mirror of
https://github.com/vacp2p/vac.dev.git
synced 2026-04-27 03:01:06 -04:00
Minor
This commit is contained in:
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ To evaluate Waku under varied conditions, we conducted simulations across a rang
|
||||
Each simulation lasted 3 hours to rreach a steady state.
|
||||
The network sizes explored included *75*, *150*, *300*, and *600* nodes.
|
||||
For non-Discv5 simulations, we used static topologies with average node degrees of *K=3*, *K=13*, and *K=50*.
|
||||
In simulations with Discv5 enabled, we set the *max_peers* parameter to *12* and *50* to approximate similar average degrees.
|
||||
In simulations with Discv5, we set the *max_peers* parameter to *12* and *50* to approximate similar average degrees.
|
||||
To stress test message throughput, we simulated message rates of *1*, *10*, and *100* messages per second.
|
||||
This combination of network sizes, topologies, message rates, and hardware configurations enabled us to comprehensively evaluate Waku's performance and scalability boundaries under diverse conditions.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -75,11 +75,11 @@ This is likely due to the additional routing information that needs to be stored
|
||||
When examining the effects on bandwidth utilization, we see varying results.
|
||||
For reception rates, with lower message rates we observe that Discv5 consistently utilizes more bandwidth than the corresponding non-Discv5 case.
|
||||
However, those differences become less pronounced with higher message rates.
|
||||
For transmission rates, both cases show similar performance and both exhibit huge improvements in transmission efficiency at higher loads (*10 msgs/s*).
|
||||
For transmission rates, both cases show similar performance and both exhibit huge improvements in transmission efficiency at higher message loads.
|
||||
|
||||
## Conclusion
|
||||
This study underscores the Waku protocol’s resilience and scalability across varied conditions, but also highlights the limitations of Wakurtosis and the need for a more robust simulation infrastructure for demanding scenarios.
|
||||
The protocol’s robustness, evidenced by the absence of message loss, notable stability across network sizes and traffic loads, is a notable takeaway.
|
||||
The addition of Discv5 leads to higher memory usage but also improves bandwidth utilization in larger networks, albeit with mixed effects depending on message rate.
|
||||
The addition of Discv5 generally leads to higher memory and bandwidth usage throughout the majority of scenarios.
|
||||
Guided by these insights, our immediate priority is to keeping studying Waku behaviour for greater scalability and performance, especially under larger network loads, high-traffic situations, and different protocol configurations.
|
||||
Stay updated with our progress!
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user