Merge branch 'main' into logos/raw/logos-module-development-guide-raw

RFC Refactor: Sphinx Packet Format (#173 )
docs: update lamport timestamps to uint64, pegged to current time (#196 )
2026-01-10 08:08:17 -05:00 · 2025-10-10 15:55:54 +02:00 · 2025-10-05 20:21:16 -04:00 · 2025-10-02 14:07:29 +01:00 · 2025-09-26 17:17:18 +02:00 · 2025-09-25 20:15:42 +02:00
14 changed files with 3098 additions and 44 deletions
--- a/logos/raw/logos-module-development-guide.md
+++ b/logos/raw/logos-module-development-guide.md
@@ -0,0 +1,144 @@
+---
+title: LOGOS-MODULE-DEVELOPMENT-GUIDE
+name: Logos Module Development Guide
+status: raw
+category: Standards Track
+tags: logos-core, module-development, qt-plugins, process-isolation
+editor: Logos Core Team
+contributors:
+- Filip Dimitrijevic <filip@status.im>
+---
+
+## Abstract
+
+This RFC documents the module development requirements for the Logos Core Platform as specified in the current implementation. It covers the verified module interface requirements, the optional initLogos method, and development considerations based on the platform's modular architecture.
+
+## Background / Rationale / Motivation
+
+The Logos Core Platform uses a modular architecture where independently developed modules run in separate processes. This guide documents the module development requirements as specified in the current implementation.
+
+## Module Creation Walkthrough
+
+### Step 1: Interface Definition
+
+All modules must implement a common interface as specified in the platform requirements. The exact interface definition is not fully detailed in the current specifications, but modules are required to integrate with the platform's Qt-based architecture.
+
+### Step 2: Module Implementation
+
+As specified in the documentation, modules can optionally implement the `initLogos(LogosAPI*)` method:
+
+> "when a module calls `registerObject(name, object)`, the provider optionally calls `object->initLogos(LogosAPI*)`"
+
+```cpp
+class MyModule : public QObject {
+    Q_OBJECT
+
+public:
+    // Optional initialization method as documented
+    virtual void initLogos(LogosAPI* api);
+
+    // Module methods for inter-module communication
+    // (specific requirements not detailed in current specs)
+};
+```
+
+### Step 3: Metadata Configuration
+
+Module metadata requirements are referenced in the specifications but the exact format is not detailed in the current documentation. Modules require metadata for proper integration with the platform.
+
+### Step 4: Build System Setup
+
+Build system configuration details are not specified in the current documentation. Modules are expected to be Qt plugins that integrate with the platform's modular architecture.
+
+## Module Integration Requirements
+
+### LogosAPI Integration
+
+As specified in the documentation, modules integrate with the platform through the LogosAPI:
+
+- Modules can optionally implement `initLogos(LogosAPI*)` method
+- This method is called when a module registers an object with the platform
+- The LogosAPI provides access to inter-module communication capabilities
+
+### Platform Architecture Requirements
+
+Based on the specifications:
+
+- Modules are Qt-based plugins (as referenced in the specifications)
+- Each module runs in a separate process for isolation (as documented)
+- Inter-module communication uses a Remote Procedure Call (RPC) mechanism
+- The platform supports methods with up to 5 arguments (as specified)
+- Return types include: void, bool, int, QString, QVariant (as documented)
+
+## Module Development Process
+
+### Implementation Requirements
+
+Based on the specifications:
+
+1. **Module Interface**: Implement the common interface (specific requirements not detailed in current specs)
+2. **Optional Initialization**: Optionally implement `initLogos(LogosAPI*)` as documented
+3. **Qt Plugin Structure**: Structure the module as a Qt plugin (as referenced in specifications)
+4. **Metadata Configuration**: Provide metadata (format not detailed in current specs)
+
+### Platform Integration
+
+Modules integrate with the platform through:
+
+- **LogosAPI**: Access to inter-module communication
+- **Process Isolation**: Each module runs in its own process
+- **Authentication**: Token-based authentication for inter-module calls
+- **RPC Communication**: Remote Procedure Call mechanism for communication
+
+### LogosAPI Usage
+
+As documented, the `initLogos(LogosAPI*)` method provides access to:
+
+- Inter-module communication capabilities
+- Platform integration features
+- Authentication and capability management
+
+The specific API details and usage patterns are part of the C++ SDK implementation.
+
+## Security/Privacy Considerations
+
+### Module Isolation
+
+- **Process Boundaries**: Each module runs in a separate process as enforced by the platform
+- **Authentication Requirements**: All inter-module calls require valid authentication tokens
+- **Capability Restrictions**: Modules must request access to other modules through the Capability Module
+
+### Development Security
+
+- **Process Isolation**: Modules benefit from operating system-level process boundaries
+- **Authentication Integration**: Modules must integrate with the platform's token-based authentication system
+
+## Implementation Suggestions
+
+### Development Considerations
+
+- **Process Isolation**: Design modules to work within the process-isolated architecture
+- **Communication Limitations**: Respect the platform's method call limitations (up to 5 arguments)
+- **Return Types**: Use supported return types (void, bool, int, QString, QVariant, QJsonArray, QStringList)
+- **Qt Plugin Requirements**: Follow Qt plugin structure as referenced in the specifications
+
+## Future Enhancements
+
+As noted in the specifications, this is a "living document" that may not fully reflect the ultimate design. The current implementation represents a proof-of-concept stage.
+
+## References
+
+### Normative
+
+- [Logos Core Architecture RFC](./logos-core-architecture.md)
+- [Logos Authentication and Capability System RFC](./logos-authentication-capability-system.md)
+- [Logos Core Proof of Concept - Specifications](https://github.com/logos-co/logos-core-poc/blob/develop/docs/specs.md)
+
+### Informative
+
+- [Qt Plugin Development](https://doc.qt.io/qt-6/plugins-howto.html)
+- [Qt Remote Objects Documentation](https://doc.qt.io/qt-6/qtremoteobjects-index.html)
+
+## Copyright
+
+Copyright and related rights waived via [CC0](https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/).
--- a/nomos/README.md
+++ b/nomos/README.md
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@

 Nomos is building a secure, flexible, and
 scalable infrastructure for developers creating applications for the network state.
-To learn more about Nomos current protocols under discussion,
-head over to [Nomos Specs](https://github.com/logos-co/nomos-specs).
+Published Specifications are currently available here,
+[Nomos Specifications](https://nomos-tech.notion.site/project).
--- a/nomos/raw/nomosda-encoding.md
+++ b/nomos/raw/nomosda-encoding.md
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+--- 
+title: NOMOSDA-ENCODING
+name: NomosDA Encoding Protocol 
+status: raw
+category: 
+tags: data-availability
+editor: Daniel Sanchez-Quiros <danielsq@status.im>
+contributors:
+- Daniel Kashepava <danielkashepava@status.im>
+- Álvaro Castro-Castilla <alvaro@status.im>
+- Filip Dimitrijevic <filip@status.im>
+- Thomas Lavaur <thomaslavaur@status.im>
+- Mehmet Gonen <mehmet@status.im>
+---
+
+## Introduction
+
+This document describes the encoding and verification processes of NomosDA, which is the data availability (DA) solution used by the Nomos blockchain. NomosDA provides an assurance that all data from Nomos blobs are accessible and verifiable by every network participant.
+
+This document presents an implementation specification describing how:
+
+- Encoders encode blobs they want to upload to the Data Availability layer.
+- Other nodes implement the verification of blobs that were already uploaded to DA.
+
+## Definitions
+
+- **Encoder**: An encoder is any actor who performs the encoding process described in this document. This involves committing to the data, generating proofs, and submitting the result to the DA layer.
+
+    In the Nomos architecture, the rollup sequencer typically acts as the encoder, but the role is not exclusive and any actor in the DA layer can also act as encoders.
+- **Verifier**: Verifies its portion of the distributed blob data as per the verification protocol. In the Nomos architecture, the DA nodes act as the verifiers.
+
+## Overview
+
+In the encoding stage, the encoder takes the DA parameters and the padded blob data and creates an initial matrix of data chunks. This matrix is expanded using Reed-Solomon coding and various commitments and proofs are created for the data.
+
+When a verifier receives a sample, it verifies the data it receives from the encoder and broadcasts the information if the data is verified. Finally, the verifier stores the sample data for the required length of time.
+
+## Construction
+
+The encoder and verifier use the [NomosDA cryptographic protocol](https://www.notion.so/NomosDA-Cryptographic-Protocol-1fd261aa09df816fa97ac81304732e77?pvs=21) to carry out their respective functions. These functions are implemented as abstracted and configurable software entities that allow the original data to be encoded and verified via high-level operations.
+
+### Glossary
+
+| Name | Description | Representation |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| `Commitment` | Commitment as per the [NomosDA Cryptographic Protocol](https://www.notion.so/NomosDA-Cryptographic-Protocol-1fd261aa09df816fa97ac81304732e77?pvs=21) | `bytes` |
+| `Proof` | Proof as per the [NomosDA Cryptographic Protocol](https://www.notion.so/NomosDA-Cryptographic-Protocol-1fd261aa09df816fa97ac81304732e77?pvs=21) | `bytes` |
+| `ChunksMatrix` | Matrix of chunked data. Each chunk is **31 bytes.** Row and Column sizes depend on the encoding necessities. | `List[List[bytes]]` |
+
+### Encoder
+
+An encoder takes a set of parameters and the blob data, and creates a matrix of chunks that it uses to compute the necessary cryptographic data. It produces the set of Reed-Solomon (RS) encoded data, the commitments, and the proofs that are needed prior to [dispersal](https://www.notion.so/NomosDA-Dispersal-1fd261aa09df815288c9caf45ed72c95?pvs=21).
+
+```mermaid
+flowchart LR
+    A[DaEncoderParams] -->|Input| B(Encoder)
+    I[31bytes-padded-input] -->|Input| B
+    B -->|Creates| D[Chunks matrix]
+    D --> |Input| C[NomosDA encoding]
+    C --> E{Encoded data📄}
+```
+
+#### Encoding Process
+
+The encoder executes the encoding process as follows:
+
+1. The encoder takes the following input parameters:
+
+    ```python
+    class DAEncoderParams:
+        column_count: usize
+        bytes_per_field_element: usize
+    ```
+
+    | Name | Description | Representation |
+    | --- | --- | --- |
+    | `column_count` | The number of subnets available for dispersal in the system | `usize`, `int` in Python |
+    | `bytes_per_field_element` | The amount of bytes per data chunk. This is set to 31 bytes. Each chunk has 31 bytes rather than 32 to ensure that the chunk value does not exceed the maximum value on the [BLS12-381 elliptic curve](https://electriccoin.co/blog/new-snark-curve/). | `usize`, `int` in Python |
+
+2. The encoder also includes the blob data to be encoded, which must be of a size that is a multiple of `bytes_per_field_element` bytes. Clients are responsible for padding the data so it fits this constraint.
+3. The encoder splits the data into `bytes_per_field_element`-sized chunks. It also arranges these chunks into rows and columns, creating a matrix.
+    a. The amount of columns of the matrix needs to fit with the `column_count` parameter, taking into account the `rs_expansion_factor` (currently fixed to 2).
+        i. This means that the size of each row in this matrix is `(bytes_per_field_element*column_count)/rs_expansion_factor`.
+    b. The amount of rows depends on the size of the data.
+4. The data is encoded as per [the cryptographic details](https://www.notion.so/NomosDA-Cryptographic-Protocol-1fd261aa09df816fa97ac81304732e77?pvs=21).
+5. The encoder provides the encoded data set:
+
+    | Name | Description | Representation |
+    | --- | --- | --- |
+    | `data` | Original data | `bytes` |
+    | `chunked_data` | Matrix before RS expansion | `ChunksMatrix` |
+    | `extended_matrix` | Matrix after RS expansion | `ChunksMatrix` |
+    | `row_commitments` | Commitments for each matrix row | `List[Commitment]` |
+    | `combined_column_proofs` | Proofs for each matrix column | `List[Proof]` |
+
+    ```python
+    class EncodedData:
+        data: bytes
+        chunked_data: ChunksMatrix
+        extended_matrix: ChunksMatrix
+        row_commitments: List[Commitment]
+        combined_column_proofs: List[Proof]
+    ```
+
+#### Encoder Limits
+
+NomosDA does not impose a fixed limit on blob size at the encoding level. However, protocols that involve resource-intensive operations must include upper bounds to prevent abuse. In the case of NomosDA, blob size limits are expected to be enforced, as part of the protocol's broader responsibility for resource management and fairness.
+
+Larger blobs naturally result in higher computational and bandwidth costs, particularly for the encoder, who must compute a proof for each column. Without size limits, malicious clients could exploit the system by attempting to stream unbounded data to DA nodes. Since payment is provided before blob dispersal, DA nodes are protected from performing unnecessary work. This enables the protocol to safely accept very large blobs, as the primary computational cost falls on the encoder. The protocol can accommodate generous blob sizes in practice, while rejecting only absurdly large blobs, such as those exceeding 1 GB, to prevent denial-of-service attacks and ensure network stability.
+
+To mitigate this, the protocol define acceptable blob size limits, and DA implementations enforce local mitigation strategies, such as flagging or blacklisting clients that violate these constraints.
+
+### Verifier
+
+A verifier checks the proper encoding of data blobs it receives. A verifier executes the verification process as follows:
+
+1. The verifier receives a `DAShare` with the required verification data:
+
+    | Name | Description | Representation |
+    | --- | --- | --- |
+    | `column` | Column chunks (31 bytes) from the encoded matrix | `List[bytes]` |
+    | `column_idx` | Column id (`0..2047`). It is directly related to the `subnetworks` in the [network specification](https://www.notion.so/NomosDA-Network-Specification-1fd261aa09df81188e76cb083791252d?pvs=21). | `u16`, unsigned int of 16 bits. `int` in Python |
+    | `combined_column_proof` | Proof of the random linear combination of the column elements. | `Proof` |
+    | `row_commitments` | Commitments for each matrix row | `List[Commitment]` |
+    | `blob_id` | This is computed as the hash (**blake2b**) of `row_commitments` | `bytes` |
+
+2. Upon receiving the above data it verifies the column data as per the [cryptographic details](https://www.notion.so/NomosDA-Cryptographic-Protocol-1fd261aa09df816fa97ac81304732e77?pvs=21). If the verification is successful, the node triggers the [replication protocol](https://www.notion.so/NomosDA-Subnetwork-Replication-1fd261aa09df811d93f8c6280136bfbb?pvs=21) and stores the blob.
+
+    ```python
+    class DAShare:
+        column: Column
+        column_idx: u16
+        combined_column_proof: Proof
+        row_commitments: List[Commitment]
+
+        def blob_id(self) -> BlobId:
+            hasher = blake2b(digest_size=32)
+            for c in self.row_commitments:
+                hasher.update(bytes(c))
+            return hasher.digest()
+    ```
+
+### Verification Logic
+
+```mermaid
+sequenceDiagram
+    participant N as Node
+    participant S as Subnetwork Column N
+    loop For each incoming blob column
+        N-->>N: If blob is valid
+        N-->>S: Replication
+        N->>N: Stores blob
+    end
+```
+
+## Details
+
+The encoder and verifier processes described above make use of a variety of cryptographic functions to facilitate the correct verification of column data by verifiers. These functions rely on primitives such as polynomial commitments and Reed-Solomon erasure codes, the details of which are outside the scope of this document. These details, as well as introductions to the cryptographic primitives being used, can be found in the NomosDA Cryptographic Protocol:
+
+[NomosDA Cryptographic Protocol](https://www.notion.so/NomosDA-Cryptographic-Protocol-1fd261aa09df816fa97ac81304732e77?pvs=21)
+
+## References
+
+- Encoder Specification: [GitHub/encoder.py](https://github.com/logos-co/nomos-specs/blob/master/da/encoder.py)
+- Verifier Specification: [GitHub/verifier.py](https://github.com/logos-co/nomos-specs/blob/master/da/verifier.py)
+- Cryptographic protocol: [NomosDA Cryptographic Protocol](https://www.notion.so/NomosDA-Cryptographic-Protocol-1fd261aa09df816fa97ac81304732e77?pvs=21)
+
+## Copyright
+
+Copyright and related rights waived via [CC0](https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/).
--- a/nomos/raw/nomosda-network.md
+++ b/nomos/raw/nomosda-network.md
@@ -0,0 +1,255 @@
+---
+title: NOMOS-DA-NETWORK
+name: NomosDA Network
+status: raw
+category:
+tags: network, data-availability, da-nodes, executors, sampling
+editor: Daniel Sanchez Quiros <danielsq@status.im>
+contributors:
+- Álvaro Castro-Castilla <alvaro@status.im>
+- Daniel Kashepava <danielkashepava@status.im>
+- Gusto Bacvinka <augustinas@status.im>
+- Filip Dimitrijevic <filip@status.im>
+---
+
+## Introduction
+
+NomosDA is the scalability solution protocol for data availability within the Nomos network.
+This document delineates the protocol's structure at the network level,
+identifies participants,
+and describes the interactions among its components.  
+Please note that this document does not delve into the cryptographic aspects of the design.
+For comprehensive details on the cryptographic operations,
+a detailed specification is a work in progress.
+
+## Objectives
+
+NomosDA was created to ensure that data from Nomos zones is distributed, verifiable, immutable, and accessible.
+At the same time, it is optimised for the following properties:
+
+- **Decentralization**: NomosDA’s data availability guarantees must be achieved with minimal trust assumptions
+and centralised actors. Therefore,
+permissioned DA schemes involving a Data Availability Committee (DAC) had to be avoided in the design.
+Schemes that require some nodes to download the entire blob data were also off the list
+due to the disproportionate role played by these “supernodes”.
+
+- **Scalability**: NomosDA is intended to be a bandwidth-scalable protocol, ensuring that its functions are maintained as the Nomos network grows. Therefore, NomosDA was designed to minimise the amount of data sent to participants, reducing the communication bottleneck and allowing more parties to participate in the DA process.
+
+To achieve the above properties, NomosDA splits up zone data and
+distributes it among network participants,
+with cryptographic properties used to verify the data’s integrity.
+A major feature of this design is that parties who wish to receive an assurance of data availability
+can do so very quickly and with minimal hardware requirements.
+However, this comes at the cost of additional complexity and resources required by more integral participants.
+
+## Requirements
+
+In order to ensure that the above objectives are met,
+the NomosDA network requires a group of participants
+that undertake a greater burden in terms of active involvement in the protocol.
+Recognising that not all node operators can do so,
+NomosDA assigns different roles to different kinds of participants,
+depending on their ability and willingness to contribute more computing power
+and bandwidth to the protocol.
+It was therefore necessary for NomosDA to be implemented as an opt-in Service Network.
+
+Because the NomosDA network has an arbitrary amount of participants,
+and the data is split into a fixed number of portions (see the [Encoding & Verification Specification](https://www.notion.so/NomosDA-Encoding-Verification-4d8ca269e96d4fdcb05abc70426c5e7c)),
+it was necessary to define exactly how each portion is assigned to a participant who will receive and verify it.
+This assignment algorithm must also be flexible enough to ensure smooth operation in a variety of scenarios,
+including where there are more or fewer participants than the number of portions.
+
+## Overview
+
+### Network Participants
+
+The NomosDA network includes three categories of participants:
+
+- **Executors**: Tasked with the encoding and dispersal of data blobs.  
+- **DA Nodes**: Receive and verify the encoded data,
+subsequently temporarily storing it for further network validation through sampling.  
+- **Light Nodes**: Employ sampling to ascertain data availability.
+
+### Network Distribution
+
+The NomosDA network is segmented into `num_subnets` subnetworks.
+These subnetworks represent subsets of peers from the overarching network,
+each responsible for a distinct portion of the distributed encoded data.
+Peers in the network may engage in one or multiple subnetworks,
+contingent upon network size and participant count.
+
+### Sub-protocols
+
+The NomosDA protocol consists of the following sub-protocols:
+
+- **Dispersal**: Describes how executors distribute encoded data blobs to subnetworks.
+[NomosDA Dispersal](https://www.notion.so/NomosDA-Dispersal-1818f96fb65c805ca257cb14798f24d4?pvs=21)
+- **Replication**: Defines how DA nodes distribute encoded data blobs within subnetworks.
+[NomosDA Subnetwork Replication](https://www.notion.so/NomosDA-Subnetwork-Replication-1818f96fb65c80119fa0e958a087cc2b?pvs=21)
+- **Sampling**: Used by sampling clients (e.g., light clients) to verify the availability of previously dispersed
+and replicated data.
+[NomosDA Sampling](https://www.notion.so/NomosDA-Sampling-1538f96fb65c8031a44cf7305d271779?pvs=21)
+- **Reconstruction**: Describes gathering and decoding dispersed data back into its original form.
+[NomosDA Reconstruction](https://www.notion.so/NomosDA-Reconstruction-1828f96fb65c80b2bbb9f4c5a0cf26a5?pvs=21)
+- **Indexing**: Tracks and exposes blob metadata on-chain.
+[NomosDA Indexing](https://www.notion.so/NomosDA-Indexing-1bb8f96fb65c8044b635da9df20c2411?pvs=21)
+
+## Construction
+
+### NomosDA Network Registration
+
+Entities wishing to participate in NomosDA must declare their role via [SDP](https://www.notion.so/Final-Draft-Validator-Role-Protocol-17b8f96fb65c80c69c2ef55e22e29506) (Service Declaration Protocol).
+Once declared, they're accounted for in the subnetwork construction.
+
+This enables participation in:
+
+- Dispersal (as executor)
+- Replication & sampling (as DA node)
+- Sampling (as light node)
+
+### Subnetwork Assignment
+
+The NomosDA network comprises `num_subnets` subnetworks,
+which are virtual in nature.
+A subnetwork is a subset of peers grouped together so nodes know who they should connect with,
+serving as groupings of peers tasked with executing the dispersal and replication sub-protocols.
+In each subnetwork, participants establish a fully connected overlay,
+ensuring all nodes maintain permanent connections for the lifetime of the SDP set
+with peers within the same subnetwork.
+Nodes refer to nodes in the Data Availability SDP set to ascertain their connectivity requirements across subnetworks.
+
+#### Assignment Algorithm
+
+The concrete distribution algorithm is described in the following specification:
+[DA Subnetwork Assignation](https://www.notion.so/DA-Subnetwork-Assignation-217261aa09df80fc8bb9cf46092741ce)
+
+## Executor Connections
+
+Each executor maintains a connection with one peer per subnetwork,
+necessitating at least num_subnets stable and healthy connections.
+Executors are expected to allocate adequate resources to sustain these connections.
+An example algorithm for peer selection would be:
+
+```python
+def select_peers(
+    subnetworks: Sequence[Set[PeerId]],
+    filtered_subnetworks: Set[int],
+    filtered_peers: Set[PeerId]
+) -> Set[PeerId]:
+    result = set()
+    for i, subnetwork in enumerate(subnetworks):
+        available_peers = subnetwork - filtered_peers
+        if i not in filtered_subnetworks and available_peers:
+            result.add(next(iter(available_peers)))
+    return result
+```
+
+## NomosDA Protocol Steps
+
+### Dispersal
+
+1. The NomosDA protocol is initiated by executors
+who perform data encoding as outlined in the [Encoding Specification](https://www.notion.so/NomosDA-Encoding-Verification-4d8ca269e96d4fdcb05abc70426c5e7c).
+2. Executors prepare and distribute each encoded data portion
+to its designated subnetwork (from `0` to `num_subnets - 1` ).
+3. Executors might opt to perform sampling to confirm successful dispersal.
+4. Post-dispersal, executors publish the dispersed `blob_id` and metadata to the mempool. <!-- TODO: add link to dispersal document-->
+
+### Replication
+
+DA nodes receive columns from dispersal or replication
+and validate the data encoding.
+Upon successful validation,
+they replicate the validated column to connected peers within their subnetwork.
+Replication occurs once per blob; subsequent validations of the same blob are discarded.
+
+### Sampling
+
+1. Sampling is [invoked based on the node's current role](https://www.notion.so/1538f96fb65c8031a44cf7305d271779?pvs=25#15e8f96fb65c8006b9d7f12ffdd9a159).
+2. The node selects `sample_size` random subnetworks
+and queries each for the availability of the corresponding column for the sampled blob. Sampling is deemed successful only if all queried subnetworks respond affirmatively.
+
+- If `num_subnets` is 2048, `sample_size` is [20 as per the sampling research](https://www.notion.so/1708f96fb65c80a08c97d728cb8476c3?pvs=25#1708f96fb65c80bab6f9c6a946940078)
+
+```mermaid
+sequenceDiagram
+    SamplingClient ->> DANode_1: Request
+    DANode_1 -->> SamplingClient: Response
+    SamplingClient ->>DANode_2: Request
+    DANode_2 -->> SamplingClient: Response
+    SamplingClient ->> DANode_n: Request
+    DANode_n -->> SamplingClient: Response
+```
+
+### Network Schematics
+
+The overall network and protocol interactions is represented by the following diagram
+
+```mermaid
+flowchart TD
+subgraph Replication
+    subgraph Subnetwork_N
+        N10 -->|Replicate| N20
+        N20 -->|Replicate| N30
+        N30 -->|Replicate| N10
+    end
+    subgraph ...
+    end
+    subgraph Subnetwork_0
+        N1 -->|Replicate| N2
+        N2 -->|Replicate| N3
+        N3 -->|Replicate| N1
+    end
+end
+subgraph Sampling
+    N9 -->|Sample 0| N2
+    N9 -->|Sample S| N20
+end
+subgraph Dispersal
+    Executor -->|Disperse| N1
+    Executor -->|Disperse| N10
+end
+```
+
+## Details
+
+### Network specifics
+
+The NomosDA network is engineered for connection efficiency.
+Executors manage numerous open connections,
+utilizing their resource capabilities.
+DA nodes, with their resource constraints,
+are designed to maximize connection reuse.
+
+NomosDA uses [multiplexed](https://docs.libp2p.io/concepts/transports/quic/#quic-native-multiplexing) streams over [QUIC](https://docs.libp2p.io/concepts/transports/quic/) connections.
+For each sub-protocol, a stream protocol ID is defined to negotiate the protocol,
+triggering the specific protocol once established:
+
+- Dispersal: /nomos/da/{version}/dispersal
+- Replication: /nomos/da/{version}/replication
+- Sampling: /nomos/da/{version}/sampling
+
+Through these multiplexed streams,
+DA nodes can utilize the same connection for all sub-protocols.
+This, combined with virtual subnetworks (membership sets),
+ensures the overlay node distribution is scalable for networks of any size.
+
+## References
+
+- [Encoding Specification](https://www.notion.so/NomosDA-Encoding-Verification-4d8ca269e96d4fdcb05abc70426c5e7c)
+- [Encoding & Verification Specification](https://www.notion.so/NomosDA-Encoding-Verification-4d8ca269e96d4fdcb05abc70426c5e7c)
+- [NomosDA Dispersal](https://www.notion.so/NomosDA-Dispersal-1818f96fb65c805ca257cb14798f24d4?pvs=21)
+- [NomosDA Subnetwork Replication](https://www.notion.so/NomosDA-Subnetwork-Replication-1818f96fb65c80119fa0e958a087cc2b?pvs=21)
+- [DA Subnetwork Assignation](https://www.notion.so/DA-Subnetwork-Assignation-217261aa09df80fc8bb9cf46092741ce)
+- [NomosDA Sampling](https://www.notion.so/NomosDA-Sampling-1538f96fb65c8031a44cf7305d271779?pvs=21)
+- [NomosDA Reconstruction](https://www.notion.so/NomosDA-Reconstruction-1828f96fb65c80b2bbb9f4c5a0cf26a5?pvs=21)
+- [NomosDA Indexing](https://www.notion.so/NomosDA-Indexing-1bb8f96fb65c8044b635da9df20c2411?pvs=21)
+- [SDP](https://www.notion.so/Final-Draft-Validator-Role-Protocol-17b8f96fb65c80c69c2ef55e22e29506)
+- [invoked based on the node's current role](https://www.notion.so/1538f96fb65c8031a44cf7305d271779?pvs=25#15e8f96fb65c8006b9d7f12ffdd9a159)
+- [20 as per the sampling research](https://www.notion.so/1708f96fb65c80a08c97d728cb8476c3?pvs=25#1708f96fb65c80bab6f9c6a946940078)
+- [multiplexed](https://docs.libp2p.io/concepts/transports/quic/#quic-native-multiplexing)
+- [QUIC](https://docs.libp2p.io/concepts/transports/quic/)
+
+## Copyright
+
+Copyright and related rights waived via [CC0](https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/).
--- a/nomos/raw/p2p-hardware-requirements.md
+++ b/nomos/raw/p2p-hardware-requirements.md
@@ -0,0 +1,236 @@
+---
+title: P2P-HARDWARE-REQUIREMENTS
+name: Nomos p2p Network Hardware Requirements Specification
+status: raw
+category: infrastructure
+tags: [hardware, requirements, nodes, validators, services]
+editor: Daniel Sanchez-Quiros <danielsq@status.im>
+contributors:
+- Filip Dimitrijevic <filip@status.im>
+---
+
+## Abstract
+
+This specification defines the hardware requirements for running various types of Nomos blockchain nodes. Hardware needs vary significantly based on the node's role, from lightweight verification nodes to high-performance Zone Executors. The requirements are designed to support diverse participation levels while ensuring network security and performance.
+
+## Motivation
+
+The Nomos network is designed to be inclusive and accessible across a wide range of hardware configurations. By defining clear hardware requirements for different node types, we enable:
+
+1. **Inclusive Participation**: Allow users with limited resources to participate as Light Nodes
+2. **Scalable Infrastructure**: Support varying levels of network participation based on available resources
+3. **Performance Optimization**: Ensure adequate resources for computationally intensive operations
+4. **Network Security**: Maintain network integrity through properly resourced validator nodes
+5. **Service Quality**: Define requirements for optional services that enhance network functionality
+
+**Important Notice**: These hardware requirements are preliminary and subject to revision based on implementation testing and real-world network performance data.
+
+## Specification
+
+### Node Types Overview
+
+Hardware requirements vary based on the node's role and services:
+
+- **Light Node**: Minimal verification with minimal resources
+- **Basic Bedrock Node**: Standard validation participation
+- **Service Nodes**: Enhanced capabilities for optional network services
+
+### Light Node
+
+Light Nodes provide network verification with minimal resource requirements, suitable for resource-constrained environments.
+
+**Target Use Cases:**
+
+- Mobile devices and smartphones
+- Single-board computers (Raspberry Pi, etc.)
+- IoT devices with network connectivity
+- Users with limited hardware resources
+
+**Hardware Requirements:**
+
+| Component | Specification |
+|-----------|---------------|
+| **CPU** | Low-power processor (smartphone/SBC capable) |
+| **Memory (RAM)** | 512 MB |
+| **Storage** | Minimal (few GB) |
+| **Network** | Reliable connection, 1 Mbps free bandwidth |
+
+### Basic Bedrock Node (Validator)
+
+Basic validators participate in Bedrock consensus using typical consumer hardware.
+
+**Target Use Cases:**
+
+- Individual validators on consumer hardware
+- Small-scale validation operations
+- Entry-level network participation
+
+**Hardware Requirements:**
+
+| Component | Specification |
+|-----------|---------------|
+| **CPU** | 2 cores, 2 GHz modern multi-core processor |
+| **Memory (RAM)** | 1 GB minimum |
+| **Storage** | SSD with 100+ GB free space, expandable |
+| **Network** | Reliable connection, 1 Mbps free bandwidth |
+
+### Service-Specific Requirements
+
+Nodes can optionally run additional Bedrock Services that require enhanced resources beyond basic validation.
+
+#### Data Availability (DA) Service
+
+DA Service nodes store and serve data shares for the network's data availability layer.
+
+**Service Role:**
+
+- Store blockchain data and blob data long-term
+- Serve data shares to requesting nodes
+- Maintain high availability for data retrieval
+
+**Additional Requirements:**
+
+| Component | Specification | Rationale |
+|-----------|---------------|-----------|
+| **CPU** | Same as Basic Bedrock Node | Standard processing needs |
+| **Memory (RAM)** | Same as Basic Bedrock Node | Standard memory needs |
+| **Storage** | **Fast SSD, 500+ GB free** | Long-term chain and blob storage |
+| **Network** | **High bandwidth (10+ Mbps)** | Concurrent data serving |
+| **Connectivity** | **Stable, accessible external IP** | Direct peer connections |
+
+**Network Requirements:**
+
+- Capacity to handle multiple concurrent connections
+- Stable external IP address for direct peer access
+- Low latency for efficient data serving
+
+#### Blend Protocol Service
+
+Blend Protocol nodes provide anonymous message routing capabilities.
+
+**Service Role:**
+
+- Route messages anonymously through the network
+- Provide timing obfuscation for privacy
+- Maintain multiple concurrent connections
+
+**Additional Requirements:**
+
+| Component | Specification | Rationale |
+|-----------|---------------|-----------|
+| **CPU** | Same as Basic Bedrock Node | Standard processing needs |
+| **Memory (RAM)** | Same as Basic Bedrock Node | Standard memory needs |
+| **Storage** | Same as Basic Bedrock Node | Standard storage needs |
+| **Network** | **Stable connection (10+ Mbps)** | Multiple concurrent connections |
+| **Connectivity** | **Stable, accessible external IP** | Direct peer connections |
+
+**Network Requirements:**
+
+- Low-latency connection for effective message blending
+- Stable connection for timing obfuscation
+- Capability to handle multiple simultaneous connections
+
+#### Executor Network Service
+
+Zone Executors perform the most computationally intensive work in the network.
+
+**Service Role:**
+
+- Execute Zone state transitions
+- Generate zero-knowledge proofs
+- Process complex computational workloads
+
+**Critical Performance Note**: Zone Executors perform the heaviest computational work in the network. High-performance hardware is crucial for effective participation and may provide competitive advantages in execution markets.
+
+**Hardware Requirements:**
+
+| Component | Specification | Rationale |
+|-----------|---------------|-----------|
+| **CPU** | **Very high-performance multi-core processor** | Zone logic execution and ZK proving |
+| **Memory (RAM)** | **32+ GB strongly recommended** | Complex Zone execution requirements |
+| **Storage** | Same as Basic Bedrock Node | Standard storage needs |
+| **GPU** | **Highly recommended/often necessary** | Efficient ZK proof generation |
+| **Network** | **High bandwidth (10+ Mbps)** | Data dispersal and high connection load |
+
+**GPU Requirements:**
+
+- **NVIDIA**: CUDA-enabled GPU (RTX 3090 or equivalent recommended)
+- **Apple**: Metal-compatible Apple Silicon
+- **Performance Impact**: Strong GPU significantly reduces proving time
+
+**Network Requirements:**
+
+- Support for **2048+ direct UDP connections** to DA Nodes (for blob publishing)
+- High bandwidth for data dispersal operations
+- Stable connection for continuous operation
+
+*Note: DA Nodes utilizing [libp2p](https://docs.libp2p.io/) connections need sufficient capacity to receive and serve data shares over many connections.*
+
+## Implementation Requirements
+
+### Minimum Requirements
+
+All Nomos nodes MUST meet:
+
+1. **Basic connectivity** to the Nomos network via [libp2p](https://docs.libp2p.io/)
+2. **Adequate storage** for their designated role
+3. **Sufficient processing power** for their service level
+4. **Reliable network connection** with appropriate bandwidth for [QUIC](https://docs.libp2p.io/concepts/transports/quic/) transport
+
+### Optional Enhancements
+
+Node operators MAY implement:
+
+- Hardware redundancy for critical services
+- Enhanced cooling for high-performance configurations
+- Dedicated network connections for service nodes utilizing [libp2p](https://docs.libp2p.io/) protocols
+- Backup power systems for continuous operation
+
+### Resource Scaling
+
+Requirements may vary based on:
+
+- **Network Load**: Higher network activity increases resource demands
+- **Zone Complexity**: More complex Zones require additional computational resources
+- **Service Combinations**: Running multiple services simultaneously increases requirements
+- **Geographic Location**: Network latency affects optimal performance requirements
+
+## Security Considerations
+
+### Hardware Security
+
+1. **Secure Storage**: Use encrypted storage for sensitive node data
+2. **Network Security**: Implement proper firewall configurations
+3. **Physical Security**: Secure physical access to node hardware
+4. **Backup Strategies**: Maintain secure backups of critical data
+
+### Performance Security
+
+1. **Resource Monitoring**: Monitor resource usage to detect anomalies
+2. **Redundancy**: Plan for hardware failures in critical services
+3. **Isolation**: Consider containerization or virtualization for service isolation
+4. **Update Management**: Maintain secure update procedures for hardware drivers
+
+## Performance Characteristics
+
+### Scalability
+
+- **Light Nodes**: Minimal resource footprint, high scalability
+- **Validators**: Moderate resource usage, network-dependent scaling
+- **Service Nodes**: High resource usage, specialized scaling requirements
+
+### Resource Efficiency
+
+- **CPU Usage**: Optimized algorithms for different hardware tiers
+- **Memory Usage**: Efficient data structures for constrained environments
+- **Storage Usage**: Configurable retention policies and compression
+- **Network Usage**: Adaptive bandwidth utilization based on [libp2p](https://docs.libp2p.io/) capacity and [QUIC](https://docs.libp2p.io/concepts/transports/quic/) connection efficiency
+
+## References
+
+1. [libp2p protocol](https://docs.libp2p.io/)
+2. [QUIC protocol](https://docs.libp2p.io/concepts/transports/quic/)
+
+## Copyright
+
+Copyright and related rights waived via [CC0](https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/).
--- a/nomos/raw/p2p-nat-solution.md
+++ b/nomos/raw/p2p-nat-solution.md
@@ -0,0 +1,377 @@
+---
+title: P2P-NAT-SOLUTION
+name: Nomos P2P Network NAT Solution Specification
+status: raw
+category: networking
+tags: [nat, traversal, autonat, upnp, pcp, nat-pmp]
+editor: Antonio Antonino <antonio@status.im>
+contributors:
+- Álvaro Castro-Castilla <alvaro@status.im>
+- Daniel Sanchez-Quiros <danielsq@status.im>
+- Petar Radovic <petar@status.im>
+- Gusto Bacvinka <augustinas@status.im>
+- Youngjoon Lee <youngjoon@status.im>
+- Filip Dimitrijevic <filip@status.im>
+---
+
+## Abstract
+
+This specification defines a comprehensive NAT (Network Address Translation) traversal solution for the Nomos P2P network. The solution enables nodes to automatically determine their NAT status and establish both outbound and inbound connections regardless of network configuration. The strategy combines [AutoNAT](https://github.com/libp2p/specs/blob/master/autonat/autonat-v2.md), dynamic port mapping protocols, and continuous verification to maximize public reachability while maintaining decentralized operation.
+
+## Motivation
+
+Network Address Translation presents a critical challenge for Nomos participants, particularly those operating on consumer hardware without technical expertise. The Nomos network requires a NAT traversal solution that:
+
+1. **Automatic Operation**: Works out-of-the-box without user configuration
+2. **Inclusive Participation**: Enables nodes on consumer hardware to participate effectively
+3. **Decentralized Approach**: Leverages the existing Nomos P2P network rather than centralized services
+4. **Progressive Fallback**: Escalates through increasingly complex protocols as needed
+5. **Dynamic Adaptation**: Handles changing network environments and configurations
+
+The solution must ensure that nodes can both establish outbound connections and accept inbound connections from other peers, maintaining network connectivity across diverse NAT configurations.
+
+## Specification
+
+### Terminology
+
+- **Public Node**: A node that is publicly reachable via a public IP address or valid port mapping
+- **Private Node**: A node that is not publicly reachable due to NAT/firewall restrictions
+- **Dialing**: The process of establishing a connection using the [libp2p protocol](https://docs.libp2p.io/) stack
+- **NAT Status**: Whether a node is publicly reachable or hidden behind NAT
+
+### Key Design Principles
+
+#### Optional Configuration
+
+The NAT traversal strategy must work out-of-the-box whenever possible. Users who do not want to engage in configuration should only need to install the node software package. However, users requiring full control must be able to configure every aspect of the strategy.
+
+#### Decentralized Operation
+
+The solution leverages the existing Nomos P2P network for coordination rather than relying on centralized third-party services. This maintains the decentralized nature of the network while providing necessary NAT traversal capabilities.
+
+#### Progressive Fallback
+
+The protocol begins with lightweight checks and escalates through more complex and resource-intensive protocols. Failure at any step moves the protocol to the next stage in the strategy, ensuring maximum compatibility across network configurations.
+
+#### Dynamic Network Environment
+
+Unless explicitly configured for static addresses, each node's public or private status is assumed to be dynamic. A once publicly-reachable node can become unreachable and vice versa, requiring continuous monitoring and adaptation.
+
+### Node Discovery Considerations
+
+The Nomos public network encourages participation from a large number of nodes, many deployed through simple installation procedures. Some nodes will not achieve Public status, but the discovery protocol must track these peers and allow other nodes to discover them. This prevents network partitioning and ensures Private nodes remain accessible to other participants.
+
+### NAT Traversal Protocol
+
+#### Protocol Requirements
+
+**Each node MUST:**
+
+- Run an [AutoNAT](https://github.com/libp2p/specs/blob/master/autonat/autonat-v2.md) client, except for nodes statically configured as Public
+- Use the [Identify protocol](https://github.com/libp2p/specs/blob/master/identify/README.md) to advertise support for:
+  - `/nomos/autonat/2/dial-request` for main network
+  - `/nomos-testnet/autonat/2/dial-request` for public testnet
+  - `/nomos/autonat/2/dial-back` and `/nomos-testnet/autonat/2/dial-back` respectively
+
+#### NAT State Machine
+
+The NAT traversal process follows a multi-phase state machine:
+
+```mermaid
+graph TD
+  Start@{shape: circle, label: "Start"} -->|Preconfigured public IP or port mapping| StaticPublic[Statically configured as<br/>**Public**]
+  subgraph Phase0 [Phase 0]
+  Start -->|Default configuration| Boot
+  end
+  subgraph Phase1 [Phase 1]
+  Boot[Bootstrap and discover AutoNAT servers]--> Inspect
+  Inspect[Inspect own IP addresses]-->|At least 1 IP address in the public range| ConfirmPublic[AutoNAT]
+  end
+  subgraph Phase2 [Phase 2]
+  Inspect -->|No IP addresses in the public range| MapPorts[Port Mapping Client<br/>UPnP/NAT-PMP/PCP]
+  MapPorts -->|Successful port map| ConfirmMapPorts[AutoNAT]
+  end
+  ConfirmPublic -->|Node's IP address reachable by AutoNAT server| Public[**Public** Node]
+  ConfirmPublic -->|Node's IP address not reachable by AutoNAT server or Timeout| MapPorts
+  ConfirmMapPorts -->|Mapped IP address and port reachable by AutoNAT server| Public
+  ConfirmMapPorts -->|Mapped IP address and port not reachable by AutoNAT server or Timeout| Private
+  MapPorts -->|Failure or Timeout| Private[**Private** Node]
+  subgraph Phase3 [Phase 3]
+  Public -->Monitor
+  Private --> Monitor
+  end
+  Monitor[Network Monitoring] -->|Restart| Inspect
+```
+
+### Phase Implementation
+
+#### Phase 0: Bootstrapping and Identifying Public Nodes
+
+If the node is statically configured by the operator to be Public, the procedure stops here.
+
+The node utilizes bootstrapping and discovery mechanisms to find other Public nodes. The [Identify protocol](https://github.com/libp2p/specs/blob/master/identify/README.md) confirms which detected Public nodes support [AutoNAT v2](https://github.com/libp2p/specs/blob/master/autonat/autonat-v2.md).
+
+#### Phase 1: NAT Detection
+
+The node starts an [AutoNAT](https://github.com/libp2p/specs/blob/master/autonat/autonat-v2.md) client and inspects its own addresses. For each public IP address, the node verifies public reachability via [AutoNAT](https://github.com/libp2p/specs/blob/master/autonat/autonat-v2.md). If any public IP addresses are confirmed, the node assumes Public status and moves to Phase 3. Otherwise, it continues to Phase 2.
+
+#### Phase 2: Automated Port Mapping
+
+The node attempts to secure port mapping on the default gateway using:
+
+- **[PCP](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6887)** (Port Control Protocol) - Most reliable
+- **[NAT-PMP](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6886)** (NAT Port Mapping Protocol) - Second most reliable  
+- **[UPnP-IGD](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6970)** (Universal Plug and Play Internet Gateway Device) - Most widely deployed
+
+**Port Mapping Algorithm:**
+
+```python
+def try_port_mapping():
+    # Step 1: Get the local IPv4 address
+    local_ip = get_local_ipv4_address()
+    
+    # Step 2: Get the default gateway IPv4 address
+    gateway_ip = get_default_gateway_address()
+    
+    # Step 3: Abort if local or gateway IP could not be determined
+    if not local_ip or not gateway_ip:
+        return "Mapping failed: Unable to get local or gateway IPv4"
+
+    # Step 4: Probe the gateway for protocol support
+    supports_pcp = probe_pcp(gateway_ip)
+    supports_nat_pmp = probe_nat_pmp(gateway_ip)
+    supports_upnp = probe_upnp(gateway_ip)  # Optional for logging
+
+    # Step 5-9: Try protocols in order of reliability
+    # PCP (most reliable) -> NAT-PMP -> UPnP -> fallback attempts
+    
+    protocols = [
+        (supports_pcp, try_pcp_mapping),
+        (supports_nat_pmp, try_nat_pmp_mapping),
+        (True, try_upnp_mapping),  # Always try UPnP
+        (not supports_pcp, try_pcp_mapping),  # Fallback
+        (not supports_nat_pmp, try_nat_pmp_mapping)  # Last resort
+    ]
+    
+    for supported, mapping_func in protocols:
+        if supported:
+            mapping = mapping_func(local_ip, gateway_ip)
+            if mapping:
+                return mapping
+    
+    return "Mapping failed: No protocol succeeded"
+```
+
+If mapping succeeds, the node uses [AutoNAT](https://github.com/libp2p/specs/blob/master/autonat/autonat-v2.md) to confirm public reachability. Upon confirmation, the node assumes Public status. Otherwise, it assumes Private status.
+
+**Port Mapping Sequence:**
+
+```mermaid
+sequenceDiagram
+    box Node
+        participant AutoNAT Client
+        participant NAT State Machine
+        participant Port Mapping Client
+    end
+    participant Router
+    
+    alt Mapping is successful
+        Note left of AutoNAT Client: Phase 2
+        Port Mapping Client ->> +Router: Requests new mapping
+        Router ->> Port Mapping Client: Confirms new mapping
+        Port Mapping Client ->> NAT State Machine: Mapping secured
+        NAT State Machine ->> AutoNAT Client: Requests confirmation<br/>that mapped address<br/>is publicly reachable
+        
+        alt Node asserts Public status
+            AutoNAT Client ->> NAT State Machine: Mapped address<br/>is publicly reachable
+            Note left of AutoNAT Client: Phase 3<br/>Network Monitoring
+        else Node asserts Private status
+            AutoNAT Client ->> NAT State Machine: Mapped address<br/>is not publicly reachable
+            Note left of AutoNAT Client: Phase 3<br/>Network Monitoring
+        end
+    else Mapping fails, node asserts Private status
+        Note left of AutoNAT Client: Phase 2
+        Port Mapping Client ->> Router: Requests new mapping
+        Router ->> Port Mapping Client: Refuses new mapping or Timeout
+        Port Mapping Client ->> NAT State Machine: Mapping failed
+        Note left of AutoNAT Client: Phase 3<br/>Network Monitoring
+    end
+```
+
+#### Phase 3: Network Monitoring
+
+Unless explicitly configured, nodes must monitor their network status and restart from Phase 1 when changes are detected.
+
+**Public Node Monitoring:**
+
+A Public node must restart when:
+
+- [AutoNAT](https://github.com/libp2p/specs/blob/master/autonat/autonat-v2.md) client no longer confirms public reachability
+- A previously successful port mapping is lost or refresh fails
+
+**Private Node Monitoring:**
+
+A Private node must restart when:
+
+- It gains a new public IP address
+- Port mapping is likely to succeed (gateway change, sufficient time passed)
+
+**Network Monitoring Sequence:**
+
+```mermaid
+sequenceDiagram
+    participant AutoNAT Server
+    box Node
+        participant AutoNAT Client
+        participant NAT State Machine
+        participant Port Mapping Client
+    end
+    participant Router
+
+    Note left of AutoNAT Server: Phase 3<br/>Network Monitoring
+    par Refresh mapping and monitor changes
+        loop periodically refreshes mapping
+            Port Mapping Client ->> Router: Requests refresh
+            Router ->> Port Mapping Client: Confirms mapping refresh
+        end
+        break Mapping is lost, the node loses Public status
+            Router ->> Port Mapping Client: Refresh failed or mapping dropped
+            Port Mapping Client ->> NAT State Machine: Mapping lost
+            NAT State Machine ->> NAT State Machine: Restart
+        end
+    and Monitor public reachability of mapped addresses
+        loop periodically checks public reachability
+            AutoNAT Client ->> AutoNAT Server: Requests dialback
+            AutoNAT Server ->> AutoNAT Client: Dialback successful
+        end
+        break
+            AutoNAT Server ->> AutoNAT Client: Dialback failed or Timeout
+            AutoNAT Client ->> NAT State Machine: Public reachability lost
+            NAT State Machine ->> NAT State Machine: Restart
+        end
+    end
+    Note left of AutoNAT Server: Phase 1
+```
+
+### Public Node Responsibilities
+
+**A Public node MUST:**
+
+- Run an [AutoNAT](https://github.com/libp2p/specs/blob/master/autonat/autonat-v2.md) server
+- Listen on and advertise via [Identify protocol](https://github.com/libp2p/specs/blob/master/identify/README.md) its publicly reachable [multiaddresses](https://github.com/libp2p/specs/blob/master/addressing/README.md):
+  
+  `/{public_peer_ip}/udp/{port}/quic-v1/p2p/{public_peer_id}`
+
+- Periodically renew port mappings according to protocol recommendations
+- Maintain high availability for [AutoNAT](https://github.com/libp2p/specs/blob/master/autonat/autonat-v2.md) services
+
+### Peer Dialing
+
+Other peers can always dial a Public peer using its publicly reachable [multiaddresses](https://github.com/libp2p/specs/blob/master/addressing/README.md):
+
+`/{public_peer_ip}/udp/{port}/quic-v1/p2p/{public_peer_id}`
+
+## Implementation Requirements
+
+### Mandatory Components
+
+All Nomos nodes MUST implement:
+
+1. **[AutoNAT](https://github.com/libp2p/specs/blob/master/autonat/autonat-v2.md) client** for NAT status detection
+2. **Port mapping clients** for [PCP](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6887), [NAT-PMP](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6886), and [UPnP-IGD](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6970)
+3. **[Identify protocol](https://github.com/libp2p/specs/blob/master/identify/README.md)** for capability advertisement
+4. **Network monitoring** for status change detection
+
+### Optional Enhancements
+
+Nodes MAY implement:
+
+- Custom port mapping retry strategies
+- Enhanced network change detection
+- Advanced [AutoNAT](https://github.com/libp2p/specs/blob/master/autonat/autonat-v2.md) server load balancing
+- Backup connectivity mechanisms
+
+### Configuration Parameters
+
+#### [AutoNAT](https://github.com/libp2p/specs/blob/master/autonat/autonat-v2.md) Configuration
+
+```yaml
+autonat:
+  client:
+    dial_timeout: 15s
+    max_peer_addresses: 16
+    throttle_global_limit: 30
+    throttle_peer_limit: 3
+  server:
+    dial_timeout: 30s
+    max_peer_addresses: 16
+    throttle_global_limit: 30
+    throttle_peer_limit: 3
+```
+
+#### Port Mapping Configuration
+
+```yaml
+port_mapping:
+  pcp:
+    timeout: 30s
+    lifetime: 7200s  # 2 hours
+    retry_interval: 300s
+  nat_pmp:
+    timeout: 30s
+    lifetime: 7200s
+    retry_interval: 300s
+  upnp:
+    timeout: 30s
+    lease_duration: 7200s
+    retry_interval: 300s
+```
+
+## Security Considerations
+
+### NAT Traversal Security
+
+1. **Port Mapping Validation**: Verify that requested port mappings are actually created
+2. **[AutoNAT](https://github.com/libp2p/specs/blob/master/autonat/autonat-v2.md) Server Trust**: Implement peer reputation for [AutoNAT](https://github.com/libp2p/specs/blob/master/autonat/autonat-v2.md) servers
+3. **Gateway Communication**: Secure communication with NAT devices
+4. **Address Validation**: Validate public addresses before advertisement
+
+### Privacy Considerations
+
+1. **IP Address Exposure**: Public nodes necessarily expose IP addresses
+2. **Traffic Analysis**: Monitor for patterns that could reveal node behavior
+3. **Gateway Information**: Minimize exposure of internal network topology
+
+### Denial of Service Protection
+
+1. **[AutoNAT](https://github.com/libp2p/specs/blob/master/autonat/autonat-v2.md) Rate Limiting**: Implement request throttling for [AutoNAT](https://github.com/libp2p/specs/blob/master/autonat/autonat-v2.md) services
+2. **Port Mapping Abuse**: Prevent excessive port mapping requests
+3. **Resource Exhaustion**: Limit concurrent NAT traversal attempts
+
+## Performance Characteristics
+
+### Scalability
+
+- **[AutoNAT](https://github.com/libp2p/specs/blob/master/autonat/autonat-v2.md) Server Load**: Distributed across Public nodes
+- **Port Mapping Overhead**: Minimal ongoing resource usage
+- **Network Monitoring**: Efficient periodic checks
+
+### Reliability
+
+- **Fallback Mechanisms**: Multiple protocols ensure high success rates
+- **Continuous Monitoring**: Automatic recovery from connectivity loss
+- **Protocol Redundancy**: Multiple port mapping protocols increase reliability
+
+## References
+
+1. [Multiaddress spec](https://github.com/libp2p/specs/blob/master/addressing/README.md)
+2. [Identify protocol spec](https://github.com/libp2p/specs/blob/master/identify/README.md)
+3. [AutoNAT v2 protocol spec](https://github.com/libp2p/specs/blob/master/autonat/autonat-v2.md)
+4. [Circuit Relay v2 protocol spec](https://github.com/libp2p/specs/blob/master/relay/circuit-v2.md)
+5. [PCP - RFC 6887](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6887)
+6. [NAT-PMP - RFC 6886](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6886)
+7. [UPnP IGD - RFC 6970](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6970)
+
+## Copyright
+
+Copyright and related rights waived via [CC0](https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/).
--- a/nomos/raw/p2p-network-bootstrapping.md
+++ b/nomos/raw/p2p-network-bootstrapping.md
@@ -0,0 +1,185 @@
+---
+title: P2P-NETWORK-BOOTSTRAPPING
+name: Nomos P2P Network Bootstrapping Specification
+status: raw
+category: networking
+tags: [p2p, networking, bootstrapping, peer-discovery, libp2p]
+editor: Daniel Sanchez-Quiros <danielsq@status.im>
+contributors:
+- Álvaro Castro-Castilla <alvaro@status.im>
+- Petar Radovic <petar@status.im>
+- Gusto Bacvinka <augustinas@status.im>
+- Antonio Antonino <antonio@status.im>
+- Youngjoon Lee <youngjoon@status.im>
+- Filip Dimitrijevic <filip@status.im>
+---
+
+## Introduction
+
+Nomos network bootstrapping is the process by which a new node discovers peers and synchronizes with the existing decentralized network. It ensures that a node can:
+
+1. **Discover Peers** – Find other active nodes in the network.
+2. **Establish Connections** – Securely connect to trusted peers.
+3. **Negotiate (libp2p) Protocols** - Ensure that other peers operate in the same protocols as the node needs.
+
+## Overview
+
+The Nomos P2P network bootstrapping strategy relies on a designated subset of **bootstrap nodes** to facilitate secure and efficient node onboarding. These nodes serve as the initial entry points for new network participants.
+
+### Key Design Principles
+
+#### Trusted Bootstrap Nodes
+
+A curated set of publicly announced and highly available nodes ensures reliability during initial peer discovery. These nodes are configured with elevated connection limits to handle a high volume of incoming bootstrapping requests from new participants.
+
+#### Node Configuration & Onboarding
+
+New node operators must explicitly configure their instances with the addresses of bootstrap nodes. This configuration may be preloaded or dynamically fetched from a trusted source to minimize manual setup.
+
+#### Network Integration
+
+Upon initialization, the node establishes connections with the bootstrap nodes and begins participating in Nomos networking protocols. Through these connections, the node discovers additional peers, synchronizes with the network state, and engages in protocol-specific communication (e.g., consensus, block propagation).
+
+### Security & Decentralization Considerations
+
+**Trust Minimization**: While bootstrap nodes provide initial connectivity, the network rapidly transitions to decentralized peer discovery to prevent over-reliance on any single entity.
+
+**Authenticated Announcements**: The identities and addresses of bootstrap nodes are publicly verifiable to mitigate impersonation attacks. From [libp2p documentation](https://docs.libp2p.io/concepts/transports/quic/#quic-in-libp2p):
+
+> To authenticate each others' peer IDs, peers encode their peer ID into a self-signed certificate, which they sign using their host's private key.
+
+**Dynamic Peer Management**: After bootstrapping, nodes continuously refine their peer lists to maintain a resilient and distributed network topology.
+
+This approach ensures **rapid, secure, and scalable** network participation while preserving the decentralized ethos of the Nomos protocol.
+
+## Protocol
+
+### Protocol Overview
+
+The bootstrapping protocol follows libp2p conventions for peer discovery and connection establishment. Implementation details are handled by the underlying libp2p stack with Nomos-specific configuration parameters.
+
+### Bootstrapping Process
+
+#### Step-by-Step bootstrapping process
+
+1. **Node Initial Configuration**: New nodes load pre-configured bootstrap node addresses. Addresses may be `IP` or `DNS` embedded in a compatible [libp2p PeerId multiaddress](https://docs.libp2p.io/concepts/fundamentals/peers/#peer-ids-in-multiaddrs). Node operators may chose to advertise more than one address. This is out of the scope of this protocol. For example:
+
+    `/ip4/198.51.100.0/udp/4242/p2p/QmYyQSo1c1Ym7orWxLYvCrM2EmxFTANf8wXmmE7DWjhx5N` or
+
+    `/dns/foo.bar.net/udp/4242/p2p/QmYyQSo1c1Ym7orWxLYvCrM2EmxFTANf8wXmmE7DWjhx5N`
+
+2. **Secure Connection**: Nodes establish connections to bootstrap nodes announced addresses. Verifies network identity and protocol compatibility.
+
+3. **Peer Discovery**: Requests and receives validated peer lists from bootstrap nodes. Each entry includes connectivity details as per the peer discovery protocol engaging after the initial connection.
+
+4. **Network Integration**: Iteratively connects to discovered peers. Gradually build peer connections.
+
+5. **Protocol Engagement**: Establishes required protocol channels (gossip/consensus/sync). Begins participating in network operations.
+
+6. **Ongoing Maintenance**: Continuously evaluates and refreshes peer connections. Ideally removes the connection to the bootstrap node itself. Bootstrap nodes may chose to remove the connection on their side to keep high availability for other nodes.
+
+```mermaid
+sequenceDiagram
+    participant Nomos Network
+    participant Node
+    participant Bootstrap Node
+
+    Node->>Node: Fetches bootstrapping addresses
+
+    loop Interacts with bootstrap node
+        Node->>+Bootstrap Node: Connects
+        Bootstrap Node->>-Node: Sends discovered peers information
+    end
+
+    loop Connects to Network participants
+        Node->>Nomos Network: Engages in connections
+        Node->>Nomos Network: Negotiates protocols
+    end
+
+    loop Ongoing maintenance
+        Node-->>Nomos Network: Evaluates peer connections
+        alt Bootstrap connection no longer needed
+            Node-->>Bootstrap Node: Disconnects
+        else Bootstrap enforces disconnection
+            Bootstrap Node-->>Node: Disconnects
+        end
+    end
+```
+
+## Implementation Details
+
+The bootstrapping process for the Nomos p2p network uses the **QUIC** transport as specified in the Nomos network specification.
+
+Bootstrapping is separated from the network's peer discovery protocol. It assumes that there is one protocol that would engage as soon as the connection with the bootstrapping node triggers. Currently Nomos network uses `kademlia` as the current first approach for the Nomos p2p network, this comes granted.
+
+### Bootstrap Node Requirements
+
+Bootstrap nodes MUST fulfill the following requirements:
+
+- **High Availability**: Maintain uptime of 99.5% or higher
+- **Connection Capacity**: Support minimum 1000 concurrent connections
+- **Geographic Distribution**: Deploy across multiple regions
+- **Protocol Compatibility**: Support all required Nomos network protocols
+- **Security**: Implement proper authentication and rate limiting
+
+### Network Configuration
+
+Bootstrap node addresses are distributed through:
+
+- **Hardcoded addresses** in node software releases
+- **DNS seeds** for dynamic address resolution
+- **Community-maintained lists** with cryptographic verification
+
+## Security Considerations
+
+### Trust Model
+
+Bootstrap nodes operate under a **minimal trust model**:
+
+- Nodes verify peer identities through cryptographic authentication
+- Bootstrap connections are temporary and replaced by organic peer discovery
+- No single bootstrap node can control network participation
+
+### Attack Mitigation
+
+**Sybil Attack Protection**: Bootstrap nodes implement connection limits and peer verification to prevent malicious flooding.
+
+**Eclipse Attack Prevention**: Nodes connect to multiple bootstrap nodes and rapidly diversify their peer connections.
+
+**Denial of Service Resistance**: Rate limiting and connection throttling protect bootstrap nodes from resource exhaustion attacks.
+
+## Performance Characteristics
+
+### Bootstrapping Metrics
+
+- **Initial Connection Time**: Target < 30 seconds to first bootstrap node
+- **Peer Discovery Duration**: Discover minimum viable peer set within 2 minutes
+- **Network Integration**: Full protocol engagement within 5 minutes
+
+### Resource Requirements
+
+#### Bootstrap Nodes
+
+- Memory: Minimum 4GB RAM
+- Bandwidth: 100 Mbps sustained
+- Storage: 50GB available space
+
+#### Regular Nodes
+
+- Memory: 512MB for bootstrapping process
+- Bandwidth: 10 Mbps during initial sync
+- Storage: Minimal requirements
+
+## References
+
+- P2P Network Specification (internal document)
+- [libp2p QUIC Transport](https://docs.libp2p.io/concepts/transports/quic/)
+- [libp2p Peer IDs and Addressing](https://docs.libp2p.io/concepts/fundamentals/peers/)
+- [Ethereum bootnodes](https://ethereum.org/en/developers/docs/nodes-and-clients/bootnodes/)
+- [Bitcoin peer discovery](https://developer.bitcoin.org/devguide/p2p_network.html#peer-discovery)
+- [Cardano nodes connectivity](https://docs.cardano.org/stake-pool-operators/node-connectivity)
+- [Cardano peer sharing](https://www.coincashew.com/coins/overview-ada/guide-how-to-build-a-haskell-stakepool-node/part-v-tips/implementing-peer-sharing)
+
+## Copyright
+
+Copyright and related rights waived via [CC0](https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/).
--- a/nomos/raw/p2p-network.md
+++ b/nomos/raw/p2p-network.md
@@ -0,0 +1,307 @@
+---
+title: NOMOS-P2P-NETWORK
+name: Nomos P2P Network Specification
+status: draft
+category: networking
+tags: [p2p, networking, libp2p, kademlia, gossipsub, quic]
+editor: Daniel Sanchez-Quiros <danielsq@status.im>
+contributors:
+- Filip Dimitrijevic <filip@status.im>
+---
+
+## Abstract
+
+This specification defines the peer-to-peer (P2P) network layer for Nomos blockchain nodes. The network serves as the comprehensive communication infrastructure enabling transaction dissemination through mempool and block propagation. The specification leverages established libp2p protocols to ensure robust, scalable performance with low bandwidth requirements and minimal latency while maintaining accessibility for diverse hardware configurations and network environments.
+
+## Motivation
+
+The Nomos blockchain requires a reliable, scalable P2P network that can:
+
+1. **Support diverse hardware**: From laptops to dedicated servers across various operating systems and geographic locations
+2. **Enable inclusive participation**: Allow non-technical users to operate nodes with minimal configuration
+3. **Maintain connectivity**: Ensure nodes remain reachable even with limited connectivity or behind NAT/routers
+4. **Scale efficiently**: Support large-scale networks (+10k nodes) with eventual consistency
+5. **Provide low-latency communication**: Enable efficient transaction and block propagation
+
+## Specification
+
+### Network Architecture Overview
+
+The Nomos P2P network addresses three critical challenges:
+
+- **Peer Connectivity**: Mechanisms for peers to join and connect to the network
+- **Peer Discovery**: Enabling peers to locate and identify network participants  
+- **Message Transmission**: Facilitating efficient message exchange across the network
+
+### Transport Protocol
+
+#### QUIC Protocol Transport
+
+The Nomos network employs **[QUIC protocol](https://docs.libp2p.io/concepts/transports/quic/)** as the primary transport protocol, leveraging the [libp2p protocol](https://docs.libp2p.io/) implementation.
+
+**Rationale for [QUIC protocol](https://docs.libp2p.io/concepts/transports/quic/):**
+
+- Rapid connection establishment
+- Enhanced NAT traversal capabilities (UDP-based)
+- Built-in multiplexing simplifies configuration
+- Production-tested reliability
+
+### Peer Discovery
+
+#### Kademlia DHT
+
+The network utilizes libp2p's Kademlia Distributed Hash Table (DHT) for peer discovery.
+
+**Protocol Identifiers:**
+
+- **Mainnet**: `/nomos/kad/1.0.0`
+- **Testnet**: `/nomos-testnet/kad/1.0.0`
+
+**Features:**
+
+- Proximity-based peer discovery heuristics
+- Distributed peer routing table
+- Resilient to network partitions
+- Automatic peer replacement
+
+#### Identify Protocol
+
+Complements Kademlia by enabling peer information exchange.
+
+**Protocol Identifiers:**
+
+- **Mainnet**: `/nomos/identify/1.0.0`
+- **Testnet**: `/nomos-testnet/identify/1.0.0`
+
+**Capabilities:**
+
+- Protocol support advertisement
+- Peer capability negotiation
+- Network interoperability enhancement
+
+#### Future Considerations
+
+The current Kademlia implementation is acknowledged as interim. Future improvements target:
+
+- Lightweight design without full DHT overhead
+- Highly-scalable eventual consistency
+- Support for 10k+ nodes with minimal resource usage
+
+### NAT Traversal
+
+The network implements comprehensive NAT traversal solutions to ensure connectivity across diverse network configurations.
+
+**Objectives:**
+
+- Configuration-free peer connections
+- Support for users with varying technical expertise
+- Enable nodes on standard consumer hardware
+
+**Implementation:**
+
+- Tailored solutions based on user network configuration
+- Automatic NAT type detection and adaptation
+- Fallback mechanisms for challenging network environments
+
+*Note: Detailed NAT traversal specifications are maintained in a separate document.*
+
+### Message Dissemination
+
+#### Gossipsub Protocol
+
+Nomos employs **gossipsub** for reliable message propagation across the network.
+
+**Integration:**
+
+- Seamless integration with Kademlia peer discovery
+- Automatic peer list updates
+- Efficient message routing and delivery
+
+#### Topic Configuration
+
+**Mempool Dissemination:**
+
+- **Mainnet**: `/nomos/mempool/0.1.0`
+- **Testnet**: `/nomos-testnet/mempool/0.1.0`
+
+**Block Propagation:**
+
+- **Mainnet**: `/nomos/cryptarchia/0.1.0`
+- **Testnet**: `/nomos-testnet/cryptarchia/0.1.0`
+
+#### Network Parameters
+
+**Peering Degree:**
+
+- **Minimum recommended**: 8 peers
+- **Rationale**: Ensures redundancy and efficient propagation
+- **Configurable**: Nodes may adjust based on resources and requirements
+
+### Bootstrapping
+
+#### Initial Network Entry
+
+New nodes connect to the network through designated bootstrap nodes.
+
+**Process:**
+
+1. Connect to known bootstrap nodes
+2. Obtain initial peer list through Kademlia
+3. Establish gossipsub connections
+4. Begin participating in network protocols
+
+**Bootstrap Node Requirements:**
+
+- High availability and reliability
+- Geographic distribution
+- Version compatibility maintenance
+
+### Message Encoding
+
+All network messages follow the Nomos Wire Format specification for consistent encoding and decoding across implementations.
+
+**Key Properties:**
+
+- Deterministic serialization
+- Efficient binary encoding
+- Forward/backward compatibility support
+- Cross-platform consistency
+
+*Note: Detailed wire format specifications are maintained in a separate document.*
+
+## Implementation Requirements
+
+### Mandatory Protocols
+
+All Nomos nodes MUST implement:
+
+1. **Kademlia DHT** for peer discovery
+2. **Identify protocol** for peer information exchange
+3. **Gossipsub** for message dissemination
+
+### Optional Enhancements
+
+Nodes MAY implement:
+
+- Advanced NAT traversal techniques
+- Custom peering strategies
+- Enhanced message routing optimizations
+
+### Network Versioning
+
+Protocol versions follow semantic versioning:
+
+- **Major version**: Breaking protocol changes
+- **Minor version**: Backward-compatible enhancements
+- **Patch version**: Bug fixes and optimizations
+
+## Configuration Parameters
+
+### Implementation Note
+
+**Current Status**: The Nomos P2P network implementation uses hardcoded libp2p protocol parameters for optimal performance and reliability. While the node configuration file (`config.yaml`) contains network-related settings, the core libp2p protocol parameters (Kademlia DHT, Identify, and Gossipsub) are embedded in the source code.
+
+### Node Configuration
+
+The following network parameters are configurable via `config.yaml`:
+
+#### Network Backend Settings
+
+```yaml
+network:
+  backend:
+    host: 0.0.0.0
+    port: 3000
+    node_key: <node_private_key>
+    initial_peers: []
+```
+
+#### Protocol-Specific Topics
+
+**Mempool Dissemination:**
+
+- **Mainnet**: `/nomos/mempool/0.1.0`
+- **Testnet**: `/nomos-testnet/mempool/0.1.0`
+
+**Block Propagation:**
+
+- **Mainnet**: `/nomos/cryptarchia/0.1.0`
+- **Testnet**: `/nomos-testnet/cryptarchia/0.1.0`
+
+### Hardcoded Protocol Parameters
+
+The following libp2p protocol parameters are currently hardcoded in the implementation:
+
+#### Peer Discovery Parameters
+
+- **Protocol identifiers** for Kademlia DHT and Identify protocols
+- **DHT routing table** configuration and query timeouts
+- **Peer discovery intervals** and connection management
+
+#### Message Dissemination Parameters  
+
+- **Gossipsub mesh parameters** (peer degree, heartbeat intervals)
+- **Message validation** and caching settings
+- **Topic subscription** and fanout management
+
+#### Rationale for Hardcoded Parameters
+
+1. **Network Stability**: Prevents misconfigurations that could fragment the network
+2. **Performance Optimization**: Parameters are tuned for the target network size and latency requirements
+3. **Security**: Reduces attack surface by limiting configurable network parameters
+4. **Simplicity**: Eliminates need for operators to understand complex P2P tuning
+
+## Security Considerations
+
+### Network-Level Security
+
+1. **Peer Authentication**: Utilize libp2p's built-in peer identity verification
+2. **Message Validation**: Implement application-layer message validation
+3. **Rate Limiting**: Protect against spam and DoS attacks
+4. **Blacklisting**: Mechanism for excluding malicious peers
+
+### Privacy Considerations
+
+1. **Traffic Analysis**: Gossipsub provides some resistance to traffic analysis
+2. **Metadata Leakage**: Minimize identifiable information in protocol messages
+3. **Connection Patterns**: Randomize connection timing and patterns
+
+### Denial of Service Protection
+
+1. **Resource Limits**: Impose limits on connections and message rates
+2. **Peer Scoring**: Implement reputation-based peer management
+3. **Circuit Breakers**: Automatic protection against resource exhaustion
+
+### Node Configuration Example
+
+[Nomos Node Configuration](https://github.com/logos-co/nomos/blob/master/nodes/nomos-node/config.yaml) is an example node configuration
+
+## Performance Characteristics
+
+### Scalability
+
+- **Target Network Size**: 10,000+ nodes
+- **Message Latency**: Sub-second for critical messages
+- **Bandwidth Efficiency**: Optimized for limited bandwidth environments
+
+### Resource Requirements
+
+- **Memory Usage**: Minimal DHT routing table overhead
+- **CPU Usage**: Efficient cryptographic operations
+- **Network Bandwidth**: Adaptive based on node role and capacity
+
+## References
+
+Original working document, from Nomos Notion: [P2P Network Specification](https://nomos-tech.notion.site/P2P-Network-Specification-206261aa09df81db8100d5f410e39d75).
+
+1. [libp2p Specifications](https://docs.libp2p.io/)
+2. [QUIC Protocol Specification](https://docs.libp2p.io/concepts/transports/quic/)
+3. [Kademlia DHT](https://docs.libp2p.io/concepts/discovery-routing/kaddht/)
+4. [Gossipsub Protocol](https://github.com/libp2p/specs/tree/master/pubsub/gossipsub)
+5. [Identify Protocol](https://github.com/libp2p/specs/blob/master/identify/README.md)
+6. [Nomos Implementation](https://github.com/logos-co/nomos) - Reference implementation and source code
+7. [Nomos Node Configuration](https://github.com/logos-co/nomos/blob/master/nodes/nomos-node/config.yaml) - Example node configuration
+
+## Copyright
+
+Copyright and related rights waived via [CC0](https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/).
--- a/nomos/raw/sdp.md
+++ b/nomos/raw/sdp.md
@@ -0,0 +1,345 @@
+---
+title: NOMOS-SDP
+name: Nomos Service Declaration Protocol Specification
+status: raw
+category: 
+tags: participation, validators, declarations
+editor: Marcin Pawlowski <marcin@status.im>
+contributors:
+- Mehmet <mehmet@status.im>
+- Daniel Sanchez Quiros <danielsq@status.im>
+- Álvaro Castro-Castilla <alvaro@status.im>
+- Thomas Lavaur <thomaslavaur@status.im>
+- Filip Dimitrijevic <filip@status.im>
+- Gusto Bacvinka <augustinas@status.im>
+- David Rusu <davidrusu@status.im>
+---
+
+## Introduction
+
+This document defines a mechanism enabling validators to declare their participation in specific protocols that require a known and agreed-upon list of participants. Some examples of this are Data Availability and the Blend Network. We create a single repository of identifiers which is used to establish secure communication between validators and provide services. Before being admitted to the repository, the validator proves that it locked at least a minimum stake.
+
+## Requirements
+
+The requirements for the protocol are defined as follows:
+
+- A declaration must be backed by a confirmation that the sender of the declaration owns a certain value of the stake.
+- A declaration is valid until it is withdrawn or is not used for a service-specific amount of time.
+
+## Overview
+
+The SDP enables nodes to declare their eligibility to serve a specific service in the system, and withdraw their declarations.
+
+### Protocol Actions
+
+The protocol defines the following actions:
+
+- **Declare**: A node sends a declaration that confirms its willingness to provide a specific service, which is confirmed by locking a threshold of stake.
+- **Active**: A node marks that its participation in the protocol is active according to the service-specific activity logic. This action enables the protocol to monitor the node's activity. We utilize this as a non-intrusive differentiator of node activity. It is crucial to exclude inactive nodes from the set of active nodes, as it enhances the stability of services.
+- **Withdraw**: A node withdraws its declaration and stops providing a service.
+
+The logic of the protocol is straightforward:
+
+1. A node sends a declaration message for a specific service and proves it has a minimum stake.
+2. The declaration is registered on the ledger, and the node can commence its service according to the service-specific service logic.
+3. After a service-specific service-providing time, the node confirms its activity.
+4. The node must confirm its activity with a service-specific minimum frequency; otherwise, its declaration is inactive.
+5. After the service-specific locking period, the node can send a withdrawal message, and its declaration is removed from the ledger, which means that the node will no longer provide the service.
+
+💡 The protocol messages are subject to a finality that means messages become part of the immutable ledger after a delay. The delay at which it happens is defined by the consensus.
+
+## Construction
+
+In this section, we present the main constructions of the protocol. First, we start with data definitions. Second, we describe the protocol actions. Finally, we present part of the Bedrock Mantle design responsible for storing and processing SDP-related messages and data.
+
+### Data
+
+In this section, we discuss and define data types, messages, and their storage.
+
+#### Service Types
+
+We define the following services which can be used for service declaration:
+
+- `BN`: for Blend Network service.
+- `DA`: for Data Availability service.
+
+```python
+class ServiceType(Enum):
+    BN="BN"  # Blend Network
+    DA="DA"  # Data Availability
+```
+
+A declaration can be generated for any of the services above. Any declaration that is not one of the above must be rejected. The number of services might grow in the future.
+
+#### Minimum Stake
+
+The minimum stake is a global value that defines the minimum stake a node must have to perform any service.
+
+The `MinStake` is a structure that holds the value of the stake `stake_threshold` and the block number it was set at: `timestamp`.
+
+```python
+class MinStake:
+    stake_threshold: StakeThreshold
+    timestamp: BlockNumber
+```
+
+The `stake_thresholds` is a structure aggregating all defined `MinStake` values.
+
+```python
+stake_thresholds: list[MinStake]
+```
+
+For more information on how the minimum stake is calculated, please refer to the Nomos documentation.
+
+#### Service Parameters
+
+The service parameters structure defines the parameters set necessary for correctly handling interaction between the protocol and services. Each of the service types defined above must be mapped to a set of the following parameters:
+
+- `session_length` defines the session length expressed as the number of blocks; the sessions are counted from block `timestamp`.
+- `lock_period` defines the minimum time (as a number of sessions) during which the declaration cannot be withdrawn, this time must include the period necessary for finalizing the declaration (which might be implicit) and provision of a service for least a single session; it can be expressed as the number of blocks by multiplying its value by the `session_length`.
+- `inactivity_period` defines the maximum time (as a number of sessions) during which an activation message must be sent; otherwise, the declaration is considered inactive; it can be expressed as the number of blocks by multiplying its value by the `session_length`.
+- `retention_period` defines the time (as a number of sessions) after which the declaration can be safely deleted by the Garbage Collection mechanism; it can be expressed as the number of blocks by multiplying its value by the `session_length`.
+- `timestamp` defines the block number at which the parameter was set.
+
+```python
+class ServiceParameters:
+    session_length: NumberOfBlocks
+    lock_period: NumberOfSessions
+    inactivity_period: NumberOfSessions
+    retention_period: NumberOfSessions
+    timestamp: BlockNumber
+```
+
+The `parameters` is a structure aggregating all defined `ServiceParameters` values.
+
+```python
+parameters: list[ServiceParameters]
+```
+
+#### Identifiers
+
+We define the following set of identifiers which are used for service-specific cryptographic operations:
+
+- `provider_id`: used to sign the SDP messages and to establish secure links between validators; it is `Ed25519PublicKey`.
+- `zk_id`: used for zero-knowledge operations by the validator that includes rewarding ([Zero Knowledge Signature Scheme (ZkSignature)](https://www.notion.so/Zero-Knowledge-Signature-Scheme-ZkSignature-21c261aa09df8119bfb2dc74a3430df6?pvs=21)).
+
+#### Locators
+
+A `Locator` is the address of a validator which is used to establish secure communication between validators. It follows the [multiaddr addressing scheme from libp2p](https://docs.libp2p.io/concepts/fundamentals/addressing/), but it must contain only the location part and must not contain the node identity (`peer_id`).
+
+The `provider_id` must be used as the node identity. Therefore, the `Locator` must be completed by adding the `provider_id` at the end of it, which makes the `Locator` usable in the context of libp2p.
+
+The length of the `Locator` is restricted to 329 characters.
+
+The syntax of every `Locator` entry must be validated.
+
+**The common formatting of every** `Locator` **must be applied to maintain its unambiguity, to make deterministic ID generation work consistently.** The `Locator` must at least contain only lower case letters and every part of the address must be explicit (no implicit defaults).
+
+#### Declaration Message
+
+The construction of the declaration message is as follows:
+
+```python
+class DeclarationMessage:
+    service_type: ServiceType
+    locators: list[Locator]
+    provider_id: Ed25519PublicKey 
+    zk_id: ZkPublicKey
+```
+
+The `locators` list length must be limited to reduce the potential for abuse. Therefore, the length of the list cannot be longer than 8.
+
+The message must be signed by the `provider_id` key to prove ownership of the key that is used for network-level authentication of the validator. The message is also signed by the `zk_id` key (by default all Mantle transactions are signed with `zk_id` key).
+
+#### Declaration Storage
+
+Only valid declaration messages can be stored on the ledger. We define the `DeclarationInfo` as follows:
+
+```python
+class DeclarationInfo:
+    service: ServiceType
+    provider_id: Ed25519PublicKey
+    zk_id: ZkPublicKey
+    locators: list[Locator]
+    created: BlockNumber
+    active: BlockNumber
+    withdrawn: BlockNumber
+    nonce: Nonce
+```
+
+Where:
+
+- `service` defines the service type of the declaration;
+- `provider_id` is an `Ed25519PublicKey` used to sign the message by the validator;
+- `zk_id` is used for zero-knowledge operations by the validator that includes rewarding ([Zero Knowledge Signature Scheme (ZkSignature)](https://www.notion.so/Zero-Knowledge-Signature-Scheme-ZkSignature-21c261aa09df8119bfb2dc74a3430df6?pvs=21));
+- `locators` are a copy of the `locators` from the `DeclarationMessage`;
+- `created` refers to the block number of the block that contained the declaration;
+- `active` refers to the latest block number for which the active message was sent (it is set to `created` by default);
+- `withdrawn` refers to the block number for which the service declaration was withdrawn (it is set to 0 by default).
+- The `nonce` must be set to 0 for the declaration message and must increase monotonically by every message sent for the `declaration_id`.
+
+We also define the `declaration_id` (of a `DeclarationId` type) that is the unique identifier of `DeclarationInfo` calculated as a hash of the concatenation of `service`, `provider_id`, `locators` and `zk_id`. The implementation of the hash function is `blake2b` using 256 bits of the output.
+
+```python
+declaration_id = Hash(service||provider_id||zk_id||locators)
+```
+
+The `declaration_id` is not stored as part of the `DeclarationInfo` but it is used to index it.
+
+All `DeclarationInfo` references are stored in the `declarations` and are indexed by `declaration_id`.
+
+```python
+declarations: list[declaration_id]
+```
+
+#### Active Message
+
+The construction of the active message is as follows:
+
+```python
+class ActiveMessage:
+    declaration_id: DeclarationId
+    nonce: Nonce
+    metadata: Metadata
+```
+
+where `metadata` is a service-specific node activeness metadata.
+
+The message must be signed by the `zk_id` key associated with the `declaration_id`.
+
+The `nonce` must increase monotonically by every message sent for the `declaration_id`.
+
+#### Withdraw Message
+
+The construction of the withdraw message is as follows:
+
+```python
+class WithdrawMessage:
+    declaration_id: DeclarationId
+    nonce: Nonce
+```
+
+The message must be signed by the `zk_id` key from the `declaration_id`.
+
+The `nonce` must increase monotonically by every message sent for the `declaration_id`.
+
+#### Indexing
+
+Every event must be correctly indexed to enable lighter synchronization of the changes. Therefore, we index every `declaration_id` according to `EventType`, `ServiceType`, and `Timestamp`. Where `EventType = { "created", "active", "withdrawn" }` follows the type of the message.
+
+```python
+events = {
+    event_type: {
+        service_type: {
+            timestamp: {
+                declarations: list[declaration_id]
+            }
+        }
+    }
+}
+```
+
+### Protocol
+
+#### Declare
+
+The Declare action associates a validator with a service it wants to provide. It requires sending a valid `DeclarationMessage` (as defined in Declaration Message), which is then processed (as defined below) and stored (as defined in Declaration Storage).
+
+The declaration message is considered valid when all of the following are met:
+
+- The sender meets the stake requirements.
+- The `declaration_id` is unique.
+- The sender knows the secret behind the `provider_id` identifier.
+- The length of the `locators` list must not be longer than 8.
+- The `nonce` is increasing monotonically.
+
+If all of the above conditions are fulfilled, then the message is stored on the ledger; otherwise, the message is discarded.
+
+#### Active
+
+The Active action enables marking the provider as actively providing a service. It requires sending a valid `ActiveMessage` (as defined in Active Message), which is relayed to the service-specific node activity logic (as indicated by the service type in Common SDP Structures).
+
+The Active action updates the `active` value of the `DeclarationInfo`, which means that it also activates inactive (but not expired) providers.
+
+The SDP active action logic is:
+
+1. A node sends a `ActiveMessage` transaction.
+2. The `ActiveMessage` is verified by the SDP logic.
+    a. The `declaration_id` returns an existing `DeclarationInfo`.
+    b. The transaction containing `ActiveMessage` is signed by the `zk_id`.
+    c. The `withdrawn` from the `DeclarationInfo` is set to zero.
+    d. The `nonce` is increasing monotonically.
+3. If any of these conditions fail, discard the message and stop processing.
+4. The message is processed by the service-specific activity logic alongside the `active` value indicating the period since the last active message was sent. The `active` value comes from the `DeclarationInfo`.
+5. If the service-specific activity logic approves the node active message, then the `active` field of the `DeclarationInfo` is set to the current block height.
+
+#### Withdraw
+
+The withdraw action enables a withdrawal of a service declaration. It requires sending a valid `WithdrawMessage` (as defined in Withdraw Message). The withdrawal cannot happen before the end of the locking period, which is defined as the number of blocks counted since `created`. This lock period is stored as `lock_period` in the Service Parameters.
+
+The logic of the withdraw action is:
+
+1. A node sends a `WithdrawMessage` transaction.
+2. The `WithdrawMessage` is verified by the SDP logic:
+    a. The `declaration_id` returns an existing `DeclarationInfo`.
+    b. The transaction containing `WithdrawMessage` is signed by the `zk_id`.
+    c. The `withdrawn` from `DeclarationInfo` is set to zero.
+    d. The `nonce` is increasing monotonically.
+3. If any of the above is not correct, then discard the message and stop.
+4. Set the `withdrawn` from the `DeclarationInfo` to the current block height.
+5. Unlock the stake.
+
+#### Garbage Collection
+
+The protocol requires a garbage collection mechanism that periodically removes unused `DeclarationInfo` entries.
+
+The logic of garbage collection is:
+
+For every `DeclarationInfo` in the `declarations` set, remove the entry if either:
+
+1. The entry is past the retention period: `withdrawn + retention_period < current_block_height`.
+2. The entry is inactive beyond the inactivity and retention periods: `active + inactivity_period + retention_period < current_block_height`.
+
+#### Query
+
+The protocol must enable querying the ledger in at least the following manner:
+
+- `GetAllProviderId(timestamp)`, returns all `provider_id`s associated with the `timestamp`.
+- `GetAllProviderIdSince(timestamp)`, returns all `provider_id`s since the `timestamp`.
+- `GetAllDeclarationInfo(timestamp)`, returns all `DeclarationInfo` entries associated with the `timestamp`.
+- `GetAllDeclarationInfoSince(timestamp)`, returns all `DeclarationInfo` entries since the `timestamp`.
+- `GetDeclarationInfo(provider_id)`, returns the `DeclarationInfo` entry identified by the `provider_id`.
+- `GetDeclarationInfo(declaration_id)`, returns the `DeclarationInfo` entry identified by the `declaration_id`.
+- `GetAllServiceParameters(timestamp)`, returns all entries of the `ServiceParameters` store for the requested `timestamp`.
+- `GetAllServiceParametersSince(timestamp)`, returns all entries of the `ServiceParameters` store since the requested `timestamp`.
+- `GetServiceParameters(service_type, timestamp)`, returns the service parameter entry from the `ServiceParameters` store of a `service_type` for a specified `timestamp`.
+- `GetMinStake(timestamp)`, returns the `MinStake` structure at the requested `timestamp`.
+- `GetMinStakeSince(timestamp)`, returns a set of `MinStake` structures since the requested `timestamp`.
+
+The query must return an error if the retention period for the delegation has passed and the requested information is not available.
+
+The list of queries may be extended.
+
+Every query must return information for a finalized state only.
+
+### Mantle and ZK Proof
+
+For more information about the Mantle and ZK proofs, please refer to [Mantle Specification](https://www.notion.so/Mantle-Specification-21c261aa09df810c8820fab1d78b53d9?pvs=21).
+
+## Appendix
+
+### Future Improvements
+
+Refer to the [Mantle Specification](https://www.notion.so/Mantle-Specification-21c261aa09df810c8820fab1d78b53d9?pvs=21) for a list of potential improvements to the protocol.
+
+## References
+
+- Mantle and ZK Proof: [Mantle Specification](https://www.notion.so/Mantle-Specification-21c261aa09df810c8820fab1d78b53d9?pvs=21)
+- Ed25519 Digital Signatures: [RFC 8032](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8032)
+- BLAKE2b Cryptographic Hash: [RFC 7693](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7693)
+- libp2p Multiaddr: [Addressing Specification](https://docs.libp2p.io/concepts/fundamentals/addressing/)
+- Zero Knowledge Signatures: [ZkSignature Scheme](https://www.notion.so/Zero-Knowledge-Signature-Scheme-ZkSignature-21c261aa09df8119bfb2dc74a3430df6?pvs=21)
+
+## Copyright
+
+Copyright and related rights waived via [CC0](https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/).
--- a/vac/raw/consensus-hashgraphlike.md
+++ b/vac/raw/consensus-hashgraphlike.md
@@ -0,0 +1,252 @@
+---
+title: HASHGRAPHLIKE CONSENSUS
+name: Hashgraphlike Consensus Protocol
+status: raw
+category: Standards Track
+tags: 
+editor: Ugur Sen [ugur@status.im](mailto:ugur@status.im)
+contributors: seemenkina [ekaterina@status.im](mailto:ekaterina@status.im)
+---
+## Abstract
+
+This document specifies a scalable, decentralized, and Byzantine Fault Tolerant (BFT)
+consensus mechanism inspired by Hashgraph, designed for binary decision-making in P2P networks.
+
+## Motivation
+
+Consensus is one of the essential components of decentralization.
+In particular, in the decentralized group messaging application is used for
+binary decision-making to govern the group.
+Therefore, each user contributes to the decision-making process.
+Besides achieving decentralization, the consensus mechanism MUST be strong:
+
+- Under the assumption of at least `2/3` honest users in the network.
+
+- Each user MUST conclude the same decision and scalability:
+message propagation in the network MUST occur within `O(log n)` rounds,
+where `n` is the total number of peers,
+in order to preserve the scalability of the messaging application.
+
+## Format Specification
+
+The key words “MUST”, “MUST NOT”, “REQUIRED”, “SHALL”, “SHALL NOT”,
+“SHOULD”, “SHOULD NOT”, “RECOMMENDED”, “MAY”, and “OPTIONAL” in this document
+are to be interpreted as described in [2119](https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt).
+
+## Flow
+
+Any user in the group initializes the consensus by creating a proposal.
+Next, the user broadcasts the proposal to the whole network.
+Upon each user receives the proposal, validates the proposal,
+adds its vote as yes or no and with its signature and timestamp.
+The user then sends the proposal and vote to a random peer in a P2P setup,
+or to a subscribed gossipsub channel if gossip-based messaging is used.
+Therefore, each user first validates the signature and then adds its new vote.
+Each sending message counts as a round.
+After `log(n)` rounds all users in the network have the others vote
+if at least `2/3` number of users are honest where honesty follows the protocol.
+
+In general, the voting-based consensus consists of the following phases:
+
+1. Initialization of voting
+2. Exchanging votes across the rounds
+3. Counting the votes
+
+### Assumptions
+
+- The users in the P2P network can discover the nodes or they are subscribing same channel in a gossipsub.
+- We MAY have non-reliable (silent) nodes.
+- Proposal owners MUST know the number of voters.
+
+## 1. Initialization of voting
+
+A user initializes the voting with the proposal payload which is
+implemented using [protocol buffers v3](https://protobuf.dev/) as follows:
+
+```bash
+syntax = "proto3";
+
+package vac.voting;
+
+message Proposal {
+  string name = 10;                  // Proposal name
+  string payload = 11;               // Proposal description
+  uint32 proposal_id = 12;           // Unique identifier of the proposal
+  bytes proposal_owner = 13;         // Public key of the creator 
+  repeated Votes = 14;               // Vote list in the proposal
+  uint32 expected_voters_count = 15; // Maximum number of distinct voters
+  uint32 round = 16;                 // Number of Votes 
+  uint64 timestamp = 17;             // Creation time of proposal
+  uint64 expiration_time = 18;       // The time interval that the proposal is active.  
+  bool liveness_criteria_yes = 19;   // Shows how managing the silent peers vote
+}
+
+message Vote {
+  uint32 vote_id = 20;            // Unique identifier of the vote
+  bytes vote_owner = 21;          // Voter's public key
+  uint32 proposal_id = 22;        // Linking votes and proposals
+  int64 timestamp = 23;           // Time when the vote was cast
+  bool vote = 24;                 // Vote bool value (true/false)
+  bytes parent_hash = 25;         // Hash of previous owner's Vote
+  bytes received_hash = 26;       // Hash of previous received Vote
+  bytes vote_hash = 27;           // Hash of all previously defined fields in Vote
+  bytes signature = 28;           // Signature of vote_hash
+}
+
+```
+
+To initiate a consensus for a proposal,
+a user MUST complete all the fields in the proposal, including attaching its `vote`
+and the `payload` that shows the purpose of the proposal.
+Notably, `parent_hash` and `received_hash` are empty strings because there is no previous or received hash.
+Then the initialization section ends when the user who creates the proposal sends it
+to the random peer from the network or sends it to the proposal to the specific channel.
+
+## 2. Exchanging votes across the peers
+
+Once the peer receives the proposal message `P_1` from a 1-1 or a gossipsub channel does the following checks:
+
+1. Check the signatures of the each votes in proposal, in particular for proposal `P_1`,
+verify the signature of `V_1` where `V_1 = P_1.votes[0]` with `V_1.signature` and `V_1.vote_owner`
+2. Do `parent_hash` check: If there are repeated votes from the same sender,
+check that the hash of the former vote is equal to the `parent_hash` of the later vote.
+3. Do `received_hash` check: If there are multiple votes in a proposal, check that the hash of a vote is equal to the `received_hash` of the next one.
+4. After successful verification of the signature and hashes, the receiving peer proceeds to generate `P_2` containing a new vote `V_2` as following:
+
+   4.1. Add its public key as `P_2.vote_owner`.
+
+   4.2. Set `timestamp`.
+
+   4.3. Set boolean `vote`.
+
+   4.4. Define `V_2.parent_hash = 0` if there is no previous peer's vote, otherwise hash of previous owner's vote.
+
+   4.5. Set `V_2.received_hash = hash(P_1.votes[0])`.
+  
+   4.6. Set `proposal_id` for the `vote`.
+  
+   4.7. Calculate `vote_hash` by hash of all previously defined fields in Vote:
+  `V_2.vote_hash = hash(vote_id, owner, proposal_id, timestamp, vote, parent_hash, received_hash)`
+
+   4.8. Sign `vote_hash` with its private key corresponding the public key as `vote_owner` component then adds `V_2.vote_hash`.
+
+5. Create `P_2` with by adding `V_2` as follows:
+  
+   5.1. Assign `P_2.name`, `P_2.proposal_id`, and `P_2.proposal_owner` to be identical to those in `P_1`.
+  
+   5.2. Add the `V_2` to the `P_2.Votes` list.
+  
+   5.3. Increase the round by one, namely `P_2.round = P_1.round + 1`.
+  
+   5.4. Verify that the proposal has not expired by checking that: `P_2.timestamp - current_time < P_1.expiration_time`.
+    If this does not hold, other peers ignore the message.
+
+After the peer creates the proposal `P_2` with its vote `V_2`,
+sends it to the random peer from the network or
+sends it to the proposal to the specific channel.
+
+## 3. Determining the result
+
+Because consensus depends on meeting a quorum threshold,
+each peer MUST verify the accumulated votes to determine whether the necessary conditions have been satisfied.
+The voting result is set YES if the majority of the `2n/3` from the distinct peers vote YES.
+
+To verify, the `findDistinctVoter` method processes the proposal by traversing its `Votes` list to determine the number of unique voters.
+
+If this method returns true, the peer proceeds with strong validation,
+which ensures that if any honest peer reaches a decision,
+no other honest peer can arrive at a conflicting result.
+
+1. Check each `signature` in the vote as shown in the [Section 2](#2-exchanging-votes-across-the-peers).
+
+2. Check the `parent_hash` chain if there are multiple votes from the same owner namely `vote_i` and `vote_i+1` respectively,
+the parent hash of `vote_i+1` should be the hash of `vote_i`
+
+3. Check the `previous_hash` chain, each received hash of `vote_i+1` should be equal to the hash of `vote_i`.
+
+4. Check the `timestamp` against the replay attack.
+In particular, the `timestamp` cannot be the old in the determined threshold.
+
+5. Check that the liveness criteria defined in the Liveness section are satisfied.
+
+If a proposal is verified by all the checks,
+the `countVote` method counts each YES vote from the list of Votes.
+
+## 4. Properties
+
+The consensus mechanism satisfies liveness and security properties as follows:
+
+### Liveness
+
+Liveness refers to the ability of the protocol to eventually reach a decision when sufficient honest participation is present.
+In this protocol, if `n > 2` and more than `n/2` of the votes among at least `2n/3` distinct peers are YES,
+then the consensus result is defined as YES; otherwise, when `n ≤ 2`, unanimous agreement (100% YES votes) is required.
+
+The peer calculates the result locally as shown in the [Section 3](#3-determining-the-result).
+From the [hashgraph property](https://hedera.com/learning/hedera-hashgraph/what-is-hashgraph-consensus),
+if a node could calculate the result of a proposal,
+it implies that no peer can calculate the opposite of the result.
+Still, reliability issues can cause some situations where peers cannot receive enough messages,
+so they cannot calculate the consensus result.
+
+Rounds are incremented when a peer adds and sends the new proposal.
+Calculating the required number of rounds, `2n/3` from the distinct peers' votes is achieved in two ways:
+
+1. `2n/3` rounds in pure P2P networks
+2. `2` rounds in gossipsub
+
+Since the message complexity is `O(1)` in the gossipsub channel,
+in case the network has reliability issues,
+the second round is used for the peers cannot receive all the messages from the first round.
+
+If an honest and online peer has received at least one vote but not enough to reach consensus,
+it MAY continue to propagate its own vote — and any votes it has received — to support message dissemination.
+This process can continue beyond the expected round count,
+as long as it remains within the expiration time defined in the proposal.
+The expiration time acts as a soft upper bound to ensure that consensus is either reached or aborted within a bounded timeframe.
+
+#### Equality of votes
+
+An equality of votes occurs when verifying at least `2n/3` distinct voters and
+applying `liveness_criteria_yes` the number of YES and NO votes is equal.
+
+Handling ties is an application-level decision. The application MUST define a deterministic tie policy:
+
+RETRY: re-run the vote with a new proposal_id, optionally adjusting parameters.
+
+REJECT: abort the proposal and return voting result as NO.
+
+The chosen policy SHOULD be consistent for all peers via proposal's `payload` to ensure convergence on the same outcome.
+
+### Silent Node Management
+
+Silent nodes are the nodes that not participate the voting as YES or NO.
+There are two possible counting votes for the silent peers.
+
+1. **Silent peers means YES:**
+Silent peers counted as YES vote, if the application prefer the strong rejection for NO votes.
+2. **Silent peers means NO:**
+Silent peers counted as NO vote, if the application prefer the strong acception for NO votes.
+
+The proposal is set to default true, which means silent peers' votes are counted as YES namely `liveness_criteria_yes` is set true by default.
+
+### Security
+
+This RFC uses cryptographic primitives to prevent the
+malicious behaviours as follows:
+
+- Vote forgery attempt: creating unsigned invalid votes
+- Inconsistent voting: a malicious peer submits conflicting votes (e.g., YES to some peers and NO to others)
+in different stages of the protocol, violating vote consistency and attempting to undermine consensus.
+- Integrity breaking attempt: tampering history by changing previous votes.
+- Replay attack: storing the old votes to maliciously use in fresh voting.
+
+## 5. Copyright
+
+Copyright and related rights waived via [CC0](https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)
+
+## 6. References
+
+- [Hedera Hashgraph](https://hedera.com/learning/hedera-hashgraph/what-is-hashgraph-consensus)
+- [Gossip about gossip](https://docs.hedera.com/hedera/core-concepts/hashgraph-consensus-algorithms/gossip-about-gossip)
+- [Simple implementation of hashgraph consensus](https://github.com/conanwu777/hashgraph)
--- a/vac/raw/eth-mls-offchain.md
+++ b/vac/raw/eth-mls-offchain.md
@@ -0,0 +1,241 @@
+---
+title: ETH-MLS-OFFCHAIN
+name: Secure channel setup using decentralized MLS and Ethereum accounts
+status: raw
+category: Standards Track
+tags:
+editor: Ugur Sen [ugur@status.im](mailto:ugur@status.im)
+contributors: seemenkina [ekaterina@status.im](mailto:ekaterina@status.im)
+
+---
+
+## Abstract
+
+The following document specifies Ethereum authenticated scalable
+and decentralized secure group messaging application by
+integrating Message Layer Security (MLS) backend.
+Decentralization refers each user is a node in P2P network and
+each user has voice for any changes in group.
+This is achieved by integrating a consensus mechanism.
+Lastly, this RFC can also be referred to as de-MLS,
+decentralized MLS, to emphasize its deviation
+from the centralized trust assumptions of traditional MLS deployments.
+
+## Motivation
+
+Group messaging is a fundamental part of digital communication,
+yet most existing systems depend on centralized servers,
+which introduce risks around privacy, censorship, and unilateral control.
+In restrictive settings, servers can be blocked or surveilled;
+in more open environments, users still face opaque moderation policies,
+data collection, and exclusion from decision-making processes.
+To address this, we propose a decentralized, scalable peer-to-peer
+group messaging system where each participant runs a node, contributes
+to message propagation, and takes part in governance autonomously.
+Group membership changes are decided collectively through a lightweight
+partially synchronous, fault-tolerant consensus protocol without a centralized identity.
+This design enables truly democratic group communication and is well-suited
+for use cases like activist collectives, research collaborations, DAOs, support groups,
+and decentralized social platforms.
+
+## Format Specification
+
+The key words “MUST”, “MUST NOT”, “REQUIRED”, “SHALL”, “SHALL NOT”,
+“SHOULD”, “SHOULD NOT”, “RECOMMENDED”, “MAY”, and “OPTIONAL” in this document
+are to be interpreted as described in [2119](https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt).
+
+### Assumptions
+
+- The nodes in the P2P network can discover other nodes or will connect to other nodes when subscribing to same topic in a gossipsub.
+- We MAY have non-reliable (silent) nodes.
+- We MUST have a consensus that is lightweight, scalable and finalized in a specific time.
+
+## Roles
+
+The three roles used in de-MLS is as follows:
+
+- `node`: Nodes are members of network without being in any secure group messaging.
+- `member`: Members are special nodes in the secure group messaging who
+obtains current group key of secure group messaging.
+- `steward`: Stewards are special and transparent members in secure group
+messaging who organizes the changes upon the voted-proposals.
+
+## MLS Background
+
+The de-MLS consists of MLS backend, so the MLS services and other MLS components
+are taken from the original [MLS specification](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9420/), with or without modifications.
+
+### MLS Services
+
+MLS is operated in two services authentication service (AS) and delivery service (DS).
+Authentication service enables group members to authenticate the credentials presented by other group members.
+The delivery service routes MLS messages among the nodes or
+members in the protocol in the correct order and
+manage the `keyPackage` of the users where the `keyPackage` is the objects
+ that provide some public information about a user.
+
+### MLS Objects
+
+Following section presents the MLS objects and components that used in this RFC:
+
+`Epoch`: Fixed time intervals that changes the state that is defined by members,
+section 3.4 in [MLS RFC 9420](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9420/).
+
+`MLS proposal message:` Members MUST receive the proposal message prior to the
+corresponding commit message that initiates a new epoch with key changes,
+in order to ensure the intended security properties, section 12.1 in [MLS RFC 9420](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9420/).
+Here, the add and remove proposals are used.
+
+`Application message`: This message type used in arbitrary encrypted communication between group members.
+This is restricted by [MLS RFC 9420](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9420/) as if there is pending proposal,
+the application message should be cut.
+Note that: Since the MLS is based on servers, this delay between proposal and commit messages are very small.
+`Commit message:` After members receive the proposals regarding group changes,
+the committer, who may be any member of the group, as specified in  [MLS RFC 9420](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9420/),
+generates the necessary key material for the next epoch, including the appropriate welcome messages
+for new joiners and new entropy for removed members. In this RFC, the committers only MUST be stewards.
+
+### de-MLS Objects
+
+`Voting proposal` Similar to MLS proposals, but processed only if approved through a voting process.
+They function as application messages in the MLS group,
+allowing the steward to collect them without halting the protocol.
+
+## Flow
+
+General flow is as follows:
+
+- A steward initializes a group just once, and then sends out Group Announcements (GA) periodically.
+
+- Meanwhile, each`node`creates and sends their`credential` includes `keyPackage`.
+- Each `member`creates `voting proposals` sends them to from MLS group during epoch E.
+- Meanwhile, the `steward` collects finalized `voting proposals` from MLS group and converts them into
+`MLS proposals`  then sends them with correspondng `commit messages`
+- Evantually, with the commit messages, all members starts the next epoch E+1.
+
+## Creating Voting Proposal
+
+A `member` MAY initializes the voting with the proposal payload
+which is implemented using [protocol buffers v3](https://protobuf.dev/) as follows:
+
+```protobuf
+
+syntax = "proto3";
+
+message Proposal {
+string name = 10;                 // Proposal name
+string payload = 11;              // Describes the what is voting fore 
+int32 proposal_id = 12;           // Unique identifier of the proposal
+bytes proposal_owner = 13;        // Public key of the creator
+repeated Vote votes = 14;         // Vote list in the proposal
+int32 expected_voters_count = 15; // Maximum number of distinct voters
+int32 round = 16;                 // Number of Votes
+int64 timestamp = 17;             // Creation time of proposal
+int64 expiration_time = 18;       // Time interval that the proposal is active
+bool liveness_criteria_yes = 19;  // Shows how managing the silent peers vote
+}
+```
+
+```bash
+message Vote {
+int32 vote_id = 20;             // Unique identifier of the vote
+bytes vote_owner = 21;          // Voter's public key
+int64 timestamp = 22;           // Time when the vote was cast
+bool vote = 23;                 // Vote bool value (true/false)
+bytes parent_hash = 24;         // Hash of previous owner's Vote
+bytes received_hash = 25;       // Hash of previous received Vote
+bytes vote_hash = 26;           // Hash of all previously defined fields in Vote
+bytes signature = 27;           // Signature of vote_hash
+}
+```
+
+The voting proposal MAY include adding a `node` or removing a `member`.
+After the `member` creates the voting proposal,
+it is emitted to the network via the MLS `Application message` with a lightweight,
+epoch based voting such as [hashgraphlike consensus.](https://github.com/vacp2p/rfc-index/blob/consensus-hashgraph-like/vac/raw/consensus-hashgraphlike.md)
+This consensus result MUST be finalized within the epoch as YES or NO.
+
+If the voting result is YES, this points out the voting proposal will be converted into
+the MLS proposal by the `steward` and following commit message that starts the new epoch.
+
+## Creating welcome message
+
+When a MLS `MLS proposal message` is created by the `steward`,
+a `commit message` SHOULD follow,
+as in section 12.04 [MLS RFC 9420](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9420/) to the members.
+In order for the new `member` joining the group to synchronize with the current members
+who received the `commit message`,
+the `steward` sends a welcome message to the node as the new `member`,
+as in section 12.4.3.1. [MLS RFC 9420](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9420/).
+
+## Single steward
+
+To naive way to create a decentralized secure group messaging is having a single transparent `steward`
+who only applies the changes regarding the result of the voting.
+
+This is mostly similar with the general flow and specified in voting proposal and welcome message creation sections.
+
+1. Each time a single `steward` initializes a group with group parameters with parameters
+as in section 8.1. Group Context in [MLS RFC 9420](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9420/).
+2. `steward` creates a group anouncement (GA) according to the previous step and
+broadcast it to the all network periodically. GA message is visible in network to all `nodes`.
+3. The each `node` who wants to be a member needs to obtain this anouncement and create `credential`
+includes `keyPackage` that is specified in [MLS RFC 9420](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9420/) section 10.
+4. The `steward` aggregates all `KeyPackages` utilizes them to provision group additions for new members,
+based on the outcome of the voting process.
+5. Any `member` start to create `voting proposals` for adding or removing users,
+and present them to the voting in the MLS group as an application message.
+
+However, unlimited use of `voting proposals` within the group may be misused by
+malicious or overly active members.
+Therefore, an application-level constraint can be introduced to limit the number
+or frequency of proposals initiated by each member to prevent spam or abuse.
+6. Meanwhile, the `steward` collects finalized `voting proposals` with in epoch `E`,
+that have received affirmative votes from members via application messages.
+Otherwise, the `steward` discards proposals that did not receive a majority of "YES" votes.
+Since voting proposals are transmitted as application messages, omitting them does not affect
+the protocol’s correctness or consistency.
+7. The `steward` converts all approved `voting proposals` into
+corresponding `MLS proposals` and `commit message`, and
+transmits both in a single operation as in [MLS RFC 9420](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9420/) section 12.4,
+including welcome messages for the new members. Therefore, the `commit message` ends the previous epoch and create new ones.
+
+## Multi stewards
+
+Decentralization has already been achieved in the previous section.
+However, to improve availability and ensure censorship resistance,
+the single-steward protocol is extended to a multi-steward architecture.
+In this design, each epoch is coordinated by a designated steward,
+operating under the same protocol as the single-steward model.
+Thus, the multi-steward approach primarily defines how steward roles
+rotate across epochs while preserving the underlying structure and logic of the original protocol.
+Two variants of the multi-steward design are introduced to address different system requirements.
+
+### Multi steward with single consensus
+
+In this model, all group modifications, such as adding or removing members,
+must be approved through consensus by all participants,
+including the steward assigned for epoch `E`.
+A configuration with multiple stewards operating under a shared consensus protocol offers
+increased decentralization and stronger protection against censorship.
+However, this benefit comes with reduced operational efficiency.
+The model is therefore best suited for small groups that value
+decentralization and censorship resistance more than performance.
+
+### Multi steward with two consensuses
+
+The two-consensus model offers improved efficiency with a trade-off in decentralization.
+In this design, group changes require consensus only among the stewards, rather than all members.
+Regular members participate by periodically selecting the stewards but do not take part in each decision.
+This structure enables faster coordination since consensus is achieved within a smaller group of stewards.
+It is particularly suitable for large user groups, where involving every member in each decision would be impractical.
+
+## Copyright
+
+Copyright and related rights waived via [CC0](https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)
+
+### References
+
+- [MLS RFC 9420](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9420/)
+- [Hashgraphlike Consensus](https://github.com/vacp2p/rfc-index/blob/consensus-hashgraph-like/vac/raw/consensus-hashgraphlike.md)
+- [vacp2p/de-mls](https://github.com/vacp2p/de-mls)
--- a/vac/raw/mix.md
+++ b/vac/raw/mix.md
@@ -120,6 +120,18 @@ contents as packets are forwarded hop-by-hop.
 Sphinx packets are fixed-size and indistinguishable from one another, providing
 unlinkability and metadata protection.

+- **Initialization Vector (IV)**
+  A fixed-length input used to initialize block ciphers to add randomness to the
+  encryption process. It ensures that encrypting the same plaintext with the same
+  key produces different ciphertexts. The IV is not secret but must be unique for
+  each encryption.
+
+- **Single-Use Reply Block (SURB)**
+A pre-computed Sphinx header that encodes a return path back to the sender.
+SURBs are generated by the sender and included in the Sphinx packet sent to the recipient.
+It enables the recipient to send anonymous replies,
+without learning the sender’s identity, the return path, or the forwarding delays.
+
 ## 3. Motivation and Background

 libp2p enables modular peer-to-peer applications, but it lacks built-in support
@@ -194,7 +206,7 @@ describe the core components of a mix network.

 The Mix Protocol relies on two core design elements to achieve sender
 unlinkability and metadata
-protection: a mixing strategy and a a cryptographically secure mix packet
+protection: a mixing strategy and a cryptographically secure mix packet
 format.

 ### 4.1 Mixing Strategy
@@ -297,7 +309,7 @@ layered encryption and per-hop delay provides resistance to traffic analysis and
 enables message-level
 unlinkability.

-Unlike typical custom libp2p protocols, the Mix protocol is stateless&mdash;it
+Unlike typical custom libp2p protocols, the Mix Protocol is stateless&mdash;it
 does not establish
 persistent streams, negotiate protocols, or maintain sessions. Each message is
 self-contained
@@ -458,8 +470,8 @@ multistream handshake for protocol negotiation.

 While libp2p supports multiplexing multiple streams over a single transport
 connection using
-stream muxers such as mplex and yamux, it does not natively support reusing a
-stream over multiple
+stream muxers such as mplex and yamux, it does not natively support reusing the
+same stream over multiple
 message transmissions. However, stream reuse may be desirable in the mixnet
 setting to reduce overhead
 and avoid hitting per protocol stream limits between peers.
@@ -512,9 +524,9 @@ adversarial routing bias.

 While no existing mechanism provides unbiased sampling by default,
 [Waku’s ambient discovery](https://rfc.vac.dev/waku/standards/core/33/discv5/)
-&mdash; an extension
+&mdash;an extension
 over [Discv5](https://github.com/ethereum/devp2p/blob/master/discv5/discv5.md)
-&mdash; demonstrates
+&mdash;demonstrates
 an approximate solution. It combines topic-based capability advertisement with
 periodic
 peer sampling. A similar strategy could potentially be adapted for the Mix
@@ -618,7 +630,7 @@ _unobservability_ where
 a passive adversary cannot determine whether a node is sending real messages or
 not.

-In the Mix Protocol, cover traffic is limited to _loop messages_ &mdash; dummy
+In the Mix Protocol, cover traffic is limited to _loop messages_&mdash;dummy
 Sphinx packets
 that follow a valid mix path and return to the originating node. These messages
 carry no application
@@ -627,7 +639,7 @@ routing behavior.

 Cover traffic MAY be generated by either mix nodes or senders. The strategy for
 generating
-such traffic &mdash; such as timing and frequency &mdash; is pluggable and not
+such traffic&mdash;such as timing and frequency&mdash;is pluggable and not
 specified
 in this document.

@@ -667,9 +679,9 @@ deter participation by compromised or transient peers.

 The Mix Protocol does not mandate any form of payment, token exchange, or
 accounting. More
-sophisticated economic models &mdash; such as stake-based participation,
+sophisticated economic models&mdash;such as stake-based participation,
 credentialed relay networks,
-or zero-knowledge proof-of-contribution systems &mdash; MAY be layered on top of
+or zero-knowledge proof-of-contribution systems&mdash;MAY be layered on top of
 the protocol or
 enforced via external coordination.

@@ -779,6 +791,11 @@ destination origin protocol instance.

 The node MUST NOT retain decrypted content after forwarding.

+The routing behavior described in this section relies on the use of
+Sphinx packets to preserve unlinkability and confidentiality across
+hops. The next section specifies their structure, cryptographic
+components, and construction.
+
 ## 8. Sphinx Packet Format

 The Mix Protocol uses the Sphinx packet format to enable unlinkable, multi-hop
@@ -789,8 +806,10 @@ encapsulated in a Sphinx packet constructed by the initiating mix node. The
 packet is encrypted in
 layers such that each hop in the mix path can decrypt exactly one layer and
 obtain the next-hop
-routing information and delay value, without learning the complete path or the
+routing information and forwarding delay, without learning the complete path or the
 message origin.
+Only the final hop learns the destination, which is encoded in the innermost
+routing layer.

 Sphinx packets are self-contained and indistinguishable on the wire, providing
 strong metadata
@@ -820,12 +839,10 @@ subsections.

 ### 8.1 Packet Structure Overview

-Each Sphinx packet consists of three fixed-length header fields &mdash; $α$,
-$β$, and $γ$ &mdash;
-followed by a fixed-length encrypted payload $δ$. Together, these components
-enable per-hop message
-processing with strong confidentiality and integrity guarantees in a stateless
-and unlinkable manner.
+Each Sphinx packet consists of three fixed-length header fields&mdash; $α$,
+$β$, and $γ$ &mdash;followed by a fixed-length encrypted payload $δ$.
+Together, these components enable per-hop message processing with strong
+confidentiality and integrity guarantees in a stateless and unlinkable manner.

 - **$α$ (Alpha)**: An ephemeral public value. Each mix node uses its private key
 and $α$ to
@@ -833,8 +850,9 @@ derive a shared session key for that hop. This session key is used to decrypt
 and process
 one layer of the packet.
 - **$β$ (Beta)**: The nested encrypted routing information. It encodes the next
-hop address, the forwarding delay,
-integrity check $γ$ for the next hop, and the $β$ for subsequent hops.
+hop address, the forwarding delay, integrity check $γ$ for the next hop, and
+the $β$ for subsequent hops. At the final hop, $β$ encodes the destination
+address and fixed-length zero padding to preserve uniform size.
 - **$γ$ (Gamma)**: A message authentication code computed over $β$ using the
 session key derived
 from $α$. It ensures header integrity at each hop.
@@ -843,12 +861,12 @@ fixed maximum length and
 encrypted in layers corresponding to each hop in the mix path.

 At each hop, the mix node derives the session key from $α$, verifies the header
-integrity
-using $γ$, decrypts one layer of $β$ to extract the next hop and delay, and
-decrypts one layer
-of $δ$. It then constructs a new packet with updated values of $α$, $β$, $γ$,
-and $δ$, and
-forwards it to the next hop.
+integrity using $γ$, decrypts one layer of $β$ to extract the next hop and
+delay, and decrypts one layer of $δ$. It then constructs a new packet with
+updated values of $α$, $β$, $γ$, and $δ$, and forwards it to the next hop. At
+the final hop, the mix node decrypts the innermost layer of $β$ and $δ$, which
+yields the destination address and the original application message
+respectively.

 All Sphinx packets are fixed in size and indistinguishable on the wire. This
 uniform format,
@@ -866,20 +884,29 @@ This section defines the cryptographic primitives used in Sphinx packet
 construction and processing.

 - **Security Parameter**: All cryptographic operations target a minimum of
-$\kappa = 128$ bits of
+$κ = 128$ bits of
 security, balancing performance with resistance to modern attacks.

 - **Elliptic Curve Group $\mathbb{G}$**:
  - **Curve**: Curve25519
+  - **Notation**: Let $g$ denote the canonical base point (generator) of $\mathbb{G}$.
  - **Purpose**: Used for deriving Diffie–Hellman-style shared key at each hop
 using $α$.
  - **Representation**: Small 32-byte group elements, efficient for both
 encryption and key exchange.
+  - **Scalar Field**: The curve is defined over the finite field
+$\mathbb{Z}_q$, where $q = 2^{252} + 27742317777372353535851937790883648493$.
+Ephemeral exponents used in Sphinx packet construction are selected uniformly
+at random from $\mathbb{Z}_q^*$, the multiplicative subgroup of $\mathbb{Z}_q$.
+
+- **Hash Function**:
+  - **Construction**: SHA-256
+  - **Notation**: The hash function is denoted by $H(\cdot)$ in subsequent sections.

 - **Key Derivation Function (KDF)**:
  - **Purpose**: To derive encryption keys, IVs, and MAC key from the shared
 session key at each hop.
-  - **Construction**: SHA-256 hash with output truncated to 128 bits.
+  - **Construction**: SHA-256 hash with output truncated to $128$ bits.
  - **Key Derivation**: The KDF key separation labels (_e.g.,_ `"aes_key"`,
 `"mac_key"`)
 are fixed strings and MUST be agreed upon across implementations.
@@ -889,9 +916,457 @@ are fixed strings and MUST be agreed upon across implementations.
  - **Keys and IVs**: Each derived from the session key for the hop using the KDF.

 - **Message Authentication Code (MAC)**:
-  - **Construction**: HMAC-SHA-256 with output truncated to 128 bits.
+  - **Construction**: HMAC-SHA-256 with output truncated to $128$ bits.
  - **Purpose**: To compute $γ$ for each hop.
  - **Key**: Derived using KDF from the session key for the hop.

 These primitives are used consistently throughout packet construction and
 decryption, as described in the following sections.
+
+### 8.3 Packet Component Sizes
+
+This section defines the size of each component in a Sphinx packet, deriving them
+from the security parameter and protocol parameters introduced earlier. All Sphinx
+packets MUST be fixed in length to ensure uniformity and indistinguishability on
+the wire. The serialized packet is structured as follows:
+
+```text
+--------+----------+--------+----------+
+|   α    |     β    |   γ    |    δ     |
+| 32 B   | variable | 16 B   | variable |
+--------+----------+--------+----------+
+```
+
+#### 8.3.1 Header Field Sizes
+
+The header consists of the fields $α$, $β$, and $γ$, totaling a fixed size per
+maximum path length:
+
+- **$α$ (Alpha)**: 32 bytes  
+  The size of $α$ is determined by the elliptic curve group representation used
+  (Curve25519), which encodes group elements as 32-byte values.
+
+- **$β$ (Beta)**: $((t + 1)r + 1)κ$ bytes  
+  The size of $β$ depends on:
+  - **Maximum path length ($r$)**: The recommended value of $r=5$ balances
+  bandwidth versus anonymity tradeoffs.
+  - **Combined address and delay width ($tκ$)**: The recommended $t=6$
+  accommodates standard libp2p relay multiaddress representations plus a
+  2-byte delay field. While the actual multiaddress and delay fields may be
+  shorter, they are padded to $tκ$ bytes to maintain fixed field size. The
+  structure and rationale for the $tκ$ block and its encoding are specified in
+  [Section 8.4](#84-address-and-delay-encoding).
+
+    Note: This expands on the original
+    [Sphinx packet format]((https://cypherpunks.ca/~iang/pubs/Sphinx_Oakland09.pdf)),
+    which embeds a fixed $κ$-byte mix node identifier per hop in $β$.
+    The Mix Protocol generalizes this to $tκ$ bytes to accommodate libp2p
+    multiaddresses and forwarding delays while preserving the cryptographic
+    properties of the original design.
+
+  - **Per-hop $γ$ size ($κ$)** (defined below): Accounts for the integrity tag
+  included with each hop’s routing information.
+
+  Using the recommended value of $r=5$ and $t=6$, the resulting $β$ size is
+  $576$ bytes. At the final hop, $β$ encodes the destination address in the
+  first $tκ-2$ bytes and the remaining bytes are zero-padded.
+
+- **$γ$ (Gamma)**: $16$ bytes  
+  The size of $γ$ equals the security parameter $κ$, providing a $κ$-bit integrity
+  tag at each hop.
+
+Thus, the total header length is:
+
+$`
+\begin{aligned}
+|Header| &= α + β + γ \\
+  &= 32 + ((t + 1)r + 1)κ + 16
+\end{aligned}
+`$
+
+Notation: $|x|$ denotes the size (in bytes) of field $x$.
+
+Using the recommended value of $r = 5$ and $t = 6$, the header size is:
+
+$`
+\begin{aligned}
+|Header| &= 32 + 576 + 16 \\
+  &= 624 \ bytes
+\end{aligned}
+`$
+
+#### 8.3.2 Payload Size
+
+This subsection defines the size of the encrypted payload $δ$ in a Sphinx packet.
+
+$δ$ contains the application message, padded to a fixed maximum length to ensure
+all packets are indistinguishable on the wire. The size of $δ$ is calculated as:
+
+$`
+\begin{aligned}
+|δ| &= TotalPacketSize - HeaderSize
+\end{aligned}
+`$
+
+The recommended total packet size is $4608$ bytes, chosen to:
+
+- Accommodate larger libp2p application messages, such as those commonly
+observed in Status chat using Waku (typically ~4KB payloads),
+- Allow inclusion of additional data such as SURBs without requiring fragmentation,
+- Maintain reasonable per-hop processing and bandwidth overhead.
+
+This recommended total packet size of \$4608\$ bytes yields:
+
+$`
+\begin{aligned}
+Payload &= 4608 - 624 \\
+  &= 3984\ bytes
+\end{aligned}
+`$
+
+Implementations MUST account for payload extensions, such as SURBs,
+when determining the maximum message size that can be encapsulated in a
+single Sphinx packet. Details on SURBs are defined in
+[Section X.X].
+
+The following subsection defines the padding and fragmentation requirements for
+ensuring this fixed-size constraint.
+
+#### 8.3.3 Padding and Fragmentation
+
+Implementations MUST ensure that all messages shorter than the maximum payload size
+are padded before Sphinx encapsulation to ensure that all packets are
+indistinguishable on the wire. Messages larger than the maximum payload size MUST
+be fragmented by the origin protocol or top-level application before being passed
+to the Mix Protocol. Reassembly is the responsibility of the consuming application,
+not the Mix Protocol.
+
+#### 8.3.4 Anonymity Set Considerations
+
+The fixed maximum packet size is a configurable parameter. Protocols or
+applications that choose to configure a different packet size (either larger or
+smaller than the default) MUST be aware that using unique or uncommon packet sizes
+can reduce their effective anonymity set to only other users of the same size.
+Implementers SHOULD align with widely used defaults to maximize anonymity set size.
+
+Similarly, parameters such as $r$ and $t$ are configurable. Changes to these
+parameters affect header size and therefore impact payload size if the total packet
+size remains fixed. However, if such changes alter the total packet size on the
+wire, the same anonymity set considerations apply.
+
+The following subsection defines how the next-hop or destination address and
+forwarding delay are encoded within $β$ to enable correct routing and mixing
+behavior.
+
+### 8.4 Address and Delay Encoding
+
+Each hop’s $β$ includes a fixed-size block containing the next-hop address and
+the forwarding delay, except for the final hop, which encodes the destination
+address and a delay-sized zero padding. This section defines the structure and
+encoding of that block.
+
+The combined address and delay block MUST be exactly $tκ$ bytes in length,
+as defined in [Section 8.3.1](#831-header-field-sizes), regardless of the
+actual address or delay values. The first $(tκ - 2)$ bytes MUST encode the
+address, and the final $2$ bytes MUST encode the forwarding delay.
+This fixed-length encoding ensures that packets remain indistinguishable on
+the wire and prevents correlation attacks based on routing metadata structure.
+
+Implementations MAY use any address and delay encoding format agreed upon
+by all participating mix nodes, as long as the combined length is exactly
+$tκ$ bytes. The encoding format MUST be interpreted consistently by all
+nodes within a deployment.
+
+For interoperability, a recommended default encoding format involves:
+
+- Encoding the next-hop or destination address as a libp2p multi-address:
+  - To keep the address block compact while allowing relay connectivity, each mix
+  node is limited to one IPv4 circuit relay multiaddress. This ensures that most
+  nodes can act as mix nodes, including those behind NATs or firewalls.
+  - In libp2p terms, this combines transport addresses with multiple peer
+  identities to form an address that describes a relay circuit:  
+  `
+  /ip4/<ipv4>/tcp/<port>/p2p/<relayPeerID>/p2p-circuit/p2p/<relayedPeerID>
+  `  
+  Variants may include directly reachable peers and transports such as
+  `/quic-v1`, depending on the mix node's supported stack.
+  - IPv6 support is deferred, as it adds $16$ bytes just for the IP field.
+  - Future revisions may extend this format to support IPv6 or DNS-based
+  multiaddresses.
+  
+  With these constraints, the recommended encoding layout is:
+  - IPv4 address (4 bytes)
+  - Protocol identifier _e.g.,_ TCP or QUIC (1 byte)
+  - Port number (2 bytes)
+  - Peer IDs (39 bytes, post-Base58 decoding)
+
+- Encoding the forwarding delay as an unsigned 16-bit integer (2 bytes) in
+  milliseconds, using big endian network byte order.
+
+If the encoded address or delay is shorter than its respective allocated
+field, it MUST be padded with zeros. If it exceeds the allocated size, it
+MUST be rejected or truncated according to the implementation policy.
+
+Note: Future versions of the Mix Protocol may support address compression by
+encoding only the peer identifier and relying on external peer discovery
+mechanisms to retrieve full multiaddresses at runtime. This would allow for
+more compact headers and greater address flexibility, but requires fast and
+reliable lookup support across deployments. This design is out of scope for
+the current version.
+
+With the field sizes and encoding conventions established, the next section describes
+how a mix node constructs a complete Sphinx packet when initiating the Mix Protocol.
+
+### 8.5 Packet Construction
+
+This section defines how a mix node constructs a Sphinx packet when initiating
+the Mix Protocol on behalf of a local origin protocol instance.
+The construction process wraps the message in a sequence of encryption
+layers&mdash;one for each hop&mdash;such that only the corresponding mix node
+can decrypt its layer and retrieve the routing instructions for that hop.
+
+#### 8.5.1 Inputs
+
+To initiate the Mix Protocol, the origin protocol instance submits a message
+to the Mix Entry Layer on the same node. This layer forwards it to the local
+Mix Protocol instance, which constructs a Sphinx packet
+using the following REQUIRED inputs:
+
+- **Application message**: The serialized message provided by the origin
+  protocol instance. The Mix Protocol instance applies any configured spam
+  protection mechanism and attaches one or two SURBs prior to encapsulating
+  the message in the Sphinx packet. The initiating node MUST ensure that
+  the resulting payload size does not exceed the maximum supported size
+  defined in [Section 8.3.2](#832-payload-size).
+- **Origin protocol codec**: The libp2p protocol string corresponding to the
+  origin protocol instance. This is included in the payload so that
+  the exit node can route the message to the intended destination protocol
+  after decryption.
+- **Mix Path length $L$**: The number of mix nodes to include in the path.
+  The mix path MUST consist of at least three hops, each representing a
+  distinct mix node.
+- **Destination address $Δ$**: The routing address of the intended recipient
+  of the message. This address is encoded in $(tκ - 2)$ bytes as defined in
+  [Section 8.4](#84-address-and-delay-encoding) and revealed only at the last hop.
+
+#### 8.5.2 Construction Steps
+
+This subsection defines how the initiating mix node constructs a complete
+Sphinx packet using the inputs defined in
+[Section 8.5.1](#851-inputs). The construction MUST
+follow the cryptographic structure defined in
+[Section 8.1](#81-packet-structure-overview), use the primitives specified in
+[Section 8.2](#82-cryptographic-primitives), and adhere to the component sizes
+and encoding formats from [Section 8.3](#83-packet-component-sizes) and
+[Section 8.4](#84-address-and-delay-encoding).
+
+The construction MUST proceed as follows:
+
+1. **Prepare Application Message**
+
+   - Apply any configured spam protection mechanism (_e.g.,_ PoW, VDF, RLN)
+  to the serialized message. Spam protection mechanisms are pluggable as defined
+  in [Section 6.3](#63-spam-protection).
+   - Attach one or more SURBs, if required. Their format and processing are
+  specified in [Section X.X].
+   - Append the origin protocol codec.
+   - Pad the result to the maximum application message length of $3968$ bytes
+  using a deterministic padding scheme. This value is derived from the fixed
+  payload size in [Section 8.3.2](#832-payload-size) ($3984$ bytes) minus the
+  security parameter $κ = 16$ bytes defined in
+  [Section 8.2](#82-cryptographic-primitives). The chosen scheme MUST yield a
+  fixed-size padded output and MUST be consistent across all mix nodes to
+  ensure correct interpretation during unpadding. For example, schemes that
+  explicitly encode the padding length and prepend zero-valued padding bytes
+  MAY be used.
+   - Let the resulting message be $m$.  
+
+2. **Select A Mix Path**
+
+   - First obtain an unbiased random sample of live, routable mix nodes using
+  some discovery mechanism. The choice of discovery mechanism is
+  deployment-specific as defined in [Section 6.1](#61-discovery). The
+  discovery mechanism MUST be unbiased and provide, at a minimum, the
+  multiaddress and X25519 public key of each mix node.
+   - From this sample, choose a random mix path of length $L \geq 3$. As defined
+  in [Section 2](#2-terminology), a mix path is a non-repeating sequence of
+  mix nodes.
+   - For each hop $i \in \{0 \ldots L-1\}$:
+     - Retrieve the multiaddress and corresponding X25519 public key $y_i$ of
+  the $i$-th mix node.
+     - Encode the multiaddress in $(tκ - 2)$ bytes as defined in
+  [Section 8.4](#84-address-and-delay-encoding). Let the resulting encoded
+  multiaddress be $\mathrm{addr\_i}$.
+
+3. **Wrap Plaintext Payload In Sphinx Packet**
+
+   a. **Compute Ephemeral Secrets**
+
+   - Choose a random private exponent $x \in_R \mathbb{Z}_q^*$.
+   - Initialize:  
+     $`
+     \begin{aligned}
+     α_0 &= g^x \\
+     s_0 &= y_0^x \\
+     b_0 &= H(α_0\ |\ s_0)
+     \end{aligned}
+     `$
+   - For each hop $i$ (from $1$ to $L-1$), compute:  
+     $`
+     \begin{aligned}
+     α_i &= α_{i-1}^{b_{i-1}} \\
+     s_i &= y_{i}^{x\prod_{\text{j=0}}^{\text{i-1}} b_{j}} \\
+     b_i &= H(α_i\ |\ s_i)
+     \end{aligned}
+     `$
+
+   Note that the length of $α_i$ is $32$ bytes as defined in
+   [Section 8.3](#83-packet-component-sizes).
+
+   b. **Compute Per-Hop Filler Strings**  
+   Filler strings are encrypted strings that are appended to the header during
+   encryption. They ensure that the header length remains constant across hops,
+   regardless of the position of a node in the mix path.
+
+   To compute the sequence of filler strings, perform the following steps:
+
+   - Initialize $Φ_0 = \epsilon$ (empty string).
+   - For each $i$ (from $1$ to $L-1$):
+
+     - Derive per-hop AES key and IV:
+
+       $`
+       \begin{array}{l}
+       Φ_{\mathrm{aes\_key}_{i-1}} =
+       \mathrm{KDF}(\text{"aes\_key"} \mid s_{i-1})\\
+       Φ_{\mathrm{iv}_{i-1}} =
+       \mathrm{KDF}(\text{"iv"} \mid s_{i-1})
+       \end{array}
+       `$
+
+     - Compute the filler string $Φ_i$ using $\text{AES-CTR}^\prime_i$,
+       which is AES-CTR encryption with the keystream starting from
+       index $((t+1)(r-i)+t+2)\kappa$ :
+
+       $`
+       \begin{array}{l}
+       Φ_i = \mathrm{AES\text{-}CTR}'_i\bigl(Φ_{\mathrm{aes\_key}_{i-1}},
+       Φ_{\mathrm{iv}_{i-1}}, Φ_{i-1} \mid 0_{(t+1)\kappa} \bigr),
+       \text{where notation $0_x$ defines the string of $0$ bits of length $x$.}
+       \end{array}
+       `$
+
+   Note that the length of $Φ_i$ is $(t+1)i\kappa$.
+
+   c. **Construct Routing Header**
+   The routing header as defined in
+   [Section 8.1](#81-packet-structure-overview) is the encrypted structure
+   that carries the forwarding instructions for each hop. It ensures that a
+   mix node can learn only its immediate next hop and forwarding delay without
+   inferring the full path.
+
+   Filler strings computed in the previous step are appended during encryption
+   to ensure that the header length remains constant across hops. This prevents
+   a node from distinguishing its position in the path based on header size.
+
+   To construct the routing header, perform the following steps for each hop
+   $i = L-1$ down to $0$, recursively:
+
+   - Derive per-hop AES key, MAC key, and IV:
+
+     $`
+     \begin{array}{l}
+     β_{\mathrm{aes\_key}_i} =
+     \mathrm{KDF}(\text{"aes\_key"} \mid s_i)\\
+     \mathrm{mac\_key}_i =
+     \mathrm{KDF}(\text{"mac\_key"} \mid s_{i})\\
+     β_{\mathrm{iv}_i} =
+     \mathrm{KDF}(\text{"iv"} \mid s_i)
+     \end{array}
+     `$
+  
+   - Set the per hop two-byte encoded delay $\mathrm{delay}_i$ as defined in
+  [Section 8.4](#84-address-and-delay-encoding):
+     - If final hop (_i.e.,_ $i = L - 1$), encode two byte zero padding.
+     - For all other hop $i,\ i < L - 1$, sample a forwarding delay
+  using the delay strategy configured by the application and encode it in two bytes.
+  The delay strategy is pluggable as defined in [Section 6.2](#62-delay-strategy).
+  
+   - Using the derived keys and encoded forwarding delay, compute the nested
+  encrypted routing information $β_i$:
+
+     - If $i = L-1$ (_i.e.,_ exit node):
+
+       $`
+       \begin{array}{l}
+       β_i = \mathrm{AES\text{-}CTR}\bigl(β_{\mathrm{aes\_key}_i},
+       β_{\mathrm{iv}_i}, Δ \mid \mathrm{delay}_i \mid 0_{((t+1)(r-L)+2)\kappa}
+       \bigr) \bigm| Φ_{L-1}
+       \end{array}
+       `$
+
+     - Otherwise (_i.e.,_ intermediary node):
+
+       $`
+       \begin{array}{l}
+       β_i = \mathrm{AES\text{-}CTR}\bigl(β_{\mathrm{aes\_key}_i},
+       β_{\mathrm{iv}_i}, \mathrm{addr}_{i+1} \mid $\mathrm{delay}_i$
+       \mid γ_{i+1} \mid β_{i+1 \, [0 \ldots (r(t+1) - t)\kappa - 1]} \bigr)
+       \end{array}
+       `$
+
+     Note that the length of $\beta_i$ is $(r(t+1)+1)\kappa$, $0 \leq i \leq L-1$
+     as defined in [Section 8.3](#83-packet-component-sizes).
+
+     - Compute the message authentication code $γ_i$:
+
+       $`
+       \begin{array}{l}
+       γ_i = \mathrm{HMAC\text{-}SHA\text{-}256}\bigl(\mathrm{mac\_key}_i,
+       β_i \bigr)
+       \end{array}
+       `$
+
+     Note that the length of $\gamma_i$ is $\kappa$ as defined in
+     [Section 8.3](#83-packet-component-sizes).
+
+   d. **Encrypt Payload**
+   The encrypted payload $δ$ contains the message $m$ defined in Step 1,
+   prepended with a $κ$-byte string of zeros. It is encrypted in layers such that
+   each hop in the mix path removes exactly one layer using the per-hop session
+   key. This ensures that only the final hop (_i.e.,_ the exit node) can fully
+   recover $m$, validate its integrity, and forward it to the destination.
+   To compute the encrypted payload, perform the following steps for each hop
+   $i = L-1$ down to $0$, recursively:
+
+   - Derive per-hop AES key and IV:
+
+     $`
+     \begin{array}{l}
+     δ_{\mathrm{aes\_key}_i} =
+     \mathrm{KDF}(\text{"δ\_aes\_key"} \mid s_i)\\
+     δ_{\mathrm{iv}_i} =
+     \mathrm{KDF}(\text{"δ\_iv"} \mid s_i)
+     \end{array}
+     `$
+  
+   - Using the derived keys, compute the encrypted payload $δ_i$:
+
+     - If $i = L-1$ (_i.e.,_ exit node):
+
+       $`
+       \begin{array}{l}
+       δ_i = \mathrm{AES\text{-}CTR}\bigl(δ_{\mathrm{aes\_key}_i},
+       δ_{\mathrm{iv}_i}, 0_{\kappa} \mid m
+       \bigr)
+       \end{array}
+       `$
+
+     - Otherwise (_i.e.,_ intermediary node):
+
+       $`
+       \begin{array}{l}
+       δ_i = \mathrm{AES\text{-}CTR}\bigl(δ_{\mathrm{aes\_key}_i},
+       δ_{\mathrm{iv}_i}, δ_{i+1} \bigr)
+       \end{array}
+       `$
--- a/vac/raw/sds.md
+++ b/vac/raw/sds.md
@@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ but improves scalability by reducing direct interactions between participants.
 Each message has a globally unique, immutable ID (or hash).
 Messages can be requested from the high-availability caches or
 other participants using the corresponding message ID.
+* **Participant ID:**
+Each participant has a globally unique, immutable ID
+visible to other participants in the communication.

 ## Wire protocol

@@ -75,17 +78,18 @@ message HistoryEntry {
 }

 message Message {
-  // 1 Reserved for sender/participant id
+  string sender_id = 1;           // Participant ID of the message sender
  string message_id = 2;          // Unique identifier of the message
  string channel_id = 3;          // Identifier of the channel to which the message belongs
-  optional int32 lamport_timestamp = 10;    // Logical timestamp for causal ordering in channel
+  optional uint64 lamport_timestamp = 10;    // Logical timestamp for causal ordering in channel
  repeated HistoryEntry causal_history = 11;  // List of preceding message IDs that this message causally depends on. Generally 2 or 3 message IDs are included.
  optional bytes bloom_filter = 12;         // Bloom filter representing received message IDs in channel
  optional bytes content = 20;             // Actual content of the message
 }
 ```

-Each message MUST include its globally unique identifier in the `message_id` field,
+The sending participant MUST include its own globally unique identifier in the `sender_id` field.
+In addition, it MUST include a globally unique identifier for the message in the `message_id` field,
 likely based on a message hash.
 The `channel_id` field MUST be set to the identifier of the channel of group communication
 that is being synchronized.
@@ -98,12 +102,20 @@ These fields MAY be left unset in the case of [ephemeral messages](#ephemeral-me
 The message `content` MAY be left empty for [periodic sync messages](#periodic-sync-message),
 otherwise it MUST contain the application-level content

+> **_Note:_** Close readers may notice that, outside of filtering messages originating from the sender itself,
+the `sender_id` field is not used for much.
+Its importance is expected to increase once a p2p retrieval mechanism is added to SDS, as is planned for the protocol.
+
 ### Participant state

 Each participant MUST maintain:

 * A Lamport timestamp for each channel of communication,
-initialized to current epoch time in nanosecond resolution.
+initialized to current epoch time in millisecond resolution.
+The Lamport timestamp is increased as described in the [protocol steps](#protocol-steps)
+to maintain a logical ordering of events while staying close to the current epoch time.
+This allows the messages from new joiners to be correctly ordered with other recent messages,
+without these new participants first having to synchronize past messages to discover the current Lamport timestamp.
 * A bloom filter for received message IDs per channel.
 The bloom filter SHOULD be rolled over and
 recomputed once it reaches a predefined capacity of message IDs.
@@ -136,8 +148,11 @@ the `lamport_timestamp`, `causal_history` and `bloom_filter` fields.

 Before broadcasting a message:

-* the participant MUST increase its local Lamport timestamp by `1` and
-include this in the `lamport_timestamp` field.
+* the participant MUST set its local Lamport timestamp
+to the maximum between the current value + `1`
+and the current epoch time in milliseconds.
+In other words the local Lamport timestamp is set to `max(timeNowInMs, current_lamport_timestamp + 1)`.
+* the participant MUST include the increased Lamport timestamp in the message's `lamport_timestamp` field.
 * the participant MUST determine the preceding few message IDs in the local history
 and include these in an ordered list in the `causal_history` field.
 The number of message IDs to include in the `causal_history` depends on the application.
@@ -157,6 +172,8 @@ of unacknowledged outgoing messages.

 Upon receiving a message,

+* the participant SHOULD ignore the message if it has a `sender_id` matching its own.
+* the participant MAY deduplicate the message by comparing its `message_id` to previously received message IDs.
 * the participant MUST [review the ACK status](#review-ack-status) of messages
 in its unacknowledged outgoing buffer
 using the received message's causal history and bloom filter.
@@ -240,7 +257,8 @@ participants SHOULD periodically send sync messages to maintain state.
 These sync messages:

 * MUST be sent with empty content
-* MUST include an incremented Lamport timestamp
+* MUST include a Lamport timestamp increased to `max(timeNowInMs, current_lamport_timestamp + 1)`,
+where `timeNowInMs` is the current epoch time in milliseconds.
 * MUST include causal history and bloom filter according to regular message rules
 * MUST NOT be added to the unacknowledged outgoing buffer
 * MUST NOT be included in causal histories of subsequent messages
--- a/waku/standards/core/66/metadata.md
+++ b/waku/standards/core/66/metadata.md
@@ -3,9 +3,10 @@ slug: 66
 title: 66/WAKU2-METADATA
 name: Waku Metadata Protocol
 status: draft
-editor: Alvaro Revuelta <alrevuelta@status.im>
+editor: Franck Royer <franck@status.im>
 contributors:
- - Filip Dimitrijevic <filip@status.im>
+  - Filip Dimitrijevic <filip@status.im>
+  - Alvaro Revuelta <alrevuelta@status.im>
 ---

 ## Abstract
@@ -15,16 +16,19 @@ that can be associated with a [10/WAKU2](/waku/standards/core/10/waku2.md) node.

 ## Metadata Protocol

-Waku specifies a req/resp protocol that provides information about the node's medatadata.
-Such metadata is meant to be used by the node to decide if a peer is worth connecting
-or not.
+The keywords “MUST”, // List style “MUST NOT”, “REQUIRED”, “SHALL”, “SHALL NOT”, “SHOULD”, “SHOULD NOT”, “RECOMMENDED”,
+“NOT RECOMMENDED”, “MAY”, and “OPTIONAL” in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC 2119](https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt).
+
+Waku specifies a req/resp protocol that provides information about the node's capabilities.
+Such metadata MAY be used by other peers for subsequent actions such as light protocol requests or disconnection.
+
 The node that makes the request,
 includes its metadata so that the receiver is aware of it,
-without requiring an extra interaction.
+without requiring another round trip.
 The parameters are the following:

 * `clusterId`: Unique identifier of the cluster that the node is running in.
-* `shards`: Shard indexes that the node is subscribed to.
+* `shards`: Shard indexes that the node is subscribed to via [`11/WAKU2-RELAY`](/waku/standards/core/11/relay.md).

 ***Protocol Identifier***

@@ -48,6 +52,51 @@ message WakuMetadataResponse {
 }
 ```

+## Implementation Suggestions
+
+### Triggering Metadata Request
+
+A node SHOULD proceed with metadata request upon first connection to a remote node.
+A node SHOULD use the remote node's libp2p peer id as identifier for this heuristic.
+
+A node MAY proceed with metadata request upon reconnection to a remote peer.
+
+A node SHOULD store the remote peer's metadata information for future reference.
+A node MAY implement a TTL regarding a remote peer's metadata, and refresh it upon expiry by initiating another metadata request.
+It is RECOMMENDED to set the TTL to 6 hours.
+
+A node MAY trigger a metadata request after receiving an error response from a remote note
+stating they do not support a specific cluster or shard.
+For example, when using a request-response service such as [`19/WAKU2-LIGHTPUSH`](/waku/standards/core/19/lightpush.md).
+
+### Providing Cluster Id
+
+A node MUST include their cluster id into their metadata payload.
+It is RECOMMENDED for a node to operate on a single cluster id.
+
+### Providing Shard Information
+
+* Nodes that mount [`11/WAKU2-RELAY`](/waku/standards/core/11/relay.md) MAY include the shards they are subscribed to in their metadata payload.
+* Shard-relevant services are message related services,
+  such as [`13/WAKU2-STORE`](/waku/standards/core/13/store.md), [12/WAKU2-FILTER](/waku/standards/core/12/filter.md)
+  and [`19/WAKU2-LIGHTPUSH`](/waku/standards/core/19/lightpush.md)
+  but not [`34/WAKU2-PEER-EXCHANGE`](/waku/standards/core/34/peer-exchange.md)
+* Nodes that mount [`11/WAKU2-RELAY`](/waku/standards/core/11/relay.md) and a shard-relevant service SHOULD include the shards they are subscribed to in their metadata payload.
+* Nodes that do not mount [`11/WAKU2-RELAY`](/waku/standards/core/11/relay.md) SHOULD NOT include any shard information
+
+### Using Cluster Id
+
+When reading the cluster id of a remote peer, the local node MAY disconnect if their cluster id is different from the remote peer.
+
+### Using Shard Information
+
+It is NOT RECOMMENDED to disconnect from a peer based on the fact that their shard information is different from the local node.
+
+Ahead of doing a shard-relevant request,
+a node MAY use the previously received metadata shard information to select a peer that support the targeted shard.
+
+For non-shard-relevant requests, a node SHOULD NOT discriminate a peer based on medata shard information.
+
 ## Copyright

 Copyright and related rights waived via
Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Cofson	68996722e0	Merge branch 'main' into logos/raw/logos-module-development-guide-raw	2025-10-10 15:55:54 +02:00
AkshayaMani	36be428cdd	RFC Refactor: Sphinx Packet Format (#173 )	2025-10-05 20:21:16 -04:00
Hanno Cornelius	6672c5bedf	docs: update lamport timestamps to uint64, pegged to current time (#196 ) Lamport timestamps should remain close to current time (in milliseconds) for new joiners to be able to have their messages ordered reasonably close to other messages in the channel. This means that: - the `timestamp` field should be large enough to accommodate millisecond resolution timestamps, i.e. `uint64` (see https://github.com/vacp2p/rfc-index/pull/195 for reasoning) - the lamport timestamp should be updated before sending _each_ message to `max(timeNowInMs, current_lamport_timestamp + 1)`. The current spec only indicated that Lamport timestamps should be _initialised_ to current time, which means that the logical timestamp would soon drift from current time.	2025-10-02 14:07:29 +01:00
0xc1c4da	422b7ec3d4	Add the Notion reference for Nomos specifications (#190 ) Ideally these specifications were tracked as RFCs, but in the meantime we should have a link to the Notion. --------- Co-authored-by: Cofson <41572590+Cofson@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Jimmy Debe <91767824+jimstir@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Cofson <dimitrijevic.filip92@gmail.com>	2025-09-26 17:17:18 +02:00
Cofson	51ef4cd533	added nomos/raw/nomosda-network.md (#160 ) added nomosda-network.md dfrat file to nomos/raw folder --------- Co-authored-by: Hanno Cornelius <68783915+jm-clius@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: fryorcraken <110212804+fryorcraken@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: shash256 <111925100+shash256@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: seugu <99656002+seugu@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Ekaterina Broslavskaya <seemenkina@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Jimmy Debe <91767824+jimstir@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: kaiserd <1684595+kaiserd@users.noreply.github.com>	2025-09-25 20:15:42 +02:00
Cofson	53dfb97bc7	Created nomos/raw/sdp.md draft (#157 ) Created sdp.md draft on nomos/raw folder	2025-09-25 20:13:36 +02:00
Cofson	39d6f07d4f	added nomos/raw/nomosda-encoding.md draft (#156 ) Created nomosda-encoding.md draft on nomos/raw/ folder --------- Co-authored-by: AkshayaMani <AkshayaMani@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Jimmy Debe <91767824+jimstir@users.noreply.github.com>	2025-09-25 20:12:28 +02:00
Cofson	aa8a3b0c65	Created nomos/raw/p2p-network-bootstrapping.md draft (#175 ) Created p2p-network-bootstrapping.md draft file in nomos/raw folder	2025-09-25 20:10:51 +02:00
Cofson	cfb3b78c71	Created nomos/raw/p2p-nat-solution.md draft (#174 ) Created p2p-nat-solution.md draft file in nomos/raw folder	2025-09-25 20:08:57 +02:00
Cofson	34bbd7af90	Created nomos/raw/hardware-requirements.md file (#172 ) Created hardware-requirements.md file in nomos/raw folder	2025-09-25 20:04:03 +02:00
Cofson	a3a5b91df3	Created nomos/raw/p2p-network.md file (#169 ) Created p2p-network.md file in nomos/raw folder	2025-09-25 20:02:31 +02:00
Cofson	dda205caa5	Created logos/raw/logos-module-development-guide.md file	2025-09-25 12:44:27 +02:00
fryorcraken	b1da70386e	fix: use milliseconds for Lamport timestamp initialization (#179 ) Changed Lamport timestamp initialization from nanoseconds to milliseconds. The current time in nanoseconds exceeds JavaScript's Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER, making nanosecond precision unsuitable for JavaScript implementations. Milliseconds provide sufficient precision while remaining well within safe integer bounds for decades to come.	2025-09-15 20:23:58 +10:00
seugu	f051117d37	VAC-RAW/Consensus-hashgraphlike RFC (#142 ) This simple, scalable and decentralized consensus is for using in decentralization MLS RFC. todo: - [x] solve lints - [x] refine the RFC: adding liveness and time expiration section, also default counting silent peers (peers that dont participate the voting) - [x] add references - [x] add license - [x] first round reviewing - [x] second round reviewing - [x] last round review --------- Co-authored-by: Ekaterina Broslavskaya <seemenkina@gmail.com>	2025-09-15 10:06:24 +03:00
Jimmy Debe	3505da6bd6	sds lint fix (#177 ) Fix lint issue in sds.md	2025-08-22 14:53:34 +02:00
seugu	3b968ccce3	VAC/RAW/ ETH-MLS-OFFCHAIN RFC (#166 ) The first version of decentralized MLS (de-MLS) aka ETH-MLS-OFFCHAIN RFC. --------- Co-authored-by: Ekaterina Broslavskaya <seemenkina@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Jimmy Debe <91767824+jimstir@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: kaiserd <1684595+kaiserd@users.noreply.github.com>	2025-08-21 13:33:59 +03:00
Hanno Cornelius	536d31b5b7	docs: re-add sender ID to messages (#170 ) Re-added the concept of a participant ID and the corresponding `sender_id` field in each SDS message. This is useful to filter "self-triggered" messages as described in https://github.com/waku-org/js-waku/pull/2528 However, this will also be a necessary part of the protocol once p2p message exchange is added. --------- Co-authored-by: fryorcraken <110212804+fryorcraken@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: shash256 <111925100+shash256@users.noreply.github.com>	2025-08-19 16:38:42 +01:00
fryorcraken	4361e2958f	Add implementation recommendation for metadata (#168 ) Based on recent learnings. --------- Co-authored-by: Hanno Cornelius <68783915+jm-clius@users.noreply.github.com>	2025-07-31 12:51:04 +10:00