mirror of
https://github.com/vacp2p/linea-besu.git
synced 2026-01-09 21:17:54 -05:00
update maintainer rules (#2307)
Signed-off-by: Nicolas MASSART <nicolas.massart@consensys.net>
This commit is contained in:
108
MAINTAINERS.md
108
MAINTAINERS.md
@@ -40,39 +40,67 @@
|
||||
|
||||
## Becoming a Maintainer
|
||||
|
||||
Besu welcomes community contribution. Community members may progress to become a
|
||||
maintainer. To become a maintainer the following steps occur, roughly in order.
|
||||
Besu welcomes community contribution.
|
||||
Each community member may progress to become a maintainer.
|
||||
|
||||
- 5 significant changes have been authored by the proposed maintainer and
|
||||
accepted.
|
||||
There are two ways to become a maintainer:
|
||||
|
||||
- Contribute significantly to the code in this repository.
|
||||
- Contribute significantly to the doc or being recognized as great help by other contributors.
|
||||
|
||||
### Code maintainers contribution requirement
|
||||
|
||||
The requirement to be able to be proposed as a code maintainer is:
|
||||
|
||||
- 5 significant changes on code have been authored in this repos by the proposed maintainer and accepted (merged PRs).
|
||||
|
||||
### Other maintainers contribution requirement
|
||||
|
||||
The requirements to be able to be proposed as a non-code maintainer are:
|
||||
|
||||
- 5 significant changes on documentation have been authored in this repos by the proposed maintainer and accepted (merged pull-requests (PR), excluding hyperledger/besu-doc repos contribution).
|
||||
- or 5 significant support answers on official public channels that solved the user issue.
|
||||
- or being recognised as a fully involved and significant help for issue triage and assignment or roadmap planning effort and code review by other maintainers.
|
||||
There is no number defined for these criteria as the vote will decide if the criteria are valid.
|
||||
|
||||
### Maintainers approval process
|
||||
|
||||
For both types of maintainers, the following steps must occur for a contributor to be "upgraded" as a maintainer:
|
||||
|
||||
- The proposed maintainer meets the expectations for the targeted maintainership type (see [code](#code-maintainers-contribution-requirement) and [non code](#other-maintainers-contribution-requirement) types.)
|
||||
- The proposed maintainer has the sponsorship of at least one other maintainer.
|
||||
- This sponsoring maintainer will create a PR modifying the list of
|
||||
maintainers.
|
||||
- This sponsoring maintainer will create a proposal PR modifying the list of
|
||||
maintainers. (see [proposal PR template](#proposal-pr-template).)
|
||||
- The proposed maintainer accepts the nomination and expresses a willingness
|
||||
to be a long-term (more than 6 month) committer.
|
||||
- This would be a comment in the above PR.
|
||||
- This PR will be communicated in all appropriate communication channels. It
|
||||
should be mentioned in any maintainer/community call. It should also be
|
||||
posted to the appropriate mailing list or chat channels if they exist.
|
||||
to be a long-term (more than 6 month) committer by adding a comment in the proposal PR.
|
||||
- The PR will be communicated in all appropriate communication channels
|
||||
including at least [Besu Rocket Chat](https://wiki.hyperledger.org/display/BESU/Rocket+Chat),
|
||||
the [mailing list](https://lists.hyperledger.org/g/besu)
|
||||
and any maintainer/community call.
|
||||
- Approval by at least 3 current maintainers within two weeks of the proposal or
|
||||
an absolute majority of current maintainers.
|
||||
- These votes will be recorded in the PR modifying the list of maintainers.
|
||||
- No veto by another maintainer within two weeks of proposal are recorded.
|
||||
an absolute majority (half the total + 1) of current maintainers.
|
||||
- Maintainers will vote by approving the proposal PR.
|
||||
- No veto raised by another maintainer within the voting timeframe.
|
||||
- All vetoes must be accompanied by a public explanation as a comment in the
|
||||
PR for adding this maintainer
|
||||
- The explanation of the veto must be reasonable.
|
||||
- A veto can be retracted, in that case the approval/veto timeframe is reset.
|
||||
proposal PR.
|
||||
- The explanation of the veto must be reasonable and follow the [Besu code of conduct](https://wiki.hyperledger.org/display/BESU/Code+of+Conduct).
|
||||
- A veto can be retracted, in that case the voting timeframe is reset and all approvals are removed.
|
||||
- It is bad form to veto, retract, and veto again.
|
||||
- The proposed maintainer becomes a maintainer
|
||||
- Either two weeks have passed since the third approval,
|
||||
- Or an absolute majority of maintainers approve.
|
||||
- In either case, no maintainer presents a veto.
|
||||
|
||||
The proposed maintainer becomes a maintainer either:
|
||||
|
||||
- when two weeks have passed without veto since the third approval of the proposal PR,
|
||||
- or an absolute majority of maintainers approved the proposal PR.
|
||||
|
||||
In either case, no maintainer raised and stood by a veto.
|
||||
|
||||
## Removing Maintainers
|
||||
|
||||
Being a maintainer is not a status symbol or a title to be maintained
|
||||
indefinitely. It will occasionally be necessary and appropriate to move a
|
||||
maintainer to emeritus status. This can occur in the following situations:
|
||||
Being a maintainer is not a status symbol or a title to be maintained indefinitely.
|
||||
|
||||
It will occasionally be necessary and appropriate to move a maintainer to emeritus status.
|
||||
|
||||
This can occur in the following situations:
|
||||
|
||||
- Resignation of a maintainer.
|
||||
- Violation of the Code of Conduct warranting removal.
|
||||
@@ -84,9 +112,33 @@ maintainer to emeritus status. This can occur in the following situations:
|
||||
leave such as parental leave and medical leave.
|
||||
- Other unspecified circumstances.
|
||||
|
||||
Like adding a maintainer the record and governance process for moving a
|
||||
maintainer to emeritus status is recorded in the github PR making that change.
|
||||
As for adding a maintainer, the record and governance process for moving a
|
||||
maintainer to emeritus status is recorded using review approval in the PR making that change.
|
||||
|
||||
Returning to active status from emeritus status uses the same steps as adding a
|
||||
new maintainer. Note that the emeritus maintainer already has the 5 required
|
||||
significant changes as there is no contribution time horizon for those.
|
||||
new maintainer.
|
||||
|
||||
Note that the emeritus maintainer always already has the required significant contributions.
|
||||
There is no contribution prescription delay.
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposal PR template
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
I propose to add [maintainer github handle] as a Besu project maintainer.
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- for code contributors -->
|
||||
[maintainer github handle] contributed with many high quality commits:
|
||||
|
||||
- [list significant achievements]
|
||||
|
||||
Here are [their past contributions on Besu project](https://github.com/hyperledger/besu/commits?author=[user github handle]).
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- for non-code contributors -->
|
||||
[maintainer github handle] contributed with many high quality actions:
|
||||
|
||||
- [list significant actions]
|
||||
|
||||
Voting ends two weeks from today at [[insert date and time]]([link to coundtown created with some tool like https://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/create])
|
||||
|
||||
For more information on this process see the Becoming a Maintainer section in the MAINTAINERS.md file.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user