When I merged devel into meteor/meteor#8698 and bumped the version, I
mistakenly overwrote the (quite important) '-es' extension on the new
UglifyJS package. This reinstates that change, originally implemented
by 9d81f0e6c5.
* Visually notify of uncaught exceptions breaking client tests
These changes add a global `window.onerror` event handler
to the `test-in-browser` package, to catch any previously
uncaught exceptions. When uncaught exceptions are found,
an alert box is displayed above the test results table.
This should help notify developers of hidden uncaught
exceptions that could be preventing client tests from
running.
Fixes#4979.
* Bump the test-in-browser package version
This will make it easier to merge devel into release-1.5.2, since devel
now contains the final verison of these changes, as implemented by
@GeoffreyBooth in #9018.
Revert "Bump coffeescript package version to 1.13.0."
This reverts commit d727ad02a7.
Revert "Move coffeescript and coffeescript-test-helper packages back into core. (#8960)"
This reverts commit eb3c7dd344.
Revert "Split coffeescript package into coffeescript / coffeescript-compiler."
This reverts commit 8344cbf59d.
Revert "Instructions for how to test the coffeescript package"
This reverts commit 491cbc3bfe.
Small follow-up to #9018.
Note (especially @GeoffreyBooth): these version constraints do two things:
(1) specify a minimum version, and (2) fix the major version. In other
words, the coffeescript package should not need to be republished when we
publish new minor versions of these core packages in Meteor 1.5.2 or 1.6.
When/if we publish a new major version of these packages, the coffeescript
package can simply bump its version constraints, but that probably won't
happen any time soon. I think that's reasonable because a major version
bump suggests there are some significant changes that need to be
acknowledged by dependent packages.
@GeoffreyBooth and I are still deciding exactly what to do with the
coffeescript package in #8960, but in the meantime I need to publish
another 1.6 beta, and I'd like to avoid publishing a beta version of
coffeescript along with it.
This Meteor package version does not need to track the npm version of the
coffeescript package, and probably should not change as often as the
version of the packages/non-core/coffeescript-compiler package.
They depend on core packages like caching-compiler, but coffeescript-compiler
can remain in non-core, so it can update more frequently as npm coffeescript
gets updated.
Declaring a package-local variable called `process` in the `modules`
package causes uglify-js not to replace `process.env.NODE_ENV` with a
string literal value in any `node_modules` contained by the `modules`
package, which causes React Dev Tools to display a warning.
This Meteor package version does not need to track the npm version of the
coffeescript package, and probably should not change as often as the
version of the packages/non-core/coffeescript-compiler package.
They depend on core packages like caching-compiler, but coffeescript-compiler
can remain in non-core, so it can update more frequently as npm coffeescript
gets updated.
This fixes a problem reported by @arggh:
https://github.com/meteor/meteor/pull/8913#issuecomment-322048927
The problem appears to have been introduced by this commit:
2c5094fa0c
The reason this commit was problematic is that it turned several
Object.keys/forEach loops into for-in loops, which caused a few unchanged
return statements to take on a new meaning: instead of "continuing" the
loop by returning from the forEach callback function, the return
statements now returned from the enclosing function:
2c5094fa0c (commitcomment-23638205)2c5094fa0c (commitcomment-23638216)
Besides this refactoring hazard, what else is wrong with for-in loops?
First, for-in loops iterate over not only own but also inherited keys,
which makes them not exactly equivalent to Object.keys/forEach, which
iterates over only own keys. Another way to address that problem is to
initialize this.queries to Object.create(null) instead of {} (which I've
also done in this commit), so that there is no prototype chain.
Second, for-in loops are a trigger for deoptimization in V8:
https://github.com/petkaantonov/bluebird/wiki/Optimization-killers#5-for-in
Since 2c5094fa0c was supposed to be about
improving performance, and these changes introduced some logical problems
as well, I think it's best that we avoid for-in loops.
