Before FLUX Fill was merged, we didn't do any checks for the model variant. We always returned "normal".
To determine if a model is a FLUX Fill model, we need to check the state dict for a specific key. Initially, this logic was too strict and rejected quantized FLUX models. This issue was resolved, but it turns out there is another failure mode - some fine-tunes use a different key.
This change further reduces the strictness, handling the alternate key and also falling back to "normal" if we don't see either key. This effectively restores the previous probing behaviour for all FLUX models.
Closes#7856Closes#7859
The polynomial fit isn't perfect and we end up with alpha values of 1 instead of 0 when applying the mask. This in turn causes issues on canvas where outputs aren't 100% transparent and individual layer bbox calculations are incorrect.
Lots of squashed experimentation heh:
ci: manually specify python version in tests
ci: whoops typo in ruff cmds
ci: specify python versions for uv python install
ci: install python verbosely
ci: try forcing python preference?
ci: try forcing python preference a different way?
ci: try in a venv?
ci: it works, but try without venv
ci: oh maybe we need --preview?
ci: poking it with a stick
ci: it works, add summary to pytest output
ci: fix pytest output
experiment: simulate test failure
Revert "experiment: simulate test failure"
This reverts commit b99ca512f6e61a2a04a1c0636d44018c11019954.
ci: just use default pytest output
cI: attempt again to use uv to install python
cI: attempt again again to use uv to install python
Revert "cI: attempt again again to use uv to install python"
This reverts commit 3cba861c90738081caeeb3eca97b60656ab63929.
Revert "cI: attempt again to use uv to install python"
This reverts commit b30f2277041dc999ed514f6c594c6d6a78f5c810.
## Summary
- Extend `ModelOnDisk` with caching, type hints, default args
- Fail early if there is an error classifying a config
## Related Issues / Discussions
<!--WHEN APPLICABLE: List any related issues or discussions on github or
discord. If this PR closes an issue, please use the "Closes #1234"
format, so that the issue will be automatically closed when the PR
merges.-->
## QA Instructions
<!--WHEN APPLICABLE: Describe how you have tested the changes in this
PR. Provide enough detail that a reviewer can reproduce your tests.-->
## Merge Plan
<!--WHEN APPLICABLE: Large PRs, or PRs that touch sensitive things like
DB schemas, may need some care when merging. For example, a careful
rebase by the change author, timing to not interfere with a pending
release, or a message to contributors on discord after merging.-->
## Checklist
- [ ] _The PR has a short but descriptive title, suitable for a
changelog_
- [ ] _Tests added / updated (if applicable)_
- [ ] _Documentation added / updated (if applicable)_
- [ ] _Updated `What's New` copy (if doing a release after this PR)_
## Summary
This PR moves type definitions out of `config.py` into a new
`taxonomy.py` module.
The goal is to reduce clutter in `config.py`, and to resolve circular
import issues by isolating these types in a dedicated module with
(almost) no internal dependencies.
Because so many places import these definitions, these changes touch 73
files.
Additional changes:
- Removed star imports using "removestar" tool
- Added the commit to `.git-blame-ignore-revs` to avoid noise in git
blame history
## Related Issues / Discussions
<!--WHEN APPLICABLE: List any related issues or discussions on github or
discord. If this PR closes an issue, please use the "Closes #1234"
format, so that the issue will be automatically closed when the PR
merges.-->
## QA Instructions
<!--WHEN APPLICABLE: Describe how you have tested the changes in this
PR. Provide enough detail that a reviewer can reproduce your tests.-->
## Merge Plan
<!--WHEN APPLICABLE: Large PRs, or PRs that touch sensitive things like
DB schemas, may need some care when merging. For example, a careful
rebase by the change author, timing to not interfere with a pending
release, or a message to contributors on discord after merging.-->
## Checklist
- [ ] _The PR has a short but descriptive title, suitable for a
changelog_
- [ ] _Tests added / updated (if applicable)_
- [ ] _Documentation added / updated (if applicable)_
- [ ] _Updated `What's New` copy (if doing a release after this PR)_
