-based library agent fetching** with a
**two-phase search** strategy:
1. **Phase 1 (Initial Search):** When the user describes their goal, we
search for relevant library agents using the goal as the search query
2. **Phase 2 (Step-Based Enrichment):** After the goal is decomposed
into steps, we extract keywords from those steps and search for
additional relevant agents
This ensures we find agents that are relevant to both the high-level
goal AND the specific steps identified.
### Example Flow
```
User goal: "Create an agent that fetches weather and sends a summary email"
Phase 1: Search for "weather email summary" → finds "Weather Fetcher" agent
Phase 2: After decomposition identifies steps like "send email notification"
→ searches "send email notification" → finds "Gmail Sender" agent
```
### Changes
**Library Agent Fetching:**
- `get_library_agents_for_generation()` - Search-based fetching from
user's library
- `search_marketplace_agents_for_generation()` - Search public
marketplace
- `get_all_relevant_agents_for_generation()` - Combines both with
deduplication
**Two-Phase Search:**
- `extract_search_terms_from_steps()` - Extracts keywords from
decomposed steps
- `enrich_library_agents_from_steps()` - Searches for additional agents
based on steps
- Integrated into `create_agent.py` as "Step 1.5" after goal
decomposition
**Type Safety:**
- Added `TypedDict` definitions: `LibraryAgentSummary`,
`MarketplaceAgentSummary`, `DecompositionStep`, `DecompositionResult`
### Design Decisions
- **Search-based, not fetch-all:** Scalable for large libraries
- **Library agents prioritized:** They have full schemas; marketplace
agents have basic info only
- **Deduplication by name and graph_id:** Prevents duplicates across
searches
- **Graceful degradation:** Failures don't block agent generation
- **Limited to 3 search terms:** Avoids excessive API calls during
enrichment
## Related PR
- Agent Generator:
https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT-Agent-Generator/pull/103
## Test plan
- [x] `test_library_agents.py` - 19 tests covering all new functions
- [x] `test_service.py` - 4 tests for library_agents passthrough
- [ ] Integration test: Create agent with library sub-agent composition
|
||
|
|
8b25e62959 |
feat(backend,frontend): add explicit safe mode toggles for HITL and sensitive actions (#11756)
## Summary This PR introduces two explicit safe mode toggles for controlling agent execution behavior, providing clearer and more granular control over when agents should pause for human review. ### Key Changes **New Safe Mode Settings:** - **`human_in_the_loop_safe_mode`** (bool, default `true`) - Controls whether human-in-the-loop (HITL) blocks pause for review - **`sensitive_action_safe_mode`** (bool, default `false`) - Controls whether sensitive action blocks pause for review **New Computed Properties on LibraryAgent:** - `has_human_in_the_loop` - Indicates if agent contains HITL blocks - `has_sensitive_action` - Indicates if agent contains sensitive action blocks **Block Changes:** - Renamed `requires_human_review` to `is_sensitive_action` on blocks for clarity - Blocks marked as `is_sensitive_action=True` pause only when `sensitive_action_safe_mode=True` - HITL blocks pause when `human_in_the_loop_safe_mode=True` **Frontend Changes:** - Two separate toggles in Agent Settings based on block types present - Toggle visibility based on `has_human_in_the_loop` and `has_sensitive_action` computed properties - Settings cog hidden if neither toggle applies - Proper state management for both toggles with defaults **AI-Generated Agent Behavior:** - AI-generated agents set `sensitive_action_safe_mode=True` by default - This ensures sensitive actions are reviewed for AI-generated content ## Changes **Backend:** - `backend/data/graph.py` - Updated `GraphSettings` with two boolean toggles (non-optional with defaults), added `has_sensitive_action` computed property - `backend/data/block.py` - Renamed `requires_human_review` to `is_sensitive_action`, updated review logic - `backend/data/execution.py` - Updated `ExecutionContext` with both safe mode fields - `backend/api/features/library/model.py` - Added `has_human_in_the_loop` and `has_sensitive_action` to `LibraryAgent` - `backend/api/features/library/db.py` - Updated to use `sensitive_action_safe_mode` parameter - `backend/executor/utils.py` - Simplified execution context creation **Frontend:** - `useAgentSafeMode.ts` - Rewritten to support two independent toggles - `AgentSettingsModal.tsx` - Shows two separate toggles - `SelectedSettingsView.tsx` - Shows two separate toggles - Regenerated API types with new schema ## Test Plan - [x] All backend tests pass (Python 3.11, 3.12, 3.13) - [x] All frontend tests pass - [x] Backend format and lint pass - [x] Frontend format and lint pass - [x] Pre-commit hooks pass --------- Co-authored-by: Nicholas Tindle <nicholas.tindle@agpt.co> |
||
|
|
47a3a5ef41 |
feat(backend,frontend): optional credentials flag for blocks at agent level (#11716)
This feature allows agent makers to mark credential fields as optional.
When credentials are not configured for an optional block, the block
will be skipped during execution rather than causing a validation error.
**Use case:** An agent with multiple notification channels (Discord,
Twilio, Slack) where the user only needs to configure one - unconfigured
channels are simply skipped.
### Changes 🏗️
#### Backend
**Data Model Changes:**
- `backend/data/graph.py`: Added `credentials_optional` property to
`Node` model that reads from node metadata
- `backend/data/execution.py`: Added `nodes_to_skip` field to
`GraphExecutionEntry` model to track nodes that should be skipped
**Validation Changes:**
- `backend/executor/utils.py`:
- Updated `_validate_node_input_credentials()` to return a tuple of
`(credential_errors, nodes_to_skip)`
- Nodes with `credentials_optional=True` and missing credentials are
added to `nodes_to_skip` instead of raising validation errors
- Updated `validate_graph_with_credentials()` to propagate
`nodes_to_skip` set
- Updated `validate_and_construct_node_execution_input()` to return
`nodes_to_skip`
- Updated `add_graph_execution()` to pass `nodes_to_skip` to execution
entry
**Execution Changes:**
- `backend/executor/manager.py`:
- Added skip logic in `_on_graph_execution()` dispatch loop
- When a node is in `nodes_to_skip`, it is marked as `COMPLETED` without
execution
- No outputs are produced, so downstream nodes won't trigger
#### Frontend
**Node Store:**
- `frontend/src/app/(platform)/build/stores/nodeStore.ts`:
- Added `credentials_optional` to node metadata serialization in
`convertCustomNodeToBackendNode()`
- Added `getCredentialsOptional()` and `setCredentialsOptional()` helper
methods
**Credential Field Component:**
-
`frontend/src/components/renderers/input-renderer/fields/CredentialField/CredentialField.tsx`:
- Added "Optional - skip block if not configured" switch toggle
- Switch controls the `credentials_optional` metadata flag
- Placeholder text updates based on optional state
**Credential Field Hook:**
-
`frontend/src/components/renderers/input-renderer/fields/CredentialField/useCredentialField.ts`:
- Added `disableAutoSelect` parameter
- When credentials are optional, auto-selection of credentials is
disabled
**Feature Flags:**
- `frontend/src/services/feature-flags/use-get-flag.ts`: Minor refactor
(condition ordering)
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Build an agent using smart decision maker and down stream blocks
to test this
<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---
> [!NOTE]
> Introduces optional credentials across graph execution and UI,
allowing nodes to be skipped (no outputs, no downstream triggers) when
their credentials are not configured.
>
> - Backend
> - Adds `Node.credentials_optional` (from node `metadata`) and computes
required credential fields in `Graph.credentials_input_schema` based on
usage.
> - Validates credentials with `_validate_node_input_credentials` →
returns `(errors, nodes_to_skip)`; plumbs `nodes_to_skip` through
`validate_graph_with_credentials`,
`_construct_starting_node_execution_input`,
`validate_and_construct_node_execution_input`, and `add_graph_execution`
into `GraphExecutionEntry`.
> - Executor: dispatch loop skips nodes in `nodes_to_skip` (marks
`COMPLETED`); `execute_node`/`on_node_execution` accept `nodes_to_skip`;
`SmartDecisionMakerBlock.run` filters tool functions whose
`_sink_node_id` is in `nodes_to_skip` and errors only if all tools are
filtered.
> - Models: `GraphExecutionEntry` gains `nodes_to_skip` field. Tests and
snapshots updated accordingly.
>
> - Frontend
> - Builder: credential field uses `custom/credential_field` with an
"Optional – skip block if not configured" toggle; `nodeStore` persists
`credentials_optional` and history; UI hides optional toggle in run
dialogs.
> - Run dialogs: compute required credentials from
`credentials_input_schema.required`; allow selecting "None"; avoid
auto-select for optional; filter out incomplete creds before execute.
> - Minor schema/UI wiring updates (`uiSchema`, form context flags).
>
> <sup>Written by [Cursor
Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit
|
||
|
|
36fb1ea004 |
fix(platform): store submission validation and marketplace improvements (#11706)
## Summary Major improvements to AutoGPT Platform store submission deletion, creator detection, and marketplace functionality. This PR addresses critical issues with submission management and significantly improves performance. ### 🔧 **Store Submission Deletion Issues Fixed** **Problems Solved**: - ❌ **Wrong deletion granularity**: Deleting entire `StoreListing` (all versions) when users expected to delete individual submissions - ❌ **"Graph not found" errors**: Cascade deletion removing AgentGraphs that were still referenced - ❌ **Multiple submissions deleted**: When removing one submission, all submissions for that agent were removed - ❌ **Deletion of approved content**: Users could accidentally remove live store content **Solutions Implemented**: - ✅ **Granular deletion**: Now deletes individual `StoreListingVersion` records instead of entire listings - ✅ **Protected approved content**: Prevents deletion of approved submissions to keep store content safe - ✅ **Automatic cleanup**: Empty listings are automatically removed when last version is deleted - ✅ **Simplified logic**: Reduced deletion function from 85 lines to 32 lines for better maintainability ### 🔧 **Creator Detection Performance Issues Fixed** **Problems Solved**: - ❌ **Inefficient API calls**: Fetching ALL user submissions just to check if they own one specific agent - ❌ **Complex logic**: Convoluted creator detection requiring multiple database queries - ❌ **Performance impact**: Especially bad for non-creators who would never need this data **Solutions Implemented**: - ✅ **Added `owner_user_id` field**: Direct ownership reference in `LibraryAgent` model - ✅ **Simple ownership check**: `owner_user_id === user.id` instead of complex submission fetching - ✅ **90%+ performance improvement**: Massive reduction in unnecessary API calls for non-creators - ✅ **Optimized data fetching**: Only fetch submissions when user is creator AND has marketplace listing ### 🔧 **Original Store Submission Validation Issues (BUILDER-59F)** Fixes "Agent not found for this user. User ID: ..., Agent ID: , Version: 0" errors: - **Backend validation**: Added Pydantic validation for `agent_id` (min_length=1) and `agent_version` (>0) - **Frontend validation**: Pre-submission validation with user-friendly error messages - **Agent selection flow**: Fixed `agentId` not being set from `selectedAgentId` - **State management**: Prevented state reset conflicts clearing selected agent ### 🔧 **Marketplace Display Improvements** Enhanced version history and changelog display: - Updated title from "Changelog" to "Version history" - Added "Last updated X ago" with proper relative time formatting - Display version numbers as "Version X.0" format - Replaced all hardcoded values with dynamic API data - Improved text sizes and layout structure ### 📁 **Files Changed** **Backend Changes**: - `backend/api/features/store/db.py` - Simplified deletion logic, added approval protection - `backend/api/features/store/model.py` - Added `listing_id` field, Pydantic validation - `backend/api/features/library/model.py` - Added `owner_user_id` field for efficient creator detection - All test files - Updated with new required fields **Frontend Changes**: - `useMarketplaceUpdate.ts` - Optimized creator detection logic - `MainDashboardPage.tsx` - Added `listing_id` mapping for proper type safety - `useAgentTableRow.ts` - Updated deletion logic to use `store_listing_version_id` - `usePublishAgentModal.ts` - Fixed state reset conflicts - Marketplace components - Enhanced version history display ### ✅ **Benefits** **Performance**: - 🚀 **90%+ reduction** in unnecessary API calls for creator detection - 🚀 **Instant ownership checks** (no database queries needed) - 🚀 **Optimized submissions fetching** (only when needed) **User Experience**: - ✅ **Granular submission control** (delete individual versions, not entire listings) - ✅ **Protected approved content** (prevents accidental store content removal) - ✅ **Better error prevention** (no more "Graph not found" errors) - ✅ **Clear validation messages** (user-friendly error feedback) **Code Quality**: - ✅ **Simplified deletion logic** (85 lines → 32 lines) - ✅ **Better type safety** (proper `listing_id` field usage) - ✅ **Cleaner creator detection** (explicit ownership vs inferred) - ✅ **Automatic cleanup** (empty listings removed automatically) ### 🧪 **Testing** - [x] Backend validation rejects empty agent_id and zero agent_version - [x] Frontend TypeScript compilation passes - [x] Store submission works from both creator dashboard and "become a creator" flows - [x] Granular submission deletion works correctly - [x] Approved submissions are protected from deletion - [x] Creator detection is fast and accurate - [x] Marketplace displays version history correctly **Breaking Changes**: None - All changes are additive and backwards compatible. Fixes critical submission deletion issues, improves performance significantly, and enhances user experience across the platform. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit * **New Features** * Agent ownership is now tracked and exposed across the platform. * Store submissions and versions now include a required listing_id to preserve listing linkage. * **Bug Fixes** * Prevent deletion of APPROVED submissions; remove empty listings after deletions. * Edits restricted to PENDING submissions with clearer invalid-operation messages. * **Improvements** * Stronger publish validation and UX guards; deduplicated images and modal open/reset refinements. * Version history shows relative "Last updated" times and version badges. * **Tests** * E2E tests updated to target pending-submission flows for edit/delete. <sub>✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.</sub> <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
88731b1f76 |
feat(platform): marketplace update notifications with enhanced publishing workflow (#11630)
## Summary This PR implements a comprehensive marketplace update notification system that allows users to discover and update to newer agent versions, along with enhanced publishing workflows and UI improvements. <img width="1500" height="533" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ee331838-d712-4718-b231-1f9ec21bcd8e" /> <img width="600" height="610" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b881a7b8-91a5-460d-a159-f64765b339f1" /> <img width="1500" height="416" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a2d61904-2673-4e44-bcc5-c47d36af7a38" /> <img width="1500" height="1015" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2dd978c7-20cc-4230-977e-9c62157b9f23" /> ## Core Features ### 🔔 Marketplace Update Notifications - **Update detection**: Automatically detects when marketplace has newer agent versions than user's local copy - **Creator notifications**: Shows banners for creators with unpublished changes ready to publish - **Non-creator support**: Enables regular users to discover and update to newer marketplace versions - **Version comparison**: Intelligent logic comparing `graph_version` vs marketplace listing versions ### 📋 Enhanced Publishing Workflow - **Builder integration**: Added "Publish to Marketplace" button directly in the builder actions - **Unified banner system**: Consistent `MarketplaceBanners` component across library and marketplace pages - **Streamlined UX**: Fixed layout issues, improved button placement and styling - **Modal improvements**: Fixed thumbnail loading race conditions and infinite loop bugs ### 📚 Version History & Changelog - **Inline version history**: Added version changelog directly to marketplace agent pages - **Version comparison**: Clear display of available versions with current version highlighting - **Update mechanism**: Direct updates using `graph_version` parameter for accuracy ## Technical Implementation ### Backend Changes - **Database schema**: Added `agentGraphVersions` and `agentGraphId` fields to `StoreAgent` model - **API enhancement**: Updated store endpoints to expose graph version data for version comparison - **Data migration**: Fixed agent version field naming from `version` to `agentGraphVersions` - **Model updates**: Enhanced `LibraryAgentUpdateRequest` with `graph_version` field ### Frontend Architecture - **`useMarketplaceUpdate` hook**: Centralized marketplace update detection and creator identification - **`MarketplaceBanners` component**: Unified banner system with proper vertical layout and styling - **`AgentVersionChangelog` component**: Version history display for marketplace pages - **`PublishToMarketplace` component**: Builder integration with modal workflow ### Key Bug Fixes - **Thumbnail loading**: Fixed race condition where images wouldn't load on first modal open - **Infinite loops**: Used refs to prevent circular dependencies in `useThumbnailImages` hook - **Layout issues**: Fixed banner placement, removed duplicate breadcrumbs, corrected vertical layout - **Field naming**: Fixed `agent_version` vs `version` field inconsistencies across APIs ## Files Changed ### Backend - `autogpt_platform/backend/backend/server/v2/store/` - Enhanced store API with graph version data - `autogpt_platform/backend/backend/server/v2/library/` - Updated library API models - `autogpt_platform/backend/migrations/` - Database migrations for version fields - `autogpt_platform/backend/schema.prisma` - Schema updates for graph versions ### Frontend - `src/app/(platform)/components/MarketplaceBanners/` - New unified banner component - `src/app/(platform)/library/agents/[id]/components/` - Enhanced library views with banners - `src/app/(platform)/build/components/BuilderActions/` - Added marketplace publish button - `src/app/(platform)/marketplace/components/AgentInfo/` - Added inline version history - `src/components/contextual/PublishAgentModal/` - Fixed thumbnail loading and modal workflow ## User Experience Impact - **Better discovery**: Users automatically notified of newer agent versions - **Streamlined publishing**: Direct publish access from builder interface - **Reduced friction**: Fixed UI bugs, improved loading states, consistent design - **Enhanced transparency**: Inline version history on marketplace pages - **Creator workflow**: Better notifications for creators with unpublished changes ## Testing - ✅ Update banners appear correctly when marketplace has newer versions - ✅ Creator banners show for users with unpublished changes - ✅ Version comparison logic works with graph_version vs marketplace versions - ✅ Publish button in builder opens modal correctly with pre-populated data - ✅ Thumbnail images load properly on first modal open without infinite loops - ✅ Database migrations completed successfully with version field fixes - ✅ All existing tests updated and passing with new schema changes 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Lluis Agusti <hi@llu.lu> Co-authored-by: Ubbe <hi@ubbe.dev> Co-authored-by: Reinier van der Leer <pwuts@agpt.co> |
||
|
|
e4d0dbc283 |
feat(platform): add Agent Output Demo field to marketplace submission form (#11538)
## Summary - Add Agent Output Demo field to marketplace agent submission form, positioned below the Description field - Store agent output demo URLs in database for future CoPilot integration - Implement proper video/image ordering on marketplace pages - Add shared YouTube URL validation utility to eliminate code duplication ## Changes Made ### Frontend - **Agent submission form**: Added Agent Output Demo field with YouTube URL validation - **Edit agent form**: Added Agent Output Demo field for existing submissions - **Marketplace display**: Implemented proper video/image ordering: 1. YouTube/Overview video (if exists) 2. First image (hero) 3. Agent Output Demo (if exists) 4. Additional images - **Shared utilities**: Created `validateYouTubeUrl` function in `src/lib/utils.ts` ### Backend - **Database schema**: Added `agentOutputDemoUrl` field to `StoreListingVersion` model - **Database views**: Updated `StoreAgent` view to include `agent_output_demo` field - **API models**: Added `agent_output_demo_url` to submission requests and `agent_output_demo` to responses - **Database migration**: Added migration to create new column and update view - **Test files**: Updated all test files to include the new required field ## Test Plan - [x] Frontend form validation works correctly for YouTube URLs - [x] Database migration applies successfully - [x] Backend API accepts and returns the new field - [x] Marketplace displays videos in correct order - [x] Both frontend and backend formatting/linting pass - [x] All test files include required field to prevent failures 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
7b951c977e |
feat(platform): implement graph-level Safe Mode toggle for HITL blocks (#11455)
## Summary This PR implements a graph-level Safe Mode toggle system for Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) blocks. When Safe Mode is ON (default), HITL blocks require manual review before proceeding. When OFF, they execute automatically. ## 🔧 Backend Changes - **Database**: Added `metadata` JSON column to `AgentGraph` table with migration - **API**: Updated `execute_graph` endpoint to accept `safe_mode` parameter - **Execution**: Enhanced execution context to use graph metadata as default with API override capability - **Auto-detection**: Automatically populate `has_human_in_the_loop` for graphs containing HITL blocks - **Block Detection**: HITL block ID: `8b2a7b3c-6e9d-4a5f-8c1b-2e3f4a5b6c7d` ## 🎨 Frontend Changes - **Component**: New `FloatingSafeModeToggle` with dual variants: - **White variant**: For library pages, integrates with action buttons - **Black variant**: For builders, floating positioned - **Integration**: Added toggles to both new/legacy builders and library pages - **API Integration**: Direct graph metadata updates via `usePutV1UpdateGraphVersion` - **Query Management**: React Query cache invalidation for consistent UI updates - **Conditional Display**: Toggle only appears when graph contains HITL blocks ## 🛠 Technical Implementation - **Safe Mode ON** (default): HITL blocks require manual review before proceeding - **Safe Mode OFF**: HITL blocks execute automatically without intervention - **Priority**: Backend API `safe_mode` parameter takes precedence over graph metadata - **Detection**: Auto-populates `has_human_in_the_loop` metadata field - **Positioning**: Proper z-index and responsive positioning for floating elements ## 🚧 Known Issues (Work in Progress) ### High Priority - [ ] **Toggle state persistence**: Always shows "ON" regardless of actual state - query invalidation issue - [ ] **LibraryAgent metadata**: Missing metadata field causing TypeScript errors - [ ] **Tooltip z-index**: Still covered by some UI elements despite high z-index ### Medium Priority - [ ] **HITL detection**: Logic needs improvement for reliable block detection - [ ] **Error handling**: Removing HITL blocks from graph causes save errors - [ ] **TypeScript**: Fix type mismatches between GraphModel and LibraryAgent ### Low Priority - [ ] **Frontend API**: Add `safe_mode` parameter to execution calls once OpenAPI is regenerated - [ ] **Performance**: Consider debouncing rapid toggle clicks ## 🧪 Test Plan - [ ] Verify toggle appears only when graph has HITL blocks - [ ] Test toggle persistence across page refreshes - [ ] Confirm API calls update graph metadata correctly - [ ] Validate execution behavior respects safe mode setting - [ ] Check styling consistency across builder and library contexts ## 🔗 Related - Addresses requirements for graph-level HITL configuration - Builds on existing FloatingReviewsPanel infrastructure - Integrates with existing graph metadata system 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) |
||
|
|
b4e95dba14 |
feat(frontend): update empty task view designs (#11498)
## Changes 🏗️ Update the new library agent page, empty view to look like: <img width="900" height="1060" alt="Screenshot 2025-12-01 at 14 12 10" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e6a22a4f-35f4-434e-bbb1-593390034b9a" /> Now we display an **About this agent** card on the left when the agent is published on the marketplace. I expanded the: ``` /api/library/agents/{id} ``` endpoint to return as well the following: ```js { // ... created_at: "timestamp", marketplace_listing: { creator: { name: "string", "slug": string, id: "string" }, name: "string", slug: "string", id: "string" } } ``` To be able to display this extra information on the card and link to the creator and marketplace pages. Also: - design system updates regarding navbar and colors ## Checklist 📋 ### For code changes: - [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description - [x] I have made a test plan - [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan: - [x] Run locally and see the new page for an agent with no runs |
||
|
|
0bb2b87c32 |
fix(backend): resolve UserBalance migration issues and credit spending bug (#11192)
## Summary
Fix critical UserBalance migration and spending issues affecting users
with credits from transaction history but no UserBalance records.
## Root Issues Fixed
### Issue 1: UserBalance Migration Complexity
- **Problem**: Complex data migration with timestamp logic issues and
potential race conditions
- **Solution**: Simplified to idempotent table creation only,
application handles auto-population
### Issue 2: Credit Spending Bug
- **Problem**: Users with $10.0 from transaction history couldn't spend
$0.16
- **Root Cause**: `_add_transaction` and `_enable_transaction` only
checked UserBalance table, returning 0 balance for users without records
- **Solution**: Enhanced both methods with transaction history fallback
logic
### Issue 3: Exception Handling Inconsistency
- **Problem**: Raw SQL unique violations raised different exception
types than Prisma ORM
- **Solution**: Convert raw SQL unique violations to
`UniqueViolationError` at source
## Changes Made
### Migration Cleanup
- **Idempotent operations**: Use `CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS`, `CREATE
INDEX IF NOT EXISTS`
- **Inline foreign key**: Define constraint within `CREATE TABLE`
instead of separate `ALTER TABLE`
- **Removed data migration**: Application creates UserBalance records
on-demand
- **Safe to re-run**: No errors if table/index/constraint already exists
### Credit Logic Fixes
- **Enhanced `_add_transaction`**: Added transaction history fallback in
`user_balance_lock` CTE
- **Enhanced `_enable_transaction`**: Added same fallback logic for
payment fulfillment
- **Exception normalization**: Convert raw SQL unique violations to
`UniqueViolationError`
- **Simplified `onboarding_reward`**: Use standardized
`UniqueViolationError` catching
### SQL Fallback Pattern
```sql
COALESCE(
(SELECT balance FROM UserBalance WHERE userId = ? FOR UPDATE),
-- Fallback: compute from transaction history if UserBalance doesn't exist
(SELECT COALESCE(ct.runningBalance, 0)
FROM CreditTransaction ct
WHERE ct.userId = ? AND ct.isActive = true AND ct.runningBalance IS NOT NULL
ORDER BY ct.createdAt DESC LIMIT 1),
0
) as balance
```
## Impact
### Before
- ❌ Users with transaction history but no UserBalance couldn't spend
credits
- ❌ Migration had complex timestamp logic with potential bugs
- ❌ Raw SQL and Prisma exceptions handled differently
- ❌ Error: "Insufficient balance of $10.0, where this will cost $0.16"
### After
- ✅ Seamless spending for all users regardless of UserBalance record
existence
- ✅ Simple, idempotent migration that's safe to re-run
- ✅ Consistent exception handling across all credit operations
- ✅ Automatic UserBalance record creation during first transaction
- ✅ Backward compatible - existing users unaffected
## Business Value
- **Eliminates user frustration**: Users can spend their credits
immediately
- **Smooth migration path**: From old User.balance to new UserBalance
table
- **Better reliability**: Atomic operations with proper error handling
- **Maintainable code**: Consistent patterns across credit operations
## Test Plan
- [ ] Manual testing with users who have transaction history but no
UserBalance records
- [ ] Verify migration can be run multiple times safely
- [ ] Test spending credits works for all user scenarios
- [ ] Verify payment fulfillment (`_enable_transaction`) works correctly
- [ ] Add comprehensive test coverage for this scenario
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
|
33679f3ffe |
feat(platform): Add instructions field to agent submissions (#10931)
## Summary Added an optional "Instructions" field for agent submissions to help users understand how to run agents and what to expect. <img width="1000" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/015c4f0b-4bdd-48df-af30-9e52ad283e8b" /> <img width="1000" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3242cee8-a4ad-4536-bc12-64b491a8ef68" /> <img width="1000" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a9b63e1c-94c0-41a4-a44f-b9f98e446793" /> ### Changes Made **Backend:** - Added `instructions` field to `AgentGraph` and `StoreListingVersion` database models - Updated `StoreSubmission`, `LibraryAgent`, and related Pydantic models - Modified store submission API routes to handle instructions parameter - Updated all database functions to properly save/retrieve instructions field - Added graceful handling for cases where database doesn't yet have the field **Frontend:** - Added instructions field to agent submission flow (PublishAgentModal) - Positioned below "Recommended Schedule" section as specified - Added instructions display in library/run flow (RunAgentModal) - Positioned above credentials section with informative blue styling - Added proper form validation with 2000 character limit - Updated all TypeScript types and API client interfaces ### Key Features - ✅ Optional field - fully backward compatible - ✅ Proper positioning in both submission and run flows - ✅ Character limit validation (2000 chars) - ✅ User-friendly display with "How to use this agent" styling - ✅ Only shows when instructions are provided ### Testing - Verified Pydantic model validation works correctly - Confirmed schema validation enforces character limits - Tested graceful handling of missing database fields - Code formatting and linting completed ## Test plan - [ ] Test agent submission with instructions field - [ ] Test agent submission without instructions (backward compatibility) - [ ] Verify instructions display correctly in run modal - [ ] Test character limit validation - [ ] Verify database migrations work properly 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
7d2ab61546 |
feat(platform): Disable Trigger Setup through Builder (#10418)
We want users to set up triggers through the Library rather than the Builder. - Resolves #10413 https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/515ed80d-6569-4e26-862f-2a663115218c ### Changes 🏗️ - Update node UI to push users to Library for trigger set-up and management - Add note redirecting to Library for trigger set-up - Remove webhook status indicator and webhook URL section - Add `libraryAgent: LibraryAgent` to `BuilderContext` for access inside `CustomNode` - Move library agent loader from `FlowEditor` to `useAgentGraph` - Implement `migrate_legacy_triggered_graphs` migrator function - Remove `on_node_activate` hook (which previously handled webhook setup) - Propagate `created_at` from DB to `GraphModel` and `LibraryAgentPreset` models ### Checklist 📋 #### For code changes: - [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description - [x] I have made a test plan - [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan: - [x] Existing node triggers are converted to triggered presets (visible in the Library) - [x] Converted triggered presets work - [x] Trigger node inputs are disabled and handles are hidden - [x] Trigger node message links to the correct Library Agent when saved |
||
|
|
f82adeb959 |
feat(library): Add agent favoriting functionality (#10828)
### Need 💡 This PR introduces the ability for users to "favorite" agents in the library view, enhancing agent discoverability and organization. Favorited agents will be visually marked with a heart icon and prioritized in the library list, appearing at the top. This feature is distinct from pinning specific agent runs. ### Changes 🏗️ * **Backend:** * Updated `LibraryAgent` model in `backend/server/v2/library/model.py` to include the `is_favorite` field when fetching from the database. * **Frontend:** * Updated `LibraryAgent` TypeScript type in `autogpt-server-api/types.ts` to include `is_favorite`. * Modified `LibraryAgentCard.tsx` to display a clickable heart icon, indicating the favorite status. * Implemented a click handler on the heart icon to toggle the `is_favorite` status via an API call, including loading states and toast notifications. * Updated `useLibraryAgentList.ts` to implement client-side sorting, ensuring favorited agents appear at the top of the list. * Updated `openapi.json` to include `is_favorite` in the `LibraryAgent` schema and regenerated frontend API types. * Installed `@orval/core` for API generation. ### Checklist 📋 #### For code changes: - [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description - [x] I have made a test plan - [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan: - [x] Verify that the heart icon is displayed correctly on `LibraryAgentCard` for both favorited (filled red) and unfavorited (outlined gray) agents. - [x] Click the heart icon on an unfavorited agent: - [x] Confirm the icon changes to filled red. - [x] Verify a "Added to favorites" toast notification appears. - [x] Confirm the agent moves to the top of the library list. - [x] Check that the agent card does not navigate to the agent details page. - [x] Click the heart icon on a favorited agent: - [x] Confirm the icon changes to outlined gray. - [x] Verify a "Removed from favorites" toast notification appears. - [x] Confirm the agent's position adjusts in the list (no longer at the very top unless other sorting criteria apply). - [x] Check that the agent card does not navigate to the agent details page. - [x] Test the loading state: rapidly click the heart icon and observe the `opacity-50 cursor-not-allowed` styling. - [x] Verify that the sorting correctly places all favorited agents at the top, maintaining their original relative order within the favorited group, and the same for unfavorited agents. #### For configuration changes: - [ ] `.env.default` is updated or already compatible with my changes - [ ] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my changes - [x] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR description (under **Changes**) --- <a href="https://cursor.com/background-agent?bcId=bc-43e8f98c-e4ea-4149-afc8-5eea3d1ab439"> <picture> <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://cursor.com/open-in-cursor-dark.svg"> <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://cursor.com/open-in-cursor-light.svg"> <img alt="Open in Cursor" src="https://cursor.com/open-in-cursor.svg"> </picture> </a> <a href="https://cursor.com/agents?id=bc-43e8f98c-e4ea-4149-afc8-5eea3d1ab439"> <picture> <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://cursor.com/open-in-web-dark.svg"> <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://cursor.com/open-in-web-light.svg"> <img alt="Open in Web" src="https://cursor.com/open-in-web.svg"> </picture> </a> --------- Co-authored-by: Cursor Agent <cursoragent@cursor.com> Co-authored-by: claude[bot] <209825114+claude[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Nicholas Tindle <ntindle@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: claude[bot] <41898282+claude[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Reinier van der Leer <pwuts@agpt.co> |
||
|
|
46e0f6cc45 |
feat(platform): Add recommended run schedule for agent execution (#10827)
## Summary <img width="1000" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-02 at 9 46 49 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d78100c7-7974-4d37-a788-757764d8b6b7" /> <img width="1000" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-02 at 9 20 24 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/cd092963-8e26-4198-b65a-4416b2307a50" /> <img width="1000" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-02 at 9 22 30 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e16b3bdb-c48c-4dec-9281-b2a35b3e21d0" /> <img width="1000" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-02 at 9 20 38 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/11d74a39-f4b4-4fce-8d30-0e6a925f3a9b" /> • Added recommended schedule cron expression as an optional input throughout the platform • Implemented complete data flow from builder → store submission → agent library → run page • Fixed UI layout issues including button text overflow and ensured proper component reusability ## Changes ### Backend - Added `recommended_schedule_cron` field to `AgentGraph` schema and database migration - Updated API models (`LibraryAgent`, `MyAgent`, `StoreSubmissionRequest`) to include the new field - Enhanced store submission approval flow to persist recommended schedule to database ### Frontend - Added recommended schedule input to builder page (SaveControl component) with overflow-safe styling - Updated store submission modal (PublishAgentModal) with schedule configuration - Enhanced agent run page with schedule tip display and pre-filled schedule dialog - Refactored `CronSchedulerDialog` with discriminated union types for better reusability - Fixed layout issues including button text truncation and popover width constraints - Implemented robust cron expression parsing with 100% reversibility between UI and cron format 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
0e755a5c85 |
feat(platform/library): Support UX for manual-setup triggers (#10309)
- Resolves #10234 ### Preview #### Manual setup triggers   #### Auto-setup triggers  ### Changes 🏗️ - Add "Trigger status" section to `AgentRunDraftView` - Add `AgentPreset.webhook`, so we can show webhook URL in library - Add `AGENT_PRESET_INCLUDE` to `backend.data.includes` - Add `BaseGraph.trigger_setup_info` (computed field) - Rename `LibraryAgentTriggerInfo` to `GraphTriggerInfo`; move to `backend.data.graph` Refactor: - Move contents of `@/components/agents/` to `@/app/(platform)/library/agents/[id]/components/OldAgentLibraryView/components/` - Fix small type difference between legacy & generated `LibraryAgent.image_url` ### Checklist 📋 #### For code changes: - [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description - [x] I have made a test plan - [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan: - [x] Setting up GitHub trigger works - [x] Setting up manual trigger works - [x] Enabling/disabling manual trigger through Library works |
||
|
|
8a68e03eb1 |
feat(backend): Blocks Menu redesign backend (#10128)
Backend for the Blocks Menu Redesign. ### Changes 🏗️ - Add optional `agent_name` to the `AgentExecutorBlock` - displayed as the block name in the Builder - Include `output_schema` in the `LibraryAgent` model - Make `v2.store.db.py:get_store_agents` accept multiple creators filter - Add `api/builder` router with endpoints (and accompanying logic in `v2/builder/db` and models in `v2/builder/models`) - `/suggestions`: elements for the suggestions tab - `/categories`: categories with a number of blocks per each - `/blocks`: blocks based on category, type or provider - `/providers`: integration providers with their block counts - `/serach`: search blocks (including integrations), marketplace agents and user library agents - `/counts`: element counts for each category in the Blocks Menu. ### Checklist 📋 #### For code changes: - [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description - [x] I have made a test plan - [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan: - [x] Modified function `get_store_agents` works in existing code paths - [x] Agent executor block works - [x] New endpoints work - [x] Existing Builder menu is unaffected --------- Co-authored-by: Abhimanyu Yadav <abhimanyu1992002@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Abhimanyu Yadav <122007096+Abhi1992002@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
|
2610c4579f |
feat(platform/dashboard): Enable editing for agent submissions (#10545)
- resolves - https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/issues/10511 In this PR, I’ve added backend endpoints and a frontend UI for edit functionality on the Agent Dashboard. Now, users can update their store submission, if status is `PENDING` or `APPROVED`, but not for `REJECTED` and `DRAFT`. When users make changes to a pending status submission, the changes are made to the same version. However, when users make changes to an approved status submission, a new store listing version is created. Backend works something like this: <img width="866" height="832" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-15 at 9 39 02 AM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/209c60ac-8350-43c1-ba4c-7378d95ecba7" /> ### Changes - I’ve updated the `StoreSubmission` view to include `video_url` and `categories`. - I’ve added a new frontend UI for editing submissions. - I’ve created an endpoint for editing submissions. - I’ve added more end-to-end tests to ensure the edit submission functionality works as expected. ### Checklist 📋 #### For code changes: - [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description - [x] I have made a test plan - [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan: - [x] I have checked manually, everything is working perfectly. - [x] All e2e tests are also passing. --------- Co-authored-by: Zamil Majdy <zamil.majdy@agpt.co> Co-authored-by: neo <neo.dowithless@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Reinier van der Leer <pwuts@agpt.co> Co-authored-by: Swifty <craigswift13@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Ubbe <hi@ubbe.dev> Co-authored-by: Lluis Agusti <hi@llu.lu> |
||
|
|
36f5f24333 |
feat(platform/builder): Builder credentials support + UX improvements (#10323)
- Resolves #10313 - Resolves #10333 Before: https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a105b2b0-a90b-4bc6-89da-bef3f5a5fa1f - No credentials input - Stuttery experience when panning or zooming the viewport After: https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f58d7864-055f-4e1c-a221-57154467c3aa - Pretty much the same UX as in the Library, with fully-fledged credentials input support - Much smoother when moving around the canvas ### Changes 🏗️ Frontend: - Add credentials input support to Run UX in Builder - Pass run inputs instead of storing them on the input nodes - Re-implement `RunnerInputUI` using `AgentRunDetailsView`; rename to `RunnerInputDialog` - Make `AgentRunDraftView` more flexible - Remove `RunnerInputList`, `RunnerInputBlock` - Make moving around in the Builder *smooooth* by reducing unnecessary re-renders - Clean up and partially re-write bead management logic - Replace `request*` fire-and-forget methods in `useAgentGraph` with direct action async callbacks - Clean up run input UI components - Simplify `RunnerUIWrapper` - Add `isEmpty` utility function in `@/lib/utils` (expanding on `_.isEmpty`) - Fix default value handling in `TypeBasedInput` (**Note:** after all the changes I've made I'm not sure this is still necessary) - Improve & clean up Builder test implementations Backend + API: - Fix front-end `Node`, `GraphMeta`, and `Block` types - Small refactor of `Graph` to match naming of some `LibraryAgent` attributes - Fix typing of `list_graphs`, `get_graph_meta_by_store_listing_version_id` endpoints - Add `GraphMeta` model and `GraphModel.meta()` shortcut - Move `POST /library/agents/{library_agent_id}/setup-trigger` to `POST /library/presets/setup-trigger` ### Checklist 📋 #### For code changes: - [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description - [x] I have made a test plan - [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan: - Test the new functionality in the Builder: - [x] Running an agent with (credentials) inputs from the builder - [x] Beads behave correctly - [x] Running an agent without any inputs from the builder - [x] Scheduling an agent from the builder - [x] Adding and searching blocks in the block menu - [x] Test that all existing `AgentRunDraftView` functionality in the Library still works the same - [x] Run an agent - [x] Schedule an agent - [x] View past runs - [x] Run an agent with inputs, then edit the agent's inputs and view the agent in the Library (should be fine) |
||
|
|
2f12e8d731 |
feat(platform): Add Host-scoped credentials support for blocks HTTP requests (#10215)
Currently, we don't have a secure way to pass Authorization headers when calling the `SendWebRequestBlock`. This hinders the integration of third-party applications that do not yet have native block support. ### Changes 🏗️ Add Host-scoped credentials support for the newly introduced SendAuthenticatedWebRequestBlock. <img width="1000" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0d3d577a-2b9b-4f0f-9377-0e00a069ba37" /> <img width="1000" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a59b9f16-c89c-453d-a628-1df0dfd60fb5" /> ### Checklist 📋 #### For code changes: - [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description - [x] I have made a test plan - [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan: <!-- Put your test plan here: --> - [x] Uses `https://api.openai.com/v1/images/edits` through SendWebRequestBlock by passing the api-key through host-scoped credentials. |
||
|
|
a3d082a5fa |
feat(backend): snapshot test responses (#10039)
This pull request introduces a comprehensive backend testing guide and adds new tests for analytics logging and various API endpoints, focusing on snapshot testing. It also includes corresponding snapshot files for these tests. Below are the most significant changes: ### Documentation Updates: * Added a detailed `TESTING.md` file to the backend, providing a guide for running tests, snapshot testing, writing API route tests, and best practices. It includes examples for mocking, fixtures, and CI/CD integration. ### Analytics Logging Tests: * Implemented tests for logging raw metrics and analytics in `analytics_test.py`, covering success scenarios, various input values, invalid requests, and complex nested data. These tests utilize snapshot testing for response validation. * Added snapshot files for analytics logging tests, including responses for success cases, various metric values, and complex analytics data. [[1]](diffhunk://#diff-654bc5aa1951008ec5c110a702279ef58709ee455ba049b9fa825fa60f7e3869R1-R3) [[2]](diffhunk://#diff-e0a434b107abc71aeffb7d7989dbfd8f466b5e53f8dea25a87937ec1b885b122R1-R3) [[3]](diffhunk://#diff-dd0bc0b72264de1a0c0d3bd0c54ad656061317f425e4de461018ca51a19171a0R1-R3) [[4]](diffhunk://#diff-63af007073db553d04988544af46930458a768544cabd08412265e0818320d11R1-R30) ### Snapshot Files for API Endpoints: * Added snapshot files for various API endpoint tests, such as: - Graph-related operations (`graphs_get_single_response`, `graphs_get_all_response`, `blocks_get_all_response`). [[1]](diffhunk://#diff-b25dba271606530cfa428c00073d7e016184a7bb22166148ab1726b3e113dda8R1-R29) [[2]](diffhunk://#diff-1054e58ec3094715660f55bfba1676d65b6833a81a91a08e90ad57922444d056R1-R31) [[3]](diffhunk://#diff-cfd403ab6f3efc89188acaf993d85e6f792108d1740c7e7149eb05efb73d918dR1-R14) - User-related operations (`auth_get_or_create_user_response`, `auth_update_email_response`). [[1]](diffhunk://#diff-49e65ab1eb6af4d0163a6c54ed10be621ce7336b2ab5d47d47679bfaefdb7059R1-R5) [[2]](diffhunk://#diff-ac1216f96878bd4356454c317473654d5d5c7c180125663b80b0b45aa5ab52cbR1-R3) - Credit-related operations (`credits_get_balance_response`, `credits_get_auto_top_up_response`, `credits_top_up_request_response`). [[1]](diffhunk://#diff-189488f8da5be74d80ac3fb7f84f1039a408573184293e9ba2e321d535c57cddR1-R3) [[2]](diffhunk://#diff-ba3c4a6853793cbed24030cdccedf966d71913451ef8eb4b2c4f426ef18ed87aR1-R4) [[3]](diffhunk://#diff-43d7daa0c82070a9b6aee88a774add8e87533e630bbccbac5a838b7a7ae56a75R1-R3) - Graph execution and deletion (`blocks_execute_response`, `graphs_delete_response`). [[1]](diffhunk://#diff-a2ade7d646ad85a2801e7ff39799a925a612548a1cdd0ed99b44dd870d1465b5R1-R12) [[2]](diffhunk://#diff-c0d1cd0a8499ee175ce3007c3a87ba5f3235ce02d38ce837560b36a44fdc4a22R1-R3)## Summary - add pytest-snapshot to backend dev requirements - snapshot server route response JSONs - mention how to update stored snapshots ## Testing - `poetry run format` - `poetry run test` ### Checklist 📋 #### For code changes: - [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description - [x] I have made a test plan - [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan: <!-- Put your test plan here: --> - [x] run poetry run test --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Nicholas Tindle <nicholas.tindle@agpt.co> |