The model edit UI's composition allows for the model edit form to be instantiated before the model's config has been received. This results in the form having no values - all the fields are blank instead of populated by the model config.
Part of the fix is to pass the model config around directly instead of relying on _all_ components to fetch the model directly.
I also fixed a crapload of performance issues related to improper use of redux selectors.
* [MM2] replace untyped config dict passed to install_model with typed ModelRecordChanges
- adjusted frontend to work with new schema
- used this facility to assign "starter model" names and descriptions to the installed
models.
* documentation fix
* [MM2] replace untyped config dict passed to install_model with typed ModelRecordChanges
- adjusted frontend to work with new schema
- used this facility to assign "starter model" names and descriptions to the installed
models.
* documentation fix
* remove v9 pnpm lockfile
* [MM2] replace untyped config dict passed to install_model with typed ModelRecordChanges
- adjusted frontend to work with new schema
- used this facility to assign "starter model" names and descriptions to the installed
models.
* [MM2] replace untyped config dict passed to install_model with typed ModelRecordChanges
- adjusted frontend to work with new schema
- used this facility to assign "starter model" names and descriptions to the installed
models.
* remove v9 pnpm lockfile
* regenerate schema.ts
* prettified
---------
Co-authored-by: Lincoln Stein <lstein@gmail.com>
The previous super-minimal implementation had a major issue - the saved workflow didn't take into account batched field values. When generating with multiple iterations or dynamic prompts, the same workflow with the first prompt, seed, etc was stored in each image.
As a result, when the batch results in multiple queue items, only one of the images has the correct workflow - the others are mismatched.
To work around this, we can store the _graph_ in the image metadata (alongside the workflow, if generated via workflow editor). When loading a workflow from an image, we can choose to load the workflow or the graph, preferring the workflow.
Internally, we need to update images router image-saving services. The changes are minimal.
To avoid pydantic errors deserializing the graph, when we extract it from the image, we will leave it as stringified JSON and let the frontend's more sophisticated and flexible parsing handle it. The worklow is also changed to just return stringified JSON, so the API is consistent.
- Display a toast on UI launch if the HF token is invalid
- Show form in MM if token is invalid or unable to be verified, let user set the token via this form
When consolidating all the model queries I messed up the query tags. Fixed now, so that when a model is installed, removed, or changed, the list refreshes.
