mirror of
https://github.com/vacp2p/zerokit.git
synced 2026-01-08 21:28:11 -05:00
Changes: - Unified error types (`PoseidonError`, `HashError`, etc.) across hashing, keygen, witness calculation, and serialization for consistent and descriptive error handling. - Refactored tests and examples to use `unwrap()` where safe, and limited `expect()` in library code to non-panicking cases with clear messaging. - Improved witness and proof generation by removing panicking code paths and enforcing proper error propagation. - Cleaned up outdated imports, removed unused operations in `graph.rs`, and updated public API documentation. - Updated C, Nim, and WASM FFI bindings with more robust serialization and clearer error log messages. - Added keywords to package.json and update dependencies in Makefile.toml and Nightly CI.
148 lines
5.6 KiB
Rust
148 lines
5.6 KiB
Rust
// Tests
|
|
|
|
#![cfg(not(feature = "stateless"))]
|
|
|
|
#[cfg(test)]
|
|
mod test {
|
|
use rln::prelude::*;
|
|
use zerokit_utils::merkle_tree::{
|
|
FullMerkleTree, OptimalMerkleTree, ZerokitMerkleProof, ZerokitMerkleTree,
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
// The test checked correctness for `FullMerkleTree` and `OptimalMerkleTree` with Poseidon hash
|
|
fn test_zerokit_merkle_implementations() {
|
|
let sample_size = 100;
|
|
let leaves: Vec<Fr> = (0..sample_size).map(Fr::from).collect();
|
|
|
|
let mut tree_full = FullMerkleTree::<PoseidonHash>::default(DEFAULT_TREE_DEPTH).unwrap();
|
|
let mut tree_opt = OptimalMerkleTree::<PoseidonHash>::default(DEFAULT_TREE_DEPTH).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
for (i, leave) in leaves
|
|
.into_iter()
|
|
.enumerate()
|
|
.take(sample_size.try_into().unwrap())
|
|
{
|
|
tree_full.set(i, leave).unwrap();
|
|
let proof = tree_full.proof(i).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(proof.leaf_index(), i);
|
|
|
|
tree_opt.set(i, leave).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(tree_opt.root(), tree_full.root());
|
|
let proof = tree_opt.proof(i).unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(proof.leaf_index(), i);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We check all roots are the same
|
|
let tree_full_root = tree_full.root();
|
|
let tree_opt_root = tree_opt.root();
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(tree_full_root, tree_opt_root);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn test_subtree_root() {
|
|
const DEPTH: usize = 3;
|
|
const LEAVES_LEN: usize = 8;
|
|
|
|
let mut tree = PoseidonTree::default(DEPTH).unwrap();
|
|
let leaves: Vec<Fr> = (0..LEAVES_LEN).map(|s| Fr::from(s as i32)).collect();
|
|
let _ = tree.set_range(0, leaves.into_iter());
|
|
|
|
for i in 0..LEAVES_LEN {
|
|
// check leaves
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
tree.get(i).unwrap(),
|
|
tree.get_subtree_root(DEPTH, i).unwrap()
|
|
);
|
|
// check root
|
|
assert_eq!(tree.root(), tree.get_subtree_root(0, i).unwrap());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// check intermediate nodes
|
|
for n in (1..=DEPTH).rev() {
|
|
for i in (0..(1 << n)).step_by(2) {
|
|
let idx_l = i * (1 << (DEPTH - n));
|
|
let idx_r = (i + 1) * (1 << (DEPTH - n));
|
|
let idx_sr = idx_l;
|
|
|
|
let prev_l = tree.get_subtree_root(n, idx_l).unwrap();
|
|
let prev_r = tree.get_subtree_root(n, idx_r).unwrap();
|
|
let subroot = tree.get_subtree_root(n - 1, idx_sr).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(poseidon_hash(&[prev_l, prev_r]).unwrap(), subroot);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn test_get_empty_leaves_indices() {
|
|
let depth = 4;
|
|
let nof_leaves: usize = 1 << (depth - 1);
|
|
|
|
let mut tree = PoseidonTree::default(depth).unwrap();
|
|
let leaves: Vec<Fr> = (0..nof_leaves).map(|s| Fr::from(s as i32)).collect();
|
|
|
|
// check set_range
|
|
let _ = tree.set_range(0, leaves.clone().into_iter());
|
|
assert!(tree.get_empty_leaves_indices().is_empty());
|
|
|
|
let mut vec_idxs = Vec::new();
|
|
// check delete function
|
|
for i in 0..nof_leaves {
|
|
vec_idxs.push(i);
|
|
let _ = tree.delete(i);
|
|
assert_eq!(tree.get_empty_leaves_indices(), vec_idxs);
|
|
}
|
|
// check set function
|
|
for i in (0..nof_leaves).rev() {
|
|
vec_idxs.pop();
|
|
let _ = tree.set(i, leaves[i]);
|
|
assert_eq!(tree.get_empty_leaves_indices(), vec_idxs);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// check remove_indices_and_set_leaves inside override_range function
|
|
assert!(tree.get_empty_leaves_indices().is_empty());
|
|
let leaves_2: Vec<Fr> = (0..2).map(Fr::from).collect();
|
|
tree.override_range(0, leaves_2.clone().into_iter(), [0, 1, 2, 3].into_iter())
|
|
.unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(tree.get_empty_leaves_indices(), vec![2, 3]);
|
|
|
|
// check remove_indices inside override_range function
|
|
tree.override_range(0, [].into_iter(), [0, 1].into_iter())
|
|
.unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(tree.get_empty_leaves_indices(), vec![0, 1, 2, 3]);
|
|
|
|
// check set_range inside override_range function
|
|
tree.override_range(0, leaves_2.clone().into_iter(), [].into_iter())
|
|
.unwrap();
|
|
assert_eq!(tree.get_empty_leaves_indices(), vec![2, 3]);
|
|
|
|
let leaves_4: Vec<Fr> = (0..4).map(Fr::from).collect();
|
|
// check if the indexes for write and delete are the same
|
|
tree.override_range(0, leaves_4.clone().into_iter(), [0, 1, 2, 3].into_iter())
|
|
.unwrap();
|
|
assert!(tree.get_empty_leaves_indices().is_empty());
|
|
|
|
// check if indexes for deletion are before indexes for overwriting
|
|
tree.override_range(4, leaves_4.clone().into_iter(), [0, 1, 2, 3].into_iter())
|
|
.unwrap();
|
|
// The result will be like this, because in the set_range function in pmtree
|
|
// the next_index value is increased not by the number of elements to insert,
|
|
// but by the union of indices for deleting and inserting.
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
tree.get_empty_leaves_indices(),
|
|
vec![0, 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 10, 11]
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// check if the indices for write and delete do not overlap completely
|
|
tree.override_range(2, leaves_4.clone().into_iter(), [0, 1, 2, 3].into_iter())
|
|
.unwrap();
|
|
// The result will be like this, because in the set_range function in pmtree
|
|
// the next_index value is increased not by the number of elements to insert,
|
|
// but by the union of indices for deleting and inserting.
|
|
// + we've already set to 6 and 7 in previous test
|
|
assert_eq!(tree.get_empty_leaves_indices(), vec![0, 1, 8, 9, 10, 11]);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|