Whether a workflow is published or not shouldn't be something stored on the client. It's properly server-side state.
This change removes the `is_published` flag from redux and updates all references to the flag to use the getWorkflow query.
It also updates the socket event listener that handles session complete events. When a validation run completes, we invalidate the tags for the getWorkflow query. We need to do a bit of juggling to avoid a race condition (documented in the code). Works well though.
Previously, we maintained an `isTouched` flag in redux state to indicate if a workflow had unsaved changes. We manually updated this whenever we changed something on the workflow.
This was tedious and error-prone. It also didn't handle undo/redo, so if you made a change to a node and undid it, we'd still think the workflow had unsaved changes.
Moving forward, we use a simpler and more robust strategy by hashing the server's version of the workflow and comparing it to the client's version of the workflow.
The hashing uses `stable-hash`, which is both fast and, well, stable. Most importantly, the ordering of keys in hashed objects does not change the resultant hash.
- Remove `isTouched` state entirely.
- Extract the logic that builds the "preview" workflow object from redux state into its own hook. This "preview" workflow is what we send to the server when saving a workflow. This "preview" workflow is effectively the client version of the workflow.
- Add `useDoesWorkflowHaveUnsavedChanges()` hook, which compares the hash of the client workflow and server workflow (if it exists).
- Add `useIsWorkflowUntouched()` hook, which compares the hash of the client workflow and the initial workflow that you get when you click new workflow.
- Remove `reactflow` workaround in the nodes slice undo/redo filter. When we set the nodes state while loading a workflow, `reactflow` emits a nodes size/placement change event. This triggered up our `isTouched` flag logic and marked the workflow as unsaved right from the get-go. With the new strategy to track touched status, this workaround can be removed.
- Update all logic that tracked the old `isTouched` flag to use the new hooks.
Previously, the workflow form's root element id was random. Every time we reset the workflow editor, the root id changed. This makes it difficult to check if the workflow editor is untouched (in its default state).
Now that root element's id is simply "root". I can't imagine any way that this would break anything.
In https://github.com/pydantic/pydantic/pull/10029, pydantic made an improvement to its generated JSON schemas (OpenAPI schemas). The previous and new generated schemas both meet the schema spec.
When we parse the OpenAPI schema to generate node templates, we use some typeguard to narrow schema components from generic OpenAPI schema objects to a node field schema objects. The narrower node field schema objects contain extra data.
For example, they contain a `field_kind` attribute that indicates it the field is an input field or output field. These extra attributes are not part of the OpenAPI spec (but the spec allows does allow for this extra data).
This typeguard relied on a pydantic implementation detail. This was changed in the linked pydantic PR, which released with v2.9.0. With the change, our typeguard rejects input field schema objects, causing parsing to fail with errors/warnings like `Unhandled input property` in the JS console.
In the UI, this causes many fields - mostly model fields - to not show up in the workflow editor.
The fix for this is very simple - instead of relying on an implementation detail for the typeguard, we can check if the incoming schema object has any of our invoke-specific extra attributes. Specifically, we now look for the presence of the `field_kind` attribute on the incoming schema object. If it is present, we know we are dealing with an invocation input field and can parse it appropriately.
This is a squash of a lot of scattered commits that became very difficult to clean up and make individually. Sorry.
Besides the new UI, there are a number of notable changes:
- Publishing logic is disabled in OSS by default. To enable it, provided a `disabledFeatures` prop _without_ "publishWorkflow".
- Enqueuing a workflow is no longer handled in a redux listener. It was hard to track the state of the enqueue logic in the listener. It is now in a hook. I did not migrate the canvas and upscaling tabs - their enqueue logic is still in the listener.
- When queueing a validation run, the new `useEnqueueWorkflows()` hook will update the payload with the required data for the run.
- Some logic is added to the socket event listeners to handle workflow publish runs completing.
- The workflow library side nav has a new "published" view. It is hidden when the "publishWorkflow" feature is disabled.
- I've added `Safe` and `OrThrow` versions of some workflows hooks. These hooks typically retrieve some data from redux. For example, a node. The `Safe` hooks return the node or null if it cannot be found, while the `OrThrow` hooks return the node or raise if it cannot be found. The `OrThrow` hooks should be used within one of the gate components. These components use the `Safe` hooks and render a fallback if e.g. the node isn't found. This change is required for some of the publish flow UI.
- Add support for locking the workflow editor. When locked, you can pan and zoom but that's it. Currently, it is only locked during publish flow and if a published workflow is opened.
Currently translated at 98.8% (1818 of 1840 strings)
translationBot(ui): update translation (Italian)
Currently translated at 98.6% (1816 of 1840 strings)
translationBot(ui): update translation (Italian)
Currently translated at 98.7% (1816 of 1839 strings)
Co-authored-by: Riccardo Giovanetti <riccardo.giovanetti@gmail.com>
Translate-URL: https://hosted.weblate.org/projects/invokeai/web-ui/it/
Translation: InvokeAI/Web UI
Previously, reactflow appears to have handled an edge case when using its `applyChanges` utility. If a change was provided without an item, it would skip that change. For example, an "add edge" change that somehow passed `null` as the edge, instead of a valid edge.
In our workflow loading and validation logic, invalid edges were removed from the array using `delete edges[i]`. This left "holes" in the array of edges. We then asked `reactflow` to add these edges to state. When it encountered one of the "holes", it skipped over it.
In a recent release (unsure which, somewhere between the latest v11 and ~v12.4) this seems to have changed. It no longer skips over the "holes" and instead trusts the data. This can cause a couple issues:
- Error when loading the workflow if `reactflow` attempt to do anything with the nonexistent edge.
- If somehow the workflow makes it into state with "holes" in the array of edges, all sorts of other stuff breaks when our code does anything with the nonexistent edge.
Two-part fix:
- Update the invalid edge handling to not use `delete edges[i]`. Instead, as we check each edge, we add invalid ones to a set. Then, after all the checks are finished, filter out the invalid edges. The resultant edges array has no holes.
- Simplify the logic around setting nodes and edges in redux. Previously we were using `reactflow`'s `applyChanges` utils, but this does literally nothing except take extra CPU cycles. We can simply set the loaded nodes and edges directly in redux. Perhaps we were using `applyChanges` because it addressed the "holes" issue? Not sure. But we don't need it now.
Closes#7868
