mirror of
https://github.com/privacy-scaling-explorations/pse.dev.git
synced 2026-01-09 06:08:03 -05:00
Merge pull request #612 from privacy-ethereum/feature/px-user-survey
Add PX User Survey
This commit is contained in:
@@ -451,6 +451,51 @@ const rehypeProcessBrTags = () => {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const rehypeStyleAside = () => {
|
||||
return (tree: any) => {
|
||||
const visit = (node: any) => {
|
||||
if (node.type === "element" && node.tagName === "aside") {
|
||||
if (!node.properties) {
|
||||
node.properties = {}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!node.properties.className) {
|
||||
node.properties.className = []
|
||||
}
|
||||
const classes = Array.isArray(node.properties.className)
|
||||
? node.properties.className
|
||||
: [node.properties.className]
|
||||
node.properties.className = [
|
||||
...classes,
|
||||
"my-6",
|
||||
"p-4",
|
||||
"rounded-lg",
|
||||
"bg-tuatara-50",
|
||||
"dark:bg-tuatara-900",
|
||||
"border-l-4",
|
||||
"border-anakiwa-500",
|
||||
"dark:border-anakiwa-400",
|
||||
"[&>p]:text-tuatara-700",
|
||||
"dark:[&>p]:text-tuatara-200",
|
||||
"[&>p]:my-2",
|
||||
"[&>ul]:text-tuatara-700",
|
||||
"dark:[&>ul]:text-tuatara-200",
|
||||
"[&>ul]:my-2",
|
||||
"[&>strong]:text-tuatara-900",
|
||||
"dark:[&>strong]:text-tuatara-100",
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (node.children) {
|
||||
node.children.forEach(visit)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return node
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return visit(tree)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const CodeBlock = ({
|
||||
className,
|
||||
children,
|
||||
@@ -953,7 +998,11 @@ export const Markdown = ({
|
||||
...components,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const rehypePlugins = [rehypeRaw as any, rehypeProcessBrTags as any]
|
||||
const rehypePlugins = [
|
||||
rehypeRaw as any,
|
||||
rehypeProcessBrTags as any,
|
||||
rehypeStyleAside as any,
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
setContent([
|
||||
<ReactMarkdown
|
||||
@@ -972,7 +1021,11 @@ export const Markdown = ({
|
||||
<ReactMarkdown
|
||||
key="fallback"
|
||||
skipHtml={false}
|
||||
rehypePlugins={[rehypeRaw as any, rehypeProcessBrTags as any]}
|
||||
rehypePlugins={[
|
||||
rehypeRaw as any,
|
||||
rehypeProcessBrTags as any,
|
||||
rehypeStyleAside as any,
|
||||
]}
|
||||
components={{
|
||||
...REACT_MARKDOWN_CONFIG(darkMode),
|
||||
...components,
|
||||
|
||||
394
content/articles/px-user-survey-2025.md
Normal file
394
content/articles/px-user-survey-2025.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,394 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "Privacy Experience User Survey"
|
||||
description: "This report extends our prior qualitative research with a user survey on the current state of privacy on Ethereum, including how people perceive, trust, and adopt privacy tools."
|
||||
date: "2026-01-08"
|
||||
authors:
|
||||
- "Privacy Experience"
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- privacy
|
||||
- user experience
|
||||
- privacy experience
|
||||
image: "/articles/privacy-experience-report/privacy-experience-report.webp"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
This quantitative survey (75 respondents) builds directly on our earlier **qualitative research on privacy experience on Ethereum** ([Link to the qualitative report](https://pse.dev/blog/privacy-experience-report)), which identified seven core themes shaping how users perceive, trust, and adopt privacy tools. This report should be read as a continuation of that work: the survey was designed to **test, validate, and size those qualitative hypotheses** across a broader and more diverse set of experienced Ethereum users.
|
||||
|
||||
**Key takeaways at a glance:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Privacy is non-negotiable, but current solutions fall short.**
|
||||
- Privacy importance is rated **high (3.3 / 4)**, while satisfaction is **low (1.7 / 4)**.
|
||||
- Users are moderately confident today (**2.4 / 4**) but pessimistic about the future (**1.9 / 4**).
|
||||
- **The adoption gap is driven by experience failures, not lack of interest.**
|
||||
- **86%** of respondents have abandoned a privacy flow at least once.
|
||||
- The top blocker is **complexity and usability (58%)**, far outweighing cost or regulation.
|
||||
- **Active privacy tools are widely tried, but rarely habitual.**
|
||||
- Tools requiring manual steps (mixers, stealth addresses, shielded pools) have **~70% reach** but only **~15–17% habitual use**.
|
||||
- Passive or background tools (private mempools, RPCs) reach fewer users but are **significantly stickier**.
|
||||
- **Users strongly prefer privacy by default.**
|
||||
- **73%** prefer systems that are *private by default with an option to share*.
|
||||
- “Missing in my wallet” is a top blocker, pointing to the need for wallet-native privacy.
|
||||
- **Trust depends on verifiability and clarity, not branding.**
|
||||
- The strongest trust signals are **open-source code (61%)**, clear documentation and architecture (~46%), and **transaction previews/simulations (52%)**.
|
||||
- Social proof and marketing rank much lower.
|
||||
- **Trade-offs reveal clear limits.**
|
||||
- Users are willing to trade **time** (69% will wait a few extra minutes) and tolerate limited extra steps.
|
||||
- They resist **higher fees, network switching, and compatibility breaks**, which sharply reduce adoption.
|
||||
- **Confidence does not equal capability.**
|
||||
- Segmentation shows that even highly capable users frequently abandon privacy flows.
|
||||
- The *low confidence / high capability* group exhibits the **highest abandonment (~90%)**, highlighting verification anxiety and mental model gaps as critical issues.
|
||||
|
||||
The findings reinforce a central conclusion from the qualitative phase: **the gap in privacy adoption is not caused by lack of interest, but by experience failures**. Users overwhelmingly consider privacy *very important*, yet remain dissatisfied with current solutions. Complexity, unclear guarantees, and verification anxiety dominate abandonment, while a strong majority prefer **privacy by default** rather than opt-in flows.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 0. Who This Survey Represents
|
||||
|
||||
Before interpreting the results, it is important to clarify **who these findings describe**.
|
||||
|
||||
This survey reflects a highly experienced, technically skewed Ethereum audience:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Total responses:** 75
|
||||
- **Ethereum tenure:** 92% have been involved for **3+ years**; 15% for **9+ years**
|
||||
- **Activity level:** ~50% interact with Ethereum daily; another ~30% weekly
|
||||
- **Roles:** Developers, researchers, and security professionals make up over half of respondents
|
||||
|
||||
This context matters. If privacy tools are frequently abandoned or misunderstood by this group, the usability barrier for less experienced users is likely significantly higher.
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Clarity of Privacy Scope: High Importance, Low Confidence
|
||||
|
||||
<aside>
|
||||
|
||||
**💬 Qualitative themes referenced:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Theme 1: Clarity of privacy scope
|
||||
- Theme 5: Verification anxiety
|
||||
- Theme 7: Educational & mental model gaps
|
||||
|
||||
**Qualitative hypothesis:** Users believe they understand what is private on-chain, but struggle to accurately identify what is hidden, visible, or still inferable.
|
||||
</aside>
|
||||
|
||||
**Quantitative results:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Importance of privacy:** **3.3 / 4** (High)
|
||||
- **Satisfaction with current privacy:** **1.7 / 4** (Low, net dissatisfied)
|
||||
- **Confidence in current privacy guarantees:** **2.4 / 4** (Moderate)
|
||||
- **Confidence privacy will remain intact in the future:** **1.9 / 4** (Low)
|
||||
|
||||
Despite high experience levels, confidence remains limited. Users care deeply about privacy, but do not feel secure that they understand or can rely on existing protections.
|
||||
|
||||
**Interpretation:** This validates the qualitative finding that privacy tools fail to clearly communicate scope. Users are not rejecting privacy, they are uncertain what they are actually getting.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Motivation: Privacy as Control, Not Secrecy
|
||||
|
||||
<aside>
|
||||
|
||||
**💬 Qualitative themes referenced:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Theme 6:** Context-specific motivation
|
||||
|
||||
**Qualitative hypothesis:** Privacy is primarily about control and selective disclosure, not anonymity for its own sake.
|
||||
|
||||
</aside>
|
||||
|
||||
**Quantitative results (free-text + ranking):**
|
||||
|
||||
Users consistently frame privacy as:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Control:** choosing what is revealed, to whom, and when
|
||||
- **Freedom:** a digital extension of fundamental rights
|
||||
- **Security hygiene:** protection against scams, extortion, profiling, and physical risk
|
||||
|
||||
**Top motivations:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. Personal safety & security (~60%)
|
||||
2. Anti-profiling / identity separation (~55%)
|
||||
3. Asset and balance protection (~50%)
|
||||
|
||||
**Top perceived risks:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Targeted attacks and scams
|
||||
- Loss of funds or access
|
||||
- Surveillance by governments or large platforms
|
||||
|
||||
**Interpretation:** The survey confirms that privacy demand is principled and pragmatic, not ideological or fringe, aligning directly with qualitative insights.
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Usage: Widely Tried, Rarely Habitual
|
||||
|
||||
<aside>
|
||||
|
||||
**💬 Qualitative themes referenced:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Theme 3:** Technical friction
|
||||
- **Theme 4:** Usability and defaults
|
||||
|
||||
**Qualitative hypothesis:** Active, multi-step privacy tools introduce friction that prevents habitual use.
|
||||
|
||||
</aside>
|
||||
|
||||
**Quantitative results:**
|
||||
|
||||
A clear pattern emerges:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Active tools** (stealth addresses, mixers, shielded pools) have **high reach (≈70%)** but **low habitual use (≈15–17%)**
|
||||
- **Passive or infrastructure tools** (private mempools, RPCs) have lower reach (~50%) but higher daily usage (~23%)
|
||||
|
||||
| **Tool Category** | **Reach** | **Habit** | **Usage** |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| **Stealth / One-time Addresses** | **73%** (54 users) | 15% (11 users) | Wide but Sporadic |
|
||||
| **Mixers or Privacy Pools** | **70%** (52 users) | 17% (13 users) | Wide but Sporadic |
|
||||
| **Shielded Pools** | **69%** (51 users) | 17% (13 users) | Wide but Sporadic |
|
||||
| **ZK Identity / Proofs** | 68% (50 users) | 16% (12 users) | Wide but Sporadic |
|
||||
| **Private Mempools / MEV** | 68% (50 users) | **23%** (17 users) | Stickier |
|
||||
| **Private Voting** | 59% (44 users) | 9% (7 users) | Sporadic |
|
||||
| **Private L2s / Rollups** | 57% (42 users) | 13% (10 users) | Moderate |
|
||||
| **Private Relayers** | 54% (40 users) | 9% (7 users) | Sporadic |
|
||||
| **Private / Custom RPCs** | 51% (38 users) | **23%** (17 users) | Niche Stickier |
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
**Interpretation:** The moment privacy requires users to leave their normal flow, usage drops sharply. Privacy that runs in the background is more likely to stick.
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Technical Friction: Usability Is the Primary Blocker
|
||||
|
||||
<aside>
|
||||
|
||||
**💬 Qualitative themes referenced:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Theme 3:** Technical friction
|
||||
- **Theme 5:** Verification anxiety
|
||||
|
||||
**Qualitative hypothesis:** Complexity and lack of clarity outweigh cost or regulation as adoption barriers.
|
||||
|
||||
</aside>
|
||||
|
||||
**Quantitative results:**
|
||||
|
||||
Top blockers:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Complex or hard to use:** 58% (43 votes)
|
||||
- High gas costs: 32% (24 votes)
|
||||
- Regulatory uncertainty: 31% (23 votes)
|
||||
- Missing in wallet or favorite dapps: 30% (22 votes)
|
||||
|
||||
Additional signals:
|
||||
|
||||
- **~86%** of respondents have abandoned a privacy flow at least once
|
||||
- Top reasons: confusion and uncertainty about safety
|
||||
- The most requested feature **with 74% of all users**, is to **have private sends as default** in existing wallets
|
||||
|
||||
**User quotes**
|
||||
|
||||
- *"I need a switch in my wallet to turn on private mode."*
|
||||
- *"Unclear what it would do... Unsure the tool was safe."*
|
||||
- *"Native wallet support for stealth addresses... making privacy seamless like HTTPS."*
|
||||
|
||||
**Interpretation:** This strongly confirms the qualitative finding that privacy UX is fragile. Abandonment is the norm, not the exception.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Trade-offs: Time Is Acceptable, Workflow Breakage Is Not
|
||||
|
||||
<aside>
|
||||
|
||||
**💬 Qualitative themes referenced:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Theme 3:** Technical friction
|
||||
- **Theme 6:** Context-specific motivation
|
||||
|
||||
**Qualitative hypothesis:** Users are willing to trade speed for privacy, but not cost or workflow disruption.
|
||||
|
||||
</aside>
|
||||
|
||||
Users are willing to trade **time**, but not **cost or workflow disruption**:
|
||||
|
||||
- 69% will wait a few minutes longer
|
||||
- 53% accept 2–3 extra screens
|
||||
- Only ~25% accept higher fees or network switching
|
||||
|
||||
| **Trade-off** | **Votes** | **Percentage** | **Verdict** |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| **Wait up to a few minutes longer** | **47** | **69.1%** | **😍 Highly Acceptable** |
|
||||
| 2–3 extra confirmations or screens | 36 | 52.9% | 🙂 Acceptable |
|
||||
| Using a separate wallet or account | 26 | 38.2% | 😐 Borderline |
|
||||
| Signing multiple transactions | 18 | 26.5% | ☹️ High Friction |
|
||||
| Switching to a different network or L2 | 18 | 26.5% | ☹️ High Friction |
|
||||
| Pay up to ~5% more in fees | 17 | 25.0% | ☹️ High Friction |
|
||||
| Lower compatibility with some dapps | 8 | 11.8% | 😡 Unacceptable |
|
||||
| Withdrawal delays up to 1 day | 8 | 11.8% | 😡 Unacceptable |
|
||||
| Fixed deposit/withdrawal sizes | 6 | 8.8% | 😡 Unacceptable |
|
||||
|
||||
**Interpretation:** Privacy can be slower, but it must remain affordable and integrated into existing workflows.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Trust & Verification: Don’t Trust, Verify (But Make It Legible)
|
||||
|
||||
<aside>
|
||||
|
||||
**💬 Qualitative themes referenced:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Theme 2:** Trust transparency
|
||||
- **Theme 5:** Verification anxiety
|
||||
|
||||
**Qualitative hypothesis:** Users want verifiable guarantees, but struggle to interpret technical proofs without clear UX support.
|
||||
|
||||
</aside>
|
||||
|
||||
**Quantitative results:**
|
||||
|
||||
Top trust signals (See appendix 3 for the full table):
|
||||
|
||||
- Open-source code (61%)
|
||||
- Clear docs and architecture explanations (~46%)
|
||||
- Transaction previews/simulations (52%)
|
||||
|
||||
Social proof and branding rank significantly lower.
|
||||
|
||||
| **Top 5 Trust Factors** | **Votes** | **Percentage** |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| **Open-source code** | **45** | **60.8%** |
|
||||
| Clear docs on how it works | 34 | 45.9% |
|
||||
| Transparent architecture | 34 | 45.9% |
|
||||
| Clear explanation of trade-offs | 34 | 45.9% |
|
||||
| Referrals or endorsements from trusted people | 20 | 27.0% |
|
||||
|
||||
**Interpretation:** Users want verification, but only if it is surfaced in human-readable ways. Trust must be designed into the interface, not outsourced to reputation.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Confidence vs Capability: Why Adoption Fails Even for Experts
|
||||
|
||||
<aside>
|
||||
|
||||
**💬 Qualitative themes referenced:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Theme 3:** Technical friction
|
||||
- **Theme 5:** Verification anxiety
|
||||
- **Theme 7:** Educational & mental model gaps
|
||||
|
||||
**Qualitative hypothesis:** Capability does not guarantee confidence; experienced users still hesitate without clear confirmation and mental models.
|
||||
|
||||
</aside>
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
To synthesize multiple themes, we segmented users by **confidence** and **capability**:
|
||||
|
||||
- **High confidence / High capability (36.5%):** still abandon flows ~70% of the time
|
||||
- **High confidence / Low capability (31.1%):** optimism without practice
|
||||
- **Low confidence / High capability (13.5%):** *highest abandonment (~90%)* and lowest trust
|
||||
- **Low confidence / Low capability (18.9%)**
|
||||
|
||||
**Interpretation:** Technical skill does not eliminate anxiety. The most capable users are often the most cautious, reinforcing that adoption failure is driven by unclear guarantees and weak mental models, not lack of education.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Synthesis: What Quantative + Qualitative Together Tell Us
|
||||
|
||||
Across both research phases, the same story repeats:
|
||||
|
||||
- Privacy demand is high and principled
|
||||
- Satisfaction and confidence are low
|
||||
- Friction and ambiguity dominate behavior
|
||||
- Defaults, previews, and clarity matter more than cryptographic sophistication alone
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Actionable Recommendations (Community Invitation)
|
||||
|
||||
This research points to challenges that cannot be solved by any single team or protocol. We see these recommendations as **invitations to the Ethereum community** (wallet teams, protocol developers, UX designers, researchers, and educators) to collaborate on improving the privacy experience together.
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Wallet-native privacy primitives**
|
||||
- Private send / receive as first-class wallet features
|
||||
- Shared UX patterns for privacy presets (e.g., Quick Private, Maximum Privacy)
|
||||
2. **Standardized privacy scope visualization**
|
||||
- Community-aligned patterns for showing what is hidden, visible, and inferable
|
||||
- Reusable components for transaction privacy previews and confirmations
|
||||
3. **Confidence-building UX patterns**
|
||||
- Sandbox or test modes for private transactions
|
||||
- Progressive disclosure designs that support anxious power users
|
||||
4. **Shared trust and verification standards**
|
||||
- Common transparency checklists (open source, architecture, simulations)
|
||||
- Consistent terminology across wallets and dapps
|
||||
5. **Passive-by-default privacy infrastructure**
|
||||
- MEV protection, private RPCs, and address hygiene as defaults
|
||||
- Tooling that works without requiring behavior changes
|
||||
6. **Context-aware privacy design**
|
||||
- Prioritize financial and identity-linked actions first
|
||||
- Explore programmable privacy for compliance-friendly use cases
|
||||
|
||||
We invite builders and researchers to experiment with these directions, share learnings, and help define what “usable privacy” should look like on Ethereum.
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Make privacy native:** integrate private sends and protections directly into wallets
|
||||
2. **Expose privacy scope clearly:** show what is hidden, visible, and inferable
|
||||
3. **Add previews and confirmations:** reduce verification anxiety
|
||||
4. **Design for anxious power users:** sandbox modes, progressive disclosure, safe defaults
|
||||
5. **Standardize trust signals:** consistent transparency across tools
|
||||
6. **Favor passive protections:** private infrastructure as default
|
||||
7. **Respect context:** prioritize financial and identity-linked actions
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Conclusion
|
||||
|
||||
This quantitative survey validates, and strengthens our earlier published qualitative findings. Privacy on Ethereum is not failing because users do not care, but because **the experience does not meet the psychological requirements of trust, clarity, and confidence**.
|
||||
|
||||
Solving privacy adoption is therefore not only a cryptographic challenge, but a **design and UX challenge**. Addressing this gap is the fastest path to making privacy usable, trusted, and ultimately normal on Ethereum.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Appendix
|
||||
|
||||
### Qualitative Themes and How We Tested Them Quantitatively
|
||||
|
||||
| **Theme** | **Hypothesis (based on interview insights)** | **Purpose of Testing It** |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| **1. Clarity of privacy scope** | Users believe they know what’s private on-chain, but in reality, most cannot accurately identify what data is visible or protected. | Measure how well people actually understand privacy boundaries. |
|
||||
| **2. Trust transparency** | Users place more trust in *brands* (e.g., Flashbots, Railgun) than in *verifiable proofs* (e.g., audits or on-chain evidence). | Quantify how trust forms: social vs technical trust. |
|
||||
| **3. Technical friction** | Complex setup and multi-step flows (extra wallets, ENS, signatures) are major barriers, even for technically skilled users. | Assess how much friction affects adoption intent. |
|
||||
| **4. Usability and defaults** | Users assume privacy settings are enabled by default, and rarely change them manually. | Confirm the behavioral gap between assumption and action. |
|
||||
| **5. Verification anxiety** | Lack of clear confirmations or test environments causes users to hesitate or limit fund size in private transactions. | Measure confidence thresholds and safety needs. |
|
||||
| **6. Context-specific motivation** | Privacy priorities depend on context: users care most in financial or identity-linked actions, less in social or governance contexts. | Rank contexts by perceived privacy need. |
|
||||
| **7. Educational & mental model gaps** | Even experienced users struggle to explain how privacy tech (e.g., stealth addresses, shielded pools) actually works. | Measure comprehension and need for educational support. |
|
||||
|
||||
### Blockers when using on-chain privacy tools
|
||||
|
||||
| **Blocker** | **Votes** | **Percentage** |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| **Complex or hard to use** | **43** | **58%** |
|
||||
| High gas or transaction costs | 24 | 32% |
|
||||
| Regulatory or policy uncertainty | 23 | 31% |
|
||||
| Missing in my wallet or favorite dapps | 22 | 30% |
|
||||
| Too few people use it / Privacy feels weak | 20 | 27% |
|
||||
| Hard to verify what is private | 15 | 20% |
|
||||
| Security concerns (e.g. fear of hacks) | 13 | 17% |
|
||||
| Doesn’t work the same across apps or chains | 11 | 15% |
|
||||
| My activity does not feel sensitive enough | 8 | 10% |
|
||||
| I want onchain reputation (airdrops, social graph) | 7 | 9% |
|
||||
| Social stigma or reputation risk | 4 | 5% |
|
||||
| Other | 6 | 8% |
|
||||
|
||||
### Trust factors when using on-chain privacy tools
|
||||
|
||||
| **Trust Factor** | **Votes** | **Percentage** |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| **Open-source code** | **45** | **60.8%** |
|
||||
| Clear docs on how it works | 34 | 45.9% |
|
||||
| Transparent architecture | 34 | 45.9% |
|
||||
| Clear explanation of trade-offs | 34 | 45.9% |
|
||||
| Referrals or endorsements from trusted people | 20 | 27.0% |
|
||||
| Logical in-app UX with info and context | 19 | 25.7% |
|
||||
| Widely used in production and time-tested | 18 | 24.3% |
|
||||
| Strong security practices (bug bounties) | 16 | 21.6% |
|
||||
| Independent audits | 16 | 21.6% |
|
||||
| Clear website/language explaining function | 16 | 21.6% |
|
||||
| Reproducible builds | 14 | 18.9% |
|
||||
| Clear changelogs | 14 | 18.9% |
|
||||
| Verifiable releases and contracts | 14 | 18.9% |
|
||||
| Transparent team identity and track record | 10 | 13.5% |
|
||||
| Verified listings on reputable directories | 1 | 1.4% |
|
||||
|
||||
### Open data
|
||||
|
||||
We are sharing the full, anonymized survey responses so anyone can analyze the results and draw their own conclusions. The CSV includes all questions and raw answers. Feel free to remix, chart, or join with your own data.
|
||||
- [Download the dataset](/articles/privacy-experience-report/px-user-survey-2025-results.csv).
|
||||
BIN
public/articles/privacy-experience-report/px-confidence.png
Normal file
BIN
public/articles/privacy-experience-report/px-confidence.png
Normal file
Binary file not shown.
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 1.6 MiB |
BIN
public/articles/privacy-experience-report/px-usage.png
Normal file
BIN
public/articles/privacy-experience-report/px-usage.png
Normal file
Binary file not shown.
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 99 KiB |
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
|
||||
Pick the role that best describes you,Where you are primarily based,Which wallet(s) you use most often,How long you have been actively involved with Ethereum,How often you interact with Ethereum,What you primarily use Ethereum for,"How confident you feel using wallets, signing, and using dapps",Which statements match your typical behavior,What does privacy mean to you?,Your main reasons for using privacy tools.,"Have you used any privacy tools (e.g. VPNs, encrypted email/messenger) before?","Have you used any onchain privacy tools (e.g. Tornado Cash, Railgun, Zcash) before?",How important transaction privacy is to you when using Ethereum,Your overall satisfaction with the current level of privacy available on Ethereum today,How confident you are what is private and what is not when using privacy on Ethereum,How confident you are that what is private will remain private in the future,Your trust in the tools or methods you use for privacy on Ethereum,Which factors most influence your trust in using privacy tools,Which in-app signals would help you feel more confident and safe,How often you use each category of privacy tools | Mixers or privacy pools,How often you use each category of privacy tools | Shielded pools or transactions,How often you use each category of privacy tools | Stealth or one-time addresses,How often you use each category of privacy tools | ZK identity or selective disclosure proofs,How often you use each category of privacy tools | Private or anonymous voting,How often you use each category of privacy tools | Private relayers or paymasters,How often you use each category of privacy tools | Private mempools or MEV-protected order flows,How often you use each category of privacy tools | Private L2/rollups focused on privacy,How often you use each category of privacy tools | Private read mode or custom/private RPCs,Which onchain privacy tools do you use most (be specific),How often you use other privacy tools | VPN,How often you use other privacy tools | Tor,How often you use other privacy tools | Encrypted messaging (e.g. Signal),How often you use other privacy tools | Password manager,How often you use other privacy tools | Hardware security key (e.g. YubiKey),How often you use other privacy tools | Private or hardened browser profile,How often you use other privacy tools | Ad/tracker blockers,How often you use other privacy tools | Email aliases or burner emails,How often you use other privacy tools | Encrypted storage,How often you use other privacy tools | Encrypted DNS,What stops you most from using privacy tools today,What stops you most from using privacy tools today,Have you ever abandoned a privacy app before using or finishing the flow?,"If yes, why?",What your biggest risks are when transacting on Ethereum,Which trade-offs are acceptable for you when using privacy features,Where you would expect to turn on privacy,"Do you prefer transparency by default with an option to go private, or privacy by default with an option to share",How important is it that your main wallet includes clear privacy controls,How likely are you to switch if another wallet offers clearly better privacy,Which of these would help you use privacy tools more,Which of these would help you use privacy tools more,"What’s one thing you’d change, fix, or add to increase adoption of privacy on Ethereum",What privacy use cases or projects are you most excited about?,Any other feedback you like to share
|
||||
Developer,Europe,"Rabby,Rainbow,Gnosis Safe",9+ years,Daily,"Finance, payments and transfers,NFTs, art, collectibles, memberships, etc.,Running nodes or infrastructure",Very confident,"I rely on wallet security alerts and blocklists,I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I decode and read what I am signing,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I avoid linking social profiles to my active addresses,I use a hardware wallet as my primary signer,I use social recovery or a recovery setup I trust,I use a multisig or smart account",It's important,"Personal safety and security,Avoid profiling, doxxing, or unwanted linking,Reduce data trails across apps and services",Yes,Yes,Very important,Not at all satisfied,Somewhat confident,Somewhat confident,Some trust,"Widely used in production and time-tested,Transparent team identity and track record,Open-source code","Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs,Integrated test networks,Linked verified contracts and release notes",Weekly,Monthly,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Never,Never,Monthly,Never,"Privacy Pools, Payy",Daily,Rarely,Daily,Daily,Rarely,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Never,"Missing in my wallet or favorite dapps,Too few people use it, so privacy feels weak,Security concerns",,Sometimes,"Unclear what it would do,Unsure the tool was safe or trustworthy,Needed new wallet/account or setup I didn’t want","Physical targeting or extortion risk,Permanent onchain records that cannot be undone,Contract exploits or protocol hacks","2–3 extra confirmations or screens,Switching to a different network or L2,Lower compatibility with some dapps or tools",In my wallet,"Private by default, option to share",Very important,Likely,"Private send in wallets,Private L2s focused on privacy,Selective disclosure proofs",,Native private transfers ,Aztec,
|
||||
Product,East Asia,MetaMask,3-5 years,Daily,"Finance, payments and transfers,Work, salary or payroll,Education and learning",Somewhat confident,"I rely on wallet security alerts and blocklists,I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I decode and read what I am signing,I simulate or dry run transactions before sending,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I avoid linking social profiles to my active addresses,I use a multisig or smart account",Something important but we don’t usually think about until something goes wrong,"Personal safety and security,Keep balances, income, or holdings confidential,Avoid profiling, doxxing, or unwanted linking",Yes,Yes,Very important,Satisfied,Somewhat confident,Somewhat confident,Trust,"Referrals or endorsements from trusted people or orgs,Widely used in production and time-tested,Transparent team identity and track record","Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs,Onboarding with in-app documentation and tips,Integrated test networks",Never,Never,Monthly,Rarely,Never,Never,Never,Rarely,Never,Fluidkey,Daily,Never,Daily,Daily,Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,"Complex or hard to use,Too few people use it, so privacy feels weak,My activity does not feel sensitive enough",,Sometimes,"Unclear what it would do,Unsure the tool was safe or trustworthy,Took too long or got stuck","Losing funds or access,Metadata leakage (IP, RPC, browser, mempool),Social or reputation risk","Wait up to a few minutes longer,2–3 extra confirmations or screens,Signing multiple transactions","I do not care where, I just want it to work","Public by default, option to go private",Important,Very likely,"Private send in wallets,Private identity and attestations,Selective disclosure proofs",,Better UX and story,,
|
||||
Ethereum user,East Asia,"MetaMask,Other",3-5 years,Weekly,"Finance, payments and transfers,DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking,NFTs, art, collectibles, memberships, etc.",Very confident,"I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I avoid linking social profiles to my active addresses,I use a hardware wallet as my primary signer,I rotate addresses or refresh accounts periodically",,,Yes,Yes,Very important,Not at all satisfied,Not at all confident,Not at all confident,Trust,"Clear docs on how it works, architecture, and trade-offs,Referrals or endorsements from trusted people or orgs,Open-source code",,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,Rarely,None,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Rarely,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Rarely,"Complex or hard to use,High gas or transaction costs,Doesn’t work the same across apps or chains",,Rarely,Unclear what the benefits were,"Physical targeting or extortion risk,Deanonymization later by chain analysis,Metadata leakage (IP, RPC, browser, mempool)","2–3 extra confirmations or screens,Signing multiple transactions,Using a separate wallet or account",In my wallet,"Private by default, option to share",Very important,Very likely,"Private send in wallets,Private stablecoins,Privacy-preserving RPC and network routing",,Privacy on L1,Kohaku ,
|
||||
Security,South America,MetaMask,3-5 years,Weekly,"Finance, payments and transfers,DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking,Work, salary or payroll",Somewhat confident,"I rely on wallet security alerts and blocklists,I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I decode and read what I am signing,I review token approvals and revoke them regularly,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I use a hardware wallet as my primary signer,I use social recovery or a recovery setup I trust",Anarquism,"Personal safety and security,Avoid profiling, doxxing, or unwanted linking,Prevent targeting, scams, or front-running",Yes,Yes,Very important,Satisfied,Confident,Confident,Some trust,"Clear docs on how it works, architecture, and trade-offs,Transparent team identity and track record,Open-source code","Transaction preview or simulation before sending,Integrated test networks,Linked audits or a security page",Monthly,Weekly,Never,Rarely,Rarely,Never,Never,Never,Never,"Monero, tornado",Daily,Weekly,Weekly,Weekly,Never,Daily,Daily,Never,,,"Complex or hard to use,High gas or transaction costs,Regulatory or policy uncertainty",,Rarely,"Unclear what it would do,Unclear what the benefits were,Took too long or got stuck","Losing funds or access,Targeted attacks, scams, or phishing","Pay up to ~5% more in fees,Wait up to a few minutes longer,Switching to a different network or L2",In my network or connection settings,"Private by default, option to share",Important,Likely,"Private send in wallets,Private messaging,Private L2s focused on privacy",,Easy use,Privacy pools,I hate goverments
|
||||
Developer,Europe,"MetaMask,Other",6-8 years,Daily,"Finance, payments and transfers,DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking",Confident,"I rely on wallet security alerts and blocklists,I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I decode and read what I am signing",Freedom ,"Personal safety and security,Keep balances, income, or holdings confidential,Avoid profiling, doxxing, or unwanted linking",Yes,Yes,Very important,Somewhat satisfied,Confident,Not at all confident,Some trust,Clear website and language that explains what it does,"Onboarding with in-app documentation and tips,Linked audits or a security page,Linked verified contracts and release notes",Rarely,Rarely,Daily,Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,Fluidkey ,Daily,Rarely,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Monthly,"Complex or hard to use,High gas or transaction costs,Missing in my wallet or favorite dapps",,Rarely,,"Losing funds or access,Targeted attacks, scams, or phishing,Contract exploits or protocol hacks",Lower compatibility with some dapps or tools,In my wallet,"Private by default, option to share",Very important,Very likely,"Verifiable in-App privacy labels, audits, and reputation badges",,Keystore ,Privacy pools tò break traceability ,
|
||||
Community builder,Africa,"MetaMask,Zerion",6-8 years,Daily,"NFTs, art, collectibles, memberships, etc.,Identity, like ENS, Passports, etc.,Education and learning",Very confident,"I review token approvals and revoke them regularly,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I use a hardware wallet as my primary signer",,"Personal safety and security,Avoid profiling, doxxing, or unwanted linking,Keep work and personal activity separate",No,Yes,Very important,Somewhat satisfied,Very confident,Confident,Strong trust,"Clear website and language that explains what it does,Referrals or endorsements from trusted people or orgs,Transparent team identity and track record","Clear instructions and confirmation prompts,Transaction preview or simulation before sending",Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,,,,,,,,,,,,Complex or hard to use,,,,,,,,,,"Private send in wallets,Private identity and attestations,Private messaging",,Education and Ethereum Communities Focus,,
|
||||
Education,Southeast Asia,"MetaMask,Rabby,Gnosis Safe",6-8 years,Weekly,"Finance, payments and transfers,DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking,Identity, like ENS, Passports, etc.",Not at all confident,"I rely on wallet security alerts and blocklists,I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I use a multisig or smart account",very important,"Personal safety and security,Keep balances, income, or holdings confidential,Avoid profiling, doxxing, or unwanted linking",Yes,Yes,Important,Not at all satisfied,Not at all confident,Somewhat confident,Some trust,"Clear docs on how it works, architecture, and trade-offs,Open-source code,Independent audits","Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs,Linked audits or a security page,Linked verified contracts and release notes",Rarely,Rarely,Never,Rarely,Never,Never,Never,Rarely,Never,tornado cash,Monthly,Rarely,Rarely,Daily,Weekly,Weekly,Never,Rarely,Never,Never,"Complex or hard to use,High gas or transaction costs,Regulatory or policy uncertainty",,Sometimes,"Unclear what it would do,Fees or deposits required up front,Unsure the tool was safe or trustworthy","Losing funds or access,Contract exploits or protocol hacks,Legal or policy issues","Wait up to a few minutes longer,2–3 extra confirmations or screens,Switching to a different network or L2",In my wallet,"Private by default, option to share",Important,Likely,"Private send in wallets,Private stablecoins,Private identity and attestations",,i need a switch on wallet to turn on private mode,like tornado cash but much cheaper and easy to use,
|
||||
Product,Europe,"MetaMask,Rabby,Gnosis Safe",6-8 years,Daily,"Finance, payments and transfers,Identity, like ENS, Passports, etc.,DAOs and governance",Confident,"I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I avoid linking social profiles to my active addresses,I use a hardware wallet as my primary signer,I rotate addresses or refresh accounts periodically,I use a multisig or smart account",Freedom to choose what becomes public,"Personal safety and security,Avoid profiling, doxxing, or unwanted linking,Avoid censorship and keep freedom to transact",Yes,Yes,Important,Satisfied,Confident,Somewhat confident,Some trust,"Clear docs on how it works, architecture, and trade-offs,Transparent team identity and track record,Open-source code","Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs,Transaction preview or simulation before sending,Proofs or logs you can copy or share if you need to prove something later",Never,Rarely,Weekly,Rarely,Rarely,Weekly,Weekly,Rarely,Weekly,Fluidkey,Daily,Rarely,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Missing in my wallet or favorite dapps,,Rarely,Fees or deposits required up front,"Metadata leakage (IP, RPC, browser, mempool),Government or big-tech surveillance and misuse of data,Permanent onchain records that cannot be undone","Wait up to a few minutes longer,Switching to a different network or L2,Using a separate wallet or account",Inside the app I am using,"Private by default, option to share",Very important,Very likely,"Private send in wallets,Private governance and voting,Selective disclosure proofs",,Make it a default,Neptune Cash,Wishing you the best with these new efforts
|
||||
Developer,East Asia,"MetaMask,OKX wallet",6-8 years,Monthly,"Finance, payments and transfers,Work, salary or payroll",Somewhat confident,"I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming",a way to earn money ,"Personal safety and security,Avoid profiling, doxxing, or unwanted linking,Avoid censorship and keep freedom to transact",Yes,Yes,Somewhat important,Somewhat satisfied,Somewhat confident,Somewhat confident,No trust at all,"Clear docs on how it works, architecture, and trade-offs,Verifiable releases and contracts, reproducible builds, and clear changelogs","Trusted badge or reputation labels,Proofs or logs you can copy or share if you need to prove something later",Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,,Daily,,,Daily,,,,,,,Other,,,,,,,,,,"Privacy-preserving RPC and network routing,Privacy risk and monitoring dashboards",,I learn zk ,,
|
||||
Researcher,East Asia,"MetaMask,Other",1-2 years,Rarely,"Finance, payments and transfers,Work, salary or payroll",Somewhat confident,"I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I avoid linking social profiles to my active addresses",everything,"Personal safety and security,Keep balances, income, or holdings confidential,Avoid censorship and keep freedom to transact",Yes,No,Somewhat important,Not at all satisfied,Somewhat confident,Confident,No trust at all,"Clear docs on how it works, architecture, and trade-offs,Widely used in production and time-tested,Open-source code","Clear instructions and confirmation prompts,Transaction preview or simulation before sending,Proofs or logs you can copy or share if you need to prove something later",Rarely,Monthly,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Monthly,Never,Never,,Daily,,Weekly,Daily,Rarely,Rarely,Daily,Daily,Daily,Monthly,"Complex or hard to use,Too few people use it, so privacy feels weak,Hard to verify what is private",,Sometimes,"Too many steps or signatures,Unclear what it would do,Took too long or got stuck","Government or big-tech surveillance and misuse of data,Contract exploits or protocol hacks,Social or reputation risk","Wait up to a few minutes longer,Signing multiple transactions,Switching to a different network or L2",Inside the app I am using,"Private by default, option to share",Important,Very likely,"Private send in wallets,Private messaging,Private governance and voting",,none,none,yes
|
||||
Researcher,Europe,"MetaMask,Gnosis Safe",3-5 years,Daily,"Finance, payments and transfers,DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking",Somewhat confident,"I rely on wallet security alerts and blocklists,I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I review token approvals and revoke them regularly","LINDDUN, i.e. a i see it from the perspective of privacy harms that LINDDUN is an acronym for.","Keep balances, income, or holdings confidential,Avoid profiling, doxxing, or unwanted linking,Meet local policies or regulations",Yes,Yes,Very important,Not at all satisfied,Not at all confident,Not at all confident,No trust at all,"Widely used in production and time-tested,Strong security practices: active bug bounties, and policies,Verifiable releases and contracts, reproducible builds, and clear changelogs","Transaction preview or simulation before sending,Linked audits or a security page,Linked verified contracts and release notes",Monthly,Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,,Monthly,Rarely,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Never,"Regulatory or policy uncertainty,Missing in my wallet or favorite dapps,Security concerns",,Often,"Too many steps or signatures,Unclear what it would do,Unclear what the benefits were","Losing funds or access,Targeted attacks, scams, or phishing","Signing multiple transactions,Using a separate wallet or account,Withdrawal delays up to 1 day",In my wallet,"Private by default, option to share",Very important,Very likely,"Private send in wallets,Private stablecoins,Private identity and attestations",,"Actually talk about privacy. Even this form is mostly about security. Not a single person in PSE knows what privacy even is. I have talked with many of them. Literally no clue. Sad. At least hire a single expert, please.",,
|
||||
Developer,South Asia,MetaMask,3-5 years,Monthly,"DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking,NFTs, art, collectibles, memberships, etc.,Education and learning",Confident,"I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I decode and read what I am signing,I simulate or dry run transactions before sending,I review token approvals and revoke them regularly,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties",,"Personal safety and security,Avoid profiling, doxxing, or unwanted linking,Prevent targeting, scams, or front-running",Yes,No,Important,Somewhat satisfied,Somewhat confident,Somewhat confident,Trust,"Logical in-app UX with info and context,Clear docs on how it works, architecture, and trade-offs,Open-source code","Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs,Onboarding with in-app documentation and tips,Linked audits or a security page",Never,Never,Never,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Monthly,Rarely,,Monthly,Rarely,Rarely,Weekly,Rarely,Monthly,Daily,Rarely,Weekly,Rarely,"Complex or hard to use,High gas or transaction costs,Regulatory or policy uncertainty",,,,,,On Ethereum itself,,Important,Very likely,"Private send in wallets,Private identity and attestations,Private messaging",,NA,,
|
||||
Marketing or Growth,Europe,"Rabby,Coinbase wallet,Gnosis Safe",3-5 years,Daily,"Finance, payments and transfers,DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking,Running nodes or infrastructure",Confident,"I rely on wallet security alerts and blocklists,I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I review token approvals and revoke them regularly",,"Personal safety and security,Avoid profiling, doxxing, or unwanted linking,Avoid censorship and keep freedom to transact",Yes,Yes,Important,Not at all satisfied,Not at all confident,Not at all confident,Some trust,"Clear website and language that explains what it does,Widely used in production and time-tested,Open-source code","Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs",Rarely,Never,Rarely,Monthly,Monthly,Never,Monthly,Rarely,Never,,Daily,Rarely,Daily,Daily,Never,Monthly,Daily,Monthly,Daily,Weekly,"Complex or hard to use,Social stigma or reputation risk,Other",,Sometimes,"Unclear what it would do,Needed new wallet/account or setup I didn’t want,Took too long or got stuck","Losing funds or access,Targeted attacks, scams, or phishing,Government or big-tech surveillance and misuse of data","Pay up to ~5% more in fees,Wait up to a few minutes longer","I do not care where, I just want it to work","Private by default, option to share",Very important,Likely,"Private stablecoins,Private identity and attestations,Private messaging",,More EF support to teams working in privacy tech,,
|
||||
Other,Europe,"Rabby,Trust wallet",6-8 years,Daily,"Finance, payments and transfers,DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking,Education and learning",Very confident,I rely on wallet security alerts and blocklists,decentraliz,"Personal safety and security,Keep balances, income, or holdings confidential,Avoid censorship and keep freedom to transact",Yes,Yes,Somewhat important,Satisfied,Confident,Somewhat confident,Trust,"Clear website and language that explains what it does,Logical in-app UX with info and context,Open-source code","Clear instructions and confirmation prompts,Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs,Transaction preview or simulation before sending",Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,Rarely,Monthly,Never,https://quilibrium.com/,Daily,,Daily,,,,Daily,,Daily,Daily,"Complex or hard to use,Regulatory or policy uncertainty,Security concerns",,Often,"Unclear what it would do,Unclear what the benefits were,Fees or deposits required up front","Deanonymization later by chain analysis,Metadata leakage (IP, RPC, browser, mempool),Government or big-tech surveillance and misuse of data","Wait up to a few minutes longer,2–3 extra confirmations or screens,Using a separate wallet or account",On Ethereum itself,"Private by default, option to share",Somewhat important,Likely,"Private send in wallets,Private messaging,Verifiable in-App privacy labels, audits, and reputation badges",,A PEER-TO-PEER MPC PLATFORM AS A SERVICE,https://quilibrium.com/quilibrium.pdf,
|
||||
Researcher,East Asia,Rabby,3-5 years,Weekly,"DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking,Running nodes or infrastructure,Education and learning",Not at all confident,"I rely on wallet security alerts and blocklists,I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I review token approvals and revoke them regularly,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I connect through my own node or a custom RPC",,"Personal safety and security,Keep balances, income, or holdings confidential,Avoid censorship and keep freedom to transact",Yes,Yes,Important,Not at all satisfied,Somewhat confident,Somewhat confident,Some trust,"Clear docs on how it works, architecture, and trade-offs,Widely used in production and time-tested,Verifiable releases and contracts, reproducible builds, and clear changelogs","Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs,Transaction preview or simulation before sending,Linked audits or a security page",Rarely,Weekly,Monthly,Rarely,Never,Never,Weekly,Rarely,Weekly,,Daily,,Daily,Daily,Never,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Rarely,"High gas or transaction costs,Regulatory or policy uncertainty,Too few people use it, so privacy feels weak",,Sometimes,Fees or deposits required up front,Government or big-tech surveillance and misuse of data,"Wait up to a few minutes longer,2–3 extra confirmations or screens,Using a separate wallet or account",,"Private by default, option to share",Very important,Very unlikely,"Private send in wallets,Private stablecoins,Encrypted mempools or private order flow",,encrypted mempool,Every ether transfer id mixed and untraceable natively. ,
|
||||
Developer,Europe,"MetaMask,Other",9+ years,Monthly,"DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking,DAOs and governance,Donations, charities and public goods",Very confident,"I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I avoid linking social profiles to my active addresses,I rotate addresses or refresh accounts periodically,I connect through my own node or a custom RPC",Being able to choice what I share and to who I share it with,"Personal safety and security,Keep balances, income, or holdings confidential,Avoid censorship and keep freedom to transact",Yes,Yes,Very important,Not at all satisfied,Not at all confident,Not at all confident,Some trust,"Open-source code,Strong security practices: active bug bounties, and policies,Verifiable releases and contracts, reproducible builds, and clear changelogs","Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs,Linked verified contracts and release notes,Proofs or logs you can copy or share if you need to prove something later",Daily,Daily,Weekly,Daily,Daily,Rarely,Rarely,Never,Never,"I want to use privacy tools I can interact with that go beyond defi, like privacy for generic compute etc",,Daily,Daily,Daily,,Daily,Daily,Daily,Never,Daily,"High gas or transaction costs,Missing in my wallet or favorite dapps,Hard to verify what is private",,Sometimes,"Too many steps or signatures,Unsure the tool was safe or trustworthy,Took too long or got stuck","Physical targeting or extortion risk,Government or big-tech surveillance and misuse of data,Permanent onchain records that cannot be undone","2–3 extra confirmations or screens,Signing multiple transactions,Fixed deposit/withdrawal sizes",Inside the app I am using,"Private by default, option to share",Very important,Very likely,"Private send in wallets,Private L2s focused on privacy,Encrypted mempools or private order flow",,Make developer tooling and fund and help privacy projects such as shield dot markets stay alive . Make developers aware of these tools,Privacy beyond defi also indistinguishable obfuscation ,"Keep making developers tools, pse should fund more grants to team etc"
|
||||
Developer,Central America,"Rabby,Other",6-8 years,Monthly,"Finance, payments and transfers,DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking,Work, salary or payroll",Somewhat confident,"I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I avoid linking social profiles to my active addresses,I use a hardware wallet as my primary signer",,,Yes,No,Somewhat important,Not at all satisfied,Somewhat confident,Somewhat confident,Some trust,"Clear docs on how it works, architecture, and trade-offs,Open-source code,Independent audits","Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs,Integrated test networks,Proofs or logs you can copy or share if you need to prove something later",Monthly,Rarely,Rarely,Weekly,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Monthly,Monthly,ZKP,Weekly,Monthly,Daily,Daily,Rarely,Rarely,Daily,Rarely,Daily,Rarely,"Complex or hard to use,Regulatory or policy uncertainty,Too few people use it, so privacy feels weak",,Sometimes,"Too many steps or signatures,Unclear what it would do,Fees or deposits required up front","Losing funds or access,Targeted attacks, scams, or phishing,Government or big-tech surveillance and misuse of data","Wait up to a few minutes longer,2–3 extra confirmations or screens,Signing multiple transactions",In my wallet,"Private by default, option to share",Important,Very likely,"Private send in wallets,Private identity and attestations,Private governance and voting",,Grandma test pasable UX,ZKPassport,"Good job, keep going!! "
|
||||
Ethereum user,Europe,Other,6-8 years,Daily,"DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking,Running nodes or infrastructure",Very confident,"I review token approvals and revoke them regularly,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I avoid linking social profiles to my active addresses,I use a hardware wallet as my primary signer,I use social recovery or a recovery setup I trust,I connect through my own node or a custom RPC,I use a multisig or smart account",Being able to take any action I want to take without it being linked back to me,"Personal safety and security,Avoid profiling, doxxing, or unwanted linking,Reduce data trails across apps and services",Yes,Yes,Important,Not at all satisfied,Not at all confident,Somewhat confident,Trust,"Clear docs on how it works, architecture, and trade-offs,Open-source code,Strong security practices: active bug bounties, and policies",Transaction preview or simulation before sending,Rarely,Rarely,Never,Rarely,Never,Rarely,Never,Never,Weekly,Railgun,Monthly,Weekly,Rarely,Daily,Weekly,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Rarely,"High gas or transaction costs,Too few people use it, so privacy feels weak",,Rarely,,"Deanonymization later by chain analysis,Metadata leakage (IP, RPC, browser, mempool),Permanent onchain records that cannot be undone","Pay up to ~5% more in fees,Wait up to a few minutes longer,Switching to a different network or L2",In my network or connection settings,"Private by default, option to share",Somewhat important,Very likely,"Private send in wallets,Privacy-preserving RPC and network routing",,Verifiable RPC privacy and unlinkability,Aztec,
|
||||
Product,Europe,"MetaMask,Coinbase wallet,Rainbow",3-5 years,Daily,"Finance, payments and transfers,DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking,Identity, like ENS, Passports, etc.",Confident,"I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I simulate or dry run transactions before sending,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I use a hardware wallet as my primary signer",,"Personal safety and security,Keep balances, income, or holdings confidential",Yes,Yes,Very important,Not at all satisfied,Somewhat confident,Not at all confident,No trust at all,"Logical in-app UX with info and context,Independent audits,Strong security practices: active bug bounties, and policies","Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs,Integrated test networks,Linked audits or a security page",Weekly,Rarely,Rarely,Monthly,Rarely,Never,Never,Monthly,Never,,Weekly,Rarely,Daily,Daily,Rarely,Rarely,Daily,Daily,Daily,Weekly,"Complex or hard to use,Too few people use it, so privacy feels weak",,Sometimes,Unsure the tool was safe or trustworthy,"Targeted attacks, scams, or phishing,Deanonymization later by chain analysis,Tools breaking, being blocked, or delisted",,In my wallet,"Private by default, option to share",Very important,Very likely,"Private send in wallets,Private identity and attestations,Privacy risk and monitoring dashboards",,Privacy Dashboard,,
|
||||
Researcher,North America,"MetaMask,Coinbase wallet,Argent",6-8 years,Weekly,"Finance, payments and transfers,DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking,NFTs, art, collectibles, memberships, etc.",Confident,None of the above,Personally speaking: a lot. On-chain: nothing. Because I really dislike the state of on-chain privacy. ,"Keep balances, income, or holdings confidential",Yes,Yes,Somewhat important,Not at all satisfied,Very confident,Confident,No trust at all,"Clear docs on how it works, architecture, and trade-offs,Referrals or endorsements from trusted people or orgs,Open-source code","Clear instructions and confirmation prompts,Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs",Rarely,Monthly,Monthly,Rarely,Weekly,Never,Never,Never,Never,On Ethereum: none. I use zcash shielded addresses otherwise. ,Weekly,Rarely,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Monthly,Monthly,Rarely,Complex or hard to use,,Sometimes,"Too many steps or signatures,Needed new wallet/account or setup I didn’t want","Losing funds or access,Contract exploits or protocol hacks","Pay up to ~5% more in fees,Wait up to a few minutes longer","I do not care where, I just want it to work","Public by default, option to go private",Somewhat important,Unlikely,Private send in wallets,,"It's very hard to create new privacy protocols because of the fact that a wallet address has to pay for gas in the first place. Relayers, etc are not the solution. There needs to be a better mechanism to allow users to interact privately with the smart contracts that can provide privacy. Account abstraction isn't the solution either because people have been talking about it for years and there's almost nothing to show on that front.","Projects: Starknet (Private stwo proving), Intmax & Enygma (Rayls). Use cases: private DEXes & AMMs",
|
||||
Ethereum user,North America,"MetaMask,Rabby,Rainbow",9+ years,Daily,"DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking",Confident,"I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I avoid linking social profiles to my active addresses,I use a hardware wallet as my primary signer",Non-kyc,"Keep balances, income, or holdings confidential,Avoid profiling, doxxing, or unwanted linking,Avoid censorship and keep freedom to transact",Yes,Yes,Very important,Not at all satisfied,Somewhat confident,Somewhat confident,Some trust,"Clear docs on how it works, architecture, and trade-offs,Open-source code,Independent audits","Clear instructions and confirmation prompts,Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs,Transaction preview or simulation before sending",Never,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,,Daily,Monthly,Weekly,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Weekly,Weekly,Weekly,"Missing in my wallet or favorite dapps,Security concerns,Doesn’t work the same across apps or chains",,Sometimes,Unsure the tool was safe or trustworthy,"Losing funds or access,Metadata leakage (IP, RPC, browser, mempool),Tools breaking, being blocked, or delisted","Wait up to a few minutes longer,2–3 extra confirmations or screens,Using a separate wallet or account",In my network or connection settings,"Private by default, option to share",Important,Likely,"Private send in wallets,Privacy-preserving RPC and network routing,Encrypted mempools or private order flow",,Market makers providing more private asset liquidity in defi,"Defi, social/messaging",
|
||||
Developer,South Asia,"MetaMask,Rainbow,Other",3-5 years,Weekly,"Finance, payments and transfers,Work, salary or payroll",Somewhat confident,"I rely on wallet security alerts and blocklists,I decode and read what I am signing,I review token approvals and revoke them regularly,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I rotate addresses or refresh accounts periodically",,"Keep balances, income, or holdings confidential",Yes,Yes,Important,Not at all satisfied,Confident,Somewhat confident,Trust,"Logical in-app UX with info and context,Widely used in production and time-tested,Independent audits","Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs,Transaction preview or simulation before sending,Linked verified contracts and release notes",Rarely,Rarely,Monthly,Never,Rarely,Never,Never,Never,Never,Nada,Daily,Rarely,Daily,Daily,Rarely,Rarely,Weekly,Monthly,Rarely,Rarely,"High gas or transaction costs,Missing in my wallet or favorite dapps,Doesn’t work the same across apps or chains",,Rarely,Unclear what it would do,"Targeted attacks, scams, or phishing,Tools breaking, being blocked, or delisted,Contract exploits or protocol hacks",Wait up to a few minutes longer,In my wallet,"Public by default, option to go private",Important,Likely,"Private send in wallets,Selective disclosure proofs,Other",Private interoperable receive,Right now there are too many experiments. Either pick a winner or make things interoperable.,Curvy v2 and interoperable privacy ,
|
||||
Ethereum user,North America,"MetaMask,Coinbase wallet",3-5 years,Daily,"Finance, payments and transfers,DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking,Identity, like ENS, Passports, etc.",Confident,"I rely on wallet security alerts and blocklists,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties",Sovereignty and Agency,"Keep balances, income, or holdings confidential,Avoid censorship and keep freedom to transact,Reduce data trails across apps and services",Yes,No,Important,Not at all satisfied,Confident,Somewhat confident,Trust,"Referrals or endorsements from trusted people or orgs,Open-source code","Clear instructions and confirmation prompts,Transaction preview or simulation before sending,Trusted badge or reputation labels",Never,Never,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Railgun if ux improves,Weekly,Never,Monthly,Weekly,Never,Never,Monthly,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,"Missing in my wallet or favorite dapps,Too few people use it, so privacy feels weak,Hard to verify what is private",,Never,,"Losing funds or access,Targeted attacks, scams, or phishing,Contract exploits or protocol hacks","Wait up to a few minutes longer,Switching to a different network or L2,Using a separate wallet or account","I do not care where, I just want it to work","Public by default, option to go private",Important,Likely,"Private send in wallets,Private identity and attestations,Private messaging",,Ease like private browser,Shielding balances,Railgun has potential
|
||||
Ethereum user,East Asia,"Rabby,OKX wallet",6-8 years,Weekly,"Finance, payments and transfers,DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking,NFTs, art, collectibles, memberships, etc.",Confident,"I rely on wallet security alerts and blocklists,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties","Privacy, to me, is the right to have a part of yourself that is not for sale, not for surveillance, not for optimization, and not for anyone else’s convenience.","Keep balances, income, or holdings confidential,Avoid profiling, doxxing, or unwanted linking,Prevent targeting, scams, or front-running",No,No,Somewhat important,Somewhat satisfied,Not at all confident,Somewhat confident,Some trust,"Clear website and language that explains what it does,Clear docs on how it works, architecture, and trade-offs,Widely used in production and time-tested","Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs,Onboarding with in-app documentation and tips,Linked audits or a security page",Never,Never,Monthly,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Never,Never,,,Rarely,Rarely,Monthly,Monthly,Rarely,Rarely,Never,Never,Never,"Complex or hard to use,Regulatory or policy uncertainty,Social stigma or reputation risk",,Rarely,"Unclear what the benefits were,Fees or deposits required up front,Unsure the tool was safe or trustworthy","Losing funds or access,Targeted attacks, scams, or phishing,Contract exploits or protocol hacks","Switching to a different network or L2,Using a separate wallet or account,Withdrawal delays up to 1 day","I do not care where, I just want it to work","Private by default, option to share",Somewhat important,Unlikely,"Private stablecoins,Selective disclosure proofs,Privacy risk and monitoring dashboards",,Users can choose whether or not to fully disclose their transaction records,,
|
||||
Researcher,East Asia,OKX wallet,1-2 years,Weekly,Education and learning,Not at all confident,"I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I avoid linking social profiles to my active addresses,I use a hardware wallet as my primary signer",,"Keep balances, income, or holdings confidential",Yes,No,Somewhat important,Somewhat satisfied,Not at all confident,Somewhat confident,Trust,"Clear docs on how it works, architecture, and trade-offs,Widely used in production and time-tested,Open-source code","Clear instructions and confirmation prompts,Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs,Transaction preview or simulation before sending",Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Never,Never,zk,Daily,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Monthly,Monthly,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,"Complex or hard to use,Too few people use it, so privacy feels weak",,Sometimes,"Too many steps or signatures,Unclear what the benefits were,Unsure the tool was safe or trustworthy","Losing funds or access,Targeted attacks, scams, or phishing,Government or big-tech surveillance and misuse of data","Signing multiple transactions,Switching to a different network or L2,Using a separate wallet or account",Inside the app I am using,"Public by default, option to go private",Somewhat important,Very likely,"Private identity and attestations,Private governance and voting,Encrypted mempools or private order flow",,i don‘t know,noon,noon
|
||||
Ethereum user,South Asia,"MetaMask,Gnosis Safe,OKX wallet",6-8 years,Daily,"Finance, payments and transfers,DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking,NFTs, art, collectibles, memberships, etc.",Confident,"I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I avoid linking social profiles to my active addresses,I use a multisig or smart account",,"Personal safety and security,Keep balances, income, or holdings confidential,Avoid profiling, doxxing, or unwanted linking",Yes,Yes,Somewhat important,Somewhat satisfied,Confident,Confident,Trust,"Logical in-app UX with info and context,Open-source code,Strong security practices: active bug bounties, and policies","Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs",Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Ethereum,Daily,,Daily,,,,,,,,Missing in my wallet or favorite dapps,,Sometimes,"Unsure the tool was safe or trustworthy,Needed new wallet/account or setup I didn’t want","Metadata leakage (IP, RPC, browser, mempool)","Wait up to a few minutes longer,Signing multiple transactions,Using a separate wallet or account",In my wallet,"Private by default, option to share",Important,Likely,"Private send in wallets,Private stablecoins,Private messaging",,privacy address,zkemail,No
|
||||
Product,North America,"Rabby,Rainbow,Gnosis Safe",9+ years,Daily,"Finance, payments and transfers,Socials, Farcaster, Lens, etc.,Identity, like ENS, Passports, etc.",Confident,"I rely on wallet security alerts and blocklists,I review token approvals and revoke them regularly,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I rotate addresses or refresh accounts periodically,I use social recovery or a recovery setup I trust,I use a multisig or smart account",,"Personal safety and security,Keep balances, income, or holdings confidential,Prevent targeting, scams, or front-running",Yes,Yes,Very important,Not at all satisfied,Not at all confident,Not at all confident,No trust at all,"Clear docs on how it works, architecture, and trade-offs,Open-source code,Independent audits","Clear instructions and confirmation prompts,Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs,Transaction preview or simulation before sending",Monthly,Rarely,Monthly,Monthly,Rarely,Monthly,Monthly,Monthly,Never,"changenow, railgun, houdiniswap, fluidkey, revoke cash, veil cash",Daily,Monthly,Daily,Daily,Monthly,Weekly,Daily,Daily,Daily,Weekly,"Complex or hard to use,Missing in my wallet or favorite dapps,Doesn’t work the same across apps or chains",,Often,"Too many steps or signatures,Unsure the tool was safe or trustworthy,Took too long or got stuck","Losing funds or access,Targeted attacks, scams, or phishing,Contract exploits or protocol hacks","Wait up to a few minutes longer,2–3 extra confirmations or screens,Using a separate wallet or account","I do not care where, I just want it to work","Private by default, option to share",Very important,Very likely,"Private send in wallets,Private identity and attestations,Privacy-preserving RPC and network routing",,"actual native account abstraction so we can rotate keys, get away from seed phrases, and not use eoa's",stealth addresses,thank you for creating this survey
|
||||
Community builder,Southeast Asia,"MetaMask,Rabby,Phantom",3-5 years,Daily,"Finance, payments and transfers,DAOs and governance,Education and learning",Confident,"I rotate addresses or refresh accounts periodically,I use a multisig or smart account",Protection,"Personal safety and security,Avoid censorship and keep freedom to transact,Reduce data trails across apps and services",Yes,Yes,Important,Not at all satisfied,Somewhat confident,Confident,Trust,"Logical in-app UX with info and context,Open-source code,Independent audits","Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs,Onboarding with in-app documentation and tips,Linked audits or a security page",Monthly,Never,Rarely,Weekly,Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,"Privacy pools, Umbra and Fileverse (not financial but onchain pruvacy)",Weekly,Monthly,Daily,Daily,Never,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Never,"Complex or hard to use,High gas or transaction costs,Too few people use it, so privacy feels weak",,Often,"Too many steps or signatures,Unclear what it would do,Took too long or got stuck","Losing funds or access,Targeted attacks, scams, or phishing,Government or big-tech surveillance and misuse of data","Pay up to ~5% more in fees,Wait up to a few minutes longer,Using a separate wallet or account",Inside the app I am using,"Private by default, option to share",Important,Likely,"Private send in wallets,Private identity and attestations,Selective disclosure proofs",,"Fixing RPCs comes first, the rest can be done app level","Privacy pools is great but not big enough, kohaku and for everyday privacy ddocs/dsheets",
|
||||
Ethereum user,North America,MetaMask,6-8 years,Weekly,"Finance, payments and transfers,DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking,Running nodes or infrastructure",Confident,I avoid linking social profiles to my active addresses,,"Keep balances, income, or holdings confidential,Avoid profiling, doxxing, or unwanted linking,Avoid censorship and keep freedom to transact",Yes,Yes,Important,Somewhat satisfied,Somewhat confident,Somewhat confident,Trust,"Logical in-app UX with info and context,Referrals or endorsements from trusted people or orgs,Open-source code","Clear instructions and confirmation prompts,Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs,Onboarding with in-app documentation and tips",Rarely,Rarely,Never,Never,Never,Rarely,Weekly,Rarely,Never,,Monthly,Never,Never,Daily,Never,Never,Daily,Never,Rarely,Never,"Complex or hard to use,High gas or transaction costs,My activity does not feel sensitive enough",,Never,,"Losing funds or access,Targeted attacks, scams, or phishing,Contract exploits or protocol hacks","2–3 extra confirmations or screens,Signing multiple transactions,Using a separate wallet or account",On Ethereum itself,"Public by default, option to go private",Somewhat important,Likely,"Private L2s focused on privacy,Privacy-preserving RPC and network routing,Encrypted mempools or private order flow",,more secure wallets,,
|
||||
Ethereum user,Central Asia,"MetaMask,OKX wallet",6-8 years,Weekly,"Finance, payments and transfers,DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking,NFTs, art, collectibles, memberships, etc.",Somewhat confident,"I rely on wallet security alerts and blocklists,I review token approvals and revoke them regularly",,"Personal safety and security,Prevent targeting, scams, or front-running,Avoid social judgment or harassment",Yes,Yes,Very important,Somewhat satisfied,Confident,Very confident,Trust,"Referrals or endorsements from trusted people or orgs,Open-source code,Independent audits","Clear instructions and confirmation prompts,Transaction preview or simulation before sending,Linked audits or a security page",Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Never,Rarely,Rarely,Never,,Daily,Rarely,Monthly,Monthly,Rarely,Never,Monthly,Rarely,,Never,"Too few people use it, so privacy feels weak,Hard to verify what is private,I want onchain reputation or eligibility (airdrops, social graph)",,Never,"Unsure the tool was safe or trustworthy,Needed new wallet/account or setup I didn’t want","Losing funds or access,Targeted attacks, scams, or phishing,Contract exploits or protocol hacks","Pay up to ~5% more in fees,Wait up to a few minutes longer,Using a separate wallet or account","I do not care where, I just want it to work","Private by default, option to share",Very important,Likely,"Private identity and attestations,Private L2s focused on privacy,Selective disclosure proofs",,"I'd add native wallet support for stealth addresses (like EIP-6538). This would let users send/receive ETH privately by default—hiding transaction links—without extra steps, making privacy seamless and driving mainstream adoption like HTTPS did for the web.",WORM | EIP-7503 ,NO
|
||||
Marketing or Growth,Southeast Asia,"MetaMask,Coinbase wallet",1-2 years,Daily,"Finance, payments and transfers,DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking,Socials, Farcaster, Lens, etc.",Confident,"I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I simulate or dry run transactions before sending,I review token approvals and revoke them regularly,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I avoid linking social profiles to my active addresses",safety,"Personal safety and security,Prevent targeting, scams, or front-running",Yes,No,Important,Not at all satisfied,Somewhat confident,Somewhat confident,Some trust,"Referrals or endorsements from trusted people or orgs,Transparent team identity and track record,Strong security practices: active bug bounties, and policies","Transaction preview or simulation before sending,Linked audits or a security page,Trusted badge or reputation labels",Never,Monthly,Never,Never,Rarely,Never,Monthly,Never,Never,Cowswap DEX protection against mev,Daily,Never,Monthly,Daily,Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,"Complex or hard to use,My activity does not feel sensitive enough,Other",Unsure of all the best ways to protect my privacy.,Rarely,Unclear what it would do,"Losing funds or access,Targeted attacks, scams, or phishing,Contract exploits or protocol hacks","Wait up to a few minutes longer,Signing multiple transactions,Using a separate wallet or account",On Ethereum itself,"Private by default, option to share",Very important,Very likely,"Private send in wallets,Encrypted mempools or private order flow,Verifiable in-App privacy labels, audits, and reputation badges",,"Greater protection against scams, risk to funds getting stolen.",,
|
||||
Ethereum user,East Asia,"MetaMask,Rabby",3-5 years,Daily,"Finance, payments and transfers,Socials, Farcaster, Lens, etc.,Gaming",Somewhat confident,None of the above,fundamental rights,"Avoid censorship and keep freedom to transact,Avoid social judgment or harassment,Meet local policies or regulations",Yes,Yes,Very important,Not at all satisfied,Somewhat confident,Somewhat confident,Some trust,"Clear website and language that explains what it does,Clear docs on how it works, architecture, and trade-offs,Strong security practices: active bug bounties, and policies","Clear instructions and confirmation prompts,Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs",Never,Never,Rarely,Never,Never,Never,Never,Monthly,Never,Aztec,Daily,Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,"Regulatory or policy uncertainty,Hard to verify what is private",,Rarely,Unclear what the benefits were,"Losing funds or access,Targeted attacks, scams, or phishing,Government or big-tech surveillance and misuse of data","Wait up to a few minutes longer,2–3 extra confirmations or screens",In my wallet,"Private by default, option to share",Very important,Very likely,"Private identity and attestations,Privacy-preserving RPC and network routing",,Think about when I need privacy and when I don’t.,INTMAX,
|
||||
Developer,Europe,"MetaMask,Gnosis Safe",6-8 years,Daily,"Finance, payments and transfers,DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking,Work, salary or payroll",Very confident,"I rely on wallet security alerts and blocklists,I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I simulate or dry run transactions before sending,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I avoid linking social profiles to my active addresses,I use a hardware wallet as my primary signer,I use social recovery or a recovery setup I trust,I use a multisig or smart account","Saftey to do what I want, with no judgement or repercussions. Not just from a leagal perspective, but mostly social.","Personal safety and security,Avoid profiling, doxxing, or unwanted linking,Avoid social judgment or harassment",Yes,No,Very important,Not at all satisfied,Confident,Confident,Some trust,"Clear docs on how it works, architecture, and trade-offs,Open-source code,Verifiable releases and contracts, reproducible builds, and clear changelogs","Transaction preview or simulation before sending,Linked verified contracts and release notes",Never,Never,Never,Rarely,Never,Never,Monthly,Never,Weekly,none,Weekly,Never,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Weekly,Rarely,Daily,"Regulatory or policy uncertainty,Too few people use it, so privacy feels weak,Hard to verify what is private",,Often,"Unclear what it would do,Unclear what the benefits were,Unsure the tool was safe or trustworthy","Losing funds or access,Deanonymization later by chain analysis,Government or big-tech surveillance and misuse of data","Pay up to ~5% more in fees,Wait up to a few minutes longer,2–3 extra confirmations or screens","I do not care where, I just want it to work","Private by default, option to share",Very important,Very likely,"Private send in wallets,Private identity and attestations,Selective disclosure proofs",,"make it default, most people don't know to care",aztec,
|
||||
Ethereum user,North America,Coinbase wallet,9+ years,Rarely,"Donations, charities and public goods,Other",Not at all confident,I rely on wallet security alerts and blocklists,Control of my own narrative. The only information available is what I provide.,"Personal safety and security,Keep balances, income, or holdings confidential,Avoid profiling, doxxing, or unwanted linking",Yes,No,Very important,Not at all satisfied,Somewhat confident,Not at all confident,Some trust,"Widely used in production and time-tested,Open-source code,Independent audits","Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs,Transaction preview or simulation before sending,Proofs or logs you can copy or share if you need to prove something later",Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,I'm terrified I'll screw something up and lose all my Eth,Rarely,Never,Weekly,Daily,Never,Daily,Daily,Daily,Never,Never,"Complex or hard to use,Missing in my wallet or favorite dapps",,Never,,"Losing funds or access,Deanonymization later by chain analysis,Government or big-tech surveillance and misuse of data","Wait up to a few minutes longer,2–3 extra confirmations or screens,Withdrawal delays up to 1 day","I do not care where, I just want it to work","Private by default, option to share",Very important,Very likely,"Private send in wallets,Private stablecoins,Private identity and attestations",,Clear work flow on how to use Alchemix privately to borrow against Eth/stables,Aztec future Eth. Privacy by default as a paradigm.,Thanks for making the world safer!
|
||||
Ethereum user,East Asia,"MetaMask,Phantom",1-2 years,Weekly,"Finance, payments and transfers,DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking",Somewhat confident,"I rely on wallet security alerts and blocklists,I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I decode and read what I am signing,I review token approvals and revoke them regularly,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I avoid linking social profiles to my active addresses,I use a hardware wallet as my primary signer,I rotate addresses or refresh accounts periodically",no one know me,"Personal safety and security,Avoid censorship and keep freedom to transact,Meet local policies or regulations",Yes,Yes,Very important,Somewhat satisfied,Confident,Confident,Trust,"Clear docs on how it works, architecture, and trade-offs,Widely used in production and time-tested,Open-source code","Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs,Transaction preview or simulation before sending",Daily,Monthly,Rarely,Never,Never,Rarely,Never,Monthly,Never,Railgun,Daily,Rarely,Daily,Daily,Daily,Weekly,Rarely,Daily,Monthly,Rarely,"High gas or transaction costs,Doesn’t work the same across apps or chains",,Sometimes,"Unclear what it would do,Fees or deposits required up front","Losing funds or access,Government or big-tech surveillance and misuse of data","Wait up to a few minutes longer,Withdrawal delays up to 1 day,Lower compatibility with some dapps or tools",Inside the app I am using,"Public by default, option to go private",Very important,Likely,"Private stablecoins,Private messaging,Privacy risk and monitoring dashboards",,The cost of privacy is too high,,
|
||||
Ethereum user,Europe,"MetaMask,Rabby",3-5 years,Monthly,"Finance, payments and transfers,DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking",Confident,I review token approvals and revoke them regularly,,"Personal safety and security,Avoid profiling, doxxing, or unwanted linking,Avoid social judgment or harassment",Yes,Yes,Very important,Somewhat satisfied,Somewhat confident,Somewhat confident,Some trust,"Clear website and language that explains what it does,Logical in-app UX with info and context",Clear instructions and confirmation prompts,Never,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Weekly,Rarely,Weekly,Weekly,Weekly,tonardo cash before ,Daily,Weekly,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,"Complex or hard to use,High gas or transaction costs,Regulatory or policy uncertainty",,Often,Took too long or got stuck,"Losing funds or access,Targeted attacks, scams, or phishing,Social or reputation risk",2–3 extra confirmations or screens,In my wallet,"Public by default, option to go private",Important,Likely,"Private send in wallets,Private stablecoins,Private identity and attestations",,"privacy send, I don't want people to judge my trading history and transaction history ",privacy send,/
|
||||
Ethereum user,Europe,"MetaMask,Rabby",3-5 years,Monthly,"Finance, payments and transfers,DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking",Confident,I review token approvals and revoke them regularly,,"Personal safety and security,Avoid profiling, doxxing, or unwanted linking,Avoid social judgment or harassment",Yes,Yes,Very important,Somewhat satisfied,Somewhat confident,Somewhat confident,Some trust,"Clear website and language that explains what it does,Logical in-app UX with info and context",Clear instructions and confirmation prompts,Never,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Weekly,Rarely,Weekly,Weekly,Weekly,tonardo cash before ,Daily,Weekly,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,"Complex or hard to use,High gas or transaction costs,Regulatory or policy uncertainty",,Often,Took too long or got stuck,"Losing funds or access,Targeted attacks, scams, or phishing,Social or reputation risk",2–3 extra confirmations or screens,In my wallet,"Public by default, option to go private",Important,Likely,"Private send in wallets,Private stablecoins,Private identity and attestations",,"privacy send, I don't want people to judge my trading history and transaction history ",privacy send,/
|
||||
Legal,South America,"MetaMask,Phantom,OKX wallet",3-5 years,Monthly,"Finance, payments and transfers,DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking",Confident,"I rely on wallet security alerts and blocklists,I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I use a multisig or smart account",,"Personal safety and security,Keep balances, income, or holdings confidential,Avoid profiling, doxxing, or unwanted linking",Yes,No,Very important,Somewhat satisfied,Somewhat confident,Somewhat confident,Trust,"Transparent team identity and track record,Open-source code,Independent audits","Linked audits or a security page,Linked verified contracts and release notes,Proofs or logs you can copy or share if you need to prove something later",Never,Monthly,Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,VPN ,Daily,,Rarely,Weekly,Weekly,Weekly,Weekly,,Weekly,,"Complex or hard to use,Regulatory or policy uncertainty,Hard to verify what is private",,Never,,"Deanonymization later by chain analysis,Metadata leakage (IP, RPC, browser, mempool),Legal or policy issues","Wait up to a few minutes longer,2–3 extra confirmations or screens,Lower compatibility with some dapps or tools","I do not care where, I just want it to work","Private by default, option to share",Very important,Very likely,"Private identity and attestations,Privacy-preserving RPC and network routing,Verifiable in-App privacy labels, audits, and reputation badges",,Untraceable tx ,Monero or similar ,"Privacy is freedom, control isn’t "
|
||||
Ethereum user,East Asia,"MetaMask,Phantom,OKX wallet",6-8 years,Daily,"Finance, payments and transfers,DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking,Identity, like ENS, Passports, etc.",Not at all confident,"I rely on wallet security alerts and blocklists,I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I decode and read what I am signing,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties",Privacy is extremely important. I don't want anyone to know of my existence.,"Keep balances, income, or holdings confidential,Avoid profiling, doxxing, or unwanted linking,Avoid social judgment or harassment",Yes,No,Very important,Not at all satisfied,Not at all confident,Confident,Some trust,"Clear docs on how it works, architecture, and trade-offs,Referrals or endorsements from trusted people or orgs,Strong security practices: active bug bounties, and policies","Onboarding with in-app documentation and tips,Transaction preview or simulation before sending,Proofs or logs you can copy or share if you need to prove something later",Rarely,Never,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Monthly,Monthly,Rarely,None,Daily,Never,Monthly,Weekly,Never,Weekly,Rarely,Never,Weekly,Rarely,"Missing in my wallet or favorite dapps,Security concerns,I want onchain reputation or eligibility (airdrops, social graph)",,Rarely,"Unclear what the benefits were,Fees or deposits required up front,Needed new wallet/account or setup I didn’t want","Targeted attacks, scams, or phishing,Deanonymization later by chain analysis,Tools breaking, being blocked, or delisted","Wait up to a few minutes longer,2–3 extra confirmations or screens,Switching to a different network or L2",In my network or connection settings,"Private by default, option to share",Very important,Very likely,"Private identity and attestations,Private messaging,Private L2s focused on privacy",,YES,None,None
|
||||
Developer,South America,"MetaMask,Gnosis Safe",6-8 years,Daily,"DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking,Identity, like ENS, Passports, etc.,Running nodes or infrastructure",Very confident,"I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I decode and read what I am signing,I simulate or dry run transactions before sending,I use a hardware wallet as my primary signer,I connect through my own node or a custom RPC,I use a multisig or smart account",Interacting with other without revealing/leaking PII,"Keep balances, income, or holdings confidential,Avoid censorship and keep freedom to transact,Reduce data trails across apps and services",Yes,Yes,Important,Satisfied,Somewhat confident,Somewhat confident,Some trust,"Clear docs on how it works, architecture, and trade-offs,Open-source code,Strong security practices: active bug bounties, and policies","Onboarding with in-app documentation and tips,Linked verified contracts and release notes,Proofs or logs you can copy or share if you need to prove something later",Monthly,Rarely,Never,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Railgun for sending funds privately to a CEX address before cashing out. zkPassport for private KYC verification ,Rarely,Rarely,Monthly,Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,Monthly,Never,High gas or transaction costs,,Rarely,Took too long or got stuck,"Targeted attacks, scams, or phishing,Deanonymization later by chain analysis,Government or big-tech surveillance and misuse of data","Wait up to a few minutes longer,2–3 extra confirmations or screens,Using a separate wallet or account",On Ethereum itself,"Private by default, option to share",Very important,Very likely,"Private send in wallets,Privacy-preserving RPC and network routing,Privacy risk and monitoring dashboards",,Enshrine private at the infra level,"Private smart contracts, A2A private communication, Privacy wallets by default",
|
||||
Ethereum user,Europe,"MetaMask,Argent,Gnosis Safe",9+ years,Daily,"Finance, payments and transfers,DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking,Identity, like ENS, Passports, etc.",Very confident,"I rely on wallet security alerts and blocklists,I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I review token approvals and revoke them regularly,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I avoid linking social profiles to my active addresses,I rotate addresses or refresh accounts periodically,I use a multisig or smart account",Freedom of not be controlled by government ,"Personal safety and security,Keep balances, income, or holdings confidential,Avoid censorship and keep freedom to transact",Yes,No,Important,Somewhat satisfied,Somewhat confident,Somewhat confident,Some trust,"Clear website and language that explains what it does,Open-source code,Independent audits","Clear instructions and confirmation prompts,Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs,Linked verified contracts and release notes",Monthly,Monthly,Monthly,Monthly,Monthly,Monthly,Monthly,Monthly,Weekly,Fluidkey ,Daily,,Monthly,Daily,Daily,,Daily,,,,"Complex or hard to use,Missing in my wallet or favorite dapps,Security concerns",,Sometimes,"Too many steps or signatures,Unclear what it would do,Unsure the tool was safe or trustworthy","Metadata leakage (IP, RPC, browser, mempool),Government or big-tech surveillance and misuse of data,Permanent onchain records that cannot be undone","Pay up to ~5% more in fees,2–3 extra confirmations or screens,Using a separate wallet or account",On Ethereum itself,"Private by default, option to share",Important,Likely,"Private send in wallets,Privacy-preserving RPC and network routing,Verifiable in-App privacy labels, audits, and reputation badges",,More private options directly in wallets & apps,Fluidkey ,
|
||||
Ethereum user,Europe,"MetaMask,Gnosis Safe",9+ years,Monthly,"Finance, payments and transfers,DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking",Somewhat confident,"I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I review token approvals and revoke them regularly,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I avoid linking social profiles to my active addresses,I use a hardware wallet as my primary signer,I rotate addresses or refresh accounts periodically,I use a multisig or smart account",-,Personal safety and security,Yes,Yes,Important,Somewhat satisfied,Somewhat confident,Somewhat confident,Some trust,"Clear website and language that explains what it does,Logical in-app UX with info and context",,Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,,,,,,,,,,,,Complex or hard to use,,,,,,,,,,"Private send in wallets,Private identity and attestations",,UX,,
|
||||
Ethereum user,Europe,"MetaMask,Rabby,Other",3-5 years,Daily,"DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking,Socials, Farcaster, Lens, etc.,Running nodes or infrastructure",Confident,"I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I avoid linking social profiles to my active addresses,I use a hardware wallet as my primary signer",Safety,"Personal safety and security,Avoid profiling, doxxing, or unwanted linking,Prevent targeting, scams, or front-running",Yes,No,Very important,Not at all satisfied,Not at all confident,Not at all confident,Some trust,"Logical in-app UX with info and context,Referrals or endorsements from trusted people or orgs,Verifiable releases and contracts, reproducible builds, and clear changelogs","Clear instructions and confirmation prompts,Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs,Transaction preview or simulation before sending",Rarely,Never,Rarely,Never,Rarely,Never,Never,Never,Rarely,Fileverse,Monthly,Monthly,Daily,Daily,Daily,Weekly,Daily,Daily,Rarely,Never,"Complex or hard to use,Missing in my wallet or favorite dapps,I want onchain reputation or eligibility (airdrops, social graph)",,Never,,"Losing funds or access,Targeted attacks, scams, or phishing,Permanent onchain records that cannot be undone","Wait up to a few minutes longer,Using a separate wallet or account,Fixed deposit/withdrawal sizes",In my network or connection settings,"Private by default, option to share",Very important,Very likely,"Private identity and attestations,Privacy-preserving RPC and network routing,Verifiable in-App privacy labels, audits, and reputation badges",,EF actively using the tools and leading by example,Fileverse,Thanks for doing this
|
||||
Developer,Europe,"Rainbow,Gnosis Safe,Other",3-5 years,Daily,"Finance, payments and transfers,Socials, Farcaster, Lens, etc.,Other",Very confident,"I avoid linking social profiles to my active addresses,I rotate addresses or refresh accounts periodically,I use a multisig or smart account",Choosing what to hide and what to reveal,"Personal safety and security,Avoid profiling, doxxing, or unwanted linking,Business confidentiality for vendors, payroll, or partners",Yes,Yes,Very important,Somewhat satisfied,Very confident,Not at all confident,Some trust,"Clear docs on how it works, architecture, and trade-offs,Open-source code,Verifiable releases and contracts, reproducible builds, and clear changelogs","Transaction preview or simulation before sending,Linked verified contracts and release notes,Trusted badge or reputation labels",Never,Never,Weekly,Never,Never,Never,Monthly,Never,Never,FluidKey,Daily,Rarely,Daily,Daily,Never,Never,Daily,Daily,Never,Never,"Complex or hard to use,Missing in my wallet or favorite dapps,Doesn’t work the same across apps or chains",,Sometimes,"Too many steps or signatures,Unclear what it would do,Took too long or got stuck","Physical targeting or extortion risk,Deanonymization later by chain analysis,Permanent onchain records that cannot be undone","Wait up to a few minutes longer,Signing multiple transactions,Using a separate wallet or account",In my wallet,"Private by default, option to share",Very important,Likely,"Private send in wallets,Privacy-preserving RPC and network routing,Encrypted mempools or private order flow",,Delete WalletConnect,"FluidKey, RAILGUN, Aztec",
|
||||
Developer,Europe,MetaMask,6-8 years,Weekly,"Finance, payments and transfers,Socials, Farcaster, Lens, etc.,DAOs and governance",Confident,"I rely on wallet security alerts and blocklists,I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I decode and read what I am signing",,"Personal safety and security,Keep balances, income, or holdings confidential,Donate or support causes without exposure",Yes,Yes,Important,Somewhat satisfied,Somewhat confident,Not at all confident,Some trust,"Logical in-app UX with info and context,Open-source code,Verified listings or badges on reputable directories","Onboarding with in-app documentation and tips,Integrated test networks,Linked verified contracts and release notes",Weekly,Weekly,Weekly,Daily,Monthly,Monthly,Weekly,Weekly,Weekly,"Use nodes via tor and recent I been starting to use shield.markets the Kusama shield, I also used the private voting with maci ",Weekly,Daily,Daily,Daily,Weekly,Daily,Weekly,Daily,Weekly,Weekly,"Complex or hard to use,High gas or transaction costs,Doesn’t work the same across apps or chains",,Sometimes,Fees or deposits required up front,"Losing funds or access,Deanonymization later by chain analysis,Government or big-tech surveillance and misuse of data","Wait up to a few minutes longer,Switching to a different network or L2,Fixed deposit/withdrawal sizes",Inside the app I am using,"Private by default, option to share",Very important,Very likely,"Private send in wallets,Private stablecoins,Private identity and attestations",,"Make privacy cheap and easy to use, shout out Kusama shield, also apps that make privacy Permissionless ",Privacy beyond defi so private web3 interactions,"Keep it going, push more products"
|
||||
Developer,Europe,"Rabby,Argent,Other",3-5 years,Weekly,"Finance, payments and transfers,DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking,Running nodes or infrastructure",Confident,"I rely on wallet security alerts and blocklists,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I use a hardware wallet as my primary signer",,"Personal safety and security,Keep balances, income, or holdings confidential,Avoid profiling, doxxing, or unwanted linking",Yes,Yes,Somewhat important,Not at all satisfied,Not at all confident,Not at all confident,Some trust,"Referrals or endorsements from trusted people or orgs,Widely used in production and time-tested,Open-source code","Clear instructions and confirmation prompts,Onboarding with in-app documentation and tips,Transaction preview or simulation before sending",Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,,Weekly,Monthly,Daily,Daily,Daily,Weekly,Daily,Rarely,Weekly,,"Complex or hard to use,High gas or transaction costs,I want onchain reputation or eligibility (airdrops, social graph)",,Sometimes,"Unclear what the benefits were,Unsure the tool was safe or trustworthy","Losing funds or access,Deanonymization later by chain analysis,Contract exploits or protocol hacks","Pay up to ~5% more in fees,Wait up to a few minutes longer,2–3 extra confirmations or screens","I do not care where, I just want it to work","Private by default, option to share",Important,Very likely,"Private send in wallets,Encrypted mempools or private order flow,Verifiable in-App privacy labels, audits, and reputation badges",,privacy at the protocol layer,private transfers,
|
||||
Marketing or Growth,South Asia,Rainbow,3-5 years,Weekly,"Finance, payments and transfers",Somewhat confident,I review token approvals and revoke them regularly,Privacy is normal.,"Keep balances, income, or holdings confidential",Yes,Yes,Very important,Somewhat satisfied,Somewhat confident,Somewhat confident,Some trust,"Clear docs on how it works, architecture, and trade-offs","Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs",Rarely,Rarely,Monthly,Weekly,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Never,Stabletrust by Fairblock,Weekly,Never,Rarely,Daily,Never,Daily,Weekly,Never,Never,Never,"Complex or hard to use,Regulatory or policy uncertainty",,Sometimes,Unclear what it would do,"Targeted attacks, scams, or phishing,Government or big-tech surveillance and misuse of data","Wait up to a few minutes longer,2–3 extra confirmations or screens","I do not care where, I just want it to work","Private by default, option to share",Very important,Very likely,"Private stablecoins,Private governance and voting,Encrypted mempools or private order flow",,"Making it more easy to use, Compliance friendly, not isolated chain it should be opt in","Fairblock, 0xbow, Aztec",
|
||||
Business or Operations,Europe,"Rabby,Zerion,Other",3-5 years,Daily,"DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking,DAOs and governance,Donations, charities and public goods",Confident,"I rely on wallet security alerts and blocklists,I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I review token approvals and revoke them regularly,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I use a multisig or smart account",ability to to decide over which information I decide to share publicly,"Personal safety and security,Keep work and personal activity separate,Reduce data trails across apps and services",Yes,Yes,Important,Somewhat satisfied,Somewhat confident,Somewhat confident,Some trust,"Clear docs on how it works, architecture, and trade-offs,Referrals or endorsements from trusted people or orgs,Independent audits","Clear instructions and confirmation prompts,Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs,Transaction preview or simulation before sending",Monthly,Monthly,Daily,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Monthly,Rarely,Rarely,"Railgun, Fluidkey, Worm (testnet), CowSwap",Daily,Monthly,Daily,Daily,Monthly,Daily,Daily,Weekly,Rarely,Rarely,"Complex or hard to use,Missing in my wallet or favorite dapps,Social stigma or reputation risk",,Sometimes,"Unclear what it would do,Unsure the tool was safe or trustworthy,Took too long or got stuck","Deanonymization later by chain analysis,Metadata leakage (IP, RPC, browser, mempool),Government or big-tech surveillance and misuse of data","Wait up to a few minutes longer,2–3 extra confirmations or screens,Signing multiple transactions",In my wallet,"Private by default, option to share",Very important,Very likely,"Private send in wallets,Privacy-preserving RPC and network routing,Encrypted mempools or private order flow",,make privacy by default,"Worm (EIP7503), Kohaku, web3privacy now","together in privacy, stronk"
|
||||
Developer,Europe,"Rabby,Other",6-8 years,Daily,"Finance, payments and transfers,DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking",Very confident,"I rely on wallet security alerts and blocklists,I simulate or dry run transactions before sending,I review token approvals and revoke them regularly,I use a hardware wallet as my primary signer,I use a multisig or smart account",I don't care that much and i guess even most of the community do not care since they are using pseudonymous blockchains and authors made them pseudonymous by default,"Personal safety and security,Avoid profiling, doxxing, or unwanted linking,Avoid social judgment or harassment",Yes,No,Somewhat important,Satisfied,Very confident,Not at all confident,Some trust,"Clear website and language that explains what it does,Logical in-app UX with info and context,Referrals or endorsements from trusted people or orgs","Clear instructions and confirmation prompts,Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs,Transaction preview or simulation before sending",Never,Never,Never,Rarely,Never,Weekly,Weekly,Never,Never,,Daily,Rarely,Rarely,Daily,Weekly,Never,Daily,Daily,Daily,Never,"Complex or hard to use,High gas or transaction costs,Too few people use it, so privacy feels weak",,Never,,"Losing funds or access,Government or big-tech surveillance and misuse of data,Permanent onchain records that cannot be undone","Wait up to a few minutes longer,2–3 extra confirmations or screens,Lower compatibility with some dapps or tools",In my wallet,"Public by default, option to go private",Somewhat important,Likely,"Private send in wallets,Private stablecoins,Private governance and voting",,wormholes,kohaku,
|
||||
Developer,Europe,"MetaMask,Rabby,Gnosis Safe",9+ years,Weekly,"Finance, payments and transfers,Work, salary or payroll,Running nodes or infrastructure",Very confident,"I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I decode and read what I am signing,I simulate or dry run transactions before sending,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I avoid linking social profiles to my active addresses,I use a hardware wallet as my primary signer,I use a multisig or smart account","The ultimate feeling of capture resistance and freedom, a refreshing feeling of independence deep inside","Keep balances, income, or holdings confidential,Avoid profiling, doxxing, or unwanted linking,Reduce data trails across apps and services",Yes,Yes,Very important,Not at all satisfied,Very confident,Somewhat confident,Some trust,"Widely used in production and time-tested,Open-source code,Strong security practices: active bug bounties, and policies","Clear instructions and confirmation prompts,Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs,Proofs or logs you can copy or share if you need to prove something later",Monthly,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Never,Never,Rarely,Rarely,Monthly,"Tornado Cash, privacypools.com, Gnosis VPN (in earliest internal test version)",Daily,Monthly,Daily,Daily,Monthly,Weekly,Daily,Monthly,Daily,Never,"Complex or hard to use,High gas or transaction costs,Too few people use it, so privacy feels weak",,Sometimes,"Unclear what it would do,Unsure the tool was safe or trustworthy,Took too long or got stuck","Losing funds or access,Metadata leakage (IP, RPC, browser, mempool),Government or big-tech surveillance and misuse of data","Wait up to a few minutes longer,2–3 extra confirmations or screens,Signing multiple transactions","I do not care where, I just want it to work","Private by default, option to share",Very important,Very likely,"Private send in wallets,Privacy-preserving RPC and network routing,Privacy risk and monitoring dashboards",,"Culture: transition from the current core dev consensus on goals being FASTER, MORE TVL, BIGGER to MORE RESILIENT. Everything else is downstream from that.","Shielded pools that are so easy to integrate that every wallet they I care about has them available, Gnosis VPN :)","People don't like to say it but a major reason for using privacy tools that you don't list as an option is ""afraid of the tax man"". This isn't just ""I want to dox taxes"" but there's really NO way that you can 100% correctly report your taxes as an even moderately active cross chain Ethereum user with only a dozen accounts. Everyone can make an example of you for ""doxxing taxes"" even though that wasn't your intent!"
|
||||
Developer,South America,"MetaMask,Gnosis Safe",3-5 years,Weekly,"Finance, payments and transfers,DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking,Education and learning",Very confident,"I rely on wallet security alerts and blocklists,I review token approvals and revoke them regularly,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I avoid linking social profiles to my active addresses,I use a hardware wallet as my primary signer",Privacy in Ethereum means being able to transact/interact on-chain without anybody (besides the party I am interacting with) been able to see my data,"Avoid profiling, doxxing, or unwanted linking,Avoid censorship and keep freedom to transact,Donate or support causes without exposure",Yes,Yes,Important,Somewhat satisfied,Somewhat confident,Somewhat confident,Trust,"Logical in-app UX with info and context,Clear docs on how it works, architecture, and trade-offs,Open-source code","Onboarding with in-app documentation and tips,Transaction preview or simulation before sending,Trusted badge or reputation labels",Never,Never,Rarely,Monthly,Monthly,Never,Weekly,Rarely,Never,Fluidkey,Never,Never,Weekly,Monthly,Monthly,Weekly,Weekly,Never,Weekly,Never,"Complex or hard to use,Regulatory or policy uncertainty,Hard to verify what is private",,Sometimes,"Unclear what it would do,Unsure the tool was safe or trustworthy","Losing funds or access,Government or big-tech surveillance and misuse of data,Contract exploits or protocol hacks","2–3 extra confirmations or screens,Signing multiple transactions,Switching to a different network or L2","I do not care where, I just want it to work","Public by default, option to go private",Very important,Likely,"Private send in wallets,Selective disclosure proofs,Verifiable in-App privacy labels, audits, and reputation badges",,Better documentation and explanations. Also I think it is important to have more people using privacy tools so the anonymity set is larger,"Railgun, Nullmask, WORM (EIP-7503)",No :)
|
||||
Product,North America,"MetaMask,Gnosis Safe,Other",6-8 years,Monthly,"Finance, payments and transfers,DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking,Socials, Farcaster, Lens, etc.",Somewhat confident,"I rely on wallet security alerts and blocklists,I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I avoid linking social profiles to my active addresses,I use a multisig or smart account",Essential at the least; fun at its best.,"Personal safety and security,Keep balances, income, or holdings confidential,Avoid censorship and keep freedom to transact",Yes,Yes,Very important,Somewhat satisfied,Very confident,Not at all confident,Some trust,"Clear docs on how it works, architecture, and trade-offs,Open-source code,Strong security practices: active bug bounties, and policies","Clear instructions and confirmation prompts,Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs,Transaction preview or simulation before sending",Weekly,Weekly,Monthly,Monthly,Rarely,Rarely,Monthly,Weekly,Weekly,Payy,Daily,Rarely,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Weekly,Daily,"High gas or transaction costs,Security concerns,Doesn’t work the same across apps or chains",,Rarely,"Fees or deposits required up front,Unsure the tool was safe or trustworthy,Took too long or got stuck","Targeted attacks, scams, or phishing,Physical targeting or extortion risk,Contract exploits or protocol hacks","Wait up to a few minutes longer,2–3 extra confirmations or screens,Using a separate wallet or account",In my wallet,"Private by default, option to share",Very important,Very likely,"Private stablecoins,Private L2s focused on privacy,Other",Stronger security guarantees,UX,"Aztec, Payy, Hopr, Tor, ZKPassport, Signal",Thank you for hosting the survey! Great if PSE could tally and share results publicly after it wraps.
|
||||
Security,North America,"MetaMask,Rabby,Other",3-5 years,Weekly,"Socials, Farcaster, Lens, etc.,Donations, charities and public goods,Running nodes or infrastructure",Very confident,"I simulate or dry run transactions before sending,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I avoid linking social profiles to my active addresses,I use a hardware wallet as my primary signer,I connect through my own node or a custom RPC","I get to control who learns what information about me and my past/, present, and future activity.","Personal safety and security,Avoid profiling, doxxing, or unwanted linking,Reduce data trails across apps and services",Yes,Yes,Very important,Not at all satisfied,Very confident,Somewhat confident,Trust,"Clear docs on how it works, architecture, and trade-offs,Widely used in production and time-tested,Open-source code","Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs,Linked audits or a security page,Proofs or logs you can copy or share if you need to prove something later",Monthly,Weekly,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Never,Weekly,Never,Rarely,I've used Zcash more than I've ever used any Ethereum-specific tool. Ethereum tools are still lagging behind in terms of integration and convenience. Zcash wallets have shielded pools as their default UX path.,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Weekly,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,"Missing in my wallet or favorite dapps,Doesn’t work the same across apps or chains,Other","Tracking for tax purposes. I use a custom script to track my activity and create tax reports to pay my yearly taxes, including things like treating each ETH transaction fee as a sale event. This script relies on public chain data. Making all this activity private creates a very large personal accounting and tracking burden that can no longer be as automated.",Often,Needed new wallet/account or setup I didn’t want,"Deanonymization later by chain analysis,Metadata leakage (IP, RPC, browser, mempool),Permanent onchain records that cannot be undone","Pay up to ~5% more in fees,Wait up to a few minutes longer,Fixed deposit/withdrawal sizes","I do not care where, I just want it to work","Private by default, option to share",Very important,Very likely,"Private send in wallets,Private messaging,Privacy-preserving RPC and network routing",,"There is a huge UX challenge ahead of breaking the UX assumption that one account = one Ethereum address. This breaks the way dapps, wallets, and users all think about Ethereum. It feels impossible to fix, yet it is required regardless of which privacy solution ends up winning (whether pool-based or stealth-address-based). I think this really needs some fleshing out and I don't see current privacy solutions really paying enough attention to this problem relative to how large and inevitably-in-the-way it seems to be in my view.","Kohaku, making it easy for wallets to actually integrate.",I really appreciate that the Ethereum Foundation is looking at privacy seriously!
|
||||
Security,Oceania,Other,6-8 years,Weekly,"Finance, payments and transfers,Identity, like ENS, Passports, etc.",Very confident,"I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I avoid linking social profiles to my active addresses,I use a hardware wallet as my primary signer,I rotate addresses or refresh accounts periodically","A means to an end for achieving agency over my data for important digital services such as finance, identity, and messaging.","Keep balances, income, or holdings confidential,Avoid censorship and keep freedom to transact,Reduce data trails across apps and services",Yes,Yes,Very important,Not at all satisfied,Very confident,Not at all confident,Some trust,"Clear docs on how it works, architecture, and trade-offs,Open-source code,Strong security practices: active bug bounties, and policies",,Rarely,Weekly,Never,Never,Never,Rarely,Weekly,Rarely,Weekly,"ZEC, but I don't transact on chain because offchain systems are currently more private and usable at this point. There's too many sharp edges to do things on chain right now and chainalysis still is a massive data broker sitting in the middle of all this and reselling all this data to governments and businesses.",Daily,Rarely,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,"High gas or transaction costs,Missing in my wallet or favorite dapps,Doesn’t work the same across apps or chains",,Often,"Too many steps or signatures,Fees or deposits required up front,Needed new wallet/account or setup I didn’t want","Deanonymization later by chain analysis,Permanent onchain records that cannot be undone,Contract exploits or protocol hacks",,On Ethereum itself,"Private by default, option to share",Very important,Very likely,"Private stablecoins,Privacy-preserving RPC and network routing",,"wallets act as an abstraction layer to make it easier for Web2 apps to add support for Web3 functionality like cheaper, more private, and more permissionless payment rails","private transactions that just work. I don't want to care about what coin I'm transacting in, what network it's on, and I want it cheaper than Visa and Mastercard (so not % based fees, but instead market based like gas currently)",I didn't answer 28 because I don't want to compromise anything for this to work. We're trying to export a payment rails that competes against Visa and Mastercard so we can't compromise to beat them.
|
||||
Marketing or Growth,Europe,"MetaMask,Rabby,Rainbow",6-8 years,Daily,"Finance, payments and transfers,DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking,Work, salary or payroll",Very confident,"I rely on wallet security alerts and blocklists,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I rotate addresses or refresh accounts periodically",Using Ambire Wallet,"Personal safety and security,Avoid censorship and keep freedom to transact,Keep work and personal activity separate",Yes,No,Somewhat important,Somewhat satisfied,Somewhat confident,Somewhat confident,Some trust,"Clear website and language that explains what it does,Logical in-app UX with info and context,Referrals or endorsements from trusted people or orgs","Clear instructions and confirmation prompts,Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs,Transaction preview or simulation before sending",Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,I don't use much,Rarely,Never,Monthly,Daily,Daily,Weekly,Daily,Weekly,Daily,Daily,"Complex or hard to use,Missing in my wallet or favorite dapps,My activity does not feel sensitive enough",,Never,,"Losing funds or access,Targeted attacks, scams, or phishing,Tools breaking, being blocked, or delisted","Pay up to ~5% more in fees,Switching to a different network or L2,Using a separate wallet or account","I do not care where, I just want it to work","Public by default, option to go private",Somewhat important,Likely,"Private send in wallets,Private identity and attestations,Private L2s focused on privacy",,Better explanations and education on when privacy is needed,Private mempools ,
|
||||
Marketing or Growth,Europe,Other,6-8 years,Daily,"DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking",Very confident,"I rely on wallet security alerts and blocklists,I review token approvals and revoke them regularly,I use a hardware wallet as my primary signer,I use a multisig or smart account","It means freedom, i dont wanna dont want to see my things public in the open.","Personal safety and security,Avoid profiling, doxxing, or unwanted linking,Keep work and personal activity separate",Yes,Yes,Important,Somewhat satisfied,Confident,Somewhat confident,Trust,"Logical in-app UX with info and context,Clear docs on how it works, architecture, and trade-offs,Transparent team identity and track record","Clear instructions and confirmation prompts,Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs,Transaction preview or simulation before sending",Monthly,Monthly,Never,Never,Never,Never,Monthly,Rarely,Rarely,Railgun only for now,Daily,Weekly,Daily,Daily,Daily,Monthly,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,"Complex or hard to use,Missing in my wallet or favorite dapps,Too few people use it, so privacy feels weak",,Rarely,"Too many steps or signatures,Fees or deposits required up front,Took too long or got stuck","Losing funds or access,Targeted attacks, scams, or phishing","Wait up to a few minutes longer,Using a separate wallet or account,Lower compatibility with some dapps or tools",On Ethereum itself,"Public by default, option to go private",Very important,Likely,"Private send in wallets,Private governance and voting",,Getting privacy tools integrated in wallet and offer better UX compared to eg today's Railwallet.,"Light client, private transfers.",
|
||||
Education,Oceania,"MetaMask,Coinbase wallet,Rainbow",6-8 years,Daily,"Finance, payments and transfers,NFTs, art, collectibles, memberships, etc.,Identity, like ENS, Passports, etc.",Confident,"I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I avoid linking social profiles to my active addresses,I use a hardware wallet as my primary signer",Freedom,Personal safety and security,No,No,Important,Not at all satisfied,Very confident,Somewhat confident,Some trust,"Clear website and language that explains what it does,Widely used in production and time-tested,Open-source code","Clear instructions and confirmation prompts,Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs,Transaction preview or simulation before sending",Never,Never,Rarely,Never,Rarely,Never,Never,Never,Never,,Daily,Monthly,Monthly,Daily,Weekly,Never,Daily,Daily,Never,Never,"Complex or hard to use,I want onchain reputation or eligibility (airdrops, social graph),Other",How to easily do taxes,Often,"Too many steps or signatures,Unclear what the benefits were,Needed new wallet/account or setup I didn’t want","Losing funds or access,Targeted attacks, scams, or phishing,Contract exploits or protocol hacks","Pay up to ~5% more in fees,Wait up to a few minutes longer,Switching to a different network or L2",In my wallet,"Private by default, option to share",Very important,Likely,"Private send in wallets,Private stablecoins",,Make doing taxes easier,,
|
||||
Ethereum user,Oceania,Rabby,3-5 years,Daily,"Finance, payments and transfers,DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking,Work, salary or payroll",Very confident,"I rely on wallet security alerts and blocklists,I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I review token approvals and revoke them regularly,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I avoid linking social profiles to my active addresses",It is literally a basic thing like air. ,"Personal safety and security,Avoid profiling, doxxing, or unwanted linking,Keep work and personal activity separate",Yes,Yes,Very important,Somewhat satisfied,Very confident,Somewhat confident,Trust,"Clear website and language that explains what it does,Clear docs on how it works, architecture, and trade-offs,Verifiable releases and contracts, reproducible builds, and clear changelogs",Clear instructions and confirmation prompts,Weekly,Weekly,Monthly,Never,Never,Monthly,Never,Never,Rarely,Privacy pools and railgun,Weekly,,Daily,Daily,Monthly,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,"Complex or hard to use,High gas or transaction costs,Doesn’t work the same across apps or chains",,Often,"Too many steps or signatures,Unclear what the benefits were,Unsure the tool was safe or trustworthy","Losing funds or access,Targeted attacks, scams, or phishing,Permanent onchain records that cannot be undone","Wait up to a few minutes longer,Switching to a different network or L2,Withdrawal delays up to 1 day","I do not care where, I just want it to work","Private by default, option to share",Very important,Very unlikely,"Private send in wallets,Privacy-preserving RPC and network routing,Encrypted mempools or private order flow",,Na,"Privacy pools, railgun, kohaku",Can u publish this survey result
|
||||
Other,Europe,"MetaMask,Rabby,Coinbase wallet",6-8 years,Weekly,"Finance, payments and transfers,NFTs, art, collectibles, memberships, etc.,Identity, like ENS, Passports, etc.",Confident,"I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I review token approvals and revoke them regularly,I use a multisig or smart account","safe virtual-physical interactions, obfuscation of private activities, protection against malevolent actors","Personal safety and security,Prevent targeting, scams, or front-running,Avoid censorship and keep freedom to transact",Yes,No,Somewhat important,Not at all satisfied,Not at all confident,Not at all confident,Some trust,"Referrals or endorsements from trusted people or orgs,Transparent team identity and track record,Open-source code","Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs,Transaction preview or simulation before sending,Proofs or logs you can copy or share if you need to prove something later",Never,Never,Never,Monthly,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Monthly,Never,"ZK L2, Cloudflare ETH RPC, Rabby Wallet features",Never,Never,Daily,Monthly,Never,Rarely,Daily,Rarely,Monthly,Rarely,"Security concerns,My activity does not feel sensitive enough,I want onchain reputation or eligibility (airdrops, social graph)",,Sometimes,"Unclear what the benefits were,Unsure the tool was safe or trustworthy","Targeted attacks, scams, or phishing,Physical targeting or extortion risk,Government or big-tech surveillance and misuse of data","2–3 extra confirmations or screens,Switching to a different network or L2,Withdrawal delays up to 1 day",Inside the app I am using,"Private by default, option to share",Very important,Likely,"Private send in wallets,Privacy risk and monitoring dashboards,Verifiable in-App privacy labels, audits, and reputation badges",,"Choose what digital information (wallet, location, time, tools) to send out when executing public transactions",ZK-encrypted rollups,A public code repository of apps and other onchain tools reputed for privacy (A sort of L2Beat for blockchain user interfaces)
|
||||
Ethereum user,Europe,Other,3-5 years,Monthly,Running nodes or infrastructure,Somewhat confident,"I rely on wallet security alerts and blocklists,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I avoid linking social profiles to my active addresses,I use a hardware wallet as my primary signer","To not be able to be tracked. Nobody wants open doors and windows in their apartment, so why do I need to have data leaks not under my control, where I can never shut the door?","Avoid profiling, doxxing, or unwanted linking,Avoid censorship and keep freedom to transact,Reduce data trails across apps and services",Yes,Yes,Very important,Not at all satisfied,Not at all confident,Not at all confident,No trust at all,"Open-source code,Independent audits,Strong security practices: active bug bounties, and policies","Clear instructions and confirmation prompts,Transaction preview or simulation before sending",Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Never,Monthly,Never,Monthly,Never,Never,Shutter snapshot dao voting,Monthly,Rarely,Daily,Never,Never,Daily,Daily,Monthly,Never,Never,"Regulatory or policy uncertainty,Hard to verify what is private,Security concerns",,Never,,"Losing funds or access,Targeted attacks, scams, or phishing,Contract exploits or protocol hacks","Pay up to ~5% more in fees,Wait up to a few minutes longer,2–3 extra confirmations or screens",On Ethereum itself,"Private by default, option to share",Very important,Very likely,"Private send in wallets,Privacy-preserving RPC and network routing,Verifiable in-App privacy labels, audits, and reputation badges",,build it into the core of Ethereum,the one hopefully changing the game - maybe in the zk game,
|
||||
Developer,Europe,MetaMask,6-8 years,Monthly,"Work, salary or payroll,Education and learning",Confident,"I rely on wallet security alerts and blocklists,I simulate or dry run transactions before sending,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I use a multisig or smart account",Ability to choose myself what I share,"Personal safety and security,Prevent targeting, scams, or front-running,Avoid social judgment or harassment",Yes,Yes,Somewhat important,Somewhat satisfied,Very confident,Confident,Trust,"Clear website and language that explains what it does,Referrals or endorsements from trusted people or orgs,Widely used in production and time-tested","Clear instructions and confirmation prompts,Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs,Transaction preview or simulation before sending",Rarely,Never,Rarely,Monthly,Never,Never,Never,Rarely,Never,Aztec for testing,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Daily,Never,Monthly,Daily,Daily,Never,Never,"Complex or hard to use,Regulatory or policy uncertainty",,Sometimes,"Unclear what it would do,Unsure the tool was safe or trustworthy","Losing funds or access,Legal or policy issues",Wait up to a few minutes longer,"I do not care where, I just want it to work","Public by default, option to go private",Somewhat important,Unlikely,Private messaging,,More and better tooling,ZKPassport,
|
||||
Ethereum user,North America,Other,3-5 years,Daily,"Finance, payments and transfers,DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking,Running nodes or infrastructure",Very confident,"I review token approvals and revoke them regularly,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I avoid linking social profiles to my active addresses,I use a hardware wallet as my primary signer,I rotate addresses or refresh accounts periodically,I connect through my own node or a custom RPC","No trust, no backdoors","Personal safety and security,Keep balances, income, or holdings confidential,Avoid profiling, doxxing, or unwanted linking",Yes,Yes,Very important,Somewhat satisfied,Confident,Somewhat confident,Trust,"Clear docs on how it works, architecture, and trade-offs,Independent audits,Verifiable releases and contracts, reproducible builds, and clear changelogs","Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs,Linked audits or a security page,Linked verified contracts and release notes",Rarely,Rarely,Never,Rarely,Never,Never,Weekly,Never,Daily,,Daily,Rarely,Rarely,Monthly,Never,Monthly,Daily,Weekly,Weekly,Monthly,"Too few people use it, so privacy feels weak,Other",black box centralized verification provider,Sometimes,"Unclear what it would do,Fees or deposits required up front,Unsure the tool was safe or trustworthy","Physical targeting or extortion risk,Metadata leakage (IP, RPC, browser, mempool),Contract exploits or protocol hacks","Signing multiple transactions,Switching to a different network or L2,Withdrawal delays up to 1 day","I do not care where, I just want it to work","Private by default, option to share",Very important,Very likely,"Private send in wallets,Private L2s focused on privacy,Privacy-preserving RPC and network routing",,Add to base layer,AZTEC,Privacy pools are a non-starter with the centralized gatekeeper
|
||||
Developer,South America,"Rabby,Uniswap wallet",1-2 years,Weekly,"Finance, payments and transfers,DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking,NFTs, art, collectibles, memberships, etc.",Confident,"I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming",Safety of operating in public without being traced,"Personal safety and security,Keep balances, income, or holdings confidential,Avoid profiling, doxxing, or unwanted linking",Yes,No,Somewhat important,Somewhat satisfied,Somewhat confident,Confident,Trust,"Clear website and language that explains what it does,Logical in-app UX with info and context,Widely used in production and time-tested","Clear instructions and confirmation prompts,Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs,Transaction preview or simulation before sending",Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Never,Monthly,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,I don’t actively use onchain privacy tools today.,Daily,Rarely,Weekly,Daily,Never,Never,Daily,Weekly,Rarely,Rarely,"Hard to verify what is private,Security concerns,My activity does not feel sensitive enough",,Rarely,Unsure the tool was safe or trustworthy,"Losing funds or access,Targeted attacks, scams, or phishing,Tools breaking, being blocked, or delisted","Wait up to a few minutes longer,Using a separate wallet or account",In my wallet,"Public by default, option to go private",Somewhat important,Likely,"Private send in wallets,Private stablecoins,Private L2s focused on privacy",,"Make private transactions the default UX in wallets. If privacy didn’t require extra steps, special tooling, or social stigma, adoption would be easier.","I’m most excited about privacy for payments and identity, stealth addresses, private attestations, and tools that let users prove things without exposing their data.",
|
||||
Developer,South America,MetaMask,Less than 1 year,Daily,"Finance, payments and transfers,NFTs, art, collectibles, memberships, etc.,Work, salary or payroll",Somewhat confident,"I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I avoid linking social profiles to my active addresses,I use a hardware wallet as my primary signer,I rotate addresses or refresh accounts periodically",-,"Personal safety and security,Avoid profiling, doxxing, or unwanted linking,Prevent targeting, scams, or front-running",Yes,No,Important,Satisfied,Confident,Somewhat confident,Some trust,"Clear docs on how it works, architecture, and trade-offs,Referrals or endorsements from trusted people or orgs,Open-source code","Clear instructions and confirmation prompts,Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs,Linked verified contracts and release notes",Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,-,Weekly,Rarely,Daily,Daily,Rarely,Rarely,Daily,Weekly,Rarely,Rarely,"Complex or hard to use,Hard to verify what is private,Security concerns",,Never,,"Losing funds or access,Deanonymization later by chain analysis,Contract exploits or protocol hacks","Wait up to a few minutes longer,2–3 extra confirmations or screens,Lower compatibility with some dapps or tools","I do not care where, I just want it to work","Private by default, option to share",Very important,Likely,"Private send in wallets,Private stablecoins,Private identity and attestations",,-,,
|
||||
Developer,Europe,MetaMask,3-5 years,Daily,"Finance, payments and transfers,DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking,Education and learning",Confident,"I rely on wallet security alerts and blocklists,I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I decode and read what I am signing,I simulate or dry run transactions before sending,I review token approvals and revoke them regularly,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I avoid linking social profiles to my active addresses,I rotate addresses or refresh accounts periodically,I use a multisig or smart account",non negotiable ,"Personal safety and security,Keep balances, income, or holdings confidential,Avoid profiling, doxxing, or unwanted linking",Yes,Yes,Very important,Not at all satisfied,Confident,Somewhat confident,Some trust,"Clear docs on how it works, architecture, and trade-offs,Open-source code,Verifiable releases and contracts, reproducible builds, and clear changelogs","Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs,Linked verified contracts and release notes,Proofs or logs you can copy or share if you need to prove something later",Monthly,Rarely,Monthly,Weekly,Never,Rarely,Weekly,Never,Daily,privacy pools,Daily,Monthly,Daily,Daily,Monthly,Monthly,Daily,Daily,Daily,Monthly,"Regulatory or policy uncertainty,Too few people use it, so privacy feels weak,Security concerns",,Sometimes,"Unclear what it would do,Unclear what the benefits were,Unsure the tool was safe or trustworthy","Losing funds or access,Deanonymization later by chain analysis,Contract exploits or protocol hacks","Pay up to ~5% more in fees,2–3 extra confirmations or screens,Fixed deposit/withdrawal sizes",On Ethereum itself,"Private by default, option to share",Very important,Likely,"Private send in wallets,Private stablecoins,Privacy-preserving RPC and network routing",,benis,,
|
||||
Marketing or Growth,South Asia,MetaMask,3-5 years,Daily,"DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking",Somewhat confident,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,Railgun ,,No,Yes,Very important,Very satisfied,Very confident,Very confident,Trust,Other,Proofs or logs you can copy or share if you need to prove something later,Daily,Monthly,Monthly,Daily,Monthly,Monthly,Monthly,Weekly,Monthly,,Daily,,Monthly,Monthly,Daily,,Monthly,,,,"Too few people use it, so privacy feels weak,Hard to verify what is private,My activity does not feel sensitive enough",,Sometimes,"Fees or deposits required up front,Unsure the tool was safe or trustworthy,Took too long or got stuck","Targeted attacks, scams, or phishing",Pay up to ~5% more in fees,In my wallet,"Public by default, option to go private",Important,Very likely,"Private send in wallets,Private stablecoins",,Railgun,Railgun,Railgun
|
||||
Developer,Europe,"MetaMask,Argent,Gnosis Safe",9+ years,Daily,"Finance, payments and transfers,Identity, like ENS, Passports, etc.,Running nodes or infrastructure",Not at all confident,"I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I decode and read what I am signing,I review token approvals and revoke them regularly,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I avoid linking social profiles to my active addresses,I use a hardware wallet as my primary signer,I rotate addresses or refresh accounts periodically,I connect through my own node or a custom RPC,I use a multisig or smart account",,"Personal safety and security,Avoid profiling, doxxing, or unwanted linking,Prevent targeting, scams, or front-running",Yes,Yes,Somewhat important,Not at all satisfied,Somewhat confident,Somewhat confident,Some trust,"Open-source code,Independent audits,Verifiable releases and contracts, reproducible builds, and clear changelogs","Transaction preview or simulation before sending,Linked verified contracts and release notes,Proofs or logs you can copy or share if you need to prove something later",Rarely,Rarely,Monthly,Rarely,Never,Rarely,Rarely,Never,Weekly,Mixers,Daily,Rarely,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,"Regulatory or policy uncertainty,Hard to verify what is private,My activity does not feel sensitive enough",,Sometimes,"Too many steps or signatures,Unclear what it would do,Took too long or got stuck","Losing funds or access,Targeted attacks, scams, or phishing,Contract exploits or protocol hacks","Pay up to ~5% more in fees,Using a separate wallet or account,Lower compatibility with some dapps or tools",In my wallet,"Private by default, option to share",Somewhat important,Very likely,"Private send in wallets,Private identity and attestations,Privacy-preserving RPC and network routing",,"Shielded balances by default (similar to Zcash's Sapling), view keys for selective disclosure (auditors, tax, compliance), public transactions as the explicit choice",,
|
||||
Ethereum user,North America,"MetaMask,Rabby,Coinbase wallet",3-5 years,Daily,"Finance, payments and transfers,DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking,DAOs and governance",Somewhat confident,"I rely on wallet security alerts and blocklists,I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I review token approvals and revoke them regularly",Safety from bad actors targeting one entity ,"Personal safety and security,Avoid profiling, doxxing, or unwanted linking,Avoid censorship and keep freedom to transact",Yes,Yes,Very important,Somewhat satisfied,Somewhat confident,Somewhat confident,Some trust,"Clear docs on how it works, architecture, and trade-offs,Referrals or endorsements from trusted people or orgs,Widely used in production and time-tested","Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs,Linked audits or a security page,Trusted badge or reputation labels",Monthly,Monthly,Monthly,Monthly,Monthly,Daily,Daily,Weekly,Monthly,"Railgun , vpn , etc",Weekly,Weekly,Monthly,Monthly,Monthly,Daily,Daily,Monthly,Never,Rarely,"Complex or hard to use,Missing in my wallet or favorite dapps,I want onchain reputation or eligibility (airdrops, social graph)",,Sometimes,"Too many steps or signatures,Unclear what it would do,Unclear what the benefits were","Government or big-tech surveillance and misuse of data,Permanent onchain records that cannot be undone,Contract exploits or protocol hacks","Wait up to a few minutes longer,2–3 extra confirmations or screens,Signing multiple transactions","I do not care where, I just want it to work","Private by default, option to share",Very important,Very likely,"Private stablecoins,Private identity and attestations,Private governance and voting",,"More obvious stack of Accepted privacy preserving tools, easily accessible",Signal . Some ZK projects ,Would love to learn more about: [redacted]
|
||||
Ethereum user,North America,"MetaMask,Other",9+ years,Weekly,"Finance, payments and transfers,DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking,Running nodes or infrastructure",Somewhat confident,"I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I simulate or dry run transactions before sending,I review token approvals and revoke them regularly,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I avoid linking social profiles to my active addresses,I use a hardware wallet as my primary signer,I rotate addresses or refresh accounts periodically,I use social recovery or a recovery setup I trust",Peace of mind,"Personal safety and security,Keep balances, income, or holdings confidential,Donate or support causes without exposure",Yes,Yes,Very important,Not at all satisfied,Somewhat confident,Not at all confident,Some trust,"Logical in-app UX with info and context,Strong security practices: active bug bounties, and policies,Verifiable releases and contracts, reproducible builds, and clear changelogs","Clear instructions and confirmation prompts,Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs,Transaction preview or simulation before sending",Weekly,Weekly,Weekly,Weekly,Monthly,Monthly,Monthly,Monthly,Monthly,Zcash wallet Zingo! desktop and mobile,Weekly,,Daily,,Weekly,,Daily,Daily,Daily,,"Complex or hard to use,Missing in my wallet or favorite dapps",,Often,,"Deanonymization later by chain analysis,Government or big-tech surveillance and misuse of data,Permanent onchain records that cannot be undone","Wait up to a few minutes longer,2–3 extra confirmations or screens",In my wallet,"Private by default, option to share",Very important,Very likely,"Private send in wallets,Private identity and attestations,Privacy risk and monitoring dashboards",,Privacy by default ,Privacy by default ,The complete chaos when having to transact on different chains and layers. It keeps the world from using Ethereum.
|
||||
Business or Operations,Europe,MetaMask,3-5 years,Weekly,"Finance, payments and transfers,DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking,Work, salary or payroll",Somewhat confident,"I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I decode and read what I am signing,I review token approvals and revoke them regularly,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I use a hardware wallet as my primary signer,I use a multisig or smart account","Freedom of handling my assets as I see fit, without exposing myself to any stigma due to using privacy tools","Personal safety and security,Keep balances, income, or holdings confidential,Business confidentiality for vendors, payroll, or partners",Yes,Yes,Very important,Not at all satisfied,Confident,Not at all confident,Some trust,"Logical in-app UX with info and context,Clear docs on how it works, architecture, and trade-offs,Referrals or endorsements from trusted people or orgs","Clear instructions and confirmation prompts,Onboarding with in-app documentation and tips,Proofs or logs you can copy or share if you need to prove something later",Never,Never,Rarely,Never,Never,Rarely,Weekly,Never,Never,Mirage :D,Daily,Rarely,Daily,Rarely,Weekly,Weekly,Daily,Daily,Rarely,Rarely,"Complex or hard to use,Regulatory or policy uncertainty,Social stigma or reputation risk",,Often,"Too many steps or signatures,Needed new wallet/account or setup I didn’t want,Took too long or got stuck","Losing funds or access,Targeted attacks, scams, or phishing,Contract exploits or protocol hacks","Wait up to a few minutes longer,2–3 extra confirmations or screens,Signing multiple transactions","I do not care where, I just want it to work","Public by default, option to go private",Very important,Very likely,"Private send in wallets,Private stablecoins,Selective disclosure proofs",,"We need an easy-to-use normie friendly privacy solution that ""just works"". Focus on UX and speed.",Private stablecoin transfers obviously :),"We are building mirageprivacy.com and think support from the EF in promoting more privacy protocols (Mirage and others) would be very valuable. Kohaku is a great initiative, but we remain skeptical of how well it will be adopted due to its reliance on privacy pools and mixer designs which are inherently limited when it comes to scaling and being stigma-free."
|
||||
Ethereum user,Europe,"MetaMask,Trust wallet,Other",3-5 years,Rarely,"Finance, payments and transfers,DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking,Education and learning",Confident,,,"Personal safety and security,Keep balances, income, or holdings confidential,Avoid profiling, doxxing, or unwanted linking",Yes,Yes,Very important,Somewhat satisfied,Confident,Somewhat confident,Some trust,"Open-source code,Strong security practices: active bug bounties, and policies",Proofs or logs you can copy or share if you need to prove something later,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Rarely,Never,Never,Rarely,,Daily,Rarely,Monthly,Daily,Rarely,Daily,Weekly,Weekly,Monthly,Never,"Hard to verify what is private,Security concerns",,Sometimes,Unsure the tool was safe or trustworthy,Losing funds or access,"Using a separate wallet or account,Fixed deposit/withdrawal sizes,Withdrawal delays up to 1 day",On Ethereum itself,"Private by default, option to share",Very important,Very likely,"Private send in wallets,Private stablecoins,Privacy-preserving RPC and network routing",,.,,
|
||||
Developer,Europe,"MetaMask,Gnosis Safe,Other",9+ years,Daily,"DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking,Identity, like ENS, Passports, etc.,Gaming",Very confident,"I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I decode and read what I am signing,I simulate or dry run transactions before sending,I review token approvals and revoke them regularly,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I use a hardware wallet as my primary signer,I use a multisig or smart account",Security,"Personal safety and security,Prevent targeting, scams, or front-running,Avoid censorship and keep freedom to transact",Yes,Yes,Somewhat important,Somewhat satisfied,Confident,Not at all confident,Some trust,"Referrals or endorsements from trusted people or orgs,Transparent team identity and track record,Open-source code","Simple explanation of risks, leaks and trade-offs,Linked verified contracts and release notes,Trusted badge or reputation labels",Rarely,Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,Rarely,Never,Rarely,,Daily,Rarely,Daily,Daily,Weekly,Daily,Daily,Monthly,Monthly,Rarely,"High gas or transaction costs,Regulatory or policy uncertainty,Too few people use it, so privacy feels weak",,Often,"Too many steps or signatures,Fees or deposits required up front,Needed new wallet/account or setup I didn’t want","Losing funds or access,Targeted attacks, scams, or phishing,Physical targeting or extortion risk","Wait up to a few minutes longer,2–3 extra confirmations or screens,Switching to a different network or L2",Inside the app I am using,"Public by default, option to go private",Somewhat important,Unlikely,"Private identity and attestations,Private L2s focused on privacy,Encrypted mempools or private order flow",,"Too much focus on the ""wallets"", privacy should be at the raw signing rpc level, the wallet or a dapp is just a front end, users are not just the front end users. The focus should be at the integration layer where all users share the same standard ""protocol"" (normal users, advanced users and business). Like Ethereum itself, to reach to everyone, privacy should to cater to be integrated in all current and future applications in a standard way. Shared crypto libraries used across all development languages, shared integration, etc, etc. ","Commerce (purchase of physical goods) will be the simplest use case, the capability to buy (trade) anything on chain, without tracing the original account supplying the funds. ","Options in the survey should be other of preference, as so many are valid. Including not important"
|
||||
Ethereum user,Europe,"Zerion,Other",3-5 years,Monthly,"Finance, payments and transfers,DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking,Education and learning",Somewhat confident,"I rely on wallet security alerts and blocklists,I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I review token approvals and revoke them regularly,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties",Protect myself against authoritarian actors,"Personal safety and security,Keep balances, income, or holdings confidential,Avoid censorship and keep freedom to transact",Yes,Yes,Very important,Satisfied,Somewhat confident,Not at all confident,Some trust,"Open-source code,Independent audits,Verifiable releases and contracts, reproducible builds, and clear changelogs","Transaction preview or simulation before sending,Linked audits or a security page,Linked verified contracts and release notes",Rarely,Rarely,Monthly,Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,Never,,Monthly,Rarely,Rarely,Daily,Rarely,Rarely,Daily,Monthly,Rarely,Rarely,"Regulatory or policy uncertainty,Too few people use it, so privacy feels weak,Hard to verify what is private",,Rarely,Took too long or got stuck,"Deanonymization later by chain analysis,Metadata leakage (IP, RPC, browser, mempool),Government or big-tech surveillance and misuse of data","2–3 extra confirmations or screens,Signing multiple transactions,Using a separate wallet or account",On Ethereum itself,"Private by default, option to share",Important,Likely,"Private stablecoins,Privacy-preserving RPC and network routing,Encrypted mempools or private order flow",,Increase privacy and security education for normies,Fluidkey (Stealth) and WORM (private by def),Very good survey. Sharing it w/ my communities.
|
||||
Researcher,Europe,"MetaMask,Other",6-8 years,Daily,"DeFi, lending, swaps, or staking,Work, salary or payroll,Running nodes or infrastructure",Very confident,"I review gas, nonce, and permissions before confirming,I decode and read what I am signing,I simulate or dry run transactions before sending,I review token approvals and revoke them regularly,I use separate wallets for different activities or counterparties,I avoid linking social profiles to my active addresses,I use a hardware wallet as my primary signer,I rotate addresses or refresh accounts periodically,I use social recovery or a recovery setup I trust,I connect through my own node or a custom RPC,I use a multisig or smart account",Privacy is a right everyone should have the option to,"Personal safety and security,Keep balances, income, or holdings confidential,Avoid censorship and keep freedom to transact",Yes,Yes,Very important,Somewhat satisfied,Very confident,Not at all confident,Strong trust,"Open-source code,Strong security practices: active bug bounties, and policies,Verifiable releases and contracts, reproducible builds, and clear changelogs","Transaction preview or simulation before sending,Integrated test networks,Proofs or logs you can copy or share if you need to prove something later",Weekly,Daily,Daily,Daily,Monthly,Weekly,Monthly,Daily,Daily,"railgun, ceaser (custom mainet contracts), zec",Daily,Weekly,Daily,Daily,Monthly,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,Daily,"High gas or transaction costs,Regulatory or policy uncertainty",,Rarely,,"Targeted attacks, scams, or phishing,Government or big-tech surveillance and misuse of data,Legal or policy issues",Pay up to ~5% more in fees,Inside the app I am using,"Public by default, option to go private",Somewhat important,Very likely,"Private send in wallets,Verifiable in-App privacy labels, audits, and reputation badges",,private onchain chat,https://zkwrapper.pages.dev/,
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user