This allows tags to be invalidated while mutations are executing, resolving an issue in this situation:
- A long-running mutation starts.
- A tag is invalidated; for example, user edits a board name, and the boards list query tag is invalidated.
- The boards list query isn't fired, and the board name isn't updated.
- The long-running mutation finishes.
- Finally, the boards list query fires and the board name is updated.
This is the "delayed" behaviour. The "immediately" behaviour has the fires requests from tag invalidation immediately, without waiting for all mutations to finish.
It may cause extra network requests and stale data if we are mutating a lot of things very quickly. I don't think it will be an issue in practice and the improved responsiveness will be a net benefit.
Fixes an issue where fields like control weight on ControlNet nodes and image on IP Adapter nodes didn't render.
These are "single or collection" fields. They accept a single input object, or collection. They are supposed to render the UI input for a single object.
In a7a71ca935 a performance optimisation for a hot code-path inadvertently broke this.
The determination of which UI component to render for a given field was done using a type guard function for the field's template. Previously, this used a zod schema to parse the template. This is very slow, especially when the template was not the expected type.
The optimization changed the type guards to check the field name (aka its type, integer, image, etc) and cardinality directly, without any zod parsing.
It's much faster, but subtly changed the behaviour because it was a bit stricter. For some fields, it rejected "single or collection" cardinalities when it should have accepted them.
When these fields - like the aforementioned Control Weight and Image - were being rendered, none of the type guards passed and they rendered nothing.
The fix here updates the type guard functions to support multiple cardinalities. So now, when we go to render a "single or collection" field, we will render the "single" input component as it should be.
On the Canvas tab, when we made the network request to enqueue a batch, we were immediately resetting the request. This effectively disabled RTKQ's tracking of the request - including the loading state.
As a result, when you click the Invoke button on the Canvas tab, it didn't show a spinner, and it was not clear that anything was happening.
The solution is simple - just await the enqueue request before resetting the tracking, same as we already did on the workflows and upscaling tabs.
I also added some extra logging messages for enqueuing, so we get the same JS console logs for each tab on success or failure.
Currently translated at 40.3% (727 of 1801 strings)
translationBot(ui): update translation (Japanese)
Currently translated at 37.7% (680 of 1801 strings)
Co-authored-by: Hiroto N <hironow365@gmail.com>
Translate-URL: https://hosted.weblate.org/projects/invokeai/web-ui/ja/
Translation: InvokeAI/Web UI
When deleting a board w/ images, the image usage checking logic was not checking image collection fields. This could result in a nonexistent image lingering in a node.
We already handle single image fields correctly, it's only the image collection fields taht were affected.
This fixes the broken readiness checks introduced in the previous commit.
To support async batch generators, all of the validation of the generators needs to be async. This is problematic because a lot of the validation logic was in redux selectors, which are necessarily synchronous.
To resolve this, the readiness checks and related logic are restructured to be run async in response to redux state changes via `useEffect` (another option is to directly subscribe to redux store). These async functions then set some react state. The checks are debounced to prevent thrashing the UI.
See #7580 for more context about this issue.
Other changes:
- Fix a minor issue where empty collections were also checked against their min and max sizes, and errors were shown for all the checks. If a collection is empty, we don't need to do the min/max checks. If a collection is empty, we skip the other min/max checks and do not report those errors to the user.
- When a field is connected, do not attempt to check its value. This fixes an issue where collection fields with a connection could erroneously appear to be invalid.
- Improved error messages for batch nodes.