mirror of
https://github.com/github/rails.git
synced 2026-04-26 03:00:59 -04:00
Adds :nullify option to :depends. Closes #2015 (Robby Russell)
git-svn-id: http://svn-commit.rubyonrails.org/rails/trunk@2595 5ecf4fe2-1ee6-0310-87b1-e25e094e27de
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
|
||||
*SVN*
|
||||
*SVN*
|
||||
=======
|
||||
|
||||
* :dependent now accepts :nullify option. Sets the foreign key of the related objects to NULL instead of deleting them. #2015 [Robby Russell <robby@planetargon.com>]
|
||||
|
||||
* Introduce read-only records. If you call object.readonly! then it will mark the object as read-only and raise ReadOnlyRecord if you call object.save. object.readonly? reports whether the object is read-only. Passing :readonly => true to any finder method will mark returned records as read-only. The :joins option now implies :readonly, so if you use this option, saving the same record will now fail. Use find_by_sql to work around.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -265,7 +265,9 @@ module ActiveRecord
|
||||
# * <tt>:foreign_key</tt> - specify the foreign key used for the association. By default this is guessed to be the name
|
||||
# of this class in lower-case and "_id" suffixed. So a +Person+ class that makes a has_many association will use "person_id"
|
||||
# as the default foreign_key.
|
||||
# * <tt>:dependent</tt> - if set to true all the associated object are destroyed alongside this object.
|
||||
# * <tt>:dependent</tt> - if set to :destroy (or true) all the associated objects are destroyed
|
||||
# alongside this object. Also accepts :nullify which will set the associated objects foriegn key
|
||||
# field to NULL.
|
||||
# May not be set if :exclusively_dependent is also set.
|
||||
# * <tt>:exclusively_dependent</tt> - if set to true all the associated object are deleted in one SQL statement without having their
|
||||
# before_destroy callback run. This should only be used on associations that depend solely on this class and don't need to do any
|
||||
@@ -297,13 +299,22 @@ module ActiveRecord
|
||||
|
||||
require_association_class(association_class_name)
|
||||
|
||||
if options[:dependent] and options[:exclusively_dependent]
|
||||
raise ArgumentError, ':dependent and :exclusively_dependent are mutually exclusive options. You may specify one or the other.' # ' ruby-mode
|
||||
raise ArgumentError, ':dependent and :exclusively_dependent are mutually exclusive options. You may specify one or the other.' if options[:dependent] and options[:exclusively_dependent]
|
||||
|
||||
# See HasManyAssociation#delete_records. Dependent associations
|
||||
# delete children, otherwise foreign key is set to NULL.
|
||||
elsif options[:dependent]
|
||||
module_eval "before_destroy '#{association_name}.each { |o| o.destroy }'"
|
||||
elsif options[:exclusively_dependent]
|
||||
case options[:dependent]
|
||||
when :destroy, true
|
||||
module_eval "before_destroy '#{association_name}.each { |o| o.destroy }'"
|
||||
when :nullify
|
||||
module_eval "before_destroy { |record| #{association_class_name}.update_all(%(#{association_class_primary_key_name} = NULL), %(#{association_class_primary_key_name} = \#{record.quoted_id})) }"
|
||||
when nil, false
|
||||
# pass
|
||||
else
|
||||
raise ArgumentError, 'The :dependent option expects either true, :destroy or :nullify'
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
if options[:exclusively_dependent]
|
||||
module_eval "before_destroy { |record| #{association_class_name}.delete_all(%(#{association_class_primary_key_name} = \#{record.quoted_id})) }"
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -353,7 +364,7 @@ module ActiveRecord
|
||||
# sql fragment, such as "rank = 5".
|
||||
# * <tt>:order</tt> - specify the order from which the associated object will be picked at the top. Specified as
|
||||
# an "ORDER BY" sql fragment, such as "last_name, first_name DESC"
|
||||
# * <tt>:dependent</tt> - if set to true, the associated object is destroyed when this object is. It's also destroyed if another
|
||||
# * <tt>:dependent</tt> - if set to :destroy (or true) all the associated object is destroyed when this object is. Also
|
||||
# association is assigned.
|
||||
# * <tt>:foreign_key</tt> - specify the foreign key used for the association. By default this is guessed to be the name
|
||||
# of this class in lower-case and "_id" suffixed. So a +Person+ class that makes a has_one association will use "person_id"
|
||||
@@ -386,7 +397,16 @@ module ActiveRecord
|
||||
association_constructor_method(:build, association_name, association_class_name, association_class_primary_key_name, options, HasOneAssociation)
|
||||
association_constructor_method(:create, association_name, association_class_name, association_class_primary_key_name, options, HasOneAssociation)
|
||||
|
||||
module_eval "before_destroy '#{association_name}.destroy unless #{association_name}.nil?'" if options[:dependent]
|
||||
case options[:dependent]
|
||||
when :destroy, true
|
||||
module_eval "before_destroy '#{association_name}.destroy unless #{association_name}.nil?'"
|
||||
when :nullify
|
||||
module_eval "before_destroy '#{association_name}.update_attribute(\"#{association_class_primary_key_name}\", nil)'"
|
||||
when nil, false
|
||||
# pass
|
||||
else
|
||||
raise ArgumentError, "The :dependent option expects either :destroy or :nullify."
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
# deprecated api
|
||||
deprecated_has_association_method(association_name)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -132,10 +132,11 @@ class HasOneAssociationsTest < Test::Unit::TestCase
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
def test_dependence
|
||||
num_accounts = Account.count
|
||||
firm = Firm.find(1)
|
||||
assert !firm.account.nil?
|
||||
firm.destroy
|
||||
assert_equal 1, Account.count
|
||||
firm.destroy
|
||||
assert_equal num_accounts - 1, Account.count
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
def test_succesful_build_association
|
||||
@@ -563,7 +564,7 @@ class HasManyAssociationsTest < Test::Unit::TestCase
|
||||
|
||||
# Should be destroyed since the association is exclusively dependent.
|
||||
assert Client.find_by_id(client_id).nil?
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
def test_deleting_a_item_which_is_not_in_the_collection
|
||||
force_signal37_to_load_all_clients_of_firm
|
||||
@@ -634,9 +635,26 @@ class HasManyAssociationsTest < Test::Unit::TestCase
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
def test_dependence_on_account
|
||||
assert_equal 2, Account.count
|
||||
num_accounts = Account.count
|
||||
companies(:first_firm).destroy
|
||||
assert_equal 1, Account.count
|
||||
assert_equal num_accounts - 1, Account.count
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_depends_and_nullify
|
||||
num_accounts = Account.count
|
||||
num_companies = Company.count
|
||||
|
||||
core = companies(:rails_core)
|
||||
assert_equal accounts(:rails_core_account), core.account
|
||||
assert_equal [companies(:leetsoft), companies(:jadedpixel)], core.companies
|
||||
core.destroy
|
||||
assert_nil accounts(:rails_core_account).reload.firm_id
|
||||
assert_nil companies(:leetsoft).reload.client_of
|
||||
assert_nil companies(:jadedpixel).reload.client_of
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
assert_equal num_accounts, Account.count
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
def test_included_in_collection
|
||||
@@ -658,7 +676,8 @@ class HasManyAssociationsTest < Test::Unit::TestCase
|
||||
assert firm.save, "Could not save firm"
|
||||
firm.reload
|
||||
assert_equal 1, firm.clients.length
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_replace_with_new
|
||||
firm = Firm.find(:first)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -79,10 +79,11 @@ class DeprecatedAssociationsTest < Test::Unit::TestCase
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
def test_has_one_dependence
|
||||
num_accounts = Account.count
|
||||
firm = Firm.find(1)
|
||||
assert firm.has_account?
|
||||
firm.destroy
|
||||
assert_equal 1, Account.find_all.length
|
||||
firm.destroy
|
||||
assert_equal num_accounts - 1, Account.count
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
def test_has_one_dependence_with_missing_association
|
||||
@@ -124,10 +125,10 @@ class DeprecatedAssociationsTest < Test::Unit::TestCase
|
||||
assert !Account.find(2).firm?(companies(:first_firm)), "Unknown isn't linked"
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
def test_has_many_dependence_on_account
|
||||
assert_equal 2, Account.find_all.length
|
||||
def test_has_many_dependence_on_account
|
||||
num_accounts = Account.count
|
||||
companies(:first_firm).destroy
|
||||
assert_equal 1, Account.find_all.length
|
||||
assert_equal num_accounts - 1, Account.count
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
def test_find_in
|
||||
|
||||
5
activerecord/test/fixtures/accounts.yml
vendored
5
activerecord/test/fixtures/accounts.yml
vendored
@@ -6,3 +6,8 @@ signals37:
|
||||
unknown:
|
||||
id: 2
|
||||
credit_limit: 50
|
||||
|
||||
rails_core_account:
|
||||
id: 3
|
||||
firm_id: 6
|
||||
credit_limit: 50
|
||||
|
||||
12
activerecord/test/fixtures/companies.yml
vendored
12
activerecord/test/fixtures/companies.yml
vendored
@@ -33,3 +33,15 @@ another_client:
|
||||
client_of: 4
|
||||
name: Ex Nihilo
|
||||
ruby_type: Client
|
||||
|
||||
rails_core:
|
||||
id: 6
|
||||
type: DependentFirm
|
||||
|
||||
leetsoft:
|
||||
id: 7
|
||||
client_of: 6
|
||||
|
||||
jadedpixel:
|
||||
id: 8
|
||||
client_of: 6
|
||||
8
activerecord/test/fixtures/company.rb
vendored
8
activerecord/test/fixtures/company.rb
vendored
@@ -27,6 +27,12 @@ class Firm < Company
|
||||
has_one :account, :foreign_key => "firm_id", :dependent => true
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
class DependentFirm < Company
|
||||
has_one :account, :foreign_key => "firm_id", :dependent => :nullify
|
||||
has_many :companies, :foreign_key => 'client_of', :order => "id", :dependent => :nullify
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class Client < Company
|
||||
belongs_to :firm, :foreign_key => "client_of"
|
||||
belongs_to :firm_with_basic_id, :class_name => "Firm", :foreign_key => "firm_id"
|
||||
@@ -62,4 +68,4 @@ class Account < ActiveRecord::Base
|
||||
def validate
|
||||
errors.add_on_empty "credit_limit"
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ class InheritanceTest < Test::Unit::TestCase
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
def test_inheritance_condition
|
||||
assert_equal 5, Company.count
|
||||
assert_equal 8, Company.count
|
||||
assert_equal 2, Firm.count
|
||||
assert_equal 3, Client.count
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user