Files
crewAI/docs/en/learn/human-in-the-loop.mdx
João Moura c73b36a4c5 Adding HITL for Flows (#4143)
* feat: introduce human feedback events and decorator for flow methods

- Added HumanFeedbackRequestedEvent and HumanFeedbackReceivedEvent classes to handle human feedback interactions within flows.
- Implemented the @human_feedback decorator to facilitate human-in-the-loop workflows, allowing for feedback collection and routing based on responses.
- Enhanced Flow class to store human feedback history and manage feedback outcomes.
- Updated flow wrappers to preserve attributes from methods decorated with @human_feedback.
- Added integration and unit tests for the new human feedback functionality, ensuring proper validation and routing behavior.

* adding deployment docs

* New docs

* fix printer

* wrong change

* Adding Async Support
feat: enhance human feedback support in flows

- Updated the @human_feedback decorator to use 'message' parameter instead of 'request' for clarity.
- Introduced new FlowPausedEvent and MethodExecutionPausedEvent to handle flow and method pauses during human feedback.
- Added ConsoleProvider for synchronous feedback collection and integrated async feedback capabilities.
- Implemented SQLite persistence for managing pending feedback context.
- Expanded documentation to include examples of async human feedback usage and best practices.

* linter

* fix

* migrating off printer

* updating docs

* new tests

* doc update
2025-12-25 21:04:10 -03:00

154 lines
6.2 KiB
Plaintext

---
title: "Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) Workflows"
description: "Learn how to implement Human-in-the-Loop workflows in CrewAI for enhanced decision-making"
icon: "user-check"
mode: "wide"
---
Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) is a powerful approach that combines artificial intelligence with human expertise to enhance decision-making and improve task outcomes. CrewAI provides multiple ways to implement HITL depending on your needs.
## Choosing Your HITL Approach
CrewAI offers two main approaches for implementing human-in-the-loop workflows:
| Approach | Best For | Integration |
|----------|----------|-------------|
| **Flow-based** (`@human_feedback` decorator) | Local development, console-based review, synchronous workflows | [Human Feedback in Flows](/en/learn/human-feedback-in-flows) |
| **Webhook-based** (Enterprise) | Production deployments, async workflows, external integrations (Slack, Teams, etc.) | This guide |
<Tip>
If you're building flows and want to add human review steps with routing based on feedback, check out the [Human Feedback in Flows](/en/learn/human-feedback-in-flows) guide for the `@human_feedback` decorator.
</Tip>
## Setting Up Webhook-Based HITL Workflows
<Steps>
<Step title="Configure Your Task">
Set up your task with human input enabled:
<Frame>
<img src="/images/enterprise/crew-human-input.png" alt="Crew Human Input" />
</Frame>
</Step>
<Step title="Provide Webhook URL">
When kicking off your crew, include a webhook URL for human input:
<Frame>
<img src="/images/enterprise/crew-webhook-url.png" alt="Crew Webhook URL" />
</Frame>
Example with Bearer authentication:
```bash
curl -X POST {BASE_URL}/kickoff \
-H "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"inputs": {
"topic": "AI Research"
},
"humanInputWebhook": {
"url": "https://your-webhook.com/hitl",
"authentication": {
"strategy": "bearer",
"token": "your-webhook-secret-token"
}
}
}'
```
Or with Basic authentication:
```bash
curl -X POST {BASE_URL}/kickoff \
-H "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"inputs": {
"topic": "AI Research"
},
"humanInputWebhook": {
"url": "https://your-webhook.com/hitl",
"authentication": {
"strategy": "basic",
"username": "your-username",
"password": "your-password"
}
}
}'
```
</Step>
<Step title="Receive Webhook Notification">
Once the crew completes the task requiring human input, you'll receive a webhook notification containing:
- Execution ID
- Task ID
- Task output
</Step>
<Step title="Review Task Output">
The system will pause in the `Pending Human Input` state. Review the task output carefully.
</Step>
<Step title="Submit Human Feedback">
Call the resume endpoint of your crew with the following information:
<Frame>
<img src="/images/enterprise/crew-resume-endpoint.png" alt="Crew Resume Endpoint" />
</Frame>
<Warning>
**Critical: Webhook URLs Must Be Provided Again**:
You **must** provide the same webhook URLs (`taskWebhookUrl`, `stepWebhookUrl`, `crewWebhookUrl`) in the resume call that you used in the kickoff call. Webhook configurations are **NOT** automatically carried over from kickoff - they must be explicitly included in the resume request to continue receiving notifications for task completion, agent steps, and crew completion.
</Warning>
Example resume call with webhooks:
```bash
curl -X POST {BASE_URL}/resume \
-H "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"execution_id": "abcd1234-5678-90ef-ghij-klmnopqrstuv",
"task_id": "research_task",
"human_feedback": "Great work! Please add more details.",
"is_approve": true,
"taskWebhookUrl": "https://your-server.com/webhooks/task",
"stepWebhookUrl": "https://your-server.com/webhooks/step",
"crewWebhookUrl": "https://your-server.com/webhooks/crew"
}'
```
<Warning>
**Feedback Impact on Task Execution**:
It's crucial to exercise care when providing feedback, as the entire feedback content will be incorporated as additional context for further task executions.
</Warning>
This means:
- All information in your feedback becomes part of the task's context.
- Irrelevant details may negatively influence it.
- Concise, relevant feedback helps maintain task focus and efficiency.
- Always review your feedback carefully before submission to ensure it contains only pertinent information that will positively guide the task's execution.
</Step>
<Step title="Handle Negative Feedback">
If you provide negative feedback:
- The crew will retry the task with added context from your feedback.
- You'll receive another webhook notification for further review.
- Repeat steps 4-6 until satisfied.
</Step>
<Step title="Execution Continuation">
When you submit positive feedback, the execution will proceed to the next steps.
</Step>
</Steps>
## Best Practices
- **Be Specific**: Provide clear, actionable feedback that directly addresses the task at hand
- **Stay Relevant**: Only include information that will help improve the task execution
- **Be Timely**: Respond to HITL prompts promptly to avoid workflow delays
- **Review Carefully**: Double-check your feedback before submitting to ensure accuracy
## Common Use Cases
HITL workflows are particularly valuable for:
- Quality assurance and validation
- Complex decision-making scenarios
- Sensitive or high-stakes operations
- Creative tasks requiring human judgment
- Compliance and regulatory reviews