mirror of
https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT.git
synced 2026-02-12 07:45:14 -05:00
36aeb0b2b3
## Problem The agent builder (LLM) misinterprets the HumanInTheLoop block outputs. It thinks `approved_data` and `rejected_data` will yield status strings like "APPROVED" or "REJECTED" instead of understanding that the actual input data passes through. This leads to unnecessary complexity - the agent builder adds comparison blocks to check for status strings that don't exist. ## Solution Enriched the block docstring and all input/output field descriptions to make it explicit that: 1. The output is the actual data itself, not a status string 2. The routing is determined by which output pin fires 3. How to use the block correctly (connect downstream blocks to appropriate output pins) ## Changes - Updated block docstring with clear "How it works" and "Example usage" sections - Enhanced `data` input description to explain data flow - Enhanced `name` input description for reviewer context - Enhanced `approved_data` output to explicitly state it's NOT a status string - Enhanced `rejected_data` output to explicitly state it's NOT a status string - Enhanced `review_message` output for clarity ## Testing Documentation-only change to schema descriptions. No functional changes. Fixes SECRT-1930 <!-- greptile_comment --> <h2>Greptile Overview</h2> <details><summary><h3>Greptile Summary</h3></summary> Enhanced documentation for the `HumanInTheLoopBlock` to clarify how output pins work. The key improvement explicitly states that output pins (`approved_data` and `rejected_data`) yield the actual input data, not status strings like "APPROVED" or "REJECTED". This prevents the agent builder (LLM) from misinterpreting the block's behavior and adding unnecessary comparison blocks. **Key changes:** - Added "How it works" and "Example usage" sections to the block docstring - Clarified that routing is determined by which output pin fires, not by comparing output values - Enhanced all input/output field descriptions with explicit data flow explanations - Emphasized that downstream blocks should be connected to the appropriate output pin based on desired workflow path This is a documentation-only change with no functional modifications to the code logic. </details> <details><summary><h3>Confidence Score: 5/5</h3></summary> - This PR is safe to merge with no risk - Documentation-only change that accurately reflects the existing code behavior. No functional changes, no runtime impact, and the enhanced descriptions correctly explain how the block outputs work based on verification of the implementation code. - No files require special attention </details> <!-- greptile_other_comments_section --> <!-- /greptile_comment --> Co-authored-by: Zamil Majdy <zamil.majdy@agpt.co>