github/consensus-specs
1
1
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs.git synced 2026-02-02 01:25:16 -05:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Fix INACTIVITY_PENALTY_QUOTIENT

Browse Source 
The amount of inactivity penalty was adjusted to half since we were applying penalty for missing FFG target and source. But now we only apply it for missing target, so `INACTIVITY_PENALTY_QUOTIENT` should be `2**24`.
This commit is contained in:
Hsiao-Wei Wang
2020-04-08 10:32:16 +08:00
parent 2a36f366ef
commit c10e59bdf7
3 changed files with 6 additions and 6 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
configs/mainnet.yaml
View File

@@ -122,8 +122,8 @@ BASE_REWARD_FACTOR: 64
WHISTLEBLOWER_REWARD_QUOTIENT: 512
# 2**3 (= 8)
PROPOSER_REWARD_QUOTIENT: 8
# 2**25 (= 33,554,432)
INACTIVITY_PENALTY_QUOTIENT: 33554432
# 2**24 (= 16,777,216)
INACTIVITY_PENALTY_QUOTIENT: 16777216
# 2**5 (= 32)
MIN_SLASHING_PENALTY_QUOTIENT: 32

4
configs/minimal.yaml
View File

@@ -122,8 +122,8 @@ BASE_REWARD_FACTOR: 64
WHISTLEBLOWER_REWARD_QUOTIENT: 512
# 2**3 (= 8)
PROPOSER_REWARD_QUOTIENT: 8
# 2**25 (= 33,554,432)
INACTIVITY_PENALTY_QUOTIENT: 33554432
# 2**24 (= 16,777,216)
INACTIVITY_PENALTY_QUOTIENT: 16777216
# 2**5 (= 32)
MIN_SLASHING_PENALTY_QUOTIENT: 32

4
specs/phase0/beacon-chain.md
View File

@@ -242,10 +242,10 @@ The following values are (non-configurable) constants used throughout the specif
| `BASE_REWARD_FACTOR` | `2**6` (= 64) |
| `WHISTLEBLOWER_REWARD_QUOTIENT` | `2**9` (= 512) |
| `PROPOSER_REWARD_QUOTIENT` | `2**3` (= 8) |
| `INACTIVITY_PENALTY_QUOTIENT` | `2**25` (= 33,554,432) |
| `INACTIVITY_PENALTY_QUOTIENT` | `2**24` (= 16,777,216) |
| `MIN_SLASHING_PENALTY_QUOTIENT` | `2**5` (= 32) |
- The `INACTIVITY_PENALTY_QUOTIENT` equals `INVERSE_SQRT_E_DROP_TIME**2` where `INVERSE_SQRT_E_DROP_TIME := 2**12 epochs` (about 18 days) is the time it takes the inactivity penalty to reduce the balance of non-participating validators to about `1/sqrt(e) ~= 60.6%`. Indeed, the balance retained by offline validators after `n` epochs is about `(1 - 1/INACTIVITY_PENALTY_QUOTIENT)**(n**2/2)`; so after `INVERSE_SQRT_E_DROP_TIME` epochs, it is roughly `(1 - 1/INACTIVITY_PENALTY_QUOTIENT)**(INACTIVITY_PENALTY_QUOTIENT/2) ~= 1/sqrt(e)`.
- The `INACTIVITY_PENALTY_QUOTIENT` equals `INVERSE_SQRT_E_DROP_TIME**2` where `INVERSE_SQRT_E_DROP_TIME := 2**12` epochs (about 18 days) is the time it takes the inactivity penalty to reduce the balance of non-participating validators to about `1/sqrt(e) ~= 60.6%`. Indeed, the balance retained by offline validators after `n` epochs is about `(1 - 1/INACTIVITY_PENALTY_QUOTIENT)**(n**2/2)`; so after `INVERSE_SQRT_E_DROP_TIME` epochs, it is roughly `(1 - 1/INACTIVITY_PENALTY_QUOTIENT)**(INACTIVITY_PENALTY_QUOTIENT/2) ~= 1/sqrt(e)`.
### Max operations per block