Update key exchange

This commit is contained in:
sinu
2023-09-06 11:23:36 -07:00
committed by Hendrik Eeckhaut
parent 2f83978e87
commit 5ca38ee762
2 changed files with 45 additions and 18 deletions

View File

@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
:root {
--content-max-width: 1000px;
}
.aligncenter {
text-align: center;
}

View File

@@ -4,32 +4,53 @@ In TLS, the first step towards obtaining TLS session keys is to compute a shared
With TLSNotary, at the end of the key exchange, the `Server` gets the `PMS` as usual. The `Prover` and the `Verifier`, jointly operating as the TLS client, compute additive shares of the `PMS`. This prevents either party from unilaterally sending or receiving messages with the `Server`. Subsequently, the authenticity and integrity of the messages are guaranteed to both the `Prover` and `Verifier`, while also keeping the plaintext hidden from the `Verifier`.
<img src="../../diagrams/key_exchange.svg" width="800">
<div class="aligncenter"><img src="../diagrams/key_exchange.svg" width="800"></div>
The 3-party ECDH protocol between the `Server` the `Prover` and the `Verifier` works as follows:
## ECDH
We will denote:
- $P$ as the `Prover`
- $V$ as the `Verifier`
- $S$ as the `Server`
- $\mathbb{pms}$ as the TLS pre-master secret.
Below is the 3-party ECDH protocol between $S$, $P$ and $V$, enabling $P$ and $V$ to arrive at shares of $\mathbb{pms}$.
1. `Server` sends its public key $Q_b$ to `Prover`, and `Prover` forwards it to `Verifier`
2. `Prover` picks a random private key share $d_c$ and computes a public key share $Q_c = d_c * G$
3. `Verifier` picks a random private key share $d_n$ and computes a public key share $Q_n = d_n * G$
4. `Verifier` sends $Q_n$ to `Prover` who computes $Q_a = Q_c + Q_n $ and sends $Q_a$ to `Server`
5. `Prover` computes an EC point $(x_p, y_p) = d_c * Q_b$
6. `Verifier` computes an EC point $(x_q, y_q) = d_n * Q_b$
7. Addition of points $(x_p, y_p)$ and $(x_q, y_q)$ results in the coordinate $x_r$, which is `PMS`. (The coordinate $y_r$ is not used in TLS)
1. $S$ sends its public key $Q_b$ to $P$, and $P$ forwards it to $V$
2. $P$ picks a random private key share $d_c$ and computes a public key share $Q_c = d_c * G$
3. $V$ picks a random private key share $d_n$ and computes a public key share $Q_n = d_n * G$
4. $V$ sends $Q_n$ to $P$ who computes $Q_a = Q_c + Q_n $ and sends $Q_a$ to $S$
5. $P$ computes an EC point $(x_p, y_p) = d_c * Q_b$
6. $V$ computes an EC point $(x_q, y_q) = d_n * Q_b$
Now our goal is to compute additive shares of $\mathbb{pms}$, which we'll redenote as $x_r$, using elliptic curve point addition
Using the notation from [here](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliptic_curve_point_multiplication#Point_addition), our goal is to compute
$$ x_r = (\frac{y_q-y_p}{x_q-x_p})^2 - x_p - x_q $$
in such a way that
1. Neither party learns the other party's $x$ value
2. Neither party learns $x_r$, only their respective shares of $x_r$.
We will use two maliciously secure protocols described on p.25 in the paper [Efficient Secure Two-Party Exponentiation](https://www.cs.umd.edu/~fenghao/paper/modexp.pdf):
- Neither party learns the other party's share.
- Neither party learns $x_r$, only their respective shares of $x_r$.
- `A2M` protocol, which converts additive shares into multiplicative shares, i.e. given shares `a` and `b` such that `a + b = c`, it converts them into shares `d` and `e` such that `d * e = c`
- `M2A` protocol, which converts multiplicative shares into additive shares
To do this we will need two functionalities defined below:
We apply `A2M` to $y_q + (-y_p)$ to get $A_q * A_p$ and also we apply `A2M` to $x_q + (-x_p)$ to get $B_q * B_p$. Then the above can be rewritten as:
### A2M
$\mathsf{A2M}$ converts additive shares into multiplicative shares.
For example, given additive shares $a$ and $b$ such that $a + b = c$, invoking $\mathsf{A2M}$ gives $(d, e) \larr (a, b)_{\mathsf{A2M}}$ such that $d * e = c$
### M2A
$\mathsf{M2A}$, which converts multiplicative shares into additive shares.
For example, given multiplicative shares $d$ and $e$ such that $d * e = c$, invoking $\mathsf{M2A}$ gives $(a, b) \larr (d, e)_{\mathsf{M2A}}$ such that $a + b = c$
### Deriving additive shares of the pre-master secret
We apply $\mathsf{A2M}$ to $y_q + (-y_p)$ to get $A_q * A_p$ and also we apply $\mathsf{A2M}$ to $x_q + (-x_p)$ to get $B_q * B_p$. Then the above can be rewritten as:
$$x_r = (\frac{A_q}{B_q})^2 * (\frac{A_p}{B_p})^2 - x_p - x_q $$
@@ -37,6 +58,8 @@ Then the first party locally computes the first factor and gets $C_q$, the secon
$$x_r = C_q * C_p - x_p - x_q $$
Now we apply `M2A` to $C_q * C_p$ to get $D_q + D_p$, which leads us to two final terms each of which is the share of $x_r$ of the respective party:
Now we apply $\mathsf{M2A}$ to $C_q * C_p$ to get $D_q + D_p$, which leads us to two final terms each of which is the share of $x_r$ of the respective party:
$$x_r = (D_q - x_q) + (D_p - x_p)$$
$$x_r = (D_q - x_q) + (D_p - x_p)$$
Now each party holds their respective additive shares of the TLS pre-master secret.