Files
zerokit/rln/tests/poseidon_tree.rs
Vinh Trịnh 0ebeea50fd feat(rln): extend error handling for rln module (#358)
Changes:
- Unified error types (`PoseidonError`, `HashError`, etc.) across
hashing, keygen, witness calculation, and serialization for consistent
and descriptive error handling.
- Refactored tests and examples to use `unwrap()` where safe, and
limited `expect()` in library code to non-panicking cases with clear
messaging.
- Improved witness and proof generation by removing panicking code paths
and enforcing proper error propagation.
- Cleaned up outdated imports, removed unused operations in `graph.rs`,
and updated public API documentation.
- Updated C, Nim, and WASM FFI bindings with more robust serialization
and clearer error log messages.
- Added keywords to package.json and update dependencies in
Makefile.toml and Nightly CI.
2025-12-17 19:27:07 +07:00

148 lines
5.6 KiB
Rust

// Tests
#![cfg(not(feature = "stateless"))]
#[cfg(test)]
mod test {
use rln::prelude::*;
use zerokit_utils::merkle_tree::{
FullMerkleTree, OptimalMerkleTree, ZerokitMerkleProof, ZerokitMerkleTree,
};
#[test]
// The test checked correctness for `FullMerkleTree` and `OptimalMerkleTree` with Poseidon hash
fn test_zerokit_merkle_implementations() {
let sample_size = 100;
let leaves: Vec<Fr> = (0..sample_size).map(Fr::from).collect();
let mut tree_full = FullMerkleTree::<PoseidonHash>::default(DEFAULT_TREE_DEPTH).unwrap();
let mut tree_opt = OptimalMerkleTree::<PoseidonHash>::default(DEFAULT_TREE_DEPTH).unwrap();
for (i, leave) in leaves
.into_iter()
.enumerate()
.take(sample_size.try_into().unwrap())
{
tree_full.set(i, leave).unwrap();
let proof = tree_full.proof(i).unwrap();
assert_eq!(proof.leaf_index(), i);
tree_opt.set(i, leave).unwrap();
assert_eq!(tree_opt.root(), tree_full.root());
let proof = tree_opt.proof(i).unwrap();
assert_eq!(proof.leaf_index(), i);
}
// We check all roots are the same
let tree_full_root = tree_full.root();
let tree_opt_root = tree_opt.root();
assert_eq!(tree_full_root, tree_opt_root);
}
#[test]
fn test_subtree_root() {
const DEPTH: usize = 3;
const LEAVES_LEN: usize = 8;
let mut tree = PoseidonTree::default(DEPTH).unwrap();
let leaves: Vec<Fr> = (0..LEAVES_LEN).map(|s| Fr::from(s as i32)).collect();
let _ = tree.set_range(0, leaves.into_iter());
for i in 0..LEAVES_LEN {
// check leaves
assert_eq!(
tree.get(i).unwrap(),
tree.get_subtree_root(DEPTH, i).unwrap()
);
// check root
assert_eq!(tree.root(), tree.get_subtree_root(0, i).unwrap());
}
// check intermediate nodes
for n in (1..=DEPTH).rev() {
for i in (0..(1 << n)).step_by(2) {
let idx_l = i * (1 << (DEPTH - n));
let idx_r = (i + 1) * (1 << (DEPTH - n));
let idx_sr = idx_l;
let prev_l = tree.get_subtree_root(n, idx_l).unwrap();
let prev_r = tree.get_subtree_root(n, idx_r).unwrap();
let subroot = tree.get_subtree_root(n - 1, idx_sr).unwrap();
assert_eq!(poseidon_hash(&[prev_l, prev_r]).unwrap(), subroot);
}
}
}
#[test]
fn test_get_empty_leaves_indices() {
let depth = 4;
let nof_leaves: usize = 1 << (depth - 1);
let mut tree = PoseidonTree::default(depth).unwrap();
let leaves: Vec<Fr> = (0..nof_leaves).map(|s| Fr::from(s as i32)).collect();
// check set_range
let _ = tree.set_range(0, leaves.clone().into_iter());
assert!(tree.get_empty_leaves_indices().is_empty());
let mut vec_idxs = Vec::new();
// check delete function
for i in 0..nof_leaves {
vec_idxs.push(i);
let _ = tree.delete(i);
assert_eq!(tree.get_empty_leaves_indices(), vec_idxs);
}
// check set function
for i in (0..nof_leaves).rev() {
vec_idxs.pop();
let _ = tree.set(i, leaves[i]);
assert_eq!(tree.get_empty_leaves_indices(), vec_idxs);
}
// check remove_indices_and_set_leaves inside override_range function
assert!(tree.get_empty_leaves_indices().is_empty());
let leaves_2: Vec<Fr> = (0..2).map(Fr::from).collect();
tree.override_range(0, leaves_2.clone().into_iter(), [0, 1, 2, 3].into_iter())
.unwrap();
assert_eq!(tree.get_empty_leaves_indices(), vec![2, 3]);
// check remove_indices inside override_range function
tree.override_range(0, [].into_iter(), [0, 1].into_iter())
.unwrap();
assert_eq!(tree.get_empty_leaves_indices(), vec![0, 1, 2, 3]);
// check set_range inside override_range function
tree.override_range(0, leaves_2.clone().into_iter(), [].into_iter())
.unwrap();
assert_eq!(tree.get_empty_leaves_indices(), vec![2, 3]);
let leaves_4: Vec<Fr> = (0..4).map(Fr::from).collect();
// check if the indexes for write and delete are the same
tree.override_range(0, leaves_4.clone().into_iter(), [0, 1, 2, 3].into_iter())
.unwrap();
assert!(tree.get_empty_leaves_indices().is_empty());
// check if indexes for deletion are before indexes for overwriting
tree.override_range(4, leaves_4.clone().into_iter(), [0, 1, 2, 3].into_iter())
.unwrap();
// The result will be like this, because in the set_range function in pmtree
// the next_index value is increased not by the number of elements to insert,
// but by the union of indices for deleting and inserting.
assert_eq!(
tree.get_empty_leaves_indices(),
vec![0, 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 10, 11]
);
// check if the indices for write and delete do not overlap completely
tree.override_range(2, leaves_4.clone().into_iter(), [0, 1, 2, 3].into_iter())
.unwrap();
// The result will be like this, because in the set_range function in pmtree
// the next_index value is increased not by the number of elements to insert,
// but by the union of indices for deleting and inserting.
// + we've already set to 6 and 7 in previous test
assert_eq!(tree.get_empty_leaves_indices(), vec![0, 1, 8, 9, 10, 11]);
}
}