mirror of
https://github.com/AtHeartEngineer/upgrading-ethereum-book.git
synced 2026-01-09 21:38:07 -05:00
Address issue #1 Typo
This commit is contained in:
@@ -933,11 +933,11 @@ Quoting from Vitalik's [Discouragement Attacks paper](https://github.com/ethereu
|
||||
|
||||
Attackers might do this to gain more rewards with fewer participants in the system. Or they might do it as preparation for an attack on the chain: by reducing the number of validators they decrease their own cost of attack.
|
||||
|
||||
The paper goes into some quantitative analysis of different kinds of discouragement attacks. I would _encourage_ you to read it and think through these things. As per the conclusion:
|
||||
The paper goes into some quantitative analysis of different kinds of discouragement attacks. I would _en_courage you to read it and think through these things. As per the conclusion:
|
||||
|
||||
> In general, this is still an active area of research, and more research on counter-strategies is desired.
|
||||
|
||||
Some of areas in the beacon chain design that have already been influenced by a desire to avoid discouragement attacks are:
|
||||
Some parts of the beacon chain design that have already been influenced by a desire to avoid discouragement attacks are:
|
||||
- the [inverse square root scaling](/part2/incentives/issuance#inverse-square-root-scaling) of validator rewards;
|
||||
- the [scaling of rewards](#rewards-scale-with-participation) with participation;
|
||||
- the zeroing of attestation rewards during an [inactivity leak](/part2/incentives/inactivity); and
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user