Files
genai-toolbox/CONTRIBUTING.md
Yuan Teoh fa148c60a7 docs: update contributing.md integration test code reference to v0.23.0 tag (#2197)
Update links to point towards files within v0.23.0 version. There are
some updates done within the function since the previous link was
generated.
2025-12-18 16:39:49 +00:00

12 KiB

How to contribute

We'd love to accept your patches and contributions to this project.

Before you begin

Sign our Contributor License Agreement

Contributions to this project must be accompanied by a Contributor License Agreement (CLA). You (or your employer) retain the copyright to your contribution; this simply gives us permission to use and redistribute your contributions as part of the project.

If you or your current employer have already signed the Google CLA (even if it was for a different project), you probably don't need to do it again.

Visit https://cla.developers.google.com/ to see your current agreements or to sign a new one.

Review our community guidelines

This project follows Google's Open Source Community Guidelines.

Contribution process

Note

New contributions should always include both unit and integration tests.

All submissions, including submissions by project members, require review. We use GitHub pull requests for this purpose. Consult GitHub Help for more information on using pull requests.

Code reviews

  • Within 2-5 days, a reviewer will review your PR. They may approve it, or request changes.
  • When requesting changes, reviewers should self-assign the PR to ensure they are aware of any updates.
  • If additional changes are needed, push additional commits to your PR branch - this helps the reviewer know which parts of the PR have changed.
  • Commits will be squashed when merged.
  • Please follow up with changes promptly.
  • If a PR is awaiting changes by the author for more than 10 days, maintainers may mark that PR as Draft. PRs that are inactive for more than 30 days may be closed.

Automated Code Reviews

This repository uses Gemini Code Assist to provide automated code reviews on Pull Requests. While this does not replace human review, it provides immediate feedback on code quality and potential issues.

You can manually trigger the bot by commenting on your Pull Request:

  • /gemini: Manually invokes Gemini Code Assist in comments
  • /gemini review: Posts a code review of the changes in the pull request
  • /gemini summary: Posts a summary of the changes in the pull request.
  • /gemini help: Overview of the available commands

Adding a New Database Source or Tool

Please create an issue before implementation to ensure we can accept the contribution and no duplicated work. This issue should include an overview of the API design. If you have any questions, reach out on our Discord to chat directly with the team.

Note

New tools can be added for pre-existing data sources. However, any new database source should also include at least one new tool type.

Adding a New Database Source

We recommend looking at an example source implementation.

  • Create a new directory under internal/sources for your database type (e.g., internal/sources/newdb).
  • Define a configuration struct for your data source in a file named newdb.go. Create a Config struct to include all the necessary parameters for connecting to the database (e.g., host, port, username, password, database name) and a Source struct to store necessary parameters for tools (e.g., Name, Kind, connection object, additional config).
  • Implement the SourceConfig interface. This interface requires two methods:
    • SourceConfigKind() string: Returns a unique string identifier for your data source (e.g., "newdb").
    • Initialize(ctx context.Context, tracer trace.Tracer) (Source, error): Creates a new instance of your data source and establishes a connection to the database.
  • Implement the Source interface. This interface requires one method:
    • SourceKind() string: Returns the same string identifier as SourceConfigKind().
  • Implement init() to register the new Source.
  • Implement Unit Tests in a file named newdb_test.go.

Adding a New Tool

Note

Please follow the tool naming convention detailed here.

We recommend looking at an example tool implementation.

  • Create a new directory under internal/tools for your tool type (e.g., internal/tools/newdb/newdbtool).
  • Define a configuration struct for your tool in a file named newdbtool.go. Create a Config struct and a Tool struct to store necessary parameters for tools.
  • Implement the ToolConfig interface. This interface requires one method:
    • ToolConfigKind() string: Returns a unique string identifier for your tool (e.g., "newdb-tool").
    • Initialize(sources map[string]Source) (Tool, error): Creates a new instance of your tool and validates that it can connect to the specified data source.
  • Implement the Tool interface. This interface requires the following methods:
    • Invoke(ctx context.Context, params map[string]any) ([]any, error): Executes the operation on the database using the provided parameters.
    • ParseParams(data map[string]any, claims map[string]map[string]any) (ParamValues, error): Parses and validates the input parameters.
    • Manifest() Manifest: Returns a manifest describing the tool's capabilities and parameters.
    • McpManifest() McpManifest: Returns an MCP manifest describing the tool for use with the Model Context Protocol.
    • Authorized(services []string) bool: Checks if the tool is authorized to run based on the provided authentication services.
  • Implement init() to register the new Tool.
  • Implement Unit Tests in a file named newdbtool_test.go.

Adding Integration Tests

  • Add a test file under a new directory tests/newdb.

  • Add pre-defined integration test suites in the /tests/newdb/newdb_integration_test.go that are required to be run as long as your code contains related features. Please check each test suites for the config defaults, if your source require test suites config updates, please refer to config option:

    1. RunToolGetTest: tests for the GET endpoint that returns the tool's manifest.

    2. RunToolInvokeTest: tests for tool calling through the native Toolbox endpoints.

    3. RunMCPToolCallMethod: tests tool calling through the MCP endpoints.

    4. (Optional) RunExecuteSqlToolInvokeTest: tests an execute-sql tool for any source. Only run this test if you are adding an execute-sql tool.

    5. (Optional) RunToolInvokeWithTemplateParameters: tests for template parameters. Only run this test if template parameters apply to your tool.

  • Add the new database to the integration test workflow in integration.cloudbuild.yaml.

Adding Documentation

  • Update the documentation to include information about your new data source and tool. This includes:

    • Adding a new page to the docs/en/resources/sources directory for your data source.
    • Adding a new page to the docs/en/resources/tools directory for your tool.
  • (Optional) Add samples to the docs/en/samples/<newdb> directory.

(Optional) Adding Prebuilt Tools

You can provide developers with a set of "build-time" tools to aid common software development user journeys like viewing and creating tables/collections and data.

  • Create a set of prebuilt tools by defining a new tools.yaml and adding it to internal/tools. Make sure the file name matches the source (i.e. for source "alloydb-postgres" create a file named "alloydb-postgres.yaml").
  • Update cmd/root.go to add new source to the prebuilt flag.
  • Add tests in internal/prebuiltconfigs/prebuiltconfigs_test.go and cmd/root_test.go.

Submitting a Pull Request

Submit a pull request to the repository with your changes. Be sure to include a detailed description of your changes and any requests for long term testing resources.

  • Title: All pull request title should follow the formatting of Conventional Commit guidelines: <type>[optional scope]: description. For example, if you are adding a new field in postgres source, the title should be feat(source/postgres): add support for "new-field" field in postgres source.

    Here are some commonly used type in this GitHub repo.

    type description
    Breaking Change Anything with this type of a ! after the type/scope introduces a breaking change.
    feat Adding a new feature to the codebase.
    fix Fixing a bug or typo in the codebase. This does not include fixing docs.
    test Changes made to test files.
    ci Changes made to the cicd configuration files or scripts.
    docs Documentation-related PRs, including fixes on docs.
    chore Other small tasks or updates that don't fall into any of the above types.
    refactor Change src code but unlike feat, there are no tests broke and no line lost coverage.
    revert Revert changes made in another commit.
    style Update src code, with only formatting and whitespace updates (e.g. code formatter or linter changes).

    Pull requests should always add scope whenever possible. The scope is formatted as <scope-type>/<scope-kind> (e.g., sources/postgres, or tools/mssql-sql).

    Ideally, each PR covers only one scope, if this is inevitable, multiple scopes can be seaparated with a comma (e.g. sources/postgres,sources/alloydbpg). If the PR covers multiple scope-type (such as adding a new database), you can disregard the scope-type, e.g. feat(new-db): adding support for new-db source and tool.

  • PR Description: PR description should always be included. It should include a concise description of the changes, it's impact, along with a summary of the solution. If the PR is related to a specific issue, the issue number should be mentioned in the PR description (e.g. Fixes #1).