test(e2e): selfdestruct pre- and post-Dencun (#21363)

crates/ethereum/node/tests/e2e/main.rs

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ mod p2p;
 mod pool;
 mod prestate;
 mod rpc;
+mod selfdestruct;
 mod utils;
 
 const fn main() {}

crates/ethereum/node/tests/e2e/selfdestruct.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,529 @@
+//! E2E tests for SELFDESTRUCT behavior and output state verification.
+//!
+//! These tests verify that:
+//! - Pre-Dencun: SELFDESTRUCT clears storage and code, output state reflects this
+//! - Post-Dencun (EIP-6780): SELFDESTRUCT only works in same-tx creation, state persists
+//!
+//! We disable prewarming to ensure deterministic cache behavior and verify the execution
+//! output state contains the expected account status after SELFDESTRUCT.
+
+use crate::utils::{eth_payload_attributes, eth_payload_attributes_shanghai};
+use alloy_network::{EthereumWallet, TransactionBuilder};
+use alloy_primitives::{bytes, Address, Bytes, TxKind, U256};
+use alloy_provider::{Provider, ProviderBuilder};
+use alloy_rpc_types_eth::TransactionRequest;
+use futures::StreamExt;
+use reth_chainspec::{ChainSpec, ChainSpecBuilder, MAINNET};
+use reth_e2e_test_utils::setup_engine;
+use reth_node_api::TreeConfig;
+use reth_node_ethereum::EthereumNode;
+use reth_revm::db::BundleAccount;
+use std::sync::Arc;
+
+const MAX_FEE_PER_GAS: u128 = 20_000_000_000;
+const MAX_PRIORITY_FEE_PER_GAS: u128 = 1_000_000_000;
+
+fn cancun_spec() -> Arc<ChainSpec> {
+    Arc::new(
+        ChainSpecBuilder::default()
+            .chain(MAINNET.chain)
+            .genesis(serde_json::from_str(include_str!("../assets/genesis.json")).unwrap())
+            .cancun_activated()
+            .build(),
+    )
+}
+
+fn shanghai_spec() -> Arc<ChainSpec> {
+    Arc::new(
+        ChainSpecBuilder::default()
+            .chain(MAINNET.chain)
+            .genesis(serde_json::from_str(include_str!("../assets/genesis.json")).unwrap())
+            .shanghai_activated()
+            .build(),
+    )
+}
+
+fn deploy_tx(from: Address, nonce: u64, init_code: Bytes) -> TransactionRequest {
+    TransactionRequest::default()
+        .with_from(from)
+        .with_nonce(nonce)
+        .with_gas_limit(500_000)
+        .with_max_fee_per_gas(MAX_FEE_PER_GAS)
+        .with_max_priority_fee_per_gas(MAX_PRIORITY_FEE_PER_GAS)
+        .with_input(init_code)
+        .with_kind(TxKind::Create)
+}
+
+fn call_tx(from: Address, to: Address, nonce: u64) -> TransactionRequest {
+    TransactionRequest::default()
+        .with_from(from)
+        .with_to(to)
+        .with_nonce(nonce)
+        .with_gas_limit(100_000)
+        .with_max_fee_per_gas(MAX_FEE_PER_GAS)
+        .with_max_priority_fee_per_gas(MAX_PRIORITY_FEE_PER_GAS)
+}
+
+fn transfer_tx(from: Address, to: Address, nonce: u64, value: U256) -> TransactionRequest {
+    TransactionRequest::default()
+        .with_from(from)
+        .with_to(to)
+        .with_nonce(nonce)
+        .with_value(value)
+        .with_gas_limit(21_000)
+        .with_max_fee_per_gas(MAX_FEE_PER_GAS)
+        .with_max_priority_fee_per_gas(MAX_PRIORITY_FEE_PER_GAS)
+}
+
+/// Creates init code for a contract that selfdestructs during deployment (same tx).
+/// This tests the EIP-6780 exception where SELFDESTRUCT in same tx as creation still works.
+///
+/// The contract:
+/// 1. Stores 0x42 at slot 0
+/// 2. Immediately selfdestructs to beneficiary (during init, before returning runtime)
+fn selfdestruct_in_constructor_init_code() -> Bytes {
+    // Init code that selfdestructs during deployment:
+    // PUSH1 0x42, PUSH1 0x00, SSTORE  (store 0x42 at slot 0)
+    // PUSH20 <beneficiary>, SELFDESTRUCT
+    let mut init = Vec::new();
+    init.extend_from_slice(&[0x60, 0x42, 0x60, 0x00, 0x55]); // PUSH1 0x42, PUSH1 0x00, SSTORE
+    init.extend_from_slice(&[
+        0x73, // PUSH20
+        0xde, 0xad, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
+        0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x01, // beneficiary address
+    ]);
+    init.push(0xff); // SELFDESTRUCT
+
+    Bytes::from(init)
+}
+
+/// Creates init code for a simple contract that:
+/// 1. Stores 0x42 at slot 0 during deployment
+/// 2. On any call: selfdestructs to beneficiary
+///
+/// This simpler contract avoids complex branching logic.
+fn selfdestruct_contract_init_code() -> Bytes {
+    // Runtime: just selfdestruct on any call
+    // PUSH20 <beneficiary>
+    // SELFDESTRUCT
+    let runtime = bytes!(
+        "73dead000000000000000000000000000000000001" // PUSH20 beneficiary
+        "ff"       // SELFDESTRUCT
+    );
+
+    let runtime_len = runtime.len(); // 22 bytes
+
+    // Init code: SSTORE(0, 0x42), CODECOPY, RETURN
+    // Total init code before runtime = 17 bytes
+    let init_len: u8 = 17;
+
+    let mut init = Vec::new();
+    init.extend_from_slice(&[0x60, 0x42, 0x60, 0x00, 0x55]); // PUSH1 0x42, PUSH1 0x00, SSTORE
+    init.extend_from_slice(&[0x60, runtime_len as u8, 0x60, init_len, 0x60, 0x00, 0x39]); // CODECOPY
+    init.extend_from_slice(&[0x60, runtime_len as u8, 0x60, 0x00, 0xf3]); // RETURN
+    init.extend_from_slice(&runtime);
+
+    Bytes::from(init)
+}
+
+/// Tests SELFDESTRUCT behavior post-Dencun (Cancun+).
+///
+/// Post-Dencun (EIP-6780):
+/// - SELFDESTRUCT only deletes contract if called in same tx as creation
+/// - For existing contracts, SELFDESTRUCT only sends balance, code/storage persist
+/// - The output state should NOT mark the account as destroyed
+///
+/// This test verifies:
+/// 1. Contract deploys with storage
+/// 2. SELFDESTRUCT in later tx does NOT delete code/storage
+/// 3. Output state shows account is NOT destroyed
+#[tokio::test]
+async fn test_selfdestruct_post_dencun() -> eyre::Result<()> {
+    reth_tracing::init_test_tracing();
+
+    let tree_config = TreeConfig::default().without_prewarming(true).without_state_cache(false);
+    let (mut nodes, _tasks, wallet) =
+        setup_engine::<EthereumNode>(1, cancun_spec(), false, tree_config, eth_payload_attributes)
+            .await?;
+    let mut node = nodes.pop().unwrap();
+    let signer = wallet.inner.clone();
+    let provider = ProviderBuilder::new()
+        .wallet(EthereumWallet::new(signer.clone()))
+        .connect_http(node.rpc_url());
+
+    // Deploy contract that stores 0x42 at slot 0 and selfdestructs on any call
+    let pending = provider
+        .send_transaction(deploy_tx(signer.address(), 0, selfdestruct_contract_init_code()))
+        .await?;
+    node.advance_block().await?;
+    let receipt = pending.get_receipt().await?;
+    assert!(receipt.status(), "Contract deployment should succeed");
+
+    let contract_address = receipt.contract_address.expect("Should have contract address");
+
+    // Consume the canonical notification for deployment block
+    let _ = node.canonical_stream.next().await;
+
+    // Trigger SELFDESTRUCT by calling the contract
+    let pending = provider.send_transaction(call_tx(signer.address(), contract_address, 1)).await?;
+    node.advance_block().await?;
+    let receipt = pending.get_receipt().await?;
+    assert!(receipt.status(), "Selfdestruct tx should succeed");
+
+    // Get the canonical notification for the selfdestruct block
+    let notification = node.canonical_stream.next().await.unwrap();
+    let chain = notification.committed();
+    let execution_outcome = chain.execution_outcome();
+
+    // Verify the output state: post-Dencun, account should NOT be destroyed
+    let account_state: Option<&BundleAccount> = execution_outcome.bundle.account(&contract_address);
+    assert!(
+        account_state.is_none() || !account_state.unwrap().was_destroyed(),
+        "Post-Dencun (EIP-6780): Account should NOT be destroyed when SELFDESTRUCT called on existing contract"
+    );
+
+    // Verify via RPC that code and storage persist
+    let code_after = provider.get_code_at(contract_address).await?;
+    assert!(!code_after.is_empty(), "Post-Dencun: Contract code should persist");
+
+    let slot0_after = provider.get_storage_at(contract_address, U256::ZERO).await?;
+    assert_eq!(slot0_after, U256::from(0x42), "Post-Dencun: Storage should persist");
+
+    // Send another transaction to the contract address in a new block.
+    // This tests cache behavior - if cache has stale data, execution would be incorrect.
+    // Post-Dencun: calling the contract should trigger SELFDESTRUCT again (but only transfer
+    // balance)
+    let pending = provider.send_transaction(call_tx(signer.address(), contract_address, 2)).await?;
+    node.advance_block().await?;
+    let receipt = pending.get_receipt().await?;
+    assert!(receipt.status(), "Second call to contract should succeed");
+
+    // Consume the canonical notification
+    let notification = node.canonical_stream.next().await.unwrap();
+    let chain = notification.committed();
+    let execution_outcome = chain.execution_outcome();
+
+    // Verify the output state still shows account NOT destroyed
+    let account_state: Option<&BundleAccount> = execution_outcome.bundle.account(&contract_address);
+    assert!(
+        account_state.is_none() || !account_state.unwrap().was_destroyed(),
+        "Post-Dencun: Account should still NOT be destroyed after second SELFDESTRUCT call"
+    );
+
+    // Verify code and storage still persist after the second call
+    let code_final = provider.get_code_at(contract_address).await?;
+    assert!(!code_final.is_empty(), "Post-Dencun: Contract code should still persist");
+
+    let slot0_final = provider.get_storage_at(contract_address, U256::ZERO).await?;
+    assert_eq!(slot0_final, U256::from(0x42), "Post-Dencun: Storage should still persist");
+
+    Ok(())
+}
+
+/// Tests SELFDESTRUCT in same transaction as creation (post-Dencun).
+///
+/// Post-Dencun (EIP-6780):
+/// - SELFDESTRUCT during the same transaction as creation DOES delete the contract
+/// - This is the exception to the rule that SELFDESTRUCT no longer deletes contracts
+///
+/// This test verifies:
+/// 1. Contract selfdestructs during its constructor
+/// 2. Contract is deleted (same-tx exception applies)
+/// 3. No code or storage remains
+/// 4. Since account never existed in DB before, bundle has no entry for it
+#[tokio::test]
+async fn test_selfdestruct_same_tx_post_dencun() -> eyre::Result<()> {
+    reth_tracing::init_test_tracing();
+
+    let tree_config = TreeConfig::default().without_prewarming(true).without_state_cache(false);
+    let (mut nodes, _tasks, wallet) =
+        setup_engine::<EthereumNode>(1, cancun_spec(), false, tree_config, eth_payload_attributes)
+            .await?;
+    let mut node = nodes.pop().unwrap();
+    let signer = wallet.inner.clone();
+    let provider = ProviderBuilder::new()
+        .wallet(EthereumWallet::new(signer.clone()))
+        .connect_http(node.rpc_url());
+
+    // Deploy contract that selfdestructs during its constructor
+    let pending = provider
+        .send_transaction(deploy_tx(signer.address(), 0, selfdestruct_in_constructor_init_code()))
+        .await?;
+    node.advance_block().await?;
+    let receipt = pending.get_receipt().await?;
+    assert!(receipt.status(), "Contract deployment with selfdestruct should succeed");
+
+    // Calculate the contract address (CREATE uses sender + nonce)
+    let contract_address = signer.address().create(0);
+
+    // Get the canonical notification for the deployment block
+    let notification = node.canonical_stream.next().await.unwrap();
+    let chain = notification.committed();
+    let execution_outcome = chain.execution_outcome();
+
+    // Verify the output state: same-tx SELFDESTRUCT should destroy the account
+    let account_state: Option<&BundleAccount> = execution_outcome.bundle.account(&contract_address);
+    assert!(
+        account_state.is_none(),
+        "Post-Dencun same-tx: Account was created and selfdestructed in the same transaction, no trace in bundle state"
+    );
+
+    // Verify via RPC that code and storage are cleared
+    let code = provider.get_code_at(contract_address).await?;
+    assert!(code.is_empty(), "Post-Dencun same-tx: Contract code should be deleted");
+
+    let slot0 = provider.get_storage_at(contract_address, U256::ZERO).await?;
+    assert_eq!(slot0, U256::ZERO, "Post-Dencun same-tx: Storage should be cleared");
+
+    // Send ETH to the destroyed address in a new block to test cache behavior
+    let pending = provider
+        .send_transaction(transfer_tx(signer.address(), contract_address, 1, U256::from(1000)))
+        .await?;
+    node.advance_block().await?;
+    let receipt = pending.get_receipt().await?;
+    assert!(receipt.status(), "ETH transfer to destroyed address should succeed");
+
+    // Consume the canonical notification
+    let _ = node.canonical_stream.next().await;
+
+    // Verify code is still empty and account received ETH
+    let code_final = provider.get_code_at(contract_address).await?;
+    assert!(code_final.is_empty(), "Post-Dencun same-tx: Contract code should remain deleted");
+
+    let balance = provider.get_balance(contract_address).await?;
+    assert_eq!(balance, U256::from(1000), "Post-Dencun same-tx: Account should have received ETH");
+
+    Ok(())
+}
+
+/// Tests SELFDESTRUCT behavior pre-Dencun (Shanghai).
+///
+/// Pre-Dencun:
+/// - SELFDESTRUCT deletes contract code and storage regardless of when contract was created
+/// - The output state MUST mark the account as destroyed
+///
+/// This test verifies:
+/// 1. Contract deploys with storage
+/// 2. SELFDESTRUCT deletes code and storage
+/// 3. Output state shows account IS destroyed
+#[tokio::test]
+async fn test_selfdestruct_pre_dencun() -> eyre::Result<()> {
+    reth_tracing::init_test_tracing();
+
+    let tree_config = TreeConfig::default().without_prewarming(true).without_state_cache(false);
+    let (mut nodes, _tasks, wallet) = setup_engine::<EthereumNode>(
+        1,
+        shanghai_spec(),
+        false,
+        tree_config,
+        eth_payload_attributes_shanghai,
+    )
+    .await?;
+    let mut node = nodes.pop().unwrap();
+    let signer = wallet.inner.clone();
+    let provider = ProviderBuilder::new()
+        .wallet(EthereumWallet::new(signer.clone()))
+        .connect_http(node.rpc_url());
+
+    // Deploy contract that stores 0x42 at slot 0 and selfdestructs on any call
+    let pending = provider
+        .send_transaction(deploy_tx(signer.address(), 0, selfdestruct_contract_init_code()))
+        .await?;
+    node.advance_block().await?;
+    let receipt = pending.get_receipt().await?;
+    assert!(receipt.status(), "Contract deployment should succeed");
+
+    let contract_address = receipt.contract_address.expect("Should have contract address");
+
+    // Consume the canonical notification for deployment block
+    let _ = node.canonical_stream.next().await;
+
+    // Trigger SELFDESTRUCT by calling the contract
+    let pending = provider.send_transaction(call_tx(signer.address(), contract_address, 1)).await?;
+    node.advance_block().await?;
+    let receipt = pending.get_receipt().await?;
+    assert!(receipt.status(), "Selfdestruct tx should succeed");
+
+    // Get the canonical notification for the selfdestruct block
+    let notification = node.canonical_stream.next().await.unwrap();
+    let chain = notification.committed();
+    let execution_outcome = chain.execution_outcome();
+
+    // Verify the output state: pre-Dencun, account MUST be destroyed
+    let account_state: Option<&BundleAccount> = execution_outcome.bundle.account(&contract_address);
+    assert!(
+        account_state.is_some_and(|a: &BundleAccount| a.was_destroyed()),
+        "Pre-Dencun: Account MUST be marked as destroyed in output state"
+    );
+
+    // Verify via RPC that code and storage are cleared
+    let code_after = provider.get_code_at(contract_address).await?;
+    assert!(code_after.is_empty(), "Pre-Dencun: Contract code should be deleted");
+
+    let slot0_after = provider.get_storage_at(contract_address, U256::ZERO).await?;
+    assert_eq!(slot0_after, U256::ZERO, "Pre-Dencun: Storage should be cleared");
+
+    // Send ETH to the destroyed contract address in a new block.
+    // This tests cache behavior - the cache should correctly reflect the account was destroyed.
+    // Pre-Dencun: the contract no longer exists, so this is just a plain ETH transfer.
+    let pending = provider
+        .send_transaction(transfer_tx(signer.address(), contract_address, 2, U256::from(1000)))
+        .await?;
+    node.advance_block().await?;
+    let receipt = pending.get_receipt().await?;
+    assert!(receipt.status(), "ETH transfer to destroyed contract address should succeed");
+
+    // Consume the canonical notification
+    let notification = node.canonical_stream.next().await.unwrap();
+    let chain = notification.committed();
+    let execution_outcome = chain.execution_outcome();
+
+    // Verify the output state shows the account exists (received ETH) but has no code
+    let account_state: Option<&BundleAccount> = execution_outcome.bundle.account(&contract_address);
+    // After receiving ETH, the account should exist with balance but no code
+    assert!(
+        account_state.is_some(),
+        "Pre-Dencun: Account should exist after receiving ETH (even though contract was destroyed)"
+    );
+
+    // Verify code is still empty (contract was destroyed, only ETH was received)
+    let code_final = provider.get_code_at(contract_address).await?;
+    assert!(code_final.is_empty(), "Pre-Dencun: Contract code should remain deleted");
+
+    // Verify storage is still cleared
+    let slot0_final = provider.get_storage_at(contract_address, U256::ZERO).await?;
+    assert_eq!(slot0_final, U256::ZERO, "Pre-Dencun: Storage should remain cleared");
+
+    // Verify the account now has the ETH balance we sent
+    let balance = provider.get_balance(contract_address).await?;
+    assert_eq!(balance, U256::from(1000), "Pre-Dencun: Account should have received ETH");
+
+    Ok(())
+}
+
+/// Tests SELFDESTRUCT in same transaction as creation, where account previously had ETH
+/// (post-Dencun).
+///
+/// Post-Dencun (EIP-6780):
+/// - The same-tx exception applies when the CONTRACT is created in that transaction
+/// - Even if the address previously had ETH (as an EOA), deploying a contract there and
+///   selfdestructing in the same tx DOES delete the contract
+/// - The "created in same tx" refers to contract creation, not account existence
+///
+/// This test verifies:
+/// 1. Send ETH to the future contract address (address has balance but no code)
+/// 2. Deploy contract that selfdestructs during constructor to that address
+/// 3. Contract is deleted (same-tx exception applies - contract was created this tx)
+/// 4. Code and storage are cleared
+/// 5. Since account existed in DB before (had ETH), bundle marks it as Destroyed
+#[tokio::test]
+async fn test_selfdestruct_same_tx_preexisting_account_post_dencun() -> eyre::Result<()> {
+    reth_tracing::init_test_tracing();
+
+    let tree_config = TreeConfig::default().without_prewarming(true).without_state_cache(false);
+    let (mut nodes, _tasks, wallet) =
+        setup_engine::<EthereumNode>(1, cancun_spec(), false, tree_config, eth_payload_attributes)
+            .await?;
+    let mut node = nodes.pop().unwrap();
+    let signer = wallet.inner.clone();
+    let provider = ProviderBuilder::new()
+        .wallet(EthereumWallet::new(signer.clone()))
+        .connect_http(node.rpc_url());
+
+    // Calculate where the contract will be deployed (CREATE uses sender + nonce)
+    // We'll use nonce 1 for deployment, so first send ETH with nonce 0
+    let future_contract_address = signer.address().create(1);
+
+    // Send ETH to the future contract address first (makes it a pre-existing account)
+    let pending = provider
+        .send_transaction(transfer_tx(
+            signer.address(),
+            future_contract_address,
+            0,
+            U256::from(1000),
+        ))
+        .await?;
+    node.advance_block().await?;
+    let receipt = pending.get_receipt().await?;
+    assert!(receipt.status(), "ETH transfer should succeed");
+
+    // Consume the canonical notification
+    let _ = node.canonical_stream.next().await;
+
+    // Verify the account exists and has balance
+    let balance_before = provider.get_balance(future_contract_address).await?;
+    assert_eq!(balance_before, U256::from(1000), "Account should have ETH before deployment");
+
+    // Now deploy contract that selfdestructs during its constructor to the same address
+    let pending = provider
+        .send_transaction(deploy_tx(signer.address(), 1, selfdestruct_in_constructor_init_code()))
+        .await?;
+    node.advance_block().await?;
+    let receipt = pending.get_receipt().await?;
+    assert!(receipt.status(), "Contract deployment with selfdestruct should succeed");
+
+    // Verify deployment went to the expected address
+    assert_eq!(
+        receipt.contract_address,
+        Some(future_contract_address),
+        "Contract should be deployed to pre-computed address"
+    );
+
+    // Get the canonical notification for the deployment block
+    let notification = node.canonical_stream.next().await.unwrap();
+    let chain = notification.committed();
+    let execution_outcome = chain.execution_outcome();
+
+    // Verify the output state: same-tx exception DOES apply because contract was created this tx
+    // The account should be marked as destroyed. Since it had prior state (ETH balance),
+    // the bundle will contain it with status Destroyed and original_info set.
+    let account_state: Option<&BundleAccount> =
+        execution_outcome.bundle.account(&future_contract_address);
+    assert!(
+        account_state.is_some_and(|a| a.was_destroyed()),
+        "Post-Dencun same-tx with prior ETH: Account MUST be marked as destroyed"
+    );
+
+    // Verify via RPC that code and storage are cleared
+    let code = provider.get_code_at(future_contract_address).await?;
+    assert!(code.is_empty(), "Post-Dencun same-tx: Contract code should be deleted");
+
+    let slot0 = provider.get_storage_at(future_contract_address, U256::ZERO).await?;
+    assert_eq!(slot0, U256::ZERO, "Post-Dencun same-tx: Storage should be cleared");
+
+    // Balance should be zero (sent to beneficiary during SELFDESTRUCT)
+    let balance_after = provider.get_balance(future_contract_address).await?;
+    assert_eq!(
+        balance_after,
+        U256::ZERO,
+        "Post-Dencun same-tx: Balance should be zero (sent to beneficiary)"
+    );
+
+    // Send ETH to the destroyed address to verify cache behavior
+    let pending = provider
+        .send_transaction(transfer_tx(
+            signer.address(),
+            future_contract_address,
+            2,
+            U256::from(2000),
+        ))
+        .await?;
+    node.advance_block().await?;
+    let receipt = pending.get_receipt().await?;
+    assert!(receipt.status(), "ETH transfer should succeed");
+
+    // Consume notification
+    let _ = node.canonical_stream.next().await;
+
+    // Verify the account received ETH and has no code (it's now just an EOA)
+    let balance_final = provider.get_balance(future_contract_address).await?;
+    assert_eq!(balance_final, U256::from(2000), "Account should have received ETH");
+
+    let code_final = provider.get_code_at(future_contract_address).await?;
+    assert!(code_final.is_empty(), "Code should remain empty after ETH transfer");
+
+    let slot0_final = provider.get_storage_at(future_contract_address, U256::ZERO).await?;
+    assert_eq!(slot0_final, U256::ZERO, "Storage should remain cleared");
+
+    Ok(())
+}

crates/ethereum/node/tests/e2e/utils.rs

@@ -29,6 +29,19 @@ pub(crate) fn eth_payload_attributes(timestamp: u64) -> EthPayloadBuilderAttribu
     EthPayloadBuilderAttributes::new(B256::ZERO, attributes)
 }
 
+/// Helper function to create pre-Cancun (Shanghai) payload attributes.
+/// No `parent_beacon_block_root` field.
+pub(crate) fn eth_payload_attributes_shanghai(timestamp: u64) -> EthPayloadBuilderAttributes {
+    let attributes = PayloadAttributes {
+        timestamp,
+        prev_randao: B256::ZERO,
+        suggested_fee_recipient: Address::ZERO,
+        withdrawals: Some(vec![]),
+        parent_beacon_block_root: None,
+    };
+    EthPayloadBuilderAttributes::new(B256::ZERO, attributes)
+}
+
 /// Advances node by producing blocks with random transactions.
 pub(crate) async fn advance_with_random_transactions<Provider>(
     node: &mut NodeHelperType<EthereumNode, Provider>,