Files
AutoGPT/autogpt_platform/CLAUDE.md
Swifty ab0b537cc7 refactor(backend): optimize find_block response size by removing raw JSON schemas (#12020)
### Changes 🏗️

The `find_block` AutoPilot tool was returning ~90K characters per
response (10 blocks). The bloat came from including full JSON Schema
objects (`input_schema`, `output_schema`) with all nested `$defs`,
`anyOf`, and type definitions for every block.

**What changed:**

- **`BlockInfoSummary` model**: Removed `input_schema` (raw JSON
Schema), `output_schema` (raw JSON Schema), and `categories`. Added
`output_fields` (compact field-level summaries matching the existing
`required_inputs` format).
- **`BlockListResponse` model**: Removed `usage_hint` (info now in
`message`).
- **`FindBlockTool._execute()`**: Now extracts compact `output_fields`
from output schema properties instead of including the entire raw
schema. Credentials handling is unchanged.
- **Test**: Added `test_response_size_average_chars_per_block` with
realistic block schemas (HTTP, Email, Claude Code) to measure and assert
response size stays under 2K chars/block.
- **`CLAUDE.md`**: Clarified `dev` vs `master` branching strategy.

**Result:** Average response size reduced from ~9,000 to ~1,300 chars
per block (~85% reduction). This directly reduces LLM token consumption,
latency, and API costs for AutoPilot interactions.

### Checklist 📋

#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
  - [x] Verified models import and serialize correctly
- [x] Verified response size: 3,970 chars for 3 realistic blocks (avg
1,323/block)
- [x] Lint (`ruff check`) and type check (`pyright`) pass on changed
files
- [x] Frontend compatibility preserved: `blocks[].name` and `count`
fields retained for `block_list` handler

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Toran Bruce Richards <toran.richards@gmail.com>
2026-02-13 11:08:51 +01:00

96 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown

# CLAUDE.md
This file provides guidance to Claude Code (claude.ai/code) when working with code in this repository.
## Repository Overview
AutoGPT Platform is a monorepo containing:
- **Backend** (`backend`): Python FastAPI server with async support
- **Frontend** (`frontend`): Next.js React application
- **Shared Libraries** (`autogpt_libs`): Common Python utilities
## Component Documentation
- **Backend**: See @backend/CLAUDE.md for backend-specific commands, architecture, and development tasks
- **Frontend**: See @frontend/CLAUDE.md for frontend-specific commands, architecture, and development patterns
## Key Concepts
1. **Agent Graphs**: Workflow definitions stored as JSON, executed by the backend
2. **Blocks**: Reusable components in `backend/backend/blocks/` that perform specific tasks
3. **Integrations**: OAuth and API connections stored per user
4. **Store**: Marketplace for sharing agent templates
5. **Virus Scanning**: ClamAV integration for file upload security
### Environment Configuration
#### Configuration Files
- **Backend**: `backend/.env.default` (defaults) → `backend/.env` (user overrides)
- **Frontend**: `frontend/.env.default` (defaults) → `frontend/.env` (user overrides)
- **Platform**: `.env.default` (Supabase/shared defaults) → `.env` (user overrides)
#### Docker Environment Loading Order
1. `.env.default` files provide base configuration (tracked in git)
2. `.env` files provide user-specific overrides (gitignored)
3. Docker Compose `environment:` sections provide service-specific overrides
4. Shell environment variables have highest precedence
#### Key Points
- All services use hardcoded defaults in docker-compose files (no `${VARIABLE}` substitutions)
- The `env_file` directive loads variables INTO containers at runtime
- Backend/Frontend services use YAML anchors for consistent configuration
- Supabase services (`db/docker/docker-compose.yml`) follow the same pattern
### Branching Strategy
- **`dev`** is the main development branch. All PRs should target `dev`.
- **`master`** is the production branch. Only used for production releases.
### Creating Pull Requests
- Create the PR against the `dev` branch of the repository.
- Ensure the branch name is descriptive (e.g., `feature/add-new-block`)
- Use conventional commit messages (see below)
- Fill out the .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md template as the PR description
- Run the github pre-commit hooks to ensure code quality.
### Reviewing/Revising Pull Requests
- When the user runs /pr-comments or tries to fetch them, also run gh api /repos/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/pulls/[issuenum]/reviews to get the reviews
- Use gh api /repos/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/pulls/[issuenum]/reviews/[review_id]/comments to get the review contents
- Use gh api /repos/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/issues/9924/comments to get the pr specific comments
### Conventional Commits
Use this format for commit messages and Pull Request titles:
**Conventional Commit Types:**
- `feat`: Introduces a new feature to the codebase
- `fix`: Patches a bug in the codebase
- `refactor`: Code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature; also applies to removing features
- `ci`: Changes to CI configuration
- `docs`: Documentation-only changes
- `dx`: Improvements to the developer experience
**Recommended Base Scopes:**
- `platform`: Changes affecting both frontend and backend
- `frontend`
- `backend`
- `infra`
- `blocks`: Modifications/additions of individual blocks
**Subscope Examples:**
- `backend/executor`
- `backend/db`
- `frontend/builder` (includes changes to the block UI component)
- `infra/prod`
Use these scopes and subscopes for clarity and consistency in commit messages.