Move source-related queries from `Invoke()` function into Source.
This is an effort to generalizing tools to work with any Source that
implements a specific interface. This will provide a better segregation
of the roles for Tools vs Source.
Tool's role will be limited to the following:
* Resolve any pre-implementation steps or parameters (e.g. template
parameters)
* Retrieving Source
* Calling the source's implementation
Along with these updates, this PR also resolve some comments from
Gemini:
* update `fmt.Printf()` to logging as a Debug log and remove the
training `\n` within the log
* move `regexp.MustCompile` to the top so that it's compiled once at the
package level and reused. It is a relatively expensive operation to be
called on every invocation.
* `fetchInstanceData()` to return the `*sqladmin.DatabaseInstance`
struct directly instead of converting to map and use map lookups. More
typesafe and efficient.
Did not move `cloudsqlpgupgradeprecheck` tool since that invocation is
very specific towards cloudsql for postgres
This PR update the linking mechanism between Source and Tool.
Tools are directly linked to their Source, either by pointing to the
Source's functions or by assigning values from the source during Tool's
initialization. However, the existing approach means that any
modification to the Source after Tool's initialization might not be
reflected. To address this limitation, each tool should only store a
name reference to the Source, rather than direct link or assigned
values.
Tools will provide interface for `compatibleSource`. This will be used
to determine if a Source is compatible with the Tool.
```
type compatibleSource interface{
Client() http.Client
ProjectID() string
}
```
During `Invoke()`, the tool will run the following operations:
* retrieve Source from the `resourceManager` with source's named defined
in Tool's config
* validate Source via `compatibleSource interface{}`
* run the remaining `Invoke()` function. Fields that are needed is
retrieved directly from the source.
With this update, resource manager is also added as input to other
Tool's function that require access to source (e.g.
`RequiresClientAuthorization()`).
## Description
Tool `invoke()` and `RequiresClientAuthorization()` takes a new input
argument -- Resource Manager. Resource manager will be used to retrieve
Source in the next step.
In order to achieve the goal, this PR implements the follows:
* move resource manager from the server package to a new package to
prevent import cycles (between server and mcp)
* added a new interface in `tools.go` to prevent import cycle (between
resources and tools package)
* add new input argument in all tools
## PR Checklist
> Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there
are a
> few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly:
- [x] Make sure you reviewed
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/googleapis/genai-toolbox/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
- [x] Make sure to open an issue as a
[bug/issue](https://github.com/googleapis/genai-toolbox/issues/new/choose)
before writing your code! That way we can discuss the change, evaluate
designs, and agree on the general idea
- [x] Ensure the tests and linter pass
- [x] Code coverage does not decrease (if any source code was changed)
- [x] Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary)
- [x] Make sure to add `!` if this involve a breaking change
## Description
The MCP spec supports tool annotations like the below structure in the
2025-06-18 version of the spec.
https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/2025-06-18/schema#toolannotations
```
{
destructiveHint?: boolean;
idempotentHint?: boolean;
openWorldHint?: boolean;
readOnlyHint?: boolean;
}
```
Added a ToolAnnotations structure, an Annotations member to the
McpManifest structure, and a nil initializer for the Annotations member
to all calls to GetMcpManifest.
The ToolAnnotations structure and the member annotations are all defined
as pointers so that they are omited when not set. There are times when
the zero value is meaningful so this was the only way to make sure that
we distinguish between not setting the annotation and setting it with a
zero value.
## PR Checklist
> Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there
are a
> few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly:
- [x] Make sure you reviewed
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/googleapis/genai-toolbox/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
- [x] Make sure to open an issue as a
[bug/issue](https://github.com/googleapis/genai-toolbox/issues/new/choose)
before writing your code! That way we can discuss the change, evaluate
designs, and agree on the general idea
- [x] Ensure the tests and linter pass
- [x] Code coverage does not decrease (if any source code was changed)
- [x] Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary)
- [x] Make sure to add `!` if this involve a breaking change
🛠️Fixes#927
---------
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
## Description
This commit allows a tool to pull an alternate authorization
token from the header of the http request.
This is initially being built for the Looker integration. Looker
uses its own OAuth token. When deploying MCP Toolbox to Cloud
Run, the default token in the "Authorization" header is for
authentication with Cloud Run. An alternate token can be put into
another header by a client such as ADK or any other client that
can programatically set http headers. This token will be used
to authenticate with Looker.
If needed, other sources can use this by setting the header name
in the source config, passing it into the tool config, and returning
the header name in the Tool GetAuthTokenHeaderName() function.
## PR Checklist
> Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there
are a
> few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly:
- [x] Make sure you reviewed
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/googleapis/genai-toolbox/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
- [x] Make sure to open an issue as a
[bug/issue](https://github.com/googleapis/genai-toolbox/issues/new/choose)
before writing your code! That way we can discuss the change, evaluate
designs, and agree on the general idea
- [x] Ensure the tests and linter pass
- [x] Code coverage does not decrease (if any source code was changed)
- [x] Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary)
- [x] Make sure to add `!` if this involve a breaking change
🛠️Fixes#1540
To keep a persistent backend storage for configuration, we will have to
keep a single source of truth. This involves supporting bi-directional
conversion between Config and Tool.
This PR make the following changes:
* Embed Config in Tool
* Add `ToConfig()` to extract Config from Tool.
Jules PR
---
*PR created automatically by Jules for task
[11947649751737965380](https://jules.google.com/task/11947649751737965380)*
---------
Co-authored-by: google-labs-jules[bot] <161369871+google-labs-jules[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Yuan Teoh <yuanteoh@google.com>
To facilitate the transition of moving invocation implementation to
Source, we will have to move parameter to `internal/util`. This approach
is crucial because certain parameters may not be fully resolvable
pre-implementation. Since both `internal/sources` and `internal/tools`
will need access to `parameters`, it will be more relevant to move
parameters implementation to utils.
## Description
---
This change introduces the `DefaultProject` field for the
`alloydb-admin` and `cloud-sql-admin` sources. This field allows the
alloydb and cloud sql control plane tools to use the project value from
the environment variables (Ex: `ALLOYDB_POSTGRES_PROJECT`) if it is
already set instead of asking the user.
## PR Checklist
---
> Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there
are a
> few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly:
- [x] Make sure you reviewed
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/googleapis/genai-toolbox/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
- [x] Make sure to open an issue as a
[bug/issue](https://github.com/googleapis/genai-toolbox/issues/new/choose)
before writing your code! That way we can discuss the change, evaluate
designs, and agree on the general idea
- [x] Ensure the tests and linter pass
- [x] Code coverage does not decrease (if any source code was changed)
- [x] Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary)
- [x] Make sure to add `!` if this involve a breaking change
🛠️ Fixes: https://github.com/gemini-cli-extensions/alloydb/issues/47
---------
Co-authored-by: Averi Kitsch <akitsch@google.com>
Add `_meta` for `tools/list` method in MCP Toolbox.
If there are authorized invocation, the following will be return in
`_meta`:
```
{
"name":"my-tool-name",
"description":"my tool description",
"inputSchema":{
"type":"object",
"properties":{
"user_id":{"type":"string","description":"user's name from google login"}
},
"required":["user_id"]
},
"_meta":{
"toolbox/authParam":{"user_id":["my_auth"]}
}
}
```
If there are authenticated parameter, the following will be return in
`_meta`:
```
{
"name":"my-tool-name",
"description":"my tool description",
"inputSchema":{
"type":"object",
"properties":{
"sql":{"type":"string","description":"The sql to execute."}
},
"required":["sql"]
},
"_meta":{
"toolbox/authInvoke":["my_auth"]
}
}
```
If there are no authorized invocation or authenticated prameter, the
`_meta` field will be omitted.
With this feature, the following were updated in the source code:
* In each `func(p CommonParameter) McpManifest()`, we will return a
`[]string` for the list of authenticated parameters. This is similar to
how Manifest() return the list of authNames in non-MCP Toolbox's
manifest.
* The `func(ps Parameters) McpManifest()` will return a
`map[string][]string` that with key as param's name, and value as the
param's auth.
* Added a new function `GetMcpManifest()` in `tools.go`. This function
will consctruct the McpManifest, and add the `Metadata` field.
* Associated tests were added or updated.
## Description
---
This pull request introduces a new tool,
cloud-sql-mssql-create-instance, which allows users to create Cloud SQL
PG instances directly from the toolbox. The tool is designed to simplify
the instance creation process by providing sensible defaults while still
offering flexibility for advanced configurations.
Key Features of the New Tool:
Simplified Instance Creation: The tool introduces an editionPreset
parameter that can be set to either "Production" or "Development". This
allows users to easily create instances with appropriate settings for
their environment without needing to specify low-level configuration
details.
Production Preset: Configures a high-availability, performance-optimized
instance.
Development Preset: Configures a cost-effective, general-purpose
instance suitable for testing and development.
## PR Checklist
---
> Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there
are a
> few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly:
- [ ] Make sure you reviewed
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/googleapis/genai-toolbox/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
- [ ] Make sure to open an issue as a
[bug/issue](https://github.com/googleapis/genai-toolbox/issues/new/choose)
before writing your code! That way we can discuss the change, evaluate
designs, and agree on the general idea
- [ ] Ensure the tests and linter pass
- [ ] Code coverage does not decrease (if any source code was changed)
- [ ] Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary)
- [ ] Make sure to add `!` if this involve a breaking change
🛠️ Fixes #<issue_number_goes_here>
