This PR update the linking mechanism between Source and Tool.
Tools are directly linked to their Source, either by pointing to the
Source's functions or by assigning values from the source during Tool's
initialization. However, the existing approach means that any
modification to the Source after Tool's initialization might not be
reflected. To address this limitation, each tool should only store a
name reference to the Source, rather than direct link or assigned
values.
Tools will provide interface for `compatibleSource`. This will be used
to determine if a Source is compatible with the Tool.
```
type compatibleSource interface{
Client() http.Client
ProjectID() string
}
```
During `Invoke()`, the tool will run the following operations:
* retrieve Source from the `resourceManager` with source's named defined
in Tool's config
* validate Source via `compatibleSource interface{}`
* run the remaining `Invoke()` function. Fields that are needed is
retrieved directly from the source.
With this update, resource manager is also added as input to other
Tool's function that require access to source (e.g.
`RequiresClientAuthorization()`).
## Description
Return empty list instead of null in list tables tools when no tables
found
## PR Checklist
- [x] Make sure you reviewed
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/googleapis/genai-toolbox/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
- [x] Make sure to open an issue as a
[bug/issue](https://github.com/googleapis/genai-toolbox/issues/new/choose)
before writing your code! That way we can discuss the change, evaluate
designs, and agree on the general idea
- [x] Ensure the tests and linter pass
- [x] Code coverage does not decrease (if any source code was changed)
- [x] Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary)
- [x] Make sure to add `!` if this involve a breaking change
🛠️Fixes#2027
---------
Co-authored-by: Averi Kitsch <akitsch@google.com>
## Description
This Pull Request addresses an issue where the `postgres-list-tables`
tool was including the `google_ml` schema in the results when listing
tables from an AlloyDB PostgreSQL instance.
The primary change involves updating the SQL query within
[https://github.com/googleapis/genai-toolbox/blob/main/internal/tools/postgres/postgreslisttables/postgreslisttables.go](url)
to explicitly exclude the `google_ml` schema, alongside other system
schemas.
The `WHERE` clause in the `listTablesStatement` has been modified from:
```sql
-- Original WHERE clause snippet
AND ns.nspname NOT IN ('pg_catalog', 'information_schema', 'pg_toast')
AND ns.nspname NOT LIKE 'pg_temp_%' AND ns.nspname NOT LIKE 'pg_toast_temp_%'
```
To:
```sql
-- Updated WHERE clause snippet
AND ns.nspname NOT IN ('pg_catalog', 'information_schema', 'pg_toast','google_ml')
AND ns.nspname NOT LIKE 'pg_temp_%' AND ns.nspname NOT LIKE 'pg_toast_temp_%'
```
This ensures that tables residing in the google_ml schema are no longer
returned by the tool, improving the clarity and relevance of the table
listings for users.
## Testing
The changes were validated end-to-end by:
* Building a custom `toolbox` binary from the modified source.
* Configuring `~/.gemini/settings.json` to use this binary as an
`alloydb-test` MCP server.
* Launching `gemini` CLI and confirming the `alloydb-test` server was `🟢
Ready` via `/mcp`.
* Invoking the `postgres-list-tables` tool with `list tables`.
* Verifying that `google_ml` schema tables were successfully excluded
from the results.
Testing screenshot :
<img width="2809" height="1779" alt="Screenshot 2025-11-25 3 47 43 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/126cf5be-30d7-4ec1-9d31-652b5219c0ce"
/>
## PR Checklist
> Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there
are a
> few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly:
- [x] Make sure you reviewed
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/googleapis/genai-toolbox/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
- [x] Make sure to open an issue as a
[bug/issue](https://github.com/googleapis/genai-toolbox/issues/new/choose)
before writing your code! That way we can discuss the change, evaluate
designs, and agree on the general idea
- [x] Ensure the tests and linter pass
- [ ] Code coverage does not decrease (if any source code was changed)
- [ ] Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary)
- [ ] Make sure to add `!` if this involve a breaking change
🛠️Fixes#2009
Co-authored-by: prernakakkar-google <158031829+prernakakkar-google@users.noreply.github.com>
## Description
Tool `invoke()` and `RequiresClientAuthorization()` takes a new input
argument -- Resource Manager. Resource manager will be used to retrieve
Source in the next step.
In order to achieve the goal, this PR implements the follows:
* move resource manager from the server package to a new package to
prevent import cycles (between server and mcp)
* added a new interface in `tools.go` to prevent import cycle (between
resources and tools package)
* add new input argument in all tools
## PR Checklist
> Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there
are a
> few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly:
- [x] Make sure you reviewed
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/googleapis/genai-toolbox/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
- [x] Make sure to open an issue as a
[bug/issue](https://github.com/googleapis/genai-toolbox/issues/new/choose)
before writing your code! That way we can discuss the change, evaluate
designs, and agree on the general idea
- [x] Ensure the tests and linter pass
- [x] Code coverage does not decrease (if any source code was changed)
- [x] Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary)
- [x] Make sure to add `!` if this involve a breaking change
## Description
The MCP spec supports tool annotations like the below structure in the
2025-06-18 version of the spec.
https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/2025-06-18/schema#toolannotations
```
{
destructiveHint?: boolean;
idempotentHint?: boolean;
openWorldHint?: boolean;
readOnlyHint?: boolean;
}
```
Added a ToolAnnotations structure, an Annotations member to the
McpManifest structure, and a nil initializer for the Annotations member
to all calls to GetMcpManifest.
The ToolAnnotations structure and the member annotations are all defined
as pointers so that they are omited when not set. There are times when
the zero value is meaningful so this was the only way to make sure that
we distinguish between not setting the annotation and setting it with a
zero value.
## PR Checklist
> Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there
are a
> few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly:
- [x] Make sure you reviewed
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/googleapis/genai-toolbox/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
- [x] Make sure to open an issue as a
[bug/issue](https://github.com/googleapis/genai-toolbox/issues/new/choose)
before writing your code! That way we can discuss the change, evaluate
designs, and agree on the general idea
- [x] Ensure the tests and linter pass
- [x] Code coverage does not decrease (if any source code was changed)
- [x] Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary)
- [x] Make sure to add `!` if this involve a breaking change
🛠️Fixes#927
---------
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
## Description
This commit allows a tool to pull an alternate authorization
token from the header of the http request.
This is initially being built for the Looker integration. Looker
uses its own OAuth token. When deploying MCP Toolbox to Cloud
Run, the default token in the "Authorization" header is for
authentication with Cloud Run. An alternate token can be put into
another header by a client such as ADK or any other client that
can programatically set http headers. This token will be used
to authenticate with Looker.
If needed, other sources can use this by setting the header name
in the source config, passing it into the tool config, and returning
the header name in the Tool GetAuthTokenHeaderName() function.
## PR Checklist
> Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there
are a
> few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly:
- [x] Make sure you reviewed
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/googleapis/genai-toolbox/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
- [x] Make sure to open an issue as a
[bug/issue](https://github.com/googleapis/genai-toolbox/issues/new/choose)
before writing your code! That way we can discuss the change, evaluate
designs, and agree on the general idea
- [x] Ensure the tests and linter pass
- [x] Code coverage does not decrease (if any source code was changed)
- [x] Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary)
- [x] Make sure to add `!` if this involve a breaking change
🛠️Fixes#1540
To keep a persistent backend storage for configuration, we will have to
keep a single source of truth. This involves supporting bi-directional
conversion between Config and Tool.
This PR make the following changes:
* Embed Config in Tool
* Add `ToConfig()` to extract Config from Tool.
Jules PR
---
*PR created automatically by Jules for task
[11947649751737965380](https://jules.google.com/task/11947649751737965380)*
---------
Co-authored-by: google-labs-jules[bot] <161369871+google-labs-jules[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Yuan Teoh <yuanteoh@google.com>
To facilitate the transition of moving invocation implementation to
Source, we will have to move parameter to `internal/util`. This approach
is crucial because certain parameters may not be fully resolvable
pre-implementation. Since both `internal/sources` and `internal/tools`
will need access to `parameters`, it will be more relevant to move
parameters implementation to utils.
Add `_meta` for `tools/list` method in MCP Toolbox.
If there are authorized invocation, the following will be return in
`_meta`:
```
{
"name":"my-tool-name",
"description":"my tool description",
"inputSchema":{
"type":"object",
"properties":{
"user_id":{"type":"string","description":"user's name from google login"}
},
"required":["user_id"]
},
"_meta":{
"toolbox/authParam":{"user_id":["my_auth"]}
}
}
```
If there are authenticated parameter, the following will be return in
`_meta`:
```
{
"name":"my-tool-name",
"description":"my tool description",
"inputSchema":{
"type":"object",
"properties":{
"sql":{"type":"string","description":"The sql to execute."}
},
"required":["sql"]
},
"_meta":{
"toolbox/authInvoke":["my_auth"]
}
}
```
If there are no authorized invocation or authenticated prameter, the
`_meta` field will be omitted.
With this feature, the following were updated in the source code:
* In each `func(p CommonParameter) McpManifest()`, we will return a
`[]string` for the list of authenticated parameters. This is similar to
how Manifest() return the list of authNames in non-MCP Toolbox's
manifest.
* The `func(ps Parameters) McpManifest()` will return a
`map[string][]string` that with key as param's name, and value as the
param's auth.
* Added a new function `GetMcpManifest()` in `tools.go`. This function
will consctruct the McpManifest, and add the `Metadata` field.
* Associated tests were added or updated.
## Description
---
This pull request introduces a new custom tool kind
`postgres-list-tables` that allows users to list tables within a
Postgres database.
### Example Configuration
```yaml
tools:
postgres_list_tables:
kind: postgres-list-tables
source: postgres-source
description: Use this tool to retrieve schema information for all or specified tables. Output format can be simple (only table names) or detailed.
```
### Example Request
```
curl -X POST http://127.0.0.1:5000/api/tool/postgres_list_tables/invoke \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"table_names": "users",
"output_format": "simple"
}'
```
## PR Checklist
---
> Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there
are a
> few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly:
- [x] Make sure you reviewed
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/googleapis/genai-toolbox/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
- [ ] Make sure to open an issue as a
[bug/issue](https://github.com/googleapis/langchain-google-alloydb-pg-python/issues/new/choose)
before writing your code! That way we can discuss the change, evaluate
designs, and agree on the general idea
- [x] Ensure the tests and linter pass
- [x] Code coverage does not decrease (if any source code was changed)
- [x] Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary)
- [x] Make sure to add `!` if this involve a breaking change
---------
Co-authored-by: Averi Kitsch <akitsch@google.com>
