**What type of PR is this?**
Optimisation
**What does this PR do? Why is it needed?**
Use `InitializeFromProtoUnsafeXXX` instead of `InitializeFromProtoXXX`
when possible. (@nisdas' change)
This change avoids useless copies.
The difference between these two methods is the latest copies the input
state. However, if the input state is guaranteed not to be modified
after the use of this function (and, in particular, if the input state
is not used at all after the use of this function), then copying it is
unnecessarry. ==> Using the "unsafe" method is fine in this case.
**Other notes for review**
As a reviewer, you should ensure that when the unsafe method is used,
then the input state is never modified after the use of the function.
This PR is much easier to review directly in VSCode, because it displays
more context by default.
**Acknowledgements**
- [x] I have read
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/prysmaticlabs/prysm/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md).
- [x] I have included a uniquely named [changelog fragment
file](https://github.com/prysmaticlabs/prysm/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md#maintaining-changelogmd).
- [x] I have added a description with sufficient context for reviewers
to understand this PR.
- [x] I have tested that my changes work as expected and I added a
testing plan to the PR description (if applicable).
* Migrate Prysm repo to Offchain Labs organization ahead of Pectra upgrade v6
* Replace prysmaticlabs with OffchainLabs on general markdowns
* Update mock
* Gazelle and add mock.go to excluded generated mock file
* wip
* updating types and wip on functions
* renaming to MAX_PENDING_DEPOSITS_PER_EPOCH
* fixing linting and conversions
* adding queue deposit changes
* fixing test and cloning
* removing unneeded test based on update
* gaz
* wip apply pending deposit
* fixing replay test and adding apply pending deposit
* fixing setters test
* updating transition test
* changelog
* updating pending deposits
* fixing ProcessPendingDeposit unit tests
* gaz
* fixing cyclic dependencies
* fix visiblity
* missed adding the right signature verification
* adding point to infinity topup test
* adding apply pending deposit test
* making changes based on eip6110 changes
* fixing ineffassign
* gaz
* adding batched verifications sigs
* fixing broken type
* fixing proto
* updated consensus spec tests and fixed consensus bug tests
* testing readability improvement by avoiding ApplyPendingDeposit
* removing the boolean from apply pending deposit
* improve naming
* review comments and fixing a small bug using wrong variable
* fixing tests and skipping a test
* adding some test skips
* fixing bugs terence found
* adding test for batchProcessNewPendingDeposits
* gaz
* adding churn test
* updating spec tests to alpha.8
* adding pr to changelog
* addressing terence's comments
* Update beacon-chain/core/electra/validator.go
Co-authored-by: terence <terence@prysmaticlabs.com>
* adding tests for batch verify and rename some variables
* skipping tests , add them back in later
* skipping one more test
---------
Co-authored-by: terence <terence@prysmaticlabs.com>
* eip-7251: registry_updates
* Fix spectest violation
* More unit tests for process_registry_updates
* Update tests for ProcessRegistryUpdates
* Minor refactorings and benchmark
* Update beacon-chain/core/electra/registry_updates.go
Co-authored-by: Sammy Rosso <15244892+saolyn@users.noreply.github.com>
* Wrap errors from process_registry_updates for easier debugging
* Rewrite process_registry_updates not to use st.Validators()
---------
Co-authored-by: Sammy Rosso <15244892+saolyn@users.noreply.github.com>
* eip-7251: process_effective_balance_updates
Spectests for process_effective_balance_updates
process_effective_balance_updates unit tests
* PR feedback from the amazing @rkapka
---------
Co-authored-by: james-prysm <90280386+james-prysm@users.noreply.github.com>
* eip-7251: process_pending_balance_deposits
* Update beacon-chain/core/electra/balance_deposits_test.go
Co-authored-by: Radosław Kapka <rkapka@wp.pl>
* Remove defensive check. A unit test shows nothing bad happens
* Safe sub to protect from underflow
* Use @kasey's idea for safer subtraction
---------
Co-authored-by: Radosław Kapka <rkapka@wp.pl>
