From 99082d1473601d76c4eedddd4c9720dd9a42ea24 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?David=20Test=C3=A9?= <david.teste@fratris.fr>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 09:59:34 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] chore(ci): use name field instead of run_name in benchmark
 results

In case of benchmark_repetitions > 1 using 'run_name' will return
always the same name for a given benchmark case. It won't make the
distinction between the iterations and the aggregated values like
mean, median or stdev. Using 'name' field fix this behavior.
---
 ci/benchmark_parser.py | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/ci/benchmark_parser.py b/ci/benchmark_parser.py
index 7388cef5f..47c0fca59 100644
--- a/ci/benchmark_parser.py
+++ b/ci/benchmark_parser.py
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ def parse_results(raw_results):
     """
     raw_results = json.loads(raw_results.read_text())
     return [
-        {"value": res["cpu_time"], "test": res["run_name"]}
+        {"value": res["cpu_time"], "test": res["name"]}
         for res in raw_results["benchmarks"]
     ]