From a3495e07f484513db203e5d5654e47b221c19f4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: jpersson <jonathan.persson@creuna.se>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 13:12:02 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Avoid the word "mutate" while explaining `const`

---
 README.md | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index faadf80e..9f895b9a 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ Other Style Guides
 
   - [2.1](#2.1) <a name='2.1'></a> Use `const` for all of your references; avoid using `var`.
 
-  > Why? This ensures that you can't reassign your references (mutation), which can lead to bugs and difficult to comprehend code.
+  > Why? This ensures that you can't reassign your references, which can lead to bugs and difficult to comprehend code.
 
     ```javascript
     // bad
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ Other Style Guides
     const b = 2;
     ```
 
-  - [2.2](#2.2) <a name='2.2'></a> If you must mutate references, use `let` instead of `var`.
+  - [2.2](#2.2) <a name='2.2'></a> If you must reassign references, use `let` instead of `var`.
 
   > Why? `let` is block-scoped rather than function-scoped like `var`.