<!-- Clearly explain the need for these changes: -->
## Changes 🏗️
### Before
<img width="200" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8a8e1818-6b8c-4d86-a2b1-a474ba27a6de"
/>
### After
<img width="200" alt="Screenshot 2025-06-05 at 15 26 45"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/cc28eaeb-626b-46a8-a726-c157b2471ca9"
/>
### Adjustments
- Adjusted the padding account the menu
- Made username display on top of account name nicely
- Both username and account name will be trimmed if they are too long
`...`
## Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Login
- [x] Open account menu ( top-right )
- [x] The alignment of items is right
- [x] Long usernames are handled nicely
- [x] Username and display name don't overlap
- Fixes#10085
### Changes 🏗️
- Remove redirect from `sendResetEmail` server action
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Reset password form exits loading state after request completes
Currently, the get_graph function, with no graph version specifier will
try to fetch the latest version, and when the graph is not owned and the
latest version is not available for listing, it will return `None`
instead of picking the latest graph version available on the store.
### Changes 🏗️
Instead of using the latest graph.version to fetch the store listing,
don't provide any version filter at all and pick up whatever available
version in the store.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] CI, existing tests
- Resolves#10008
### Changes 🏗️
- Update `useSupabase` hook to propagate auth state changes
- Refresh `CredentialsProvider` whenever the user login state changes
- Add `logOut` callback to `useSupabase` hook that handles (client-side)
logout
- Remove server-side `logout` action: the Supabase reference
implementation does it client-side, and doing both causes a race
condition
Refactorings to aid implementation of the above:
- Move `@/hooks/useSupabase` -> `@/lib/supabase/useSupabase`
Other improvements:
- Clean up `login` server action based on reference implementation
- Make `BackendAPI.isAuthenticated()` more efficient and faster
- Remove unused `ProfileDropdown` component
- Improve logic and debug logging in `tests/pages/login.page.ts`
- Improve playwright test output logging
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- Log out from account (A)
- Log in to other account (B)
- Open builder, add a block for which account B has (multiple)
credentials
- [x] Credentials for account B are shown
- [x] Credentials for account A are *not* shown
**Note: do not reload the page** while going through these steps
<!-- Clearly explain the need for these changes: -->
fixed#10098
### Changes 🏗️
tells dependabot to ignore poetry
<!-- Concisely describe all of the changes made in this pull request:
-->
### Checklist 📋
N/A
Suppose we have pint with list[list[int]] type, and we want directly
insert the a new value inside the first index of the first list e.g:
list[0][0] = X through a dynamic pin, this will be translated into
list_$_0_$_0, and the system does not currently support this.
### Changes 🏗️
Add support for nested dynamic pins for list, object, and dict.
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] lots of unit tests
- [x] Tried inserting the value directly on the `value` nested field on
Google Sheets Write block.
<img width="371" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0a5e7213-b0e0-4fce-9e89-b39f7a583582"
/>
- Resolves#10041
Upgrading to Next v15 isn't trivial, but still a good idea if not simply
necessary.
### Changes 🏗️
- Upgrade Next.js from `v14.2.26` to `v15.3.2`
- Fix usage of now-async APIs `params`, `searchParams`, `headers`
([docs](https://nextjs.org/docs/app/guides/upgrading/version-15#async-request-apis-breaking-change))
- Update Next+TypeScript configs
- Set build target to ES2022 for better performance
- Unignore TypeScript build errors
- Set `hideSourceMaps: false` because OSS FTW :)
- Remove obsolete `webpack.config.js`
- Fix existing warnings/errors
- Fix Sentry missing navigation hook warning
- Fix `DYNAMIC_SERVER_USAGE` build error on `/profile` and
`/marketplace`
- Moved `getStoreData` to a proper server action `getMarketplaceData`
- Fix breaking CSS syntax error in `customnode.css`
- Use Turbopack for faster dev+test build times
- Add separate build step to frontend CI workflow: this also fixes the
test timing out if the build takes too long
Other technical improvements:
- Wrap `handleSortChange` in `MarketplaceSearchPage` in `useCallback`
- Fix typing in `ProfileInfoForm`
- Improve output of frontend tests
> [!NOTE]
> Next prints this error (in dev mode):
> ```
> Error: Route "/marketplace" used `cookies().getAll()`. `cookies()`
should be awaited before using its value. Learn more:
https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/sync-dynamic-apis
> at Object.getAll (src/lib/supabase/getServerSupabase.ts:16:31)
> at getAll (../../src/cookies.ts:115:41)
> ...
> ```
> As far as I can see, this isn't breaking, and will become a warning in
prod. See also [the Next docs about this
issue](https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/sync-dynamic-apis)
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Follow the full release QA test script
#### For configuration changes:
- [x] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
---------
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
### Changes 🏗️
#### Before
<img width="800" alt="Screenshot 2025-06-03 at 16 54 36"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2a69b69d-2b01-436e-aab3-8206485a001c"
/>
#### After
<img width="800" alt="Screenshot 2025-06-03 at 16 58 38"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4daf41d4-42ce-4119-8e9f-b2b10b524cba"
/>
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [ ] checkout this branch ( _we should have PR previews for the app and
Storybook_ )
- [ ] `cd autogpt_platform/frontend`
- [ ] `yarn storybook`
- [ ] the stories road with the right font ( Poppins ) not a serif one 😄
#### For configuration changes:
- [ ] ~~`.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my
changes~~
- [ ] ~~`docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes~~
- [ ] ~~I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)~~
## 🧢 Overview
This PR migrates the AutoGPT Platform frontend from [yarn
1](https://classic.yarnpkg.com/lang/en/) to [pnpm](https://pnpm.io/)
using **corepack** for automatic package manager management.
**yarn1** is not longer maintained and a bit old, moving to **pnpm** we
get:
- ⚡ Significantly faster install times,
- 💾 Better disk space efficiency,
- 🛠️ Better community support and maintenance,
- 💆🏽♂️ Config swap very easy
## 🏗️ Changes
### Package Management Migration
- updated [corepack](https://github.com/nodejs/corepack) to use
[pnpm](https://pnpm.io/)
- Deleted `yarn.lock` and generated new `pnpm-lock.yaml`
- Updated `.gitignore`
### Documentation Updates
- `frontend/README.md`:
- added comprehensive tech stack overview with links
- updated all commands to use pnpm
- added corepack setup instructions
- and included migration disclaimer for yarn users
- `backend/README.md`:
- Updated installation instructions to use pnpm with corepack
- `AGENTS.md`:
- Updated testing commands from yarn to pnpm
### CI/CD & Infrastructure
- **GitHub Workflows** :
- updated all jobs to use pnpm with corepack enable
- cleaned FE Playwright test workflow to avoid Sentry noise
- **Dockerfile**:
- updated to use pnpm with corepack, changed lock file reference, and
updated cache mount path
### 📋 Checklist
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
**Test Plan:**
> assuming you are on the `frontend` folder
- [x] Clean installation works: `rm -rf node_modules && corepack enable
&& pnpm install`
- [x] Development server starts correctly: `pnpm dev`
- [x] Build process works: `pnpm build`
- [x] Linting and formatting work: `pnpm lint` and `pnpm format`
- [x] Type checking works: `pnpm type-check`
- [x] Tests run successfully: `pnpm test`
- [x] Storybook starts correctly: `pnpm storybook`
- [x] Docker build succeeds with new pnpm configuration
- [x] GitHub Actions workflow passes with pnpm commands
#### For configuration changes:
- [x] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [x] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [x] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
This hotfix adds a GitHub Actions workflow to automate deployment and
undeployment of platform PRs to the development environment through
repository dispatch events.
### Changes 🏗️
- **Added new GitHub Actions workflow**:
`.github/workflows/platform-dev-deploy-event-dispatcher.yml`
- Handles `\!deploy` and `\!undeploy` comment commands on PRs
- Implements permission checks (only owners, members, and collaborators
can deploy)
- Automatically undeploys when PRs are closed with active deployments
- Dispatches events to the cloud infrastructure repository for actual
deployment/undeployment
- Provides user feedback through GitHub comments
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Verify workflow triggers on PR comment creation
- [x] Test permission validation for unauthorized users
- [x] Confirm `\!deploy` command dispatches correct event payload
- [x] Confirm `\!undeploy` command dispatches correct event payload
- [x] Test auto-undeploy on PR closure with active deployment
- [x] Verify appropriate GitHub comments are posted for each action
#### For configuration changes:
- [x] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
- [x] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
- [x] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
**Configuration changes:**
- Requires `DISPATCH_TOKEN` secret to be configured for repository
dispatch to cloud infrastructure repo
- Workflow uses `issues: write` and `pull-requests: write` permissions
Now, SendWebRequestBlock can upload files. To make this work, we also
need to improve the UI rendering on the key-value pair input so that it
can also render media/file upload.
### Changes 🏗️
* Add file multipart upload support for SendWebRequestBlock
* Improve key-value input UI rendering to allow rendering any types as a
normal input block (it was only string & number).
<img width="381" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b41d778d-8f9d-4aec-95b6-0b32bef50e89"
/>
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
- [x] Test running http request block, othe key-value pair input block
<!-- Clearly explain the need for these changes: -->
This PR adds a new internal block, **AI Image Editor**, which enables
**text-based image editing** via BlackForest Labs’ Flux Kontext models
on Replicate. This block allows users to input a prompt and optionally a
reference image, and returns a transformed image URL. It supports two
model variants (Pro and Max), with different cost tiers. This
functionality will enhance multimedia capabilities across internal agent
workflows and support richer AI-powered image manipulation.
---
### Changes 🏗️
* Added `FluxKontextBlock` in `backend/blocks/flux_kontext.py`
* Uses `ReplicateClient` to call Flux Kontext Pro or Max models
* Supports inputs for `prompt`, `input_image`, `aspect_ratio`, `seed`,
and `model`
* Outputs transformed image URL or error
* Added credit pricing logic for Flux Kontext models to
`block_cost_config.py`:
* Pro: 10 credits
* Max: 20 credits
* Added documentation for the new block at
`docs/content/platform/blocks/flux_kontext.md`
* Updated block index at `docs/content/platform/blocks/blocks.md` to
include Flux Kontext
---
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
* [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
* [x] I have made a test plan
* [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
<!-- Put your test plan here: -->
* [x] Prompt-only input generates an image
* [x] Prompt with image applies edit correctly
* [x] Image respects specified aspect ratio
* [x] Invalid image URL returns helpful error
* [x] Using the same seed gives consistent output
* [x] Output chaining works: result URI can be used in downstream blocks
* [x] Output from Max model shows higher fidelity than Pro
<details>
<summary>Example test plan</summary>
* [x] Create from scratch and execute an agent using Flux Kontext with
at least 3 blocks
* [x] Import agent with Flux Kontext from file upload, and confirm
execution
* [x] Upload agent (with Flux Kontext block) to marketplace (internal
test)
* [x] Import agent from marketplace and confirm correct execution
* [x] Edit agent with Flux Kontext block from monitor and confirm output
</details>
#### For configuration changes:
* [x] `.env.example` is updated or already compatible with my changes
* [x] `docker-compose.yml` is updated or already compatible with my
changes
* [x] I have included a list of my configuration changes in the PR
description (under **Changes**)
* No new environment variables or services introduced
<details>
<summary>Examples of configuration changes</summary>
* N/A
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: Zamil Majdy <zamil.majdy@agpt.co>
This PR adds a comprehensive system requirements section to the
README.md file. Currently, users don't have clear guidance on the
hardware, software, and network requirements needed to run AutoGPT. This
addition will help users determine if their system is capable of running
AutoGPT before attempting installation.
- Resolves#10050
### Changes 🏗️
- Added new "System Requirements" section under "How to Setup for
Self-Hosting" with:
- Hardware Requirements
- CPU specifications (4+ cores)
- RAM requirements (8GB min, 16GB recommended)
- Storage requirements (10GB minimum)
- Software Requirements
- Supported Operating Systems
- Required software with minimum versions
- Development tools requirements
- Network Requirements
- Internet connectivity requirements
- Port access information
- HTTPS connection requirements
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
- [x] I have made a test plan
- [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
- [x] Verified README.md renders correctly on GitHub
- [x] Confirmed all formatting is consistent
- [x] Validated all requirements are accurate
- [x] Checked section placement is logical
- [x] Ensured no other files are modified
#### For configuration changes:
- [x] Not applicable - This PR only contains documentation changes to
README.md
- [x] No configuration files are modified in this update
Co-authored-by: Bently <Github@bentlybro.com>
<!-- Clearly explain the need for these changes: -->
We removed the linked video because out of date so unlink it
### Changes 🏗️
<!-- Concisely describe all of the changes made in this pull request:
-->
Comment out video segment until new one posted
### Checklist 📋
#### For code changes:
- [x] no code changes made
Moves the `getBlockType` function from the SearchList component to the
`utils.ts` file to make it more reusable. Also removes the unused
`creators` state and `setCreators` function from the
BlockMenuContext and instead calculates the creators list dynamically
within the FilterSheet component based on the available search data.
Adds functionality to add Marketplace agents to the user's library and then to builder.
Includes a loading indicator while the agent is being added.
Refactors agent-to-block conversion into a utility function.
This commit adds the ability to add Agent blocks to the
flow. Clicking on an agent in the My Agents menu will add
it to the flow. The block includes the necessary
information such as input/output schemas.
