* fix: early return for gathering local deposits when EIP-6110 is applied
* Add an entry on CHANGELOG.md
* Fix weird indent at CHANGELOG.md
* Add changelog
* Fix CHANGELOG.md
---------
Co-authored-by: james-prysm <90280386+james-prysm@users.noreply.github.com>
Before this commit, this kind of logs were possible:
```
[2025-01-22 17:18:48] DEBUG sync: Could not search for peers error=node filter: no subnet exists for provided topic: /eth2/d1f05cae/blob_sidecar_0/ssz_snappy
[2025-01-22 17:18:48] DEBUG sync: Could not search for peers error=node filter: no subnet exists for provided topic: /eth2/d1f05cae/blob_sidecar_1/ssz_snappy
[2025-01-22 17:18:48] DEBUG sync: Could not search for peers error=node filter: no subnet exists for provided topic: /eth2/d1f05cae/blob_sidecar_2/ssz_snappy
[2025-01-22 17:18:48] DEBUG sync: Could not search for peers error=node filter: no subnet exists for provided topic: /eth2/d1f05cae/blob_sidecar_3/ssz_snappy
[2025-01-22 17:18:48] DEBUG sync: Could not search for peers error=node filter: no subnet exists for provided topic: /eth2/d1f05cae/blob_sidecar_4/ssz_snappy
[2025-01-22 17:18:48] DEBUG sync: Could not search for peers error=node filter: no subnet exists for provided topic: /eth2/d1f05cae/blob_sidecar_5/ssz_snappy
[2025-01-22 17:18:48] DEBUG sync: Could not search for peers error=node filter: no subnet exists for provided topic: /eth2/d1f05cae/blob_sidecar_6/ssz_snappy
[2025-01-22 17:18:48] DEBUG sync: Could not search for peers error=node filter: no subnet exists for provided topic: /eth2/d1f05cae/blob_sidecar_7/ssz_snappy
[2025-01-22 17:18:48] DEBUG sync: Could not search for peers error=node filter: no subnet exists for provided topic: /eth2/d1f05cae/blob_sidecar_8/ssz_snappy
```
Note this bug has no real other impact than logging these errors: Since all nodes are subscribed to these subnets, as soon as some peers are found, there is no more issue.
Why not using `s.subscribe` instead of `s.subscribeWithParameters`?
Blobs subnets were before considered as static subnets. But since Electra, the number of subnets is a function of the epoch.
So it's better to use `s.subscribeWithParameters` than 2 specific but almost identic functions in `s.subscribe`.
Why `filterPeerForBlobSubnet` is the only one returning always `true`?
Because blobs subnets are actually the only subnets which are both dynamic AND which have to be subscribed by all the nodes.
So, `filterPeerForBlobSubnet` does not filter out any node.
188a2ff818/specs/fulu/fork.md (upgrading-the-state)
Before this commit, the `UpgradeToFulu` did not really respect the specification. This commit fixes that.
How can we be sure now the specification is really respected?
As long as the equivalent of https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-spec-tests/tree/master/tests/mainnet/electra/fork/fork/pyspec_tests are not released, we cannot be sure.
However, with this commit, Prysm and Lighthouse do agree with the post state after the Fulu fork (which is not the case without this commit).
So either both Prysm and Lighthouse are both right,
either the are both wrong (but in the exact same way, which has a pretty low likelyhood).
* Use `SingleAttestation` for Fulu in p2p attestation map.
* Fix `TestExtractDataType`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Manu NALEPA <enalepa@offchainlabs.com>
* updating blockv2 to handle electra blocks
* adding aggregate attesation and proof electra
* gaz
* changelogs
* updating web3signer dependency
* test mock was flipped
* fixing hex value
* accidently checked in dependency changes
* preston feedback
* readding old metrics to not break linting
* review feedback and changelog
* gaz
