updates are made to account for the following api changes
1.) raw is no longer used by xmlbuilder2
2.) element has been shortened to ele
3.) the create function signature/definition has changed compared to xmlbuilder
On the server, Meteor attempts to avoid bundling node_modules code by
replacing entry point modules with a stub that calls module.useNode() (see
packages/modules-runtime/server.js). This trick allows evaluating server
node_modules natively in Node.js, faithfully preserving all Node-specific
behaviors, such as module.id being an absolute file system path, the
__dirname and __filename variables, the ability to import binary .node
modules, and so on.
However, starting in Node.js 12.16.0 (Meteor 1.9.1+), modules evaluated
natively by Node are considered ECMAScript modules (ESM) if the closest
package.json file has "type": "module" (or has an .mjs file extension).
This poses a problem for the module.useNode() trick, because ESM modules
cannot be imported synchronously using require (which is currently how
module.useNode() works).
To work around this new error, this commit checks package.json for "type":
"module" in ImportScanner#shouldUseNode to determine whether it's safe to
use the module.useNode() trick.
The good news is that ESM modules don't have access to nearly as many
Node.js-specific quirks: no module, require, or exports variables; no
__dirname, no __filename; no ability to import JSON or other non-ESM file
types (at least right now). So it seems somewhat less important for ESM
code (compared to CommonJS code) to bail out into native Node.js execution
using module.useNode(). In other words, bundling server code should not
affect its execution in nearly as many cases, if that code is ESM rather
than legacy CommonJS.
If this good news turns out to be overly optimistic, we can consider using
a different kind of bailout stub that's capable of importing ESM using
dynamic import(). For now, making sure we avoid bailing out for ESM code
like @babel/runtime/helpers/esm/* is the priority.
Commit 646fa4e3eefixed#10547 by
restricting optimisticLookupPackageJson to package.json files with a
"name" property, which effectively skipped over intermediate package.json
files with additional properties.
However, in Node.js 12.16.0 (Meteor 1.9.1+), modules evaluated natively by
Node are considered ECMAScript modules if the closest package.json file
has "type": "module" (or has an .mjs file extension). This poses a problem
for the module.useNode() trick (see packages/modules-runtime/server.js),
because ESM modules cannot be imported using require.
For example, recent versions of the @babel/runtime package have a
@babel/runtime/helpers/esm/package.json file for the ESM versions of its
helpers (which specifies "type": "module"), but that package.json file
does not have a "name" property, because it is not the root package.json
file representing the entire @babel/runtime package.
I considered making the "name" restriction configurable, but that would
have fragmented the caching of optimisticLookupPackageJson. Instead, I
made it return an array of all potentially relevant package.json objects,
which can be safely cached.
This means that the caller has to iterate over the array, but there is
only one call site for this function (in tools/isobuild/package-source.js)
right now, so that wasn't too much work.
The excludeFile API was introduced in meteor-babel@7.8.1:
bfded57377
Modules that are evaluated before meteor-babel/register is configured
should not be transformed by meteor-babel, even if they are imported again
later, after meteor-babel/register has been configured.
If my analysis is correct, this change should prevent the dreaded
Must export a default export when using ES6 modules.
error, as seen most recently in
https://travis-ci.org/meteor/meteor/builds/638030190
and https://circleci.com/gh/meteor/meteor/40863.
We accidentally published changes to webapp that should have been
restricted to Meteor 1.10 as part of the 1.8.1 version. This commit
reverts commits to packages/webapp since Meteor 1.9, so that we can
republish the 1.8.0 content as version 1.8.2. We will then bump the webapp
version to 1.9.0 on the release-1.10 branch and publish the new content
only on that branch.
Revert "Allow to exclude web architectures in development mode (#10824)"
This reverts commit a205967186.
Revert "Updates cordova-plugin-meteor-webapp to 1.7.1"
This reverts commit a1e4d27822.
Revert "Update cordova-plugin-wkwebview-engine to 1.2.1."
This reverts commit 3f9a69d7c4.
Revert "Update cordova-plugin-whitelist to 1.3.4."
This reverts commit 979273333b.
Revert "Update cordova-plugin-meteor-webapp to 1.7.1-beta.1."
This reverts commit 565c4254f1.
Revert "Update accounts-password to version 1.5.2."
This reverts commit b827d1da2f.
We haven't always updated this minimum version when we've changed the
Node.js version bundled with Meteor, which is fine because most deployment
strategies (including Galaxy) use the right version of Node.js
automatically. With Meteor 1.9 and Node.js 12.14.0, however, it seems
important that we make absolutely sure new Meteor apps are not getting run
in production with an end-of-life'd version of Node.js (v8).
Although the Meteor jquery package is no long a core package (and thus is
not tied to the Meteor release), it seems like a good idea to nudge folks
towards installing jquery from npm, instead of relying on the very old
version (1.12.1) residing in meteor/packages/non-core/jquery/jquery.js.
Closes#10289.
source-map 0.7.0+ has a much faster Rust WASM implementation.
Because this needs to be loaded, the constructor is now asynchronous.
The consumer should also be destroyed after it's no longer needed.
https://github.com/meteor/meteor/pull/10772#issuecomment-553517459
The assertion in tools/fs/optimistic.ts was failing if I passed a relative
path for --test-app-path, and passing the path as a second argument when
calling assert made it easier to tell what was going on, so I decided to
keep that change.
